Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
2.
Lab Hematol ; 11(2): 148-51, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16024339

RESUMEN

A standard bone marrow examination may be done in patients with a known nonhematologic malignancy in order to evaluate the presence or absence of metastatic disease. A 300-cell-count differential of the aspirate is often performed in these cases. However, the clinical utility of the differential count has never been assessed. A retrospective review was performed on 107 bone marrow reports from 86 patients with a documented nonhematologic malignancy to determine the clinical usefulness of the differential counts in this patient population. Two cases out of 107 had clinically relevant findings from the aspirate differential. One patient had an increase in plasma cells (7%) and one had left-shifted granulopoiesis with 19% blasts. In most instances, the performance of an aspirate differential adds little clinically useful information in patients undergoing bone marrow examination for metastatic disease. There are cost savings associated with omitting the routine aspirate differential as either technologist- or pathologist-time in performing the differential is decreased.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja/economía , Biopsia con Aguja/estadística & datos numéricos , Examen de la Médula Ósea/economía , Examen de la Médula Ósea/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuento de Células , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA