Comparison of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim to prevent neutropenia and maintain dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of prophylactic single fixed dose of pegfilgrastim and daily administration of filgrastim on febrile neutropenia (FN), severe neutropenia, treatment delay, and dose reduction in patients with breast cancer receiving dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with 1058 breast cancer patients matched by age and chemotherapy was conducted. The primary endpoints were FN, severe (grade 3, 4) neutropenia, dose reduction (>10 % reduction of the dose planned), and treatment delay (dose given more than 2 days later). RESULTS: Eighteen episodes of FN (3.4%) in the filgrastim group and 23 (4.3%) in the pegfilgrastim group (p = 0.500) were recorded. More than half of the total episodes (27/41) occurred during the first 4 cycles of treatment. Patients who received filgrastim were almost three times more likely to experience a severe neutropenia episode and were significantly more likely to experience a dose reduction (18.5%) compared to those who received pegfilgrastim (10.8%) (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients, who received their planned dose on time, was significantly lower in patients receiving filgrastim (58%) compared to those receiving pegfilgrastim (72.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was detected on FN rate between daily administration of filgrastim and single administration of pegfilgrastim. However, patients receiving pegfilgrastim had a significantly lower rate of severe neutropenia, as well as dose reduction and treatment delay, thus, achieving a higher dose density.

Genome-wide association study identifies 25 known breast cancer susceptibility loci as risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative (TN) breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with a unique set of epidemiologic and genetic risk factors. We conducted a two-stage genome-wide association study of TN breast cancer (stage 1: 1529 TN cases, 3399 controls; stage 2: 2148 cases, 1309 controls) to identify loci that influence TN breast cancer risk. Variants in the 19p13.1 and PTHLH loci showed genome-wide significant associations (P < 5 × 10(-) (8)) in stage 1 and 2 combined. Results also suggested a substantial enrichment of significantly associated variants among the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) analyzed in stage 2. Variants from 25 of 74 known breast cancer susceptibility loci were also associated with risk of TN breast cancer (P < 0.05). Associations with TN breast cancer were confirmed for 10 loci (LGR6, MDM4, CASP8, 2q35, 2p24.1, TERT-rs10069690, ESR1, TOX3, 19p13.1, RALY), and we identified associations with TN breast cancer for 15 additional breast cancer loci (P < 0.05: PEX14, 2q24.1, 2q31.1, ADAM29, EBF1, TCF7L2, 11q13.1, 11q24.3, 12p13.1, PTHLH, NTN4, 12q24, BRCA2, RAD51L1-rs2588809, MKL1). Further, two SNPs independent of previously reported signals in ESR1 [rs12525163 odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, P = 4.9 × 10(-) (4)] and 19p13.1 (rs1864112 OR = 0.84, P = 1.8 × 10(-) (9)) were associated with TN breast cancer. A polygenic risk score (PRS) for TN breast cancer based on known breast cancer risk variants showed a 4-fold difference in risk between the highest and lowest PRS quintiles (OR = 4.03, 95% confidence interval 3.46-4.70, P = 4.8 × 10(-) (69)). This translates to an absolute risk for TN breast cancer ranging from 0.8% to 3.4%, suggesting that genetic variation may be used for TN breast cancer risk prediction.

alphaB-crystallin is a marker of aggressive breast cancer behavior but does not independently predict for patient outcome: a combined analysis of two randomized studies.

BACKGROUND: alphaB-crystallin is a small heat shock protein that has recently been characterized as an oncoprotein correlating with the basal core phenotype and with negative prognostic factors in breast carcinomas. The purpose of this study was to evaluate alphaB-crystallin with respect to clinicopathological parameters and the outcome of patients with operable high-risk breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 940 tumors were examined, derived from an equal number of patients who had participated in two randomized clinical trials (paclitaxel-containing regimen in 793 cases). Immunohistochemistry for ER, PgR, HER2, Ki67, CK5, CK14, CK17, EGFR, alphaB-crystallin, BRCA1 and p53 was performed. BRCA1 mutation data were available in 89 cases. RESULTS: alphaß-crystallin was expressed in 170 cases (18.1%) and more frequently in triple-negative breast carcinomas (TNBC) (45% vs. 14.5% non-TNBC, p < 0.001). alphaB-crystallin protein expression was significantly associated with high Ki67 (Pearson chi-square test, p < 0.001), p53 (p = 0.002) and basal cytokeratin protein expression (p < 0.001), BRCA1 mutations (p = 0.045) and negative ER (p < 0.001) and PgR (p < 0.001). Its overexpression, defined as >30% positive neoplastic cells, was associated with adverse overall survival (Wald's p = 0.046). However, alphaB-crystallin was not an independent prognostic factor upon multivariate analysis. No interaction between taxane-based therapy and aß-crystallin expression was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In operable high-risk breast cancer, alphaB-crystallin protein expression is associated with poor prognostic features indicating aggressive tumor behavior, but it does not seem to have an independent impact on patient survival or to interfere with taxane-based therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ACTRN12611000506998 (HE10/97 trial) and ACTRN12609001036202 (HE10/00 trial).

Topoisomerase II alpha gene amplification is a favorable prognostic factor in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab.

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with trastuzumab eventually develop resistance to this agent. There is an unmet need therefore, for identifying biological markers with possible prognostic/predictive value in such patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic role of topoisomerase II alpha gene (TOP2A) amplification and protein (TopoIIa) expression in patients treated with trastuzumab-containing regimens. METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples were retrospectively collected from 225 eligible patients treated with trastuzumab. Protein expression of ER, PgR, Ki67, PTEN, HER2 and TopoIIa were centrally assessed by immunohistochemistry. HER2 and TOP2A gene amplification was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. PIK3CA mutations were identified by single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping. Survival was evaluated from the initiation of trastuzumab as 1st line treatment to the date of last follow-up or death. RESULTS: Among the 225 samples analyzed, only 137 (61%) were found to be HER2-positive. TOP2A was amplified in 41% and deleted in 16% of such tumors. TOP2A gene amplification was more frequent in ER-negative tumors. TopoIIa protein expression was observed in the majority (65%) of the samples and was associated with ER-positive status, high Ki67 expression, presence of PTEN protein and PIK3CA mutations. Median follow-up for patients treated in the 1st line was 51 months. Survival was more prolonged with trastuzumab-containing treatment in HER2-positive patients (50 months, log-rank, p=0.007). TOP2A non-amplified or deleted tumors were associated with increased risk for death compared to TOP2A amplified tumors (HR=2.16, Wald's p=0.010 and HR=2.67, p=0.009, respectively). In multivariate analysis, a significant interaction of TOP2A with anthracycline treatment (either in the adjuvant or the 1st line setting) was observed for survival (Wald's p=0.015). Among the TOP2A amplified subgroup, anthracycline-treated patients were associated with decreased risk for death. CONCLUSIONS: TOP2A gene amplification was shown to be a favorable prognostic marker in HER2-positive MBC patients treated with trastuzumab, such an effect however, appears to rather be related to treatment with anthracyclines (predictive marker for benefit from anthracyclines). The results of the present retrospective study warrant validation in larger cohorts of patients treated in the context of randomized trials.

Treatment adherence of cancer patients to orally administered chemotherapy: insights from a Greek study using a self-reported questionnaire.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective observational study was to investigate the patterns of treatment adherence to orally administered chemotherapy of patients being treated for cancer. METHODS: Patients were asked to participate in the survey during their visits to the study centers' pharmacists or doctors to obtain their oral medication from April 2008 until May 2009. The data were collected using a self-reported anonymous 7-page long questionnaire, which contained questions about their demographic profile, disease and treatment characteristics, and side-effects and adherence information, both intentional and nonintentional. RESULTS: 99 Patients completed the questionnaire. Missing values ranged from 1% to 8%. Unintended nonadherence to therapy was reported by 19 patients. The most important factor correlating with unintended nonadherence was the patient's belief regarding treatment effectiveness since only 16.7% of the patients believing that their treatment is effective reported nonadherence as opposed to 62.5% for those that did not believe that treatment is effective (p=0.03). Intentional nonadherence was reported by 14 patients The most important factor correlating to intentional nonadherence was time since disease diagnosis, as nonadherence was reported by 33.3% of the patients having the disease less than 6 months, compared to 16.7% for those between 6 and 24 months and 8.3% for those between 2 and 5 years (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Greek patients seem to have similar nonadherence pattern as in other countries. Confidence in treatment efficacy appeared as a significant adherence determinant.

Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lapatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2, also referred to as HER2/neu) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is active in combination with capecitabine in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after trastuzumab-based therapy. In this trial, we compared lapatinib plus capecitabine with capecitabine alone in such patients. METHODS: Women with HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after treatment with regimens that included an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab were randomly assigned to receive either combination therapy (lapatinib at a dose of 1250 mg per day continuously plus capecitabine at a dose of 2000 mg per square meter of body-surface area on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle) or monotherapy (capecitabine alone at a dose of 2500 mg per square meter on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle). The primary end point was time to progression, based on an evaluation by independent reviewers under blinded conditions. RESULTS: The interim analysis of time to progression met specified criteria for early reporting on the basis of superiority in the combination-therapy group. The hazard ratio for the independently assessed time to progression was 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.71; P<0.001), with 49 events in the combination-therapy group and 72 events in the monotherapy group. The median time to progression was 8.4 months in the combination-therapy group as compared with 4.4 months in the monotherapy group. This improvement was achieved without an increase in serious toxic effects or symptomatic cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS: Lapatinib plus capecitabine is superior to capecitabine alone in women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer that has progressed after treatment with regimens that included an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00078572 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Gene expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and microtubule-associated protein Tau in high-risk early breast cancer: a quest for molecular predictors of treatment benefit in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial.

BACKGROUND: Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) protein expression carry weak prognostic and moderate predictive utility for the outcome of early breast cancer patients on adjuvant chemohormonotherapy. We sought to study the predictive significance and correlations of transcriptional profiling of the ER, PgR and microtubule-associated protein Tau (MAP-Tau) genes in early breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Messenger RNA (mRNA) was extracted from 279 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas (T1-3N0-1M0) of patients enrolled in the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) trial HE 10/97, evaluating epirubicin-alkylator based adjuvant chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel (E-T-CMF versus E-CMF). Kinetic reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (kRT-PCR) was applied for assessment of the expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and MAP-Tau genes in 274 evaluable patients. Cohort-based cut-offs were defined at the 25th percentile mRNA value for ER and PgR and the median for MAP-Tau. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten patients (77%) were ER and/or PgR-positive by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Positive ER and MAP-Tau mRNA status was significantly associated with administration of hormonal therapy and low grade, while MAP-Tau mRNA status correlated with premenopausal patient status. MAP-Tau strongly correlated with ER and PgR mRNA status (Spearmann r = 0.52 and 0.64, P < 0.001). The observed chance corrected agreement between determination of hormonal receptor status by kRT-PCR and IHC was moderate (Kappa = 0.41) for ER and fair (Kappa = 0.33) for PgR. At a median follow-up of 8 years, univariate analysis adjusted for treatment showed positive ER mRNA status to be of borderline significance for reduced risk of relapse (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.41-1.01, P = 0.055) and death (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.36-1.05, P = 0.077), while positive MAP-Tau mRNA status was significantly associated with reduced risk of relapse (HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.78, P = 0.002) and death (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.29-0.83, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, only axillary nodal metastases (HR = 2.33, 95% CI 1.05-5.16, P = 0.04) and MAP-Tau mRNA status (HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.85, P = 0.01) independently predicted patient outcome. However, MAP-Tau mRNA levels did not predict enhanced benefit from inclusion of paclitaxel in the adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (test for interaction P = 0.99). No correlation was evident between increasing ER and PgR mRNA transcription and increasing benefit from endocrine therapy in 203 ER and/or PgR IHC-positive patients receiving adjuvant hormone therapy (Wald P = 0.54 for ER, 0.51 for PR). CONCLUSIONS: ER gene transcription carries weak predictive significance for benefit from endocrine therapy or for outcome, with no apparent dose-response association. The predictive significance is possibly exerted via MAP-Tau gene expression, an ER-inducible tubulin modulator with strong predictive significance for patient outcome. However, MAP-Tau mRNA did not predict benefit from the addition of a taxane to adjuvant chemotherapy. Further study of the biologic function and utility of MAP-Tau for individualising adjuvant therapy is warranted.

Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case-control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human granulocyte-colony-stimulating factors such as filgrastim and pegfilgrastim have been employed as primary and secondary prophylaxis against neutropenia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This study was conducted to evaluate the rate of febrile neutropenia in patients with high-risk early breast cancer receiving dose-dense chemotherapy and, as primary prophylaxis, either pegfilgrastim 6 mg fixed dose on the same day as chemotherapy or filgrastim on days 2-10 of each cycle. Secondary objectives included the rate of severe neutropenia, treatment delays and dose reductions. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized matched case-control study with 214 patients receiving dose-dense chemotherapy. Each group receiving supportive therapy included 107 patients (pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups). RESULTS: Fourteen patients (13%) in the pegfilgrastim group developed febrile neutropenia as compared to 1 patient (1%) in the filgrastim group (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences regarding the rate of severe neutropenia, treatment delays and dose reductions were observed. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that pegfilgrastim administered as primary prophylaxis on the same day as dose-dense chemotherapy is less efficacious than filgrastim administered on days 2-10 of each chemotherapy cycle. For the particular regimens given in this retrospective matched case-control study, the current recommendation for administering pegfilgrastim at least 24 h after chemotherapy completion seems justified. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify this finding.

Trastuzumab combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer. phase II Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) with biomarker evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Combination of trastuzumab and anthracyclines in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is precluded due to cardiotoxicity. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is the least cardiotoxic among the anthracyclines. We performed a phase II study of trastuzumab and PLD with biomarker evaluation. METHODS: Patients with MBC and HER2 overexpression, assessed as 3+ at local laboratories, received trastuzumab 8 mg/kg as loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg in combination with PLD 30 mg/m(2), both given every 3 weeks. To be eligible, patients should have received first-line chemotherapy for MBC or should have relapsed within a year of adjuvant taxane. Tumor tissue blocks were collected for central review and exploratory biomarker evaluation. Left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was closely monitored by cardiac ultrasound. RESULTS: Among 37 patients, an overall response rate of 22% was observed with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.5 months (0.8-31.1, 95% CI 2.7-10.3) and a survival of 18.7 months (1.6-40.8, 95% CI 3.7-33.7). No decline in LVEF was noticed. Overexpression of mTOR and TOP2A gene alterations were associated with better PFS. PTEN gene deletion was associated with resistance to treatment. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab combined with PLD every 3 weeks is feasible, effective and safe in HER2-positive patients.

A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses.

PURPOSE: Lapatinib is a small molecule, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2). Initial results of a phase III trial demonstrated that lapatinib plus capecitabine is superior to capecitabine alone in women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer that progressed following prior therapy including trastuzumab. Updated efficacy and initial biomarker results from this trial are reported. METHODS: Women with HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-, taxane-, and trastuzumab-containing regimens were randomized to lapatinib 1,250 mg/day continuously plus capecitabine 2,000 mg/m(2) days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle or capecitabine 2,500 mg/m(2) on the same schedule. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) as determined by an independent review panel. Relationship between progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor HER2 expression and serum levels of HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) were assessed. RESULTS: 399 women were randomized. The addition of lapatinib prolonged TTP with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.43-0.77; P < 0.001) and provided a trend toward improved overall survival (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.55-1.12, P = 0.177), and fewer cases with CNS involvement at first progression (4 vs. 13, P = 0.045). Baseline serum HER2 ECD did not predict for benefit from lapatinib. CONCLUSION: The addition of lapatinib to capecitabine provides superior efficacy for women with HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer progressing after treatment with anthracycline-, taxane-, and trastuzumab-based therapy. Biomarker studies could not identify a subgroup of patients who failed to benefit from the addition of lapatinib to capecitabine.

Potential value of PTEN in predicting cetuximab response in colorectal cancer: an exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is over-expressed in 70-75% of colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRC). The anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab has been approved for the treatment of metastatic CRC, however tumor response to cetuximab has not been found to be associated with EGFR over-expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The aim of this study was to explore EGFR and the downstream effector phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN) as potential predictors of response to cetuximab. METHODS: CRC patients treated with cetuximab by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology group, whose formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue was available, were included. Tissue was tested for EGFR and PTEN by IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were identified and 72 were included based on the availability of tissue blocks with adequate material for analysis on them. All patients, except one, received cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 53 months from diagnosis and 17 months from cetuximab initiation. At the time of the analysis 53% of the patients had died. Best response was complete response in one and partial response in 23 patients. In 16 patients disease stabilized. Lack of PTEN gene amplification was associated with more responses to cetuximab and longer time to progression (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: PTEN could be one of the molecular determinants of cetuximab response. Due to the heterogeneity of the population and the retrospective nature of the study, our results are hypothesis generating and should be approached with caution. Further prospective studies are needed to validate this finding.

Comparison of HER2 detection methods between central and regional laboratories in Greece.

PURPOSE: HER2 gene amplification and overexpression is associated with aggressive breast cancer and poor prognosis. Accurate HER2 testing of patients with breast cancer before treatment is important to ensure that as many patients with HER2-positive breast cancer as possible receive the most appropriate treatment and that women with HER2-negative disease avoid a potentially toxic therapy. This study compares immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) HER2 testing at central and regional laboratories in Greece. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The HER2 status of 458 breast cancer samples was determined by IHC in central and regional laboratories using commercially available anti-HER2 antibodies. FISH analysis, scored as number of signals or a ratio, was subsequently performed by the central laboratory on most samples. Various statistical analyses were used to examine concordance between test center results. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry HER2 testing was successfully performed on 445 samples in the central laboratory and 381 samples in regional laboratories, with good concordance between central and regional laboratories. After FISH analyses of a large proportion of these samples, good correlation was observed between FISH HER2 status and IHC results from the central laboratory but not from regional laboratories. These data suggest that HER2 status determined by IHC in a central laboratory is generally more accurate than that determined by a regional laboratory. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of accurate HER2 testing and the need to continually check the reproducibility and reliability of the test.

Expression of a molecular marker panel as a prognostic tool in gastric cancer patients treated postoperatively with docetaxel and irinotecan. A study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the prognostic role of vascular epidermal growth factor (VEGF), thymidylate synthase (TS), topoisomerase I (Topo-I), topoisomerase IIalpha (Topo-IIalpha) and E-cadherin (E-cadh) tumor expression, in patients with resectable gastric cancer, who were treated postoperatively with the docetaxel/irinotecan combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with resectable gastric cancer were treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 and irinotecan 110 m/m2 on day 1 and d8 every 21 days. All specimens were examined by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the expression of VEGF, TS, Topo-I, Topo-IIalpha and E-cadh. RESULTS: Positivity for TS was significantly correlated with age and for VEGF with diffuse histological type and good PS. No significant correlation was observed among Topo-I, Topo-IIalpha and E-cadh positivity with any of the clinicopathological parameters studied. Median overall survival (OS) was 31.7, and disease-free survival (DFS) 26 months, respectively. None of the above-investigated molecular markers were significantly associated with OS and DFS. Finally, according to the univariate analysis for survival, only advanced stages (III, IV) of the disease implied risk of death, mainly due to lymph node involvement and, to a lesser extent, tumor size. None of the studied molecular markers were found to be independent prognostic markers. CONCLUSION: These results should be interpreted very cautiously, due to the limited number of patients studied, as well as the limitations of the IHC technique.

Evaluation of the prognostic role of a panel of biomarkers in stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a highly lethal disease worldwide and research for more effective treatment strategies is ongoing. Identification of molecular prognostic and predictive markers remains under investigation with results that are often conflicting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients (n= 73) with stage IB-IIIA completely resected NSCLC who were postoperatively treated with 6 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin from July 1998 to September 2002 took part in this study. Most stage IIIA patients subsequently received adjuvant radiotherapy. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), vascular endorhelial growth factor (VEGF), dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (DDH), receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells (RCAS-1) and epidermic growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER-1) expression were assessed immunohistochemically; Heregulin family (HER1-4), VEGF and p53 were analysed by RT-PCR. RESULTS: Totally, 61 (84%) men and 12 (16%) women with median age of 63 years and median PS of 0 were included in the study. There were 18 stage IB, 29 stage II and 26 stage IIIA patients. Sixty-seven samples were available for immunohistohemistry. COX-2 expression was detected in 24 patients (36%), VEGF in 14 (21%), RCAS1 in 31 (46%), DDH in 15 (22%). For EGFR, only 58 samples were evaluated, 13 of which were positive (22%). Messenger RNA expression data was only available for 60 patients; VEGF was detected in 32 (53%), p53 in 30 (50%), EGFR in 35 (58%), HER2 in 4 (7%) and HER3 in 19 (32%). HER4 was not detected in any sample. In the Cox analysis for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), none of the factors evaluated by IHC or RT-PCR reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Even though the biomarkers tested are expressed in a significant proportion of lung tumors, none of them was found to be of prognostic significance in patients with NSCLC.

Combination of topotecan and cisplatin in relapsed patients with small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the hellenic cooperative oncology group (HeCOG).

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of a 3-day schedule of cisplatin and topotecan in patients with recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Thirty-four relapsed patients were treated with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and topotecan 0.9 mg/m2, both given on days 1-3 every 3 weeks, in a phase II study. RESULTS: Complete response (CR) was achieved in two patients (6%), partial response (PR) in 4 (12%), stable disease in 6 (18%) and progressive disease in 14 (41%). Eight patients (23%) were non-evaluable for response. Among 21 sensitive patients, 2 (9.5%) achieved CR and 3 (14%) PR. Among 13 refractory patients, none achieved CR and only 1 (8%) PR. Median survival was 6.5 months for all patients, 7.8 for sensitive and 6.2 for refractory. Median time to progression (TTP) was 4.4 months for all patients, 5.9 for sensitive and 3.2 for refractory. Grade 3-4 toxicities included anemia (15%), thrombocytopenia (15%), neutropenia (42%), nausea/vomiting (3%), and alopecia (6%). No toxic death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-day schedule was well tolerated, produced modest response rates but good survival and TTP both in sensitive and refractory patients with relapsed SCLC.

Adjuvant dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, CMF, and weekly docetaxel is feasible and safe in patients with operable breast cancer.

Currently, randomized phase III trials have demonstrated that docetaxel is an effective strategy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. However, previous attempts to incorporate docetaxel with an anthracycline in a dose-dense regimen have been unsuccessful. Therefore, new schedules containing both drugs should be explored. Forty-four patients with high-risk operable breast cancer entered this feasibility study. They were treated with three cycles of epirubicin 110 mg/m2 every 2 wk with G-CSF followed by three cycles of "intensified" CMF (840 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide; 57 mg/m2 methotrexate; 840 mg/m2 fluorouracil) every 2 wk with G-CSF followed 3 wk later by nine weekly cycles of 35 mg/m2 docetaxel (E-CMF-doc). Totally, 39 patients (89%) received all cycles of chemotherapy. The vast majority (92%) of cycles were administered at full dose. Therefore, dose intensity was sufficiently maintained for all drugs. Toxicity was generally mild to moderate. Most frequently recorded side effects apart from alopecia were neutropenia (54%) and nausea/vomiting (89%). Infection developed in nine patients. Two cases of febrile neutropenia were reported. The E-CMF-doc regimen, as used in this study, is feasible and well tolerated. Its impact on survival should be evaluated in phase III trials.

Temozolomide for the treatment of brain metastases associated with metastatic melanoma: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: Temozolomide is a well-tolerated oral alkylating agent with activity in the CNS. A multicenter, open-label, phase II study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of temozolomide in patients with brain metastases from metastatic melanoma (MM) who did not require immediate radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed MM to the brain, and no prior radiotherapy or radiosurgery for brain metastases. Previously untreated patients received temozolomide at 200 mg/m(2)/d x 5 days; previously treated patients received 150 mg/m(2)/d x 5 days every 28 days. Treatment continued for 1 year or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Of 151 patients enrolled, 117 had received no prior systemic chemotherapy, and 34 had received prior chemotherapy for MM. Among previously untreated patients, 25% had more than four brain lesions, eight (7%) achieved an objective response (one complete and seven partial), and 34 (29%) had stable disease in brain metastases. Median overall survival was 3.5 months. Among previously treated patients, 21% had more than four brain lesions, one had a partial response, and six (18%) had stable disease in brain metastases. Median overall survival was 2.2 months. Temozolomide was well tolerated, with four (3%) patients discontinuing because of adverse events. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included thrombocytopenia (3%), neutropenia (2%), and leukopenia (1%). Headache (9%) and vomiting (8%) were the most common nonhematologic grade 3/4 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide was well tolerated and demonstrated activity in the treatment of brain metastases from MM. Further evaluation of temozolomide combination therapy is warranted.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE: We conducted this randomized study comparing the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel and gemcitabine (PG) and paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) combinations for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus either carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 on day 1 (group A) or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (group B) every 3 weeks. A retrospective cost analysis was conducted using Student's t test to compare independent samples between groups. RESULTS: A total of 509 patients (group A, 252 patients; group B, 257 patients) were enrolled; all characteristics were well balanced. The median survival time was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8 to 12 months) for group A and 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.0 to 11.7 months) for group B (P =.32). Respective 1-year survival rates were 41.7% and 41.4%. The response rate for group A was 28.0% (2% complete response [CR], 26% partial response [PR] [95% CI, 22% to 34%]), and the response rate for group B was 35.0% (5% CR, 30% PR) [95% CI, 29% to 41%]) (P =.12). Toxicity was mild. Grades 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia for groups A and B were seen in 15% and 15%, 2% and 1%, and 5% and 2%, respectively. The mean total cost (outpatient clinic visits plus chemotherapy drug fee) for group A (euro; 7,612.64) versus group B (euro; 7,484.77) was not statistically significant (P <.66). CONCLUSION: The PG combination is as equally active and well tolerated as the PC combination in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Gemcitabine plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer resistant/refractory to platinum and/or taxanes. A HeCOG phase II study.

BACKGROUND: A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum- and/or taxane-resistant/refractory advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (pts), who had been treated with platinum or paclitaxel and met the criteria of resistant/refractory AEOC, received GEM 650 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 and PLD 25 mg/m2 day 1 every 4 weeks up to a total of 6 cycles, unless disease progression or adverse effects prohibited further therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients entered the study. There was 1 complete (3%) and 7 partial responses (19%) for an overall response rate of 22%. Two patients had stable disease (5.5%). After a median follow-up of 16.2 months, the median survival was 8.4 months and time to treatment failure 2.7 months. The most frequent severe toxicity was myelosuppression recorded in 13 (35%) patients. Severe stomatitis was recorded in only 2 (5%) cases and severe palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia in 1 patient. One severe allergic reaction (grade 4) to PLD was recorded following the third cycle of treatment. CONCLUSION: The combination of GEM and PLD in patients with AEOC, who are resistant/ refractory to platinum and/or Taxanes, did not show any superiority over monotherapy. However, in view of the acceptable toxicity profile, the above combination may deserve further investigation in a randomised setting.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, leucovorin, and continuous infusion fluorouracil followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Study.

The primary objective of this phase II study was to access the complete response (CR) rate to a new innovative induction regimen in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC). From October 2000 until October 2003 a total of 38 eligible patients (33 men and 5 women) entered the study. The large majority of them presented with a performance status of 0-1 and with clinical stage IV disease. Treatment consisted of three cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC) with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-h infusion on d 1, leucovorin (LV) 200 mg/m2 over 20 min immediately followed by FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and then 600 mg/m2 as a 24-h continuous infusion on d 1 and 2 and a cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1-h infusion on d 2 every 3 wk. This was then followed by radiation (70 Gy) and weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2. After the completion of IC, 6/38 (16%) patients had CR. The CR rate was increased to 66% post-concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Neutropenia (37.5%), pain (62%), nausea/vomiting (21%), and alopecia (79%) were the most frequent side effects during IC. The most pronounced toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were stomatitis (62.5%) and xerostomia (53%). Median time to progression was 11.0 mo and median survival 16.7 mo. One- and 2-yr survival rates were 73% and 38%, respectively. In conclusion, this novel induction regimen is active, is well tolerated, and can be successfully followed by CCRT with weekly cisplatin. CCRT should remain standard treatment for patients with LA-HNC. Novel induction combinations, such as that reported in the present study, should be evaluated in combination with CCRT only in the context of clinical trials.