Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lupus ; 31(10): 1254-1262, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35786213

RESUMEN

Background: Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE) are at an increased risk of infection and it is often difficult to differentiate between infection and disease activity in a febrile patient with SLE. Methods: Patients with SLE (SLICC criteria) presenting with fever between December 2018 and August 2021 were included. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), NEUT-x, -y, -z indices, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein(CRP), C3, C4, anti-dsDNA antibodies, and procalcitonin(PCT) were tested in addition to investigations as per the treating physician's discretion. Based on the clinical assessment and laboratory data, the febrile episode was classified into infection, disease flare, or both. Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad prism v8.4.2. A novel composite score was devised and validated with a calculator incorporated is a spreadsheet. The performance of a previously proposed model of duration of fever, CRP, and dsDNA (Beca et al) was evaluated and other models using PCT and NEUT-Z were explored. Results: Among 168 febrile episodes in 166 patients with SLE (25 (19-32) years), 46 were due to infection, 77 due to flare, 43 due to both, and two due to other causes. High SLEDAI 2K (0.001), anti-dsDNA (p = 0.004), and low complements(C3, p = 0.001 and C4, p = 0.001) were characteristic of disease flare, whereas high total leukocyte count (TLC) (p = 0.008), NLR (p = 0.008), NEUT-x (p = 0.001), -y (p = 0.03), -z (p = 0.002), CRP (p = 0.001), and PCT (p = 0.03) were observed with infection. A model using age, TLC, and CRP was devised using 80% of the cohort with an AUC of 0.88 (0.78-0.97) which was validated in the remaining 20% to have an AUC of 0.83(0.60-1.0). The model devised by Beca et al yielded an AUC of 0.74. Use of PCT did not improve the discrimination between flare and infection. A Model of C4 and NEUT-z analyzed in a subset performed well and needs further exploration. Conclusion: A composite score of low cost and routinely available parameters like age, TLC, and CRP gives a good discrimination between infection and flare in a febrile patient with SLE.


Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Anticuerpos Antinucleares , Biomarcadores , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Brote de los Síntomas
2.
Indian J Crit Care Med ; 26(4): 528-530, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35656044

RESUMEN

How to cite this article: Aggarwal A, Arora U, Mittal A, Aggarwal A, Singh K, Ray A, et al.Outcomes of HFNC Use in COVID-19 Patients inNon-ICU Settings: A Single-center Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):528-530.

3.
Indian J Med Res ; 153(5&6): 665-670, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34414924

RESUMEN

Background & objectives: In the present scenario, the most common sample for diagnosis of COVID-19 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is nasal and throat swab (NTS). Other sampling options such as gargle lavage have found limited application in clinical use mostly because of unavailability of an appropriate gargling liquid. This study was conducted to assess the stability of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in normal saline at 4°C that can serve as a gargling liquid as well as a transport medium. The study also looked at the agreement between NTS and gargle lavage/saliva for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Methods: In 29 consecutive real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) positive COVID-19 patients, paired NTS, gargle and saliva samples were taken. Samples were processed by rRT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. To assess the SARS-CoV-2 RNA stability in normal saline, gargle lavage specimens were divided into two aliquots; one subset of the specimen was run within 4-6 h along with the routine samples (NTS and saliva) and the other subset was stored at 4°C and processed after 24-30 h. Agreement between cycle threshold (Ct) values from both the runs was compared using Bland-Altman (BA) analysis. Results: The positivity rates of rRT-PCR in NTS, saliva and gargle lavage samples were 82.7 (24/29), 79.3 (23/29) and 86.2 per cent (25/29), respectively. BA plot showed a good agreement between the Ct values of fresh and stored gargle samples, stipulating that there were no significant differences in the approximate viral load levels between the fresh and stored gargle lavage samples (bias: E gene -0.64, N gene -0.51, ORF gene -0.19). Interpretation & conclusions: Our study results show stability of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the gargle samples collected using normal saline up to 24-30 h. Gargle lavage and saliva specimen collection are cost-effective and acceptable methods of sampling for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by rRT-PCR. These simplified, inexpensive and acceptable methods of specimen collection would reduce the cost and workload on healthcare workers for sample collection.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Saliva , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Faringe , ARN Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2 , Manejo de Especímenes , Irrigación Terapéutica
4.
Indian J Med Res ; 153(1 & 2): 126-131, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818469

RESUMEN

Background & objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has so far affected over 41 million people globally. The limited supply of real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) kits and reagents has made meeting the rising demand for increased testing incompetent, worldwide. A highly sensitive and specific antigen-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT) is the need of the hour. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of a rapid chromatographic immunoassay-based test (index test) compared with a clinical reference standard (rRT-PCR). Methods: A cross-sectional, single-blinded study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in north India. Paired samples were taken for RDT and rRT-PCR (reference standard) from consecutive participants screened for COVID-19 to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the RDT. Further subgroup analysis was done based on the duration of illness and cycle threshold values. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to measure the level of agreement between the two tests. Results: Of the 330 participants, 77 were rRT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2. Sixty four of these patients also tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RDT. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 81.8 and 99.6 per cent, respectively. The sensitivity of RDT was higher (85.9%) in participants with a duration of illness ≤5 days. Interpretation & conclusions: With an excellent specificity and moderate sensitivity, this RDT may be used to rule in COVID-19 in patients with a duration of illness ≤5 days. Large-scale testing based on this RDT across the country would result in quick detection, isolation and treatment of COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Prueba de COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Cromatografía , Inmunoensayo , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , India , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
5.
Mycoses ; 64(9): 1038-1044, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058036

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary aspergilloma (PA) is a common complication seen in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis sequelae. Antifungal therapy, including oral azoles, is commonly used though only surgical resection offers curative benefit. Local administration of amphotericin B, like intracavitary instillation, has been effective in aspergilloma patients though nebulised amphotericin B (nAB) has never been formally assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective, non-inferior, open-label, randomised control trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nebulised amphotericin B compared to oral itraconazole therapy in the treatment of PA. PATIENTS/METHODS: Diagnosed cases of PA (n=33) were randomised into the control group receiving oral itraconazole (n=18) and intervention group receiving nebulised amphotericin B (n = 15). Response to treatment was assessed both clinically and radiologically at the end 6 months. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The number of patients showing overall improvement at the end of 6 months in the control arm(oral itraconazole) vs intervention arm(nebulised amphotericin B) was 65% (95% CI 38.3-85.8) and 67%(95% CI 38.4%-88.2%), respectively, in the intention-to-treat and 79% (95% CI 49.2%-95.3%), and 65% (95% CI 38.4%-88.2%), respectively, in the per-protocol analysis. While there was no statistically significant difference between the intervention and control arm in both the analyses, non-inferiority was shown in the per-protocol but not in the intention-to-treat analysis. No major adverse events were noted in either group; however, a significant proportion of patients receiving nAB reported minor cough (40%), which, however, did not lead to discontinuation of therapy in any patients. Nebulised amphotericin B can be an effective therapeutic option for pulmonary aspergilloma patients.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , Antifúngicos , Itraconazol , Aspergilosis Pulmonar , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Itraconazol/administración & dosificación , Itraconazol/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Aspergilosis Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(5): 2205-2215, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31428931

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Between 19 and 58% of oncology patients experience chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN). In a sample of outpatients with breast, gastrointestinal (GI), gynecological, and lung cancer, the study purposes were to evaluate for inter-individual differences in the severity of CIN over two cycles of chemotherapy (CTX) and to determine which demographic and clinical characteristics and GI symptoms were associated with higher initial levels as well as with the trajectories of CIN severity. METHODS: Patients completed study questionnaires at six time points over two cycles of CTX. These questionnaires provided information on demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the occurrence of twelve GI symptoms. Hierarchical linear modeling based on full maximum likelihood estimation was performed. RESULTS: Of the 1251 patients, 47.2% reported CIN. Across two cycles of CTX, lower functional status scores and higher levels of comorbidity were associated with higher initial levels of CIN. Younger age and emetogenicity of the CTX regimen were associated with higher initial levels as well as worse trajectories of CIN. The occurrence of five GI symptoms (i.e., vomiting, lack of appetite, constipation, feeling bloated, and difficulty swallowing) was associated with higher initial levels of CIN. The occurrence of mouth sores was associated with higher initial levels as well as with worst trajectories of CIN. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to identify distinct demographic, clinical, and GI symptom characteristics associated with CIN severity. These findings suggest that the etiology of CIN is complex and may warrant interventions beyond standard antiemetics.


Asunto(s)
Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Antieméticos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Individualidad , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Indian J Med Res ; 152(1 & 2): 77-81, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32820725

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab (NPS and OPS) collection is widely accepted as the preferred method for obtaining respiratory samples. However, it has certain disadvantages which may be overcome by gargling. The primary objective of this study was to assess agreement between gargle lavage and swab as an appropriate respiratory sample for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The secondary objective was to assess the patient acceptability of the two sampling methods. METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study done at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India, on 50 confirmed COVID-19 patients. Paired swab (NPS and OPS) and gargle samples were taken within 72 h of their diagnosis. Samples were processed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Post-sample collection, a 10-point scale was administered to assess the level of discomfort with either of the collection methods. RESULTS: All gargle samples were positive and comparable to their corresponding swab samples irrespective of the symptoms and duration of illness. The cycle threshold (Ct) values for gargle samples were slightly higher but comparable to those of swabs. Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between the two methods. Majority (72%) of the patients reported moderate-to-severe discomfort with swab collection in comparison to 24 per cent reporting only mild discomfort with gargle collection. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results show that the gargle lavage may be a viable alternative to swabs for sample collection for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Adoption of gargle lavage for sample collection will have a significant impact as it will enable easy self-collection, relieve healthcare workers and also lead to substantial cost savings by reducing the need for swabs and personal protective equipment.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Irrigación Terapéutica , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/genética , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nasofaringe/virología , Orofaringe/virología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/genética , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Manejo de Especímenes
8.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 90(4)2020 Dec 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33372742

RESUMEN

COVID-19 pneumonia has a significant case fatality rate and no effective antiviral drugs are available even after 9 months of the pandemic. The spectrum of COVID-19 disease ranges from asymptomatic cases to severe ARDS with myriad manifestations. Here we report a case of a male patient with severe COVID-19 ARDS who improved after receiving standard therapy but again 'deteriorated' after being stepped down to ward. He complained of worsening shortness of breath and hypoxemia which was found to be mainly positional. After ruling out other causes, he was labeled as a case of platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome due to underlying lung involvement.  It is important to be aware of this condition in the context of COVID-19 which can be easily diagnosed bedside with pulse oximetry.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Disnea , Hipoxia , Pulmón , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Neumonía Viral , Anciano , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Deterioro Clínico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Disnea/diagnóstico , Disnea/etiología , Humanos , Hipoxia/diagnóstico , Hipoxia/etiología , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Oximetría/métodos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/etiología , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Síndrome , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
9.
Qual Life Res ; 28(1): 109-119, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30191365

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the quality-adjusted survival of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone among treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma based on a minimum 36-month follow-up from the CheckMate 067 trial. METHODS: Overall survival was partitioned into time without symptoms of progression or toxicity (TWiST), time with treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events after randomization but before progression (TOX), and time from progression until end of follow-up or death (REL). Mean quality-adjusted TWiST (Q-TWiST) was calculated by multiplying the mean time spent in each health state by a utility of 1.0 for TWiST and 0.5 for TOX and REL. Sensitivity analyses included varying utilities of TOX and REL; Q-TWiST gains at different follow-up times were calculated using EQ-5D-3L utilities from the trial. Relative Q-TWiST gain of ≥ 10% was considered clinically important. RESULTS: Compared with ipilimumab-treated patients, those who received nivolumab + ipilimumab combination had significantly longer TWiST and TOX but shorter REL; nivolumab-treated patients had significantly longer TWiST, shorter REL, and shorter but statistically nonsignificant TOX. Mean Q-TWiST was highest for nivolumab + ipilimumab (23.5 months; 95% CI 21.9-25.2), followed by nivolumab (21.8 months; 95% CI 20.2-23.4) and ipilimumab (15.3 months; 95% CI 13.9-16.6). Relative Q-TWiST gains were favorable and clinically important for nivolumab + ipilimumab combination (+ 36.81%) and nivolumab alone (+ 29.18%) versus ipilimumab alone. Relative gains increased with follow-up from 3 to 40 months for all comparisons. These gains remained consistent in magnitude and direction in the different sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab + ipilimumab combination and nivolumab alone resulted in a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in quality-adjusted survival compared with ipilimumab alone.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ipilimumab/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Ipilimumab/efectos adversos , Ipilimumab/farmacología , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/patología , Nivolumab/efectos adversos , Nivolumab/farmacología , Análisis de Supervivencia
10.
Epilepsy Behav ; 87: 108-116, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30120071

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy is usually effective in 60% of the patients with epilepsy while the remaining patients have refractory epilepsy. This study compared treatment patterns (adherence, persistence, addition, and switching) associated with refractory and nonrefractory epilepsy. METHODS: Texas Medicaid claims from 09/01/07-12/31/13 were analyzed, and patients eligible for the study 1) were between 18 and 62 years of age, 2) had a prescription claim for an AED during the identification period (03/01/08-12/31/11) with no prior baseline AED use (6-month), and 3) had evidence of epilepsy diagnosis within 6 months of AED use. Based on AED use in the identification period, patients were categorized into "refractory" (≥3AEDs) and "nonrefractory" (<3AEDs) cohorts. The index date was the date of the first AED claim. Patients in both cohorts were matched 1:1 using propensity scoring and compared for adherence (proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥80% vs. <80%), persistence, addition (yes/no), and switching (yes/no) using multivariate conditional regression models. Conditional logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to address the study objectives. RESULTS: Of the 10,599 eligible patients, 2798 (26.5%) patients in the refractory cohort were matched to patients in the nonrefractory cohort. Patients in the refractory cohort had significantly higher (p < 0.005) mean (±Standard deviation (SD)) adherence (88.6% (±19.1%) vs. 77.0% ±â€¯(25.8%)) and persistence (328.0 (±87.3) days vs. 294.9 ±â€¯(113.4) days) as compared with patients in the nonrefractory cohort. Compared with patients with nonrefractory epilepsy, patients with refractory epilepsy were 3.6 times (odds ratio (OR) = 3.553; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.060-4.125; p < 0.0001) more likely to adhere to AEDs and had a 34.7% (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.653; 95% CI = 0.608-0.702; p < 0.0001) lower hazard rate of discontinuation of AEDs. Also, patients with refractory epilepsy were 3.7 times (OR = 3.723; 95% CI = 2.902-4.776; p < 0.0001) more likely to add an alternative AED and 3.6 times (OR = 3.591; 95% CI = 3.010-4.284; p < 0.0001) more likely to switch to an alternative AED. CONCLUSION: Patients with refractory epilepsy were significantly more likely to adhere and persist to AED regimen and were significantly more likely to add and switch to an alternative AED than patients with nonrefractory epilepsy.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Refractaria/epidemiología , Medicaid , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
11.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 66(12): 80-83, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31315333

RESUMEN

Eosinophils are predominantly tissue-dwelling cells (spleen, lymph nodes, thymus, digestive tract) and counts <500/mm3 in the peripheral blood are considered to be normal. The functions of eosinophils are not completely understood, however there can be a significant rise in their levels in the peripheral blood and/or tissues in a variety of disease states. Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a group of disorders characterised by blood eosinophilia greater than 1500/mm3 on at least two occasions and eosinophilic infiltration and damage to multiple organs. Eosinophils on activation release substances that can lead to tissue damage. However, it is important to note that the degree of tissue damage is not directly proportional to the level of eosinophilia. A significant number of cases of HES are commonly missed and therefore a systematic approach is necessary for all such patients. Through our case, we have tried to summarise how to systematically approach a case of HES and manage it.


Asunto(s)
Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Multiorgánica/diagnóstico , Eosinófilos , Humanos
12.
Value Health ; 20(4): 602-609, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28408002

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the adjusted incremental total costs (direct and indirect) for patients (aged 3-17 years) with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and the differences in the adjusted incremental direct expenditures with respect to age groups (preschoolers, 0-5 years; children, 6-11 years; and adolescents, 12-17 years). METHODS: The 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey was used as the data source. The ADHD cohort consisted of patients aged 0 to 17 years with a diagnosis of ADHD, whereas the non-ADHD cohort consisted of subjects in the same age range without a diagnosis of ADHD. The annual incremental total cost of ADHD is composed of the incremental direct expenditures and indirect costs. A two-part model with a logistic regression (first part) and a generalized linear model (second part) was used to estimate the incremental costs of ADHD while controlling for patient characteristics and access-to-care variables. RESULTS: The 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey database included 9108 individuals aged 0 to 17 years, with 458 (5.0%) having an ADHD diagnosis. The ADHD cohort was 4.90 times more likely (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.97-8.08; P < 0.001) than the non-ADHD cohort to have an expenditure of at least $1, and among those with positive expenditures, the ADHD cohort had 58.4% higher expenditures than the non-ADHD cohort (P < 0.001). The estimated adjusted annual total incremental cost of ADHD was $949.24 (95% CI $593.30-$1305.18; P < 0.001). The adjusted annual incremental total direct expenditure for ADHD was higher among preschoolers ($989.34; 95% CI $402.70-$1575.98; P = 0.001) than among adolescents ($894.94; 95% CI $428.16-$1361.71; P < 0.001) or children ($682.71; 95% CI $347.94-$1017.48; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis and use of evidence-based treatments may address the substantial burden of ADHD.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/economía , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Gastos en Salud , Pediatría/economía , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Modelos Económicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Crohns Colitis 360 ; 6(2): otae026, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751576

RESUMEN

Background: Some patients lose response during treatment for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to characterize real-world treatment failure patterns and associated economic burdens during use of first-line advanced therapies for UC. Methods: IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases were used to identify adults initiating ≥ 1 advanced therapy for UC (January 1, 2010-September 30, 2019). Treatment failure was defined as augmentation with non-advanced therapy, discontinuation, dose escalation/interval shortening, failure to taper corticosteroids, UC-related surgery, or UC-related urgent care ≤ 12 months after treatment initiation. The index date was the date of treatment failure (treatment failure cohort) or 12 months after treatment initiation (persistent cohort). Treatment failure rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. All-cause and UC-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs 12 months post-index were also assessed. Results: Analysis of treatment failure patterns included data from 6745 patients; HCRU and cost analyses included data from 5302 patients (treatment failure cohort, n = 4295; persistent cohort, n = 1007). In the overall population, 75% experienced treatment failure within the first 12 months (median: 5.1 months). Augmentation with non-advanced therapy (39%) was the most common first treatment failure event. The treatment failure cohort had significantly (P < .001) higher mean costs than the persistent cohort (all-cause, $74 995 vs $56 169; UC-related, $57 096 vs $47 347) mainly attributed to inpatient admissions and outpatient visits. Dose escalation/interval shortening accounted for the highest total costs ($101 668) across treatment failure events. Conclusions: Advanced therapies for moderate-to-severe UC are associated with high rates of treatment failure and significant economic burden. More efficacious and durable treatments are needed.

14.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 51(4): 361-380, 2024 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38950093

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify subgroups of patients with distinct chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV) profiles; determine how these subgroups differ on several demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics; and evaluate factors associated with chemotherapy-induced nausea and CIV profiles. SAMPLE & SETTING: Adult patients (N = 1,338) receiving cancer chemotherapy. METHODS & VARIABLES: Data were collected on demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics. Differences among subgroups of patients with distinct CIV profiles were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Three CIV profiles (None, Decreasing, and Increasing) were identified. Compared with the None class, Decreasing and Increasing classes were more likely to have lower household income and a higher comorbidity burden, as well as to report higher rates of dry mouth, nausea, diarrhea, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, morning fatigue, and pain interference. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Clinicians need to assess common and distinct risk factors for CIV and chemotherapy-induced nausea.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Náusea , Neoplasias , Vómitos , Humanos , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Anciano , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Náusea/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años
15.
Biosensors (Basel) ; 13(3)2023 Mar 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36979603

RESUMEN

Mycotoxins are naturally occurring toxic secondary metabolites produced by fungi in cereals and foodstuffs during the stages of cultivation and storage. Electrochemical biosensing has emerged as a rapid, efficient, and economical approach for the detection and quantification of mycotoxins in different sample media. An electrochemical biosensor consists of two main units, a recognition receptor and a signal transducer. Natural or artificial antibodies, aptamers, molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP), peptides, and DNAzymes have been extensively employed as selective recognition receptors for the electrochemical biosensing of mycotoxins. This article affords a detailed discussion of the recent advances and future prospects of various types of recognition receptors exploited in the electrochemical biosensing of mycotoxins.


Asunto(s)
Aptámeros de Nucleótidos , Técnicas Biosensibles , Micotoxinas , Hongos , Péptidos
16.
PLoS One ; 18(1): e0280074, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36608027

RESUMEN

Membrane proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) can be targeted for the development of therapeutic and prophylactic interventions against tuberculosis. We have utilized the unique membrane-solubilising properties of the styrene maleic acid copolymer (SMA) to prepare and characterise 'styrene maleic acid lipid particles' from the native membrane of Mtb (MtM-SMALPs). When resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualised with coomassie blue, the molecular weights of Mtb membrane (MtM) proteins solubilised by SMA were mostly in the range of 40-70 kDa. When visualised by transmission electron microscopy, MtM-SMALPs appeared as nanoparticles of discrete shapes and sizes. The discoid nanoparticles exhibited a range of diameters of ~10-90 nm, with largest portion (~61%) ranging from 20-40 nm. MtM proteins of a molecular weight-range overlapping with that of MtM-SMALPs were also amenable to chemical cross-linking, revealing protein complex formation. Characterisation using monoclonal antibodies against seven MtM-associated antigens confirmed the incorporation of the inner membrane protein PRA, membrane-associated proteins PstS1, LpqH and Ag85, and the lipoglycan LAM into MtM-SMALPs. Conversely, the peripheral membrane proteins Acr and PspA were nearly completely excluded. Furthermore, although MtM showed an abundance of Con A-binding glycoproteins, MtM-SMALPs appeared devoid of these species. Immune responses of healthcare workers harbouring 'latent TB infection' provided additional insights. While MtM-SMALPs and MtM induced comparable levels of the cytokine IFN-γ, only MtM-SMALPs could induce the production of TNF-α. Antibodies present in the donor sera showed significantly higher binding to MtM than to MtM-SMALPs. These results have implications for the development of MtM-based immunoprophylaxis against tuberculosis.


Asunto(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Estireno/química , Membrana Celular/química , Poliestirenos/química , Maleatos/análisis , Maleatos/química , Proteínas de la Membrana/química , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Lípidos/química , Membrana Dobles de Lípidos/química
17.
Front Microbiol ; 14: 1233605, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37731928

RESUMEN

It is widely acknowledged that conventional mining and extraction techniques have left many parts of the world with depleting coal reserves. A sustainable method for improving the recovery of natural gas from coalbeds involves enhancing the production of biogenic methane in coal mines. By taking a culture-independent approach, the diversity of the microbial community present in the formation water of an Indian reservoir was examined using 16S rRNA gene amplification in order to study the potential of microbial-enhanced coal bed methane (CBM) production from the deep thermogenic wells at a depth of 800-1200 m. Physicochemical characterization of formation water and coal samples was performed with the aim of understanding the in situ reservoir conditions that are most favorable for microbial CBM production. Microbial community analysis of formation water showed that bacteria were more abundant than archaea. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes were found as the most prevalent phyla in all the samples. These phyla play a crucial role in providing substrate for the process of methanogenesis by performing fermentative, hydrolytic, and syntrophic functions. Considerable variation in the abundance of microbial genera was observed amongst the selected CBM wells, potentially due to variable local geochemical conditions within the reservoir. The results of our study provide insights into the impact of geochemical factors on microbial distribution within the reservoir. Further, the study demonstrates lab-scale enhancement in methane production through nutrient amendment. It also focuses on understanding the microbial diversity of the Raniganj coalbed methane block using amplicon sequencing and further recognizing the potential of biogenic methane enhancement through microbial stimulation. The findings of the study will help as a reference for better strategization and implementation of on-site microbial stimulation for enhanced biogenic methane production in the future.

18.
Adv Ther ; 40(10): 4321-4338, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458875

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite availability of advanced therapies (ATs) for ulcerative colitis (UC), many patients fail to respond to treatment. This study examined real-world clinical and humanistic outcomes associated with current treatments in patients with UC. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used US data from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for inflammatory bowel disease from before (2017-2018) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021). Physicians (gastroenterologists) seeing > 5 patients/month reported patients' disease characteristics, current symptoms and treatments, and reasons for treatment choices for their next seven consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderately to severely active UC before current treatment. Patients were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. ATs included tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), integrin receptor antagonists, interleukin-12/23 antagonists, and Janus kinase inhibitors. Patients were classified as AT-naïve or AT-experienced based on current treatment received for ≥ 8 weeks and further classified as responders or non-responders based on symptoms, disease flare status, and remission. Descriptive analyses are presented. RESULTS: The 2017-2018 cohort included 92 physicians and 539 patients (208 [38.6%] AT-experienced). The 2020-2021 cohort included 73 physicians and 448 patients (349 [77.9%] AT-experienced). TNFis were the most common ATs. In 2017-2018, 195 (58.9%) AT-naïve and 113 (54.3%) AT-experienced patients were non-responders; in 2020-2021 this was 57 (57.6%) and 182 (52.1%). Efficacy and induction of remission were physicians' most common reasons for AT choice. Dislike of injections/infusions was the most common reason for eligible patients not receiving biologic therapy. Numerically, non-responders (both AT-naïve and AT-experienced) had more symptoms, overall pain and fatigue, and lower HRQoL scores than responders. CONCLUSIONS: Before (2017-2018) and during the pandemic (2020-2021), over half of patients with UC did not respond to AT. Non-responders carried a high burden of disease. Alternative therapies are urgently needed to treat UC.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Colitis Ulcerosa , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias
19.
Adv Ther ; 40(5): 2116-2146, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37000363

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The clinical benefits of advanced therapies (i.e., biologics and small-molecule drugs) in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) have been demonstrated; however, there is less clarity regarding the economic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of these treatments. We conducted a systematic literature review to synthesize data on cost, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and HRQoL for patients who received approved advanced therapies for moderate-to-severe UC in the United States and Europe. METHODS: Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), and EconLit were searched systematically to identify observational studies published between January 1, 2010 and October 14, 2021 that assessed the impact of advanced therapies on cost, HCRU, and/or HRQoL in adults with moderate-to-severe UC. Supplementary gray literature searches of conference proceedings from the past 4 years (January 2018 to October 2021) were also performed. RESULTS: 47 publications of 40 unique cost/HCRU studies and 13 publications of nine unique HRQoL studies were included. Findings demonstrated that biologics have a positive impact on indirect costs (i.e., productivity, presenteeism, and absenteeism) and HRQoL. High costs of biologics were not always fully offset by reductions in cost and HCRU associated with disease management. For many patients, treatment switching and dose escalations were required, thus increasing drug costs, particularly when switching across treatment classes. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight a high unmet need for therapies for moderate-to-severe UC that can reduce the healthcare burden and impact on society. Further research is warranted, as the reported evidence was limited by the small sample sizes of some treatment groups within a study.


Although advanced therapies, such as biologics and small-molecule drugs, have shown clinical benefit in treating moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis, their economic impact and effect on patients' quality of life is less clear. This study comprehensively reviewed the cost and use of healthcare resources associated with starting treatment with advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis, as well as the impact of these treatments on quality of life. We found that while biologics have a benefit on work productivity, work attendance, work absence, and quality of life, the high costs of biologics were not always fully met by reductions in disease management costs and healthcare resources. Many patients needed to switch treatments or required dose increases, which were expensive. There is a high unmet need for therapies for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis that can reduce healthcare costs, use of healthcare resources, and effect on society.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Colitis Ulcerosa , Adulto , Humanos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Medicina Estatal , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio
20.
Neurol Ther ; 12(3): 849-861, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37000386

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of ozanimod compared with commonly used disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: Annualized relapse rate (ARR) and safety data were obtained from a network meta-analysis (NMA) of clinical trials of RRMS treatments including ozanimod, fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate. ARR-related number needed to treat (NNT) relative to placebo and annual total MS-related healthcare costs was used to estimate the incremental annual cost per relapse avoided with ozanimod vs each DMT. ARR and adverse event (AE) data were combined with drug costs and healthcare costs to manage relapses and AEs in order to estimate annual cost savings with ozanimod vs other DMTs, assuming a 1 million USD fixed treatment budget. RESULTS: Treatment with ozanimod was associated with lower incremental annual healthcare costs to avoid a relapse, ranging from $843,684 vs interferon beta-1a (30 µg; 95% confidence interval [CI] - $1,431,619, - $255,749) to $72,847 (95% CI - $153,444, $7750) vs fingolimod. Compared with all other DMTs, ozanimod was associated with overall healthcare cost savings ranging from $8257 vs interferon beta-1a (30 µg) to $2178 vs fingolimod. Compared with oral DMTs, ozanimod was associated with annual cost savings of $6199 with teriflunomide 7 mg, $4737 with teriflunomide 14 mg, $2178 with fingolimod, and $2793 with dimethyl fumarate. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ozanimod was associated with substantial reductions in annual drug costs and total MS-related healthcare costs to avoid relapses compared with other DMTs. In the fixed-budget analysis, ozanimod demonstrated a favorable cost-effective profile relative to other DMTs.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA