Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
CANNT J ; 19(3): 39-41, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19899498

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate epoetin alfa drug costs in hemodialysis (HD) patients after a province-wide switch from multidose vials (MDV) to prefilled syringes (PFS). METHODS: A retrospective study of epoetin alfa drug costs and estimated doses based on these costs during a six-month period of MDV usage (2007) were compared to a PFS usage period (2008). Data were collected from quarterly counts of HD patients receiving epoetin alfa in the Manitoba Renal Program (MRP) and monthly inventory billing records. RESULTS: 756 patients who received epoetin alfa MDV were compared to 799 patients who received epoetin alfa PFS. Average weekly dose calculated from drug costs was 13,282 units (MDV) versus 11,689 units (PFS). Average weekly costs were $195.71 (MDV) versus $183.23 (PFS). This translated to an estimated $12.48 per patient per week in savings ($518,519 annual savings across the Manitoba Renal Program). CONCLUSION: The switch from epoetin alfa MDV to epoetin alfa PFS realized cost savings, likely as a result of reduced drug wastage.


Asunto(s)
Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Eritropoyetina/economía , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Hematínicos/economía , Diálisis Renal/economía , Jeringas/economía , Control de Costos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Embalaje de Medicamentos , Epoetina alfa , Humanos , Manitoba , Proteínas Recombinantes , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
CANNT J ; 18(1): 39-43, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18435363

RESUMEN

We sought to describe dose conversion ratios between epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa for patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a large provincial renal program. Hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and pre-dialysis patients with CKD were included. Laboratory parameters and darbepoetin alfa doses were compared to epoetin alfa doses (same route). In 2005, 857 patients received darbepoetin alfa and were compared to 746 patients who received epoetin alfa in 2003-2004. Mean dose conversion ratios were 12,939 IU, 53.1 microg, 244:1 for HD; 9,273 IU, 41.8 microg, 222:1 for PD; and 5,516 IU, 25.2 microg and 219:1 for CKD patients. The mean hemoglobin and iron parameters were within K/DOQI targets on both drugs. Conversion ratios in HD, PD and CKD patients using erythropoietic therapies was greater than 200:1 with both intravenous and subcutaneous dosing. Renal programs across Canada should consider dosage conversion ratios in addition to drug acquisition costs when considering a formulary decision about erythropoiesis stimulating agents.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Eritropoyetina/análogos & derivados , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Anemia/etiología , Darbepoetina alfa , Epoetina alfa , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos
3.
Nephron Clin Pract ; 102(3-4): c88-92, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16282700

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this initiative was to compare erythropoietin-alpha doses in hemodialysis patients who changed from subcutaneous to intravenous administration. The Manitoba Renal Program switched routes due to concern about erythropoietin-associated pure red cell aplasia. METHODS: We compared the erythropoietin-alpha dosage requirements during subcutaneous administration (3 months pre-switch) and intravenous administration (months 4-6 post-switch). We also compared: hemoglobin, transferrin saturation (Tsat%), ferritin, and percent of patients receiving intravenous iron. The same erythropoietin-alpha regimen was initially used when patients were switched. RESULTS: Of the 628 patients receiving erythropoietin-alpha, the data were complete for 400. The dose increased 26% (mean +/- SD, 10,425 +/- 7,330 vs. 13,125 +/- 8,638 IU/week; p < 0.0001), despite similar hemoglobin, (mean +/- SD, 11.5 +/- 1.1g/dl (114.9 +/- 11.2 g/l) vs. 11.3 +/- 1.0 g/dl (113.5 +/- 10.4 g/l); p = 0.0450) and iron parameters (Tsat 30.9%, ferritin 464 ng/ml (microg/l) vs. Tsat 28.7%, ferritin 538 ng/ml (microg/l)). For the subgroup of 84 patients who maintained target hemoglobin (10-11 g/dl or 110-120 g/l) for both periods, the dose increased 26% (mean +/- SD, 8,393 +/- 6,242 vs. 10,589 +/- 7,049 IU/week; p < 0.0001) without a change in hemoglobin, (mean +/- SD, 11.5 +/- 0.3 g/dl (115.2 +/- 3.0 g/l) vs. 11.5 +/- 0.3 g/dl (114.9 +/- 3.3 g/l); p = 0.5789). When stratified by subcutaneous dose, patients with the lowest dose (<5,000 IU/week) demonstrated the greatest increase (89%), and those with the highest dose (>20,000 IU/week) experienced no increase (-3%). CONCLUSION: Overall, erythropoietin-alpha doses increased by 26% when patients were converted from subcutaneous to intravenous administration.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Diálisis Renal , Anemia/etiología , Epoetina alfa , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA