Achieving recommended low density lipoprotein cholesterol goals and the factors associated with target achievement of hypercholesterolemia patients with rosuvastatin in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and requires continuous management. The role of primary physicians in this regard is important, yet the factors associated with successful lipid lowering treatments in primary clinics have not been clearly identified. We aimed to evaluate the rate of successful hypercholesterolemia treatment in Korean primary care, and to identify the factors associated with achieving low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. METHODS: We prospectively recruited and retrospectively assessed 1851 Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia who visited family physicians and were prescribed rosuvastatin for the first time. LDL-C lowering targets, defined according to NCEP ATP III guidelines, were evaluated at 6 months after the first prescription. The factors associated with achieving these targets were also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 87.6% of our participants attained their LDL-C goals. In multiple logistic regression analysis, good adherence to medication was strongly associated with the achievement of target LDL-C levels, whereas higher cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes (in both sexes), low high density lipoprotein, and current smoking status (in males), and hypertension (in females) were related to LDL-C target level failures. CONCLUSION: Our observations of the short period for hypercholesterolemia in Korean primary care has revealed that the rate of achieving target LDL-C levels was high in these patients, whereas patients at higher risk for cardiovascular disease tended to have lower LDL-C achievement outcomes. Primary care physicians should pay more attention to patients showing higher cardiovascular risk and stress the need for good adherence and management regimens in these individuals.

[Detection of anti-ENA and anti-dsDNA antibodies using line immunoassay in systemic autoimmune diseases].

BACKGROUND: Detection of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs) and dsDNA is needed for the diagnosis of and predicting prognosis in systemic autoimmune diseases. Recently introduced line immunoassay (LIA) has the advantage of detecting several autoantibodies simultaneously, and we evaluated its usefulness in the diagnosis of autoimmune diseases in comparison with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). METHODS: Samples were collected from 437 patients referred by rheumatologists. FANA (fluorescent antinuclear antibody) test and LIA for the detection of 13 different autoantibodies, including 6 ENAs and dsDNA were performed. LIA-positive samples for ENA or dsDNA antibodies were further tested with ELISA. Final diagnosis was made by rheumatologists according to the diagnostic criteria. Agreement of results between LIA and ELISA was analyzed in 53 selected patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. RESULTS: The LIA detected antibodies to ENA and dsDNA in 118 and 22 patients, respectively, and ELISA detected 70.3% (83/118) and 45.5% (10/22) of LIA positive samples. Especially, 60.2% (71/118) of patients with positive ENA antibody on LIA was diagnosed as systemic autoimmune diseases. Patients having strong FANA titer and homogenous/speckled pattern showed higher prevalence of autoantibodies, but a small proportion of FANA negative patients also showed positive reactivity (LIA 10.8%, ELISA 5.2%). LIA showed a good agreement with ELISA for the anti-ENA antibodies (> or =80%), and a lower agreement for the anti-dsDNA antibody (67.9%). CONCLUSIONS: LIA detecting several autoantibodies simultaneously might replace ELISA for anti-ENA antibodies, but not for anti-dsDNA antibodies. When LIA is performed considering clinical manifestations and FANA, it could contribute to the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disease.