Hemodynamic Determinants of the Biologic Variation of N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Stable Systolic Chronic Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Biologic variation of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in chronic heart failure (CHF) may affect blood levels and risk stratification. The sources of NT-proBNP variation are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed NT-proBNP measurements and clinical and hemodynamic assessments in 50 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who met criteria for clinical stability over 2 time intervals. Hemodynamic variables were measured with the use of inert gas rebreathing and impedance cardiography. Heart rhythm was monitored with the use of external electrocardiographic event recorders throughout the study. Determinants of NT-proBNP-levels and both absolute (ΔNT-proBNPabs) and relative (ΔNT-proBNP%) changes at 1-week and 2-week intervals were identified with the use of univariable and multivariable linear mixed-effects models and linear regression analyses, respectively. Clinical and hemodynamic variables did not significantly change between study visits. The individual variation of NT-proBNP at 2 weeks was 9.2% (range 3.9%-18.6%). Weight and glomerular filtration rate were independently associated with baseline NT-proBNP concentrations (P = .01 and P = .005, respectively). There was no relationship between absolute and relative changes of NT-proBNP at 1-week intervals and changes in clinical and hemodynamic variables. Absolute change of NT-proBNP at 2-week intervals was associated with absolute change in left cardiac work index (P = .008), and relative change in NT-proBNP at 2-week intervals was determined by relative change of thoracic fluid content index (P = .008) and diastolic blood pressure (P = .01). The coefficients of determination (R2) for the multivariable models with Δ1wkNT-proBNPabs, Δ2-weeksNT-proBNPabs, Δ1wkNT-proBNP%, and Δ2wksNT-proBNP% as dependent variables were 0.21, 0.19, 0.10, and 0.32, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable HFrEF, changes in clinical and hemodynamic variables only marginally contribute to the variation of NT-proBNP.

Reference change values and determinants of variability of NT-proANP and GDF15 in stable chronic heart failure.

Biovariability, reference change values (RCV), and index of individuality (IOI) have not been previously described for NT-proANP or GDF15. Also, the relation of changes of these markers to other clinical variables or biomarkers is unknown. In 41 patients with stable chronic systolic dysfunction, NT-proANP and GDF15 were measured alongside with clinical variables/markers comprising NT-proBNP, hsTnT, and hsCRP at four sampling intervals (2 weeks, 1-, 2-, 3-month intervals). At 2 weeks, 1-, 2-, and 3-month-follow-up, individual NT-proANP variations were 27.1, 22.5, 28.9, 15.6%, respectively, corresponding to RCVs of 53.2, 62.4, 80.2, and 43.2%, respectively. For GDF15, the respective individual variations were 6.8, 4.1, 5.5, 6.8%, corresponding to RCVs of 18.8, 11.5, 15.3 and 18.8%. Neither changes of NT-proANP or GDF15 correlated with changes in any of the clinical variables or biomarkers examined except for GDF15 with renal function. Baseline hormonal levels and clinical variables did not consistently influence the extent of change. The IOI was 0.19-0.35 according to interval for NT-proANP and 0.06-0.09 for GDF 15. In patients with CHF preselected for clinical stability changes of NT-proANP at intermediate follow-up do not correlate with changes in other variables; changes of GDF15 inversely correlate with renal function. The extent of change in both markers is not related to baseline hormonal levels or other baseline variables. RCVs are high for NT-proANP and low for GDF15, while inter-individual variation is high in GDF15 and intermediate in NT-proANP.

Variability of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in stable chronic heart failure and its relation to changes in clinical variables.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the variability of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and its relation to known confounding variables in patients with stable chronic heart failure who were on a stable optimized medication regimen. METHODS: At 4 sampling intervals (14-day, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month) the results for NT-proBNP measurements and several clinical variables were measured in samples from 41 patients with chronic systolic dysfunction who met 21 prespecified criteria for stability. RESULTS: Mean within-person NT-proBNP variabilities expressed as percentage CV were 17.6%, 18.9%, 15.5%, and 16.2% at 14-day, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and the corresponding reference change values were 34.6%, 52.5%, 43.1%, and 45.0%, respectively. Within-person variability of NT-proBNP was not found to be associated with renal function, weight, or waist circumference. Likewise, age, sex, baseline NT-proBNP, New York Heart Association functional class, and ejection fraction did not influence variability of NT-proBNP. The index of individuality ranged from 0.07-0.15 depending on the time interval between test results. CONCLUSIONS: Although other reported studies have revealed variations in the range of 80%, in this prespecified stable heart-failure population variation of NT-proBNP at 14-day, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month follow-up was lower and was not related to renal function or weight. In view of the low index of individuality we observed, within-person variation is quite low compared to between-person variation. Consideration of these facts is important for the interpretation of clinical trials and the use of NT-proBNP in monitoring patients with heart failure.

Biological variation of the cardiac index in patients with stable chronic heart failure: inert gas rebreathing compared with impedance cardiography.

AIMS: In chronic heart failure (CHF), changes in cardiac function define the course of the disease. The cardiac index (CI) is the most adequate indicator of cardiac function. Interpretation of serial CI measurements, however, requires knowledge of the biological variation of CI. Because measurements of CI can be confounded by the clinical situation or the method applied, biological variation might be subject to the same confounders. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively included 50 CHF patients who met rigid criteria for clinical stability. CI was measured by both inert gas rebreathing (IGR) and impedance cardiography (ICG) in weekly intervals over 3 weeks-each measurement performed at rest (IGRrest/ICGrest) and during low-exercise 10 Watt pedalling (IGR10W/ICG10W). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), reference change values, and minimal important differences of CI were determined for IGRrest, ICGrest, IGR10W, and ICG10W. Impedance cardiography and IGR showed moderate agreement at rest (20% (6-36)) and good agreement at 10 Watt (-4% (-23-16)). Depending on time interval, measurement modality for CI, and mode, ICC ranged between 0.42 and 0.78, ICC values for IGR were lower than those for ICG. Reference change value ranged between 3 and 15%, and minimal important difference ranged between 0.2 and 0.5 L/min/m2. Values for IGR were lower at rest and higher at 10 Watt than those for ICG. CONCLUSION: Non-invasive measurements of CI are stable over time. Measurement modalities for CI, however, are not interchangeable. Biological variation is less pronounced when obtained by ICG. The influence of low-level exercise on stability of CI depends on the measurement modality.