Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery versus open laparotomy for epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and conventional abdominal surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), stratified by treatment type. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by an Expert Panel of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology Ovarian Cancer Committee. Several academic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, and Ichushi were searched by the Japan Medical Library Association on November 11, 2023, using the keywords "epithelial ovarian cancer", "minimally invasive surgery", "laparoscopic", and "robot-assisted". Articles describing MIS treatment for EOC compared with conventional abdominal surgery were independently assessed by two authors. The primary outcomes were survival and perioperative adverse events. RESULTS: After screening 1114 studies, 35 articles were identified, including primary staging surgery (PSS) for early-stage EOC EOC (n = 20) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy following interval debulking surgery (NACT-IDS; n = 10) and upfront primary debulking surgery (PDS; n = 5) for advanced-stage EOC. These studies included 29,888 patients (7661 undergoing MIS and 22,227 undergoing abdominal surgery). Patients receiving MIS and abdominal surgery had similar overall survival (PSS: odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.37; NACT-IDS: OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.25-3.44 and PDS: OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.36-1.22, all P > 0.05). MIS showed perioperative complication rates comparable to those of abdominal surgery (intraoperative and postoperative, all treatment types P ≥ 0.05). However, the rate of lymph node dissection in early-stage EOC (PSS: OR 0.49, 95%CI0.26-0.91) and multivisceral resections in advanced-stage EOC (NACT-IDS: OR 0.27 95%CI 0.16-0.44 and PDS: OR 0.27, 95%CI 0.16-0.44) was lower in MIS than in abdominal surgery (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: MIS did not negatively impact the survival and perioperative complications of patients with EOC compared to abdominal surgery. While MIS is a viable option, varied case selection and surgical procedures suggest potential bias, requiring further validation studies.

A single-institution retrospective exploratory analysis on the effectiveness and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab for advanced endometrial cancer: insights from ProMisE molecular classification system.

BACKGROUND: The Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer has identified four risk groups for the prognosis of endometrial cancer. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab was recently approved as a second-line treatment for unresectable endometrial cancer, but reports in clinical practice are lacking. The relationship between the efficacy of lenvatinib/pembrolizumab and Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer classification is unclear. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study included patients who underwent lenvatinib/pembrolizumab therapy at Iwate Medical University Hospital between January 2022 and March 2023. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens obtained from patients before treatment were collected and classified into the mismatch repair-deficient, p53 abnormal and no specific molecular profile subtypes using immunohistochemistry. The response rate, progression-free survival and adverse events were evaluated using electronic medical records. The study was approved by the hospital's ethics committee (approval number: MH2022-093). RESULTS: This study enrolled 20 patients, who underwent a median follow-up of 17.8 months (95% confidence interval: 16.6-18.9). The best overall response rate was 60.0% (36.1-80.9), and the median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (2.9-20.3). The median progression-free survival in the p53 abnormal group (n = 9) was 3.4 months (3.0-3.8); however, progression-free survival did not reach the median (P < 0.001) in the mismatch repair-deficient/no specific molecular profile group (n = 11). Symptomatic immune-related adverse events (except hypothyroidism) occurred in 4/20 (25.0%) patients, and partial responses were observed in all cases. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The p53abn group in the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer classification has a poor prognosis even after treatment with lenvatinib/pembrolizumab.

Efficacy and safety of standard of care with/without bevacizumab for platinum-resistant ovarian/fallopian tube/peritoneal cancer previously treated with bevacizumab: The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study JGOG3023.

We investigated the efficacy and safety of further bevacizumab therapy in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer whose disease had progressed after bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. In this multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (JGOG3023), patients were randomized 1:1 to a single-agent chemotherapy alone (either pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [40 or 50 mg/m2 administered intravenously], topotecan [1.25 mg/m2 intravenously], paclitaxel [80 mg/m2 intravenously], or gemcitabine [1000 mg/m2 intravenously]) or single-agent chemotherapy + bevacizumab (15 mg/m2 intravenously). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and response rate according to Gynecological Cancer Intergroup cancer antigen 125 criteria. In total, 103 patients were allocated to chemotherapy (n = 51) or chemotherapy + bevacizumab (n = 52). Median investigator-assessed PFS was 3.1 and 4.0 mo in each group, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.90, P = .0082). Median OS was 11.3 and 15.3 mo in each group, respectively (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.38-1.17, P = .1556). Respective ORRs were 13.7% and 25.0% (P = .0599) and response rates were 16.7% and 21.4% (P = .8273). The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs was 42.0% in the chemotherapy group and 54.9% in the chemotherapy + bevacizumab group; AEs were well tolerated, with only 2 and 12 events leading to discontinuation of therapy, respectively. Bevacizumab was effective beyond progressive disease and AEs were manageable. The observed improvement in PFS requires further verification.

Paclitaxel-carboplatin and bevacizumab combination with maintenance bevacizumab therapy for metastatic, recurrent, and persistent uterine cervical cancer: An open-label multicenter phase II trial (JGOG1079).

OBJECTIVE: This multicenter, open-label, phase II study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-carboplatin, bevacizumab, and bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy for metastatic, recurrent, and persistent uterine cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with measurable diseases that were not adapted to regional therapies, such as surgery or radiotherapy, and were systematic chemotherapy-naïve were eligible. The participants received paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), carboplatin (AUC 5), and bevacizumab (15 mg/m2) every three weeks until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety, and time to treatment failure. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were analyzed using our protocol. The median paclitaxel- carboplatin therapy duration was six cycles; 40% of patients received bevacizumab maintenance therapy. The median PFS was 11.3 months. The median OS was not reached; the median time to treatment failure was 5.9 months. The ORR was 79.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 63.8-88.4]; 16 patients (23.2%) showed complete response (CR) and 39 patients (56.5%) showed partial response (PR). The median PFS was 14.3 months (95% CI 7.3-17 months) for the 25 patients who received maintenance therapy and 7.4 months (95% CI 6.1-11 months) for nonrecipients (p = 0.0449). Gastrointestinal perforation/fistulas occurred in four patients (5.6%), all of whom had a history of radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel-carboplatin and bevacizumab therapy is an acceptable and tolerable treatment for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

Comparison of treatment outcomes between first-line chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (Tohoku gynecologic cancer unit: TGCU-RS001 study).

BACKGROUND: Outcomes with and without bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy in Japanese-only ovarian cancer patients have not been reported. In this study, we report a retrospective study conducted at the Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 453 patients with stage III/IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were divided into two groups: bevacizumab (168 patients) and without bevacizumab (285 patients). The primary endpoint was the rate of platinum-resistant recurrence and the secondary endpoints were the antitumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: The objective response rates for patients with measurable diseases treated with and without bevacizumab were 84.5% and 73.0%, respectively (P = 0.0066). Platinum-resistant recurrence in the groups treated with and without bevacizumab was noted in 31 (18.4%) and 111 (38.6%) patients, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median progression-free survival for the bevacizumab and without bevacizumab groups was 23 and 15 months, respectively (P = 0.0002), and the median overall survival was not reached and 49 months, respectively (P = 0.0005). Hypertension of grade 3 or higher was observed in 21 patients (12.5%) in the bevacizumab group (P < 0.001), and proteinuria was observed in 18 patients (10.7%) and 1 patient (0.3%) in the bevacizumab and without bevacizumab groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Intestinal perforation was observed in only one patient (0.6%) in the bevacizumab group. CONCLUSION: Combination and maintenance with bevacizumab in primary chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer was effective in reducing platinum-resistant recurrence rates and prolonging progression-free and overall survival.

Docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy for treating patients with stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy for treating patients with stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were enrolled and administered docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m2, followed by carboplatin at a dose based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 6. The treatments were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. Except for two patients, 48 were eligible for evaluation. Another patient withdrew consent before treatment; adverse events were evaluated in 47. RESULTS: The response rate was 47.9% with 5 patients achieving complete response, 18 partial response, 14 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease. The disease control rate was 77.1%. With a median follow-up duration of 368 days, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months (95% CI 5.5-8.6) and 15.8 months (95% CI 18.2-28.3), respectively. The most frequent grade 3 and grade 4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia, with 38 patients (81%) having grade 4 and 4 (9%) having grade 3 neutropenia. The non-hematological toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2 in severity. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy was effective, with a higher disease control rate and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

The incidence of ovarian cancer, which has had a poor prognosis, is increasing annually. Currently, the prognosis is expected to improve with the use of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors as maintenance therapies after the first-line chemotherapy. The GOG218 and ICON7 studies reported the usefulness of bevacizumab and the SOLO-1 and PRIMA (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy) studies have reported the usefulness of olaparib and niraparib, respectively. The ATHENA study investigating the usefulness of rucaparib is currently ongoing. Although clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are lagging in the field of gynecology, many clinical studies using programmed death cell-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are currently ongoing. Some biomarkers have been identified for molecular-targeted drugs, but none have been identified for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is a challenge that should be addressed in the future.

Comparison of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for FIGO2018 Stage IIIC1 Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: In October 2018, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) revised its classification of advanced stages of cervical cancer. The main points of the classification are as follows: stage IIIC is newly established; pelvic lymph node metastasis is stage IIIC1; and para-aortic lymph node metastasis is stage IIIC2. Currently, in Japan, radical hysterectomy is performed in advanced stages IA2 to IIB of FIGO2014, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is recommended for patients with positive lymph nodes. However, the efficacy of CCRT is not always satisfactory. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and postoperative CCRT in stage IIIC1 patients. Materials and Methods: Of the 40 patients who had undergone a radical hysterectomy at Iwate Medical University between January 2011 and December 2016 and were pathologically diagnosed as having positive pelvic lymph nodes, 21 patients in the adjuvant CT group and 19 patients in the postoperative CCRT group were compared. Results: The 5 year survival rates were 77.9% in the CT group and 74.7% in the CCRT group, with no significant difference. There was no significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between the two groups. There was no significant difference between CT and CCRT in postoperative adjuvant therapy in the new classification IIIC1 stage. Conclusions: The results of the prospective Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 1082 study are pending, but the present results suggest that CT may be a treatment option in rural areas where radiotherapy facilities are limited.

Immunotherapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer Using Checkpoint Inhibitors: Future Directions.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated marked clinical effects worldwide, and "cancer immunotherapy" has been recognized as a feasible option for cancer treatment. Significant treatment responses have already been attained for malignant melanoma and lung cancer, ahead of gynecologic cancer. In cervical cancer, however, results are only available from phase II trials, not from phase III trials. Cervical cancer is a malignant tumor and is the fourth most common cancer among women worldwide. Since the introduction of angiogenesis inhibitors, treatment for recurrent and advanced cervical cancers has improved in the past five years, but median overall survival is 16.8 months for advanced cervical cancer, and all-stage five-year overall survival rate is 68%, indicating that treatment effects remain inadequate. For this reason, the development of new therapeutic approaches is imperative. We describe herein the KEYNOTE-158 and CheckMate 358 clinical trials, which were conducted for cervical cancer, and discuss future directions, including potential combinations with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), as noted for other types of cancer.

A phase II randomized controlled study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin vs. gemcitabine and carboplatin for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (GOTIC003/intergroup study).

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability profiles of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin (PLDC) with those of gemcitabine and carboplatin (GC) for the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Ovarian cancer patients with recurrence > 6 months after first-line platinum and taxane-based therapies were randomly assigned to PLDC [pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 plus carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg/mL/min on day 1] every 4 weeks or GC (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin AUC 4 mg/mL/min on day 1) every 3 weeks for at least 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and overall response rate, overall survival, toxicity, and dose administration were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: One-hundred patients (49 PLDC; 51 GC) were randomly assigned. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival was 12.0 months (95% CI 9.2-15.0) for PLDC and 9.8 months (8.9-12.3) for GC [HR 0.69 (0.455-1.047)] with a difference of 2.2 months. The response rate was 57.1% (41.0-72.3) for PLDC and 56.4% (39.6-72.2) for GC. No obvious differences in toxicity (G3/4) were noted between arms. The median relative dose intensity of planned dose per week was 88.9% for pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and 53.1% for gemcitabine (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PLDC and GC are both good treatment candidates for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients; however, the dose intensity was lower for GC than for PLDC. PLDC had a more favorable risk-benefit profile than that of GC for patients.

An open-label, randomized, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of standard of care with or without bevacizumab in platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer patients previously treated with bevacizumab for front-line or platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: rationale, design, and methods of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study JGOG3023.

BACKGROUND: We present the study rationale and design of the JGOG3023 study, an open-label, parallel-arm, randomized, phase II trial that aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who were previously treated with bevacizumab for front-line or platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that patients treated with a combination of single-agent chemotherapy and bevacizumab will show improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those treated with single-agent chemotherapy alone, in the setting beyond disease progression following prior bevacizumab treatment. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 106 patients who have recurrence or progression of ovarian cancer, while receiving chemotherapy or within 6 months after the final dose of platinum, after completing at least three cycles of bevacizumab plus platinum chemotherapy will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with single-agent chemotherapy or single-agent chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. For chemotherapy, one of the following four drugs will be chosen by an investigator: pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, paclitaxel, or gemcitabine. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed PFS. The secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, number of paracentesis, and response rate by CA125. Safety will be evaluated by the incidence of adverse events. DISCUSSION: This study will assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with single-agent chemotherapy, which could be used continuously after disease progression following standard platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000017247 (registered April 22, 2015).

Pazopanib Maintenance Therapy in East Asian Women With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results From AGO-OVAR16 and an East Asian Study.

OBJECTIVE: The recent phase 3 trial AGO-OVAR16 demonstrated that pazopanib maintenance improved median progression-free survival in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease did not progress during first-line treatment. However, this improvement was not seen in the subset of East Asian patients. The current analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of pazopanib maintenance in East Asian patients from AGO-OVAR16 and a separate East Asian study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: East Asian patients from AGO-OVAR16 (n = 209) and the East Asian study (N = 145) were randomized 1:1 to receive pazopanib 800 mg/d or placebo for up to 24 months. The primary end point for each study was progression-free survival by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) based on investigator assessment. Clinical and genetics data were analyzed separately by study or pooled according to separate predetermined statistical plans. RESULTS: Pazopanib maintenance had a detrimental effect on median progression-free survival versus placebo in East Asian patients from the combined studies (n = 354; 17.9 vs 21.5 months; hazard ratio, 1.114; 95% confidence interval, 0.818-1.518; P = 0.4928). Pazopanib maintenance showed a disadvantage in overall survival in East Asian patients from AGO-OVAR16 versus placebo (hazard ratio, 1.706; 95% confidence interval, 1.010-2.883; P = 0.0465); overall survival analysis was not performed in the East Asian study because of insufficient event numbers. Pazopanib-treated patients had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3 or higher hypertension (27%) and neutropenia (13%) versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment effect of maintenance pazopanib in East Asian patients seemed to differ from that in non-Asian patients. In study-specific and pooled analyses, none of the potential factors analyzed could satisfactorily explain the different efficacy results of pazopanib in East Asian patients.

Phase 1 study of veliparib with carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer.

This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of veliparib with carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in Japanese women with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer. Patients received veliparib at 100 or 150 mg b.i.d. on days 1-21 with carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve 6 mg/mL•min) on day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 3 weeks for up to 6 21-day cycles. Dose escalation followed a 3 + 3 design to determine dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose. Nine patients (median age 62 [range 27-72] years) received a median of 5 (range 3-6) cycles of treatment (3 at 100 mg, 6 at 150 mg). There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common adverse events of any grade were neutropenia (100%), alopecia (89%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (78%), and anemia, nausea and malaise (67% each). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were associated with myelosuppression. Pharmacokinetics of carboplatin/paclitaxel were similar at both veliparib doses. Response, assessed in five patients, was partial in four and complete in one (objective response rate 100%). The response could not be assessed in four patients who had no measurable disease at baseline. The recommended phase 2 dose of veliparib, when combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel, is 150 mg b.i.d. Findings from this phase 1 trial demonstrate the tolerability and safety of veliparib with carboplatin/paclitaxel, a regimen with potential clinical benefit in Japanese women with ovarian cancer.

Current Status of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma in the Tohoku Region: Results of the Tohoku Translational Center Development Network Survey.

BACKGROUND: To prepare for a future clinical trial for improving the long-term prognosis of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS), we conducted a multi-institutional survey in the Tohoku region of Japan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study between 2011 and 2014 in member institutions of the Tohoku Translational Research Center Development Network. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients with ULMS were registered in 31 institutions for the present survey. The median patient age was 56 years, 67.9% of the patients were postmenopausal, 88.7% had a performance status of 0 or 1, and only 6 patients (11.3%) showed preoperative evidence of malignancy. Although retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed in only 26.4% of patients, 64.2% patients were identified as having FIGO stage 1 disease; 73.6% were eligible to undergo complete surgery. Among 36 patients who were treated with postoperative chemotherapy, 28 (77.8%) received docetaxel and gemcitabine combination therapy. The most frequent recurrence site was the lungs, and the median progression-free survival of all enrolled patients was 11.7 months. However, the median progression-free survival and the median overall survival in patients with stages III and IV disease were 3.4 and 11.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although ULMS was associated with a high rate of complete or optimal surgery, the long-term prognosis was poor. Effective postoperative therapy should be developed to improve the long-term prognosis of patients with ULMS.

Molecular Analysis of Single Tumor Glands Using the Crypt Isolation Method in Endometrial Carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: Endometrial adenocarcinomas are characterized by the presence of many single tumor glands in which multiple genetic changes have accumulated. To elucidate the differences in molecular abnormalities among single tumor glands, individual tumor glands were analyzed and microsatellite alterations (loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and microsatellite instability [MSI]) were examined using the crypt isolation method in glands from each tumor from patients with endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery were included in this study. We obtained cancerous individual isolated tumor glands from each patient using the crypt isolation method. For LOH and MSI analyses, we used 15 microsatellite markers (3p, 5q, 10q, 13q, 17p, 18q, BAT25, and BAT26) and the promoter regions of 6 genes (transforming growth factor beta receptor II, BAX, insulin-like growth factor II receptor, E2F4, MutS homolog 3, and MSH6). RESULTS: Loss of heterozygosity was detected in 8 (32%) of 25 patients, and MSI was detected in 9 (36%) of 25 patients. Some MSI-positive carcinomas had LOH in single tumor gland samples, and the coexistence of LOH and MSI was confirmed. In 16 (64%) of 25 cases, intratumoral genetic heterogeneity among single tumor gland samples was detected. CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing multiple single tumor glands within the same tumor, we found that endometrial adenocarcinoma was composed of various tumor glands with different molecular abnormalities, even in a limited region within the same tumor.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin followed by radical hysterectomy for stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin followed by radical hysterectomy for patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2, IIA2, or IIB non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were enrolled. The patients were administered docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m2, followed by carboplatin at a dose based on an area under the curve of 6. The treatments were repeated every 21 days for one to three cycles. Fifty-two patients were eligible to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy. Adverse events were evaluated in 59 patients. RESULTS: The response rate was 69 % (95 % CI, 57-82 %), with 5 patients achieving complete response, 31 partial response, 15 stable disease, and 1 progressive disease. Median follow-up duration was 1913 days with a range of 145-2632 days. Of 52 patients, 50 underwent radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 2-year overall survival rate was 81.8 % for stage IB2, 85.7 % for stage IIA2, and 92.6 % for stage IIB. The most frequent grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia, with 43 patients experiencing grade 4 and 11 with grade 3. The nonhematological toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2 in severity. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and carboplatin followed by radical hysterectomy may be a useful strategy for patients with non-squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix.

Clinical efficacy of nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: a Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with that of cisplatin-based CCRT in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: The medical records of patients with cervical cancer who had undergone CCRT between 2003 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 129 patients were treated postoperatively with CCRT (n = 52) or primary CCRT (n = 77). A total of 29 patients were treated with nedaplatin-based postoperative CCRT and 23 patients were treated with cisplatin-based postoperative CCRT. A total of 28 patients were treated with nedaplatin-based postoperative CCRT, and 49 patients were treated with cisplatin-based postoperative CCRT. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the treatment groups. RESULTS: With postoperative CCRT, there were no significant differences in recurrence rate (P = 1.0000), PFS (log-rank: P = 0.8503), and OS (log-rank: P = 0.8926) between the two treatment groups. With primary CCRT, there were no significant differences in PFS (log-rank: P = 0.7845) and OS (log-rank: P = 0.3659). The frequency of acute toxicity was not significantly different between the cisplatin-based postoperative CCRT group and the nedaplatin-based postoperative CCRT group. CONCLUSIONS: Nedaplatin-based postoperative CCRT is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for both early-stage and advanced-stage cervical cancer patients.

Phase II clinical study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CDDP/CPT-11 regimen in combination with radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with a bulky mass.

BACKGROUND: We examined the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with the CPT-11 + CDDP regimen in combination with radical hysterectomy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 42 patients with stages IB2 to IIIB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with a bulky mass. CDDP at 70 mg/m2 was intravenously administered on day 1 and CPT-11 at 70 mg/m2 was intravenously administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. In principle, two cycles were administered followed by radical hysterectomy. We examined antitumor efficacy, adverse events, completion rate of radical hysterectomy, operative time, surgical blood loss, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The antitumor effect was complete response in 7 patients, partial response in 28, stable disease in 6, and progressive disease in 1; the response rate was 83.3 % (95 % confidence interval, 68.6-93.0). Grade 3 or more severe neutropenia, anemia, and platelet count decreases were noted in 23 (54.8 %), 4 (9.5 %), and 1 (2.4 %) patient, respectively. Grade 3 nausea occurred in 3 patients (7.1 %), vomiting in 1 (2.4 %), and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 2 (7.1 %). The completion rate of radical hysterectomy was 88.1 %. The median operative time and surgical blood loss were 260 min (range, 210-334) and 500 ml (range, 393-898), respectively. The 5-year PFS rate was 67.2 %, and the 5-year OS rate was 68.0 %. In multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis before NAC [hazard ratio (HR), 34.88] and non-response to NAC (HR 30.58) were significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: NAC with the CDDP/CPT-11 regimen achieves a high antitumor efficacy with moderate adverse reactions, allowing safe radical hysterectomy, and is thus considered to be a useful therapeutic method that can improve prognosis.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 is associated with poor overall survival in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary and may be a novel therapeutic approach.

OBJECTIVE: We previously found that gene and protein expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 were increased in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC); here, we examined FGFR2 expression in CCC tumor tissues and its correlation with clinical parameters. We also analyzed the effect of an FGFR inhibitor on the growth of CCC cells to investigate whether FGFR2 could be a therapeutic target for this disease. METHODS: We analyze the protein expression of FGFR2 by immunohistochemical staining in CCC from 112 patients and evaluated the association of these molecular parameters with clinical outcome. We treated the 11 CCC cell lines with an FGFR inhibitor, and then assessed cell viability, the expression of protein in FGFR2 signaling pathway, and cell cycle distribution. RESULTS: The expressions of FGFR2 were found in 96% of CCC. The 5-year survival rate for patients with a moderate or strong expression of FGFR2 was significantly lower than that for those with an absent or poor expression of FGFR2 (54% vs 79%). Multivariable analysis revealed that FGFR2 expression and disease stage were independent prognostic factors. The FGFR inhibitor effectively suppressed the growth of CCC cells with induction of G1 cell cycle arrest and down-regulated the expression of phosphorylated Akt and phosphorylated ERK. CONCLUSIONS: FGFR2 is an important biomarker predictive of patient outcome and is a potential target for CCC. Further study is warranted for FGFR inhibitor to treat CCC.

Loss of ARID1A expression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with stage I/II clear cell carcinoma of the ovary.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that somatic mutations in the AT-rich interactive domain 1A (SWI-like) gene (ARID1A) are the most common genetic changes in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC). A gene mutation of ARID1A was found in approximately half of CCC cases, and led to absence of the encoded protein and inactivation of the putative tumor suppressor. Here, we investigated whether ARID1A could be a prognostic biomarker for this disease. METHODS: We analyzed the protein expression of ARID1A in CCC from 112 patients by immunohistochemical staining, and evaluated the association of these molecular parameters with clinical outcome. RESULTS: The loss of ARID1A expression was found in 39 % (44/112) of CCC, and was not associated with patient age, FIGO stage, and status of residual tumor. The 5-year survival rate for FIGO stage I or II patients with negative tumor expression of ARID1A was lower than those with positive tumor expression of ARID1A (74 % vs 91 %), but this difference was not observed in FIGO stage III or IV patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that ARID1A expression was an independent prognostic factor in FIGO stage I or II CCC patients. CONCLUSION: ARID1A may be a biomarker that is predictive of the outcome of FIGO stage I and II CCC.