Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring versus Office Blood Pressure Monitoring to Identify the True Hypertension Status of Living Kidney Donors.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a reliable modality and is preferred over office blood pressure monitoring (OBPM) for detecting hypertension. However, despite its advantages, the utilization of 24-h ABPM in evaluating living kidney donors has not been universally adopted by transplant centers, partly because of the lack of data about the utility of ABPM. This study aimed to identify patients with masked and white-coat hypertension, thereby ensuring appropriate identification of their true hypertension status and assessments of the risk to donors. This study included 73 potential living kidney donors. BP was measured in the office using a standardized protocol as well as by ABPM. Detailed clinical and biochemical parameters were assessed. Target organ damage was assessed in all the donors by assessing proteinuria, hypertensive retinopathy, and echocardiography. Out of the 73 donors, 64.4% were females and 35.6% were males. The average age of individuals in our donor population was 42.0 ± 11.28 years. In total, 31.5% were detected to be hypertensive by OBPM. With ABPM, only 21.9% of donors were hypertensive. The overall prevalence of white-coat hypertension was 30.4%; that of masked hypertension was 6.0%. In donors diagnosed as hypertensive by OBPM, three individuals were identified as having target organ damage. However, two additional donors who were initially missed as hypertensive using OBPM had target organ damage. OBPM overestimated the prevalence of hypertension compared with ABPM. ABPM is the better modality in terms of diagnosing white coats and masked hypertension. ABPM also more reliably correlates with target organ damage than OBPM.

A Comparative Study of Epidural Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine Infusion versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Background: There has been considerable debate regarding the ideal anaesthetic technique for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PCNL is usually performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in prone position. The prone position under GA is associated with various complications. To address these complications, our study was carried out to determine whether epidural anaesthesia [EA] with dexmedetomidine sedation can be a better alternative to GA for PCNL. Aims and Objectives: To compare the efficacy and feasibility of performing PCNL under EA in combination with dexmedetomidine infusion. Methods and Material: Out of 225 patients observed in this study, 115 patients (group A) underwent PCNL under EA with dexmedetomidine infusion and 110 patients (group B) underwent PCNL under GA. Results: Mean time to the first dose of rescue analgesia was significantly increased in Epidural group (328.17 ± 63.74) compared to GA group (72.09 min, p < .0001) and the mean Visual analog scale [VAS] scores were significantly lower in epidural compared to GA group at different time intervals during the first 24 h after surgery (p<0.05). Patients in epidural group had significantly less post-operative nausea, vomiting (6.1 % vs 13.6 %), and significantly less shivering (12.2% vs 33.6%). Mean patient satisfaction score in epidural group was significantly higher (8.75 ± 1.29 vs 8.14 ± 1.39, p=0.001); however, the mean surgeon satisfaction score was comparable among the two groups (8.76 ± 1.39 in Group A and 8.61 ± 1.35 in Group B, p=0.421). Conclusions: Our study shows that EA is an equally effective alternative to GA for PCNL, with more patient satisfaction, less postoperative pain, early ambulation and postoperative recovery, less systemic analgesic requirements and less adverse effects.

A prospective, randomized, double blind study to compare the effects of equiosmolar solutions of 3% hypertonic saline and 20% mannitol on reduction of brain-bulk during elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumor resection.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the effect of mannitol (M) and hypertonic saline (HTS) on brain relaxation and electrolyte balance. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 114 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists status II and III, scheduled to undergo craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumor resection were enrolled. Patients received 5 ml/kg 20% mannitol (n = 56) or 3% HTS (n = 58) at the start of scalp incision. Hemodynamics, fluid balance and electrolytes, were measured at 0, 15, 30, and 60 min and 6 h after infusion. Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay between the two groups was also recorded. The surgeon assessed brain relaxation on a four-point scale (1 = Relaxed, 2 = Satisfactory, 3 = Firm, 4 = Bulging). Appropriate statistical tests were used for comparison; P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Brain relaxation conditions in the HTS group (relaxed/satisfactory/firm/bulging, n = 28/20/5/3) were better than those observed in the M group (relaxed/satisfactory/firm/bulging, n = 17/21/11/9). The levels of serum sodium were higher in the HTS group (P < 0.001). The average urine output was higher in the M group (5.50 ± 0.75 L) than in the HTS group (4.38 ± 0.72 L) (P < 0.005). There was no significant difference in fluid input, ICU stay, and hospital days between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We concluded that HTS provided better brain relaxation than mannitol during elective supratentorial brain tumor surgery, without affecting ICU and hospital stay.