RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers the advantage of a 3-dimensional representation of the anatomic relationship of the mandibular third molar tooth and the inferior alveolar canal (IAC), as compared to a panoramic radiograph. We hypothesized that a novel method of categorizing the degrees of compression of the IAC were reliable predictors for postoperative nerve injuries. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the outcomes in third molar surgery for patients who obtained a CBCT scan in additional to a plain film radiograph over a 12 months period and underwent surgical removal of their mandibular third molars; 257 consecutive patients were identified, and 416 mandibular third molars were surgically removed. RESULTS: Patients who had severe compression of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) on CBCT imaging had a significantly increased risk of a postoperative IAN injury (P = .0068, OR = 3.47, 95% CI: 1.40 to 8.54) and accounted for 52.17% of all IAN injuries. Ninety-one percent of all cases of postoperative nerve injury occurred in female patients. The mean age of patients with a postoperative IAN injury (30.2 years) was significantly higher than those without injury 26.0 years; (P = .016, 95%CI: 25.11 to 33.80) CONCLUSIONS: In addition to patient factors, assessment of the degree of compression on a preoperative CBCT image is a useful tool for predicting outcomes in mandibular third molar surgery. In cases of severe compression of the IAC, patients are at a significantly increased risk of postoperative IAN injury.
Asunto(s)
Diente Impactado , Traumatismos del Nervio Trigémino , Adulto , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Femenino , Humanos , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagen , Mandíbula/cirugía , Nervio Mandibular/diagnóstico por imagen , Tercer Molar/diagnóstico por imagen , Tercer Molar/cirugía , Radiografía Panorámica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Extracción Dental/efectos adversos , Traumatismos del Nervio Trigémino/etiologíaRESUMEN
Dental emergencies are common reasons for presenting to hospital emergency departments. Here, we discuss the panoramic radiograph (orthopantomogram (OPG, OPT) as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of mandibular trauma and odontogenic infections. In this article, we review the radiographic principles of image acquisition, and how to conduct a systematic interpretation of represented maxillofacial anatomy. The aim is to equip the emergency physician with the skills to use the OPG radiograph when available, and to rapidly assess the image to expedite patient management. Included is a discussion of a number of cases seen in the emergency setting and some common errors in diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Huesos Faciales/diagnóstico por imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radiografía Panorámica/métodos , Huesos Faciales/anatomía & histología , Huesos Faciales/lesiones , Humanos , Infecciones/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones/microbiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/diagnóstico por imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Panorámica/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Dentales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Dentales/microbiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the expectations and experiences of a sample of new patients visiting an Australian regional university Student Dental Clinic with regard to anxiety provoking and alleviating stimuli in the clinical environment. Differences in anxiety levels were examined by age, gender and the type of procedure undergone. METHODS: The number of dental patients who participated in the study was 102 (56 males, 43 females). The study used a pre-treatment/post-treatment design to assess the effect of the dental procedure on anxiety levels of patients. The Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) was used to measure anxiety levels in patients at pre-treatment. Questions were also asked about factors which may increase (length of the appointment, invasiveness of procedure) or decrease (perceived student interpersonal skills and clinical ability) dental fear. RESULTS: Females reported higher total MDAS scores (M = 11.93) compared to males (M = 9.94). Younger patients (M = 12.15) had higher dental anxiety than older patients (M = 9.34). There was a reduction in dental anxiety from pre-treatment (M = 1.92) to post-treatment (M = 1.23) on the single item anxiety measure though most of the treatment being undergone by patients was for less complex procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' anticipatory experience of anxiety was higher than the anxiety experience after having undergone treatment at the student dental clinic. Student interpersonal skills and clinical ability as perceived by the patient can lessen dental anxiety in patients. Clinical Supervisor-student ratios need to be more equivalent in order to reduce the time length of appointments which currently are associated with increased patient anxiety levels in student dental clinics.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/psicología , Servicios de Salud para Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Australia/epidemiología , Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/epidemiología , Ansiedad al Tratamiento Odontológico/etiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the incidence, aetiology, and patterns of maxillofacial fracture presentations during the various stages of the 2020 Melbourne COVID-19 lockdown restrictions to periods outside lockdown in 2019 and 2020. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 344 subjects. The patterns of facial trauma presentations to a tertiary hospital in metropolitan Melbourne during the 2020 COVID-19 restrictions were compared to periods with no restrictions over 22 months from March 2019 to December 2020. RESULTS: The incidence of maxillofacial fractures decreased by 28% during lockdown (0.41 vs. 0.57 injuries/day, P = 0.0003). Falls overtook interpersonal violence as the leading cause of fractures (44% of lockdown presentations vs. 25.7% of presentations outside lockdown, P = 0.002), while sporting injuries dropped drastically (4% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.005). Lockdowns saw an increase in the proportion of female patients (40% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.03) and a fivefold increase in proportion of domestic violence-related fractures (6.7% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.006). Alcohol-related injuries decreased significantly (11% vs. 21%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: While restrictions reduced rates of interpersonal violence and alcohol-related maxillofacial trauma, there was a higher proportion of injuries to females, increased falls, and domestic violence-related injuries.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fracturas Óseas , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales , Humanos , Femenino , Violencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/complicaciones , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Maxilofaciales/etiología , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Australia , Accidentes de TránsitoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Odontogenic infections (OI) are a preventable disease commonly managed in a tertiary hospital setting. Prevention of severe infections and hospitalisation relies on timely access to primary dental care. This study outlines the pre-hospital treatment of patients presenting to hospital with OIs and the association between travel distance from the patients' residence to a tertiary hospital oral and maxillofacial surgical (OMS) unit. METHODS: This study analysed patients who initially presented hospital with an OI. Patient demographics, pre-hospital treatment, and clinical markers of severity were recorded. The travel distance from the patient's residence to the hospital was recorded in kilometers, along with any inter-hospital transfer via road/air ambulance. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-seven patients were included in this study, 17.2% required an inter-hospital transfer. Of these patients, 70.3% had prior treatment before hospitalisation, and antibiotics without source control was the most frequent treatment (83.1%). The mean travel distance for patients with more severe markers of infection significantly greater than patients with minor infections (p = < .001). Patients who required an inter-hospital transfer accounted for most cases with airway compromise requiring ICU admission. CONCLUSION: This study found that most patients presenting to hospital with an OI had received antibiotics alone as treatment before hospitalisation. The travel distance from a tertiary hospital with OMS services had a significant correlation to more severe infections. This has important public health implications for the allocation of preventative dental services, and patient access to OMS services.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of redrainage in odontogenic orofacial infections and evaluate possible risk factors. The investigators hypothesized that wait times to first surgery >48 hours and clinical risk factors may predispose patients to higher rates of redrainage. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred nineteen patients who underwent surgical drainage for odontogenic orofacial infections over an 8-year period were identified through Western Health electronic medical records. The primary outcome measure was the rate of redrainage. Secondary outcomes included total length of hospital stay and intensive care unit admission and length of stay. Stratified risk factors were analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test to produce a total overall estimate risk ratio (forest plot). RESULTS: Of 219 patients, 16 (7.3%) required at least 1 return to theater for redrainage. First surgery wait times >48 hours, multispace infection, C-reactive protein ≥150, trismus, and immunosuppression were associated with a significantly increased risk of redrainage (88%; combined risk ratio = 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.69; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: To minimize the risk of redrainage, patients with orofacial infections requiring surgery should undergo surgery within 48 hours of presentation to hospital, particularly when presenting with an elevated C-reactive protein ≥150, trismus, immunosuppression, or multispace involvement.