Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Teach Learn Med ; 23(3): 298-300, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21745066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Writing is taught as professional competency in higher education generally, but the health science education literature emphasizes writing as a pedagogical means rather than a professional end. The Medical University of South Carolina established a Writing Center in 1994 to teach professional writing. SUMMARY: This report describes the rationale for profession-specific, graduate-level writing instruction; summarizes the Writing Center model; and reports usage data. Students have reported improvement in particular texts and said they would be better able to complete writing tasks in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions modeled after the Writing Center and staffed with professionally trained writing teachers may provide a means to pool resources to teach writing as professional competency. The Writing Center has provided the expertise to teach professional writing without demanding curricular revision.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Modelos Organizacionales , Competencia Profesional , Enseñanza/métodos , Escritura/normas , Facultades de Medicina , South Carolina
2.
Am J Med ; 124(4): 369.e1-8, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21435428

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer screening guidelines recommend that women and physicians consider life expectancy when making screening decisions in older women. However, prior studies suggest that screening mammography patterns are dependent on age rather than health status or mortality risk of women. Our objective is to determine the association between 4-year mortality risk and use of screening mammography in women aged ≥ 65 years using Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data. METHODS: The primary predictor variable is 4-year mortality risk derived from a published and validated prognostic index with 4 strata of increasing probability of death in 4 years (risk groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 with 4%, 15%, 42%, and 64% risk of 4-year mortality, respectively). The main outcome was self-reported receipt of mammography in the last year. RESULTS: There was a significant decreasing trend in the use of mammography with mortality risk groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 (62.7%, 51.5%, 36.6%, and 24%, respectively; trend test P<.001). The adjusted odds of mammography use were greatest in the low mortality risk group and show a gradual decline with increasing mortality risk for risk groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 (odds ratio [confidence interval]): 1.00; 0.69 [0.53-0.90]; 0.37 [0.27-0.49], and 0.22 [0.13-0.36], respectively. CONCLUSION: Screening mammography use in older Medicare beneficiaries seems to reflect their 4-year risk of mortality rather than age alone, suggesting that patients and providers consider prognosis in screening decisions. Prospective studies are needed to explore the use of the prognostic index as a mammography screening decision tool.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Mamografía/normas , Medicare , Anciano , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Longevidad , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA