Maximizing Panfacial Aesthetic Outcomes: Findings and Recommendations From the HARMONY Study.

BACKGROUND: Aesthetic medicine has evolved from targeting individual treatment areas to a global approach of panfacial rejuvenation. HARMONY was the first clinical study to systematically demonstrate positive physical and psychosocial impacts of panfacial treatment. OBJECTIVE: Provide evidence-based guidance on treatment strategies to help maximize outcomes in patients seeking panfacial rejuvenation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study sites with the lowest (n = 2) and highest (n = 2) improvements based on FACE-Q Satisfaction with Face Overall scores were analyzed to understand differences in treatment strategy that may contribute to incrementally greater patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The highest scoring sites exhibited greater improvement in all patient-reported outcomes and investigator-assessed measures related to dermal filler treatment compared with the lowest scoring sites. The highest sites favored lateral malar augmentation and used less volume medially versus the lowest sites. In the lower face, the highest sites used greater volumes and more HYC-24L than HYC-24L+. Initial treatment volumes were more conservative at highest than lowest sites; greater volumes were used by highest sites in touch-up treatments. CONCLUSION: Product usage trends common to the highest scoring sites (including injection volume, injection sites, and product selection) may provide guidance on best practices for a panfacial approach to aesthetic treatment to maximize patient satisfaction.

Aesthetic Treatment Positively Impacts Social Perception: Analysis of Subjects From the HARMONY Study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of facial aesthetic treatments not only enhances physical appearance but also psychological well-being. Accordingly, patient-reported outcomes are increasingly utilized as an important measure of treatment success. Observer-reported outcomes are a relevant yet often overlooked measure of treatment benefit. OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to evaluate the impact of panfacial aesthetic treatment on the perception of an individual in a variety of social contexts. METHODS: A total 2000 men and women (aged 18-65 years) participated in an online study designed to capture the blinded observer's social perception of pretreatment and posttreatment patients who received panfacial aesthetic treatment in the HARMONY study. Perceptions relevant to character traits, age, attractiveness, and social status were evaluated. Observers were divided into 2 groups. Single image respondents (n = 1500) viewed 6 single, randomized patient images (3 pretreatment, 3 posttreatment), and paired image respondents (n = 500) viewed 6 pretreatment and posttreatment image pairs. RESULTS: Single image respondents reported significantly (P < 0.05) higher levels of agreement that posttreatment subjects appeared to possess more positive character traits (eg, healthy and approachable), were more socially adept, younger, more attractive, more successful at attracting others, and possessed a higher social status. Paired image respondents also reported a higher level of agreement for posttreatment images being aligned with positive character traits, representative of a younger and more attractive individual, and one with a higher social status. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the positive impact of minimally invasive panfacial treatment extends beyond enhancing physical appearance and highlights the importance of social perception and observer-reported outcomes in aesthetic medicine.

In Vivo Degradation of Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Fillers by Exogenous Hyaluronidases.

BACKGROUND: An advantage of hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers is reversibility. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of 2 hyaluronidases to degrade 3 HA-based fillers using a novel in vivo model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were injected with 3 HA fillers (HYC-24L+, VYC-20L, and RES-L) to create a projecting bolus. After 4 days, recombinant human hyaluronidase (HX) or ovine hyaluronidase (VIT) was administered at (1) varying doses (5 U, 10 U, or 30 U per 0.1 mL filler) or (2) different dilutions (10 U diluted 3-fold). The impact of tissue integration was assessed by administering 10 U/0.1 mL filler 4 weeks after filler injection. Three-dimensional images quantified projection loss over 72 hours. RESULTS: Complete loss of projection was achieved for all fillers with the highest HX and VIT doses; lower doses achieved less degradation. No difference in degradation was observed between HYC-24L+ and VYC-20L using HX or VIT. RES-L was slightly more degraded with 10 U VIT but not with 10 U HX. Enzyme dilution resulted in less degradation. Tissue integration did not impact the degree of degradation. CONCLUSION: This model incorporates the biological system while controlling variables including filler depth and volume and location of hyaluronidase delivery. Hyaluronic acid filler degradation by exogenous hyaluronidase was not hindered by differences among fillers.

Rheological Properties and In Vivo Performance Characteristics of Soft Tissue Fillers.

BACKGROUND: Physicochemical properties and performance in nonclinical animal models can provide insights into soft tissue filler performance. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vivo performance of fillers with different compositions and physicochemical properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicochemical properties were measured in vitro. Rat models were developed and used to compare lift capacity, resistance to deformation, and tissue integration. Four homogeneous hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers, 2 nonanimal stabilized HA (NASHA) fillers, and 1 calcium hydroxylapatite/carboxymethyl cellulose (CaHA/CMC) filler were evaluated. RESULTS: Filler lift capacity correlated better with filler composition/type (homogeneous > NASHA > CaHA/CMC) than with specific rheological properties. The CaHA/CMC filler had high initial resistance to deformation relative to other groups; all HA fillers exhibited lower initial resistance to deformation, which increased over time. Homogeneous HA fillers were integrated with surrounding tissue, whereas integration within particle-based fillers (NASHA and CaHA/CMC) was variable, with some areas void of tissue. CONCLUSION: The animal models provide a platform to make comparative evaluations among fillers. The results indicated that biological interaction plays an important role in how the filler performs. Rheology alone was not sufficient to understand filler performance but was most useful when comparing within fillers of similar composition.