Feasibility and acceptability of point of care testing for sexually transmitted infections in outpatient clinics offering integrated services in Eswatini.

BACKGROUND: Lack of point of care testing (POCT) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is a continuing missed opportunity in Sub-Saharan Africa. We assessed feasibility and acceptability of STI POCT in Eswatini. METHODS: STI POCT for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoea (NG) was piloted among sexually active adults 18-45 years attending two urban outpatient clinics offering HIV services. Females were randomized 1:1 to provide urine or vaginal swab and all males provided urine samples for CT/NG testing using Cepheid CT/NG cartridges on existing GeneXpert platforms. Results were returned in-person or by telephone call. We assessed duration of procedures and participant and healthcare worker acceptability of services (5-point Likert scale), time spent on STI POCT services, and correlates of CT/NG infection. RESULTS: Of 250 adults triaged, 99% (248/250) accepted STI POCT, including 44% (109/248) people living with HIV. STI POCT procedures took a median of 3:22 hours. Most adults (90%, 224/248), received results within a day (61% same day, 29% next day). CT/NG was detected among 22% (55/248): 31/55 CT, 21/55 NG and 3/55 coinfections. Youth 18-25 years, history of any sexual intercourse, and condom-less sex within the previous 7 days were significantly associated with CT/NG detected (p < 0.05). Most adults with CT/NG were treated (51/55, 93%). Most participants were satisfied with STI POCT (217/241, 90%), and would accept again/recommend it. All 32 healthcare workers who participated were satisfied with STI POCT. CONCLUSION: STI POCT was feasible, acceptable, and identified a high prevalence of STIs, highlighting the urgent need for this testing.

A time-motion study of cardiovascular disease risk factor screening integrated into HIV clinic visits in Swaziland.

INTRODUCTION: Screening of modifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors is recommended but not routinely provided for HIV-infected patients, especially in low-resource settings. Potential concerns include limited staff time and low patient acceptability, but little empirical data exists. As part of a pilot study of screening in a large urban HIV clinic in Swaziland, we conducted a time-motion study to assess the impact of screening on patient flow and HIV service delivery and exit interviews to assess patient acceptability. METHODS: A convenience sample of patients ≥40 years of age attending routine HIV clinic visits was screened for hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and tobacco smoking. We observed HIV visits with and without screening and measured time spent on HIV and CVD risk factor screening activities. We compared screened and unscreened patients on total visit time and time spent receiving HIV services using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. A separate convenience sample of screened patients participated in exit interviews to assess their satisfaction with screening. RESULTS: We observed 172 patient visits (122 with CVD risk factor screening and 50 without). Screening increased total visit time from a median (range) of 4 minutes (2 to 11) to 15 minutes (9 to 30) (p < 0.01). Time spent on HIV care was not affected: 4 (2 to 10) versus 4 (2 to 11) (p = 0.57). We recruited 126 patients for exit interviews, all of whom indicated that they would recommend screening to others. CONCLUSION: Provision of CVD risk factor screening more than tripled the length of routine HIV clinic visits but did not reduce the time spent on HIV services. Programme managers need to take longer visit duration into account in order to effectively integrate CVD risk factor screening and counselling into HIV programmes.

Integrating cardiovascular disease risk factor screening into HIV services in Swaziland: lessons from an implementation science study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of cardiovascular disease risk factor (CVDRF) screening at an HIV clinic in Swaziland. METHODS: A sample of HIV-positive patients at least 40 years on antiretroviral treatment was screened for hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco smoking. RESULTS: A total of 1826 patients were screened; 684 (39%) had at least one CVDRF. Screening volume varied markedly, and was limited by staffing, space, and supplies. DISCUSSION: CVDRF screening was feasible and prevalence of risk factors in people living with HIV at least 40 years was high.