Role of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea with asthma-like symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the major co-morbidities and aggravating factors of asthma. In OSA-complicated asthma, obesity, visceral fat, and systemic inflammation are associated with its severity, but the role of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is unclear. We investigated the involvement of BHR and mediastinal fat width, as a measure of visceral fat, with OSA severity in patients with OSA and asthma-like symptoms. METHODS: Patients with OSA who underwent BHR test and chest computed tomography scan for asthma-like symptoms were retrospectively enrolled. We evaluated the relationship between apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and PC20 or anterior mediastinal fat width, stratified by the presence or absence of BHR. RESULTS: OSA patients with BHR (n = 29) showed more obstructive airways and frequent low arousal threshold and lower mediastinal fat width, and tended to show fewer AHI than those without BHR (n = 25). In the overall analysis, mediastinal fat width was significantly positively correlated with AHI, which was significant even after adjustment with age and gender. This was especially significant in patients without BHR, while in OSA patients with BHR, there were significant negative associations between apnea index and airflow limitation, and hypopnea index and PC20. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for greater AHI differed depending on the presence or absence of BHR in OSA patients with asthma-like symptoms. In the presence of BHR, severity of asthma may determine the severity of concomitant OSA.

A randomized controlled trial of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting ß2 agonist fixed-dose combinations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, combination treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting ß2 agonist (LABA) increases forced expiratory volume in one second and reduces symptoms compared to monotherapy. In Japan, three different once-daily fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) have been prescribed since 2015, although a direct comparison of these FDCs has never been performed. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness, preference, and safety of three LAMA/LABA FDCs-glycopyrronium/indacaterol (Gly/Ind), umeclidinium/vilanterol (Ume/Vil), and tiotropium/olodaterol (Tio/Olo)-in patients with COPD. METHODS: We enrolled 75 COPD outpatients (male:female ratio, 69:6; 77.4 ± 6.9 years). A prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted on three groups using three FDCs: Gly/Ind; Ume/Vil; and Tio/Olo. Each medication was administered for 4 weeks before crossover (total 12 weeks). After each FDC administration, a respiratory function test and questionnaire survey were conducted. A comparative questionnaire survey of all three LAMA/LABA FDCs was conducted after 12 weeks (following administration of final FDC). RESULTS: No significant differences in COPD Assessment Test or modified Medical Research Council dyspnea questionnaire were reported in the surveys completed after each FDC administration; no significant differences in spirometric items were observed. In the final comparative questionnaire survey, patients reported better actual feeling of being able to inhale following Gly/Ind administration compared with Tio/Olo, although no significant differences in adverse events or other evaluations were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The three LAMA/LABA FDCs administered to COPD patients show similar effects and safety, although some minor individual preference was reported. Trial registration This study retrospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (number UMIN000041342, registered on August 6, 2020).