Gender and occupational allergy: Report from the task force of the EAACI Environmental and Occupational Allergy Interest Group.

Women's work has traditionally been considered less hazardous to health in comparison with men's work. The increased women's participation in the workforce has led to an increased attention to women's working conditions. Women and men are unequally represented in individual professions or sectors (horizontal segregation), with women also under-represented in leadership positions (vertical segregation). The selection of specific occupations can result in differences between types and levels of occupational exposures among women and men and can affect prevalence of occupational allergy. Gender distribution of work-related asthma appears to vary across countries without clear global difference. Occupational rhinitis tends to be higher in women, although is not clear if this is related to a sex/gender effect or to differences in work exposure. Women are more likely to have occupational contact dermatitis, mainly due to wet work. No clear effects of gender on rates of hypersensitivity pneumonitis have been shown. Besides variation in exposures, physical and physiological characteristics, different behaviours and health consciousness have an impact on the occupational health hazards of women and men. Occupational allergy health promotion strategies need to consider approaches for women and men adjusted by gender, and legislative actions similarly could be implemented in a more gender-sensitive way.

Food processing and occupational respiratory allergy- An EAACI position paper.

Occupational exposure to foods is responsible for up to 25% of cases of occupational asthma and rhinitis. Animal and vegetable high-molecular-weight proteins present in aerosolized foods during food processing, additives, preservatives, antioxidants, and food contaminants are the main inhalant allergen sources. Most agents typically cause IgE-mediated allergic reactions, causing a distinct form of food allergy (Class 3 food allergy). The allergenicity of a food protein, allergen exposure levels, and atopy are important risk factors. Diagnosis relies on a thorough medical and occupational history, functional assessment, assessment of sensitization, including component-resolved diagnostics where appropriate, and in selected cases specific inhalation tests. Exposure assessment, including allergen determination, is a cornerstone for establishing preventive measures. Management includes allergen exposure avoidance or reduction (second best option), pharmacological treatment, assessment of impairment, and worker's compensation. Further studies are needed to identify and characterize major food allergens and define occupational exposure limits, evaluate the relative contribution of respiratory versus cutaneous sensitization to food antigens, evaluate the role of raw versus cooked food in influencing risk, and define the absolute or relative contraindication of patients with ingestion-related food allergy, pollinosis, or oral allergy syndrome continuing to work with exposure to aerosolized food allergens.

Occupational rhinitis and occupational asthma: Association or progression?

BACKGROUND: Occupational asthma is the most frequently reported occupational respiratory disease in registries, and is often co-diagnosed with occupational rhinitis. We undertook a systematic review of the English-language epidemiologic literature linking these two conditions, with emphasis on progression from occupational rhinitis to occupational asthma. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were queried in a series of structured searches designed to identify studies comparing occupational asthma and occupational rhinitis incidence or prevalence in occupationally exposed individuals. RESULTS: The searches yielded a total of 109 unique citations, 15 of which yielded inferential data on the occupational rhinitis-asthma relationship. Nine of fifteen studies showed statistically significant associations between the occurrence of occupational rhinitis and occupational asthma among individual workers. CONCLUSIONS: Limited data support the notion that occupational rhinitis precedes the development of occupational asthma, particularly when high-molecular-weight (HMW) agents are involved. The relationship between the two conditions could not be evaluated in many relevant studies due to a lack of cross-tabulation of individual cases.

Upper airway and eye involvement in polyurethane shoe sole production workers.

OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional study was aimed to investigate the prevalence of work-related upper and lower airway and eye symptoms in 118 workers in polyurethane shoe soles (PSS) production. METHODS: Workplace monitoring of methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) and solvents was performed. Subjects completed a study-specific questionnaire and underwent anterior rhinoscopy, skin prick tests for common aeroallergens, spirometry, nasal peak inspiratory (NPIF) and expiratory flow (NPEF). RESULTS: MDI and solvent levels were below threshold limit value-time-weighted average (TLW-TWA) except for two measures of dichloromethane and tetrachloroethylene, respectively, and in one measure of acetonitrile, which were higher then TLW-TWA. In exposed workers the prevalence of cough (p < 0.05) and nasal congestion at rhinoscopy (p = 0.05) was more frequent than in non-exposed workers. Occupational exposure (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.2-16.5) and a low FEV1 (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.3) were significant predictors of cough. CONCLUSIONS: In workers exposed to low levels of MDI and solvents in polyurethane shoe sole production there was a high prevalence of cough and nasal congestion. An improvement in the exhaust ventilation system and other preventive measures were needed.

Asthma and rhinitis in cleaning workers: a systematic review of epidemiological studies.

OBJECTIVE: This article presents a systematic review of epidemiological studies linking cleaning work and risk of asthma and rhinitis. METHODS: Published reports were identified from PubMed covering the years from 1976 through June 30, 2012. In total, we identified 24 papers for inclusion in the review. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement checklist of 22 items for cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies. RESULTS: Increased risk of asthma or rhinitis has been shown in 79% of included epidemiological studies. In four studies the increased risk of asthma in cleaning workers was confirmed by objective tests, such as bronchial hyper-reactivity or airflow obstruction. Level of exposure to cleaning products, cleaning sprays, bleach, ammonia, mixing products and specific job tasks has been identified as specific causes of asthma and rhinitis. CONCLUSIONS: Possible preventive measures encompass the substitution of cleaning sprays, bleach and ammonia, avoidance of mixing products, the use of respiratory protective devices, worker education and medical surveillance.

EAACI position paper on occupational rhinitis.

The present document is the result of a consensus reached by a panel of experts from European and non-European countries on Occupational Rhinitis (OR), a disease of emerging relevance which has received little attention in comparison to occupational asthma. The document covers the main items of OR including epidemiology, diagnosis, management, socio-economic impact, preventive strategies and medicolegal issues. An operational definition and classification of OR tailored on that of occupational asthma, as well as a diagnostic algorithm based on steps allowing for different levels of diagnostic evidence are proposed. The needs for future research are pointed out. Key messages are issued for each item.

Update on asthma and cleaning agents.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Asthma due to cleaning products has been known for 20 years, and the interest in this topic is still large because of the number of cleaning workers with respiratory problems. In this review, we sought to highlight the most recent findings on the relationship between exposure to cleaning products and asthma and to summarize the specific literature published between 2013 and 2016. RECENT FINDINGS: Women are confirmed as most of workers exposed to cleaning products and have a higher frequency than men of work-related respiratory symptoms and diseases. Many cases of asthma due to cleaning products occur in healthcare occupations. The increased risk of asthma has been shown to be related to the number of years in the job and to early life disadvantage. Recent evidence suggests that predisposition to adult-onset asthma may be related to interaction between genes and occupational exposure to low-molecular weight agents/irritants. There is some evidence that an irritant mechanism is more common, although several case reports showed animmunologic mechanism (e.g. disinfectants, amine compounds, aldehydes and fragrances). SUMMARY: The review updated recent findings on epidemiology, cleaning agents and their mechanism, and prevention of asthma due to cleaning agents. This article provides new information on the level of exposure, which is still high in professional cleaners and even more in domestic cleaners, and on the frequency of asthma in professional and domestic cleaners. An irritant mechanism is more common, although an immunological mechanism is possible, especially in healthcare workers exposed to disinfectants.

Occupational rhinitis affects occupational asthma severity.

BACKGROUND: The strong interactions between asthma and rhinitis, and the influence of rhinitis in the severity and/or control of asthma, have clearly been demonstrated. Nevertheless, no specific study has been conducted in the occupational setting. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the severity of occupational asthma and rhinitis and evaluate whether rhinitis is a predictor for increased asthma severity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of 72 patients who received a diagnosis of allergic occupational asthma, with or without associated occupational rhinitis. RESULTS: Our findings suggested that persistent asthma tended to be more common in subjects with associated occupational asthma and rhinitis, and occupational asthma severity was associated with occupational rhinitis severity. Moderate-severe persistent occupational rhinitis is a risk factor for persistent occupational asthma. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated, for the first time in the occupational setting, a significant association between occupational rhinitis and asthma severity.

Outcome of occupational asthma in patients with continuous exposure: a 3-year longitudinal study during pharmacologic treatment.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate (500 microg bid) and salmeterol (50 microg bid) on lung function and respiratory symptoms in 20 subjects with occupational asthma (OA) still exposed to the work environment cause of their disease. METHODS: At enrollment and every 6 months for 3 years, respiratory symptom score (from 0 [no symptoms] to 2 [moderate-to-severe symptoms]), spirometry, methacholine challenge, peak expiratory flow (PEF) variability, and the use of rescue salbutamol were evaluated. During the 3 years of follow-up, 10 subjects were excluded from the study because they retired or changed jobs. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Symptoms of work-related asthma started 12.6 +/- 13.1 years (mean +/- SD) before diagnosis. At baseline, mean FEV(1) was 80.2% of predicted values and provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1) (PD(20)) was 1,001 +/- 1,275 microg; the workers received 2.1 +/- 2.4 puffs of salbutamol per day. After 3 years, no significant differences in any of the morbidity outcomes (FEV(1), PD(20), PEF variability, use of rescue salbutamol, respiratory symptom score) were found as compared with baseline or run-in values. CONCLUSIONS: Regular treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators seems to prevent respiratory deterioration over a 3-year period in workers with mild-to-moderate persistent OA who were still exposed at work to the environmental cause of their disease.

Anaphylaxis as occupational risk.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anaphylaxis is a severe form of allergic reaction that may cause death. Main triggers of anaphylaxis have been reported to also cause occupational anaphylaxis (OcAn). The purpose of this article was to summarize the current scientific evidence on OcAn and review the specific literature published in 2012 and 2013. RECENT FINDINGS: Allergens derived from Hymenoptera and natural rubber latex are the most frequently reported triggers of OcAn, but other high and low-molecular weight agents have been described. Among the latter, foods, insects, snakes, chemicals, and medications have been described in the last 2 years. Furthermore, reviews on the clinical significance of immunological contact urticaria as a risk factor for systemic allergic reaction and on Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy have been published. SUMMARY: OcAn is a serious event, and several agents and occupations have been identified as responsible. In any occupational setting, where there is a worker with a history of previous anaphylactic reactions, and in occupations at greater risk, a written emergency management plan of anaphylaxis episodes, along with the availability of adrenaline and trained personnel, are mandatory. Venom immunotherapy should be considered for patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy.

Non-IgE-mediated and irritant-induced work-related rhinitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recently there has been growing interest in non-IgE-mediated and irritant-induced occupational rhinitis due to old and new low-molecular-weight and irritant agents. The purpose of this review is to summarize the scientific evidence on agents and work activities responsible for non-IgE-mediated and irritant-induced occupational rhinitis and work-exacerbated rhinitis published in 2011 and 2012. RECENT FINDINGS: Several epidemiological, surveillance and experimental studies, case reports and reviews showed that workers exposed to drugs, wood dust, chemicals, metals and biocides are at high risk of non-IgE-mediated and irritant-induced occupational rhinitis; among activities at risk are healthcare, antibiotic manufacturing and cleaning workers. Work-exacerbated rhinitis has not been specifically studied, but it is reasonable to expect that it is frequently associated with work-exacerbated asthma. Recently, work-related anosmia/microsmia, nasal polyps and sinusitis have also been described. Reducing or eliminating workplace exposure to the specific agent has been confirmed to be effective in preventing symptoms of nonallergic occupational rhinitis. SUMMARY: In consideration of the relevance of non-IgE-mediated and irritant-induced work-related rhinitis, physicians should recognize work-related rhinitis symptoms due to old and new low-molecular-weight and irritant agents. The mechanisms of non-IgE-mediated and irritant-induced occupational rhinitis remain largely unclear and need to be studied further. Substitution of responsible agents, reduction or elimination of exposure at the workplace should be enforced as effective measures.

Occupational rhinitis: consensus on diagnosis and medicolegal implications.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Work-related rhinitis is a common disease in many working groups, frequently associated with asthma. The purpose of this review is to summarize the specific literature published within the past 12 months, to discuss the diagnostic workup and to illustrate the medicolegal aspects pertaining to this disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, there has been a growing scientific interest in work-related rhinitis, which includes both occupational rhinitis and work-exacerbated rhinitis. The epidemiological relevance and the relationships to asthma have been evaluated. New etiologic agents and populations at risk have been identified. A new definition and classification, and a diagnostic algorithm, have been proposed. SUMMARY: In consideration of the epidemiological relevance and of the medicolegal implications, occupational rhinitis should be considered in daily clinical practice by all physicians. In adults with late-onset rhinitis, occupational causes should be queried and patients in whom an occupational association is suspected should be referred for specific assessments.

Rhinitis guidelines and implications for occupational rhinitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the most recent rhinitis guidelines in the aspects pertaining the link between rhinitis and work, and to summarize the specific literature on occupational rhinitis published in 2007 and 2008. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently there has been a growing scientific interest in work-related rhinitis. Health personnel, cleaners, bakers, apprentices in high-risk occupations, and workers exposed to multiple agents are at increased risk of rhinitis, especially in the very first years of employment. Flour allergens are often involved and may induce nonallergic and enhance allergic airway inflammation. The specific nasal challenge remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Acoustic rhinometry and nasal lavage are validated tools for monitoring nasal response. Occupational rhinitis seems to have an impact on quality of life of affected workers and allergic rhinitis impairs work productivity. SUMMARY: This review updated recent findings on epidemiology, mechanisms, diagnosis, management, and prevention of occupational rhinitis. This article also provides new information on the impact of occupational rhinitis on quality of life and on the impact of rhinitis on work productivity. Occupational rhinitis should be considered in daily clinical practice and research.

Does an asthma education program improve quality of life? A two-year randomized trial.

Asthma education programs result in clinical improvement. However, most studies involved programs of up to 1 year of follow-up, and their efficacy in improving quality of life (QoL) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a program of patient education in asthmatics over 2 years. Thirty-seven asthmatic patients were randomly allocated to group A (usual treatment) and 32 to group B (usual treatment plus patient education program). The effectiveness of the education program was evaluated by comparing morbidity outcomes at baseline and 12 and 24 months afterwards. At baseline, no intergroup difference emerged in age, sex, smoking, asthma severity, atopy, FEV1, symptom-free days, use of rescue salbutamol, and QoL. One year later, group B subjects had an improvement in the overall QoL (from 5.8 +/- 0.8 to 6.1 +/- 0.7, p < 0.005), and in "Activities" (from 5.3 +/- 0.9 to 5.7 +/- 0.8, p < 0.05) and "Environment" (from 6.4 +/- 1.0 to 6.8 +/- 0.4, p < 0.05) domains. Two years later the "Activities" domain score increased in group B (from 5.3 +/- 0.9 to 5.7 +/- 1.1, p < 0.05). QoL did not vary in group A. The education program was ineffective in all other parameters at both follow-up time-points. In group A, a significant increase in medication expenses and a significant decrease in rescue salbutamol use was found 1 and 2 years after baseline, respectively. In conclusion, this education program improved QoL for 1 year, but the improvement was not sustained in the 2nd year.