Implementing well-being in the management of psoriasis: An expert recommendation.

Psoriasis causes detriment in a person's physical, mental and social health which impairs their quality of life (QoL). However, the current psoriasis management may not adequately address all relevant health domains. Since the goal of healthcare is to restore or maintain health, health outcomes should include all areas of the patient's overall health. Life satisfaction, QoL and patient well-being are essential to a comprehensive approach to the disease. With the inclusion of more people-centred policies, care of patients with psoriasis should evolve towards a holistic and integrated assessment of the disease impact, including subjective measures of well-being in order to encompass all aspects of health. The main objective of this expert review is to give the concept of well-being a place as an entity within the holistic therapeutic approach for patients with psoriasis. Identifying and defining common goals beyond the skin with the patient and testing them throughout the course of treatment will benefit and enhance treatment success. We propose a series of recommendations for application in clinical practice, providing tangible clinical guidance for implementing well-being in the management of psoriasis. Among the recommendations are the need to initially listen to the patient, to know their level of empowerment or what they want to achieve, their preferences in decision making, the evaluation of not only the physical but also the emotional impact of the disease (well-being), the definition of the aspects that can generate a cumulative deterioration of the disease throughout life, and a continuous assessment of the patient's preferences with the opinion of the expert clinician and the integration of the knowledge of external clinical evidence.

A Comparative Analysis of the Predictors, Extent and Impacts of Self-stigma in Patients with Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis.

The impact of dermatological diseases goes beyond symptoms and often includes psychosocial burden. Self-stigmatization plays a key role in this relationship and was compared in patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis to evaluate the validity of cross-disease stigmatization models. In total, 101 patients per indication were included in this cross-sectional study. Besides sociodemographic and clinical data, patient-reported outcome measures relating to self-stigmatization, depression, anxiety, and quality of life were compared across groups. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were tested for their moderating effects between self-stigmatization and quality of life. Group mean comparisons yielded no significant differences in self-stigmatization between patient groups. In both diseases, self-stigmatization significantly predicted depression and anxiety symptoms as well as quality of life. Current symptoms, not having close social relationships, and lower age predicted self-stigma in patients with psoriasis, whereas the involvement of sensitive body areas, the sum of previous treatments, and female sex were predictors in patients with atopic dermatitis. In both groups, symptoms had significantly moderating effects. The results underline the relevance of self-stigmatization in patients with chronic skin diseases. Awareness should be raised, screening implemented, and psychosocial support offered early on. Assessments, conceptual models of self-stigma, and interventions are probably applicable for both diseases.

Development of Measurement Tools to Assess Cumulative Life Course Impairment in Patients with Chronic Skin Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic skin diseases suffer from physical, psychological, emotional and social impairments. The overall burden has significant impact on patients' life, contributing to irreversible damage across many domains, known as cumulative life course impairment (CLCI). The aim of this project was to develop instruments which (a) measure persisting CLCI and (b) identify patients at risk for developing future CLCI. METHODS: We identified key topics that negatively impact life course due to skin disease patient-reported open item selection. Subsequently, we conducted focus group interviews with patients and experts to conceptualize items and response scales, resulting in two preliminary measurement tools. These tools were tested in a cognitive debriefing before finalization. RESULTS: Consecutively, 162 patients participated in the open item selection and indicated the following topics were most relevant to their disease: disease symptoms, risk behaviour, comorbidities, psychological and emotional impairments, physical impairments, occupational impairments, treatment, sexuality, problems with family or friends, everyday life and positive event or decisions because of the disease. In the focus group interviews, patients reported stigmatization, support at disease onset, pre-existing diseases and age of onset as additional important topics. The cognitive debriefing resulted in minor changes to sentence structure. The final tools included: (1) DermCLCI-r, which assesses retrospective CLCI, and (2) DermCLCI-p, which assesses current CLCI and future risk. Each tool consisted of 30 items. DISCUSSION: The newly developed measures allow for early identification of CLCI, facilitate adequate dermatological and psychosocial interventions and may contribute to the prevention of CLCI. Further validation studies will be performed.

Psychosocial Burden in People with Atopic Dermatitis: Effects of a Substance-Free Basic Skincare in a Randomized Health Care Study.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a physical, emotional, and social burden for patients. Most suffer from itching, pain, and dry skin as well as sleep disturbances, experienced stigmatization, anxiety, or depression. Therefore, it is important to consider the psychosocial well-being and also stigmatization in the treatment of people with AD. The aims of this study were to compare clinical and psychosocial parameters between patients with a different severity of AD and to analyse the effect of an omega-6-fatty-acid-skin therapy. METHODS: Adult patients with clinically confirmed AD were asked about quality of life, stigmatization, and well-being after dermatological diagnosis. A second examination took place after 2-5 weeks. Meanwhile, after randomization, half of the patients used an omega-6-fatty-acid-skin therapy. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included in the study. The use of omega-6-fatty-acid-skin therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the severity of xerosis cutis compared to patients using another basic therapy. In addition, the health-related quality of life of all patients improved significantly in both groups (F = 7.56; p = 0.008), and no significant difference was found between the groups over time in the patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Basic therapy for AD leads to relevant improvements in clinical status as well as quality of life. Patients using omega-6-fatty-acid-skin therapy experience greater improvement in xerosis cutis compared to free-choice basic therapy.

How do dermatologists' personal models inform a patient-centred approach to management: a qualitative study using the example of prescribing a new treatment (Apremilast).

BACKGROUND: The quality of dermatology consultations is partly determined by how clinicians approach patient care. The term 'Personal Models' describes the explanatory frameworks of thoughts, feelings and experiences that drive behaviour. One study found that clinicians' personal models, specifically their beliefs about autonomy and patient self-management, influenced the degree to which clinicians engage patients in shared decision making during consultations. Further research is needed to further explore how clinicians' personal models inform and affect the quality of patient care. OBJECTIVES: To explore how clinicians' personal models inform shared decision making and consultation style in managing people living with psoriasis in the context of a new treatment, Apremilast. METHODS: A framework analysis of qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews with 13 dermatologists from the UK and Germany who participated in a novel medicine trial for psoriasis called APPRECIATE. RESULTS: Two themes were derived from the data. Theme 1, 'personal working models of patient care', comprised two subthemes: 'patient-centredness: a continuum' and 'stereotypes and assumptions'. Theme 2, 'impact of personal working models on patient care', included three subthemes: 'shared decision making: a continuum', 'consultation skills' and 'impact of concerns about Apremilast on prescribing behaviour'. CONCLUSIONS: Although many dermatologists endorsed a patient-centred approach, not all reported working in this way. Clinicians' personal models, their beliefs, stereotypes, personal perceptions and assumptions about patients are likely to affect their prescribing behaviour and shared decision making. Additional specialized training and education could increase patient-centredness and whole-person management.

How important is subjective well-being for patients? A qualitative interview study of people with psoriasis.

PURPOSE: This qualitative study aimed to investigate the importance of subjective well-being (SWB) as an outcome of psoriasis treatment from patient's perspective. We focused on the affective component of SWB as assessed with the Daily Experience Sampling Questionnaire (DESQ), a validated daily diary. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with in-patients of a dermatological rehabilitation clinic, after participants had completed the DESQ for up to seven days to get familiar with the concept of SWB. Patients were asked to reflect on the importance of SWB as treatment goal and on its relative importance as compared with other treatment outcomes. We also addressed whether SWB could be an indirect measure of benefit in that it reflects other important outcomes. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Eleven patients participated (24-63 years, mean 53 years, 8 male, 3 female). Participants uniformly confirmed that changes in SWB reflected treatment benefit. All but one considered SWB to be a central aspect of treatment benefit-either as the most important treatment goal or as an indirect benefit indicator. In particular, participants described positive associations of SWB with other outcomes, such as symptoms. They reported that both the disease and the medical treatment had an impact on their SWB, which was reflected in the DESQ. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that SWB is a relevant indicator of treatment benefit for patients with psoriasis. Therefore, SWB measures, such as the DESQ, could be used to operationalize patient-relevant benefit of psoriasis treatment, complementing outcome measures currently used.

A Structured Intervention for Medical Students Significantly Improves Awareness of Stigmatisation in Visible Chronic Skin Diseases: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

People with visible skin diseases often experience stigmatisation. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new intervention for medical students to counter the stigmatisation of people with skin diseases. The intervention was evaluated using a randomised controlled design. Effectiveness was assessed at 3 time points. Data from 127 participants were analysed. Regarding the outcome "social distance", a significant difference between the measurement points was observed for the intervention group (χ2(2) = 54.32, p < 0.001), which also showed a significant effect on agreement with negative stereotypes (F(1.67, 118.67) = 23.83, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.25). Regarding the outcome "agreement with disease-related misconceptions", a significant difference between the measurement time points was observed for the intervention group (χ2(2) = 46.33, p < 0.001); similar results were found for the outcome "stigmatising behaviour" (F(1.86, 131.89) = 6.16, p = 0.003, partial η2 = 0.08). The results should encourage medical faculties to invest in such courses in order to prevent stigmatisation of people with skin diseases.

Skin Lesions, Skin Care, and Characteristics of Pruritus in Patients Undergoing Haemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pruritus has been shown to be a common and burdensome complaint in the general population. In some diseases, there is an even higher rate and intensity of pruritus such as in chronic kidney diseases. In particular, patients requiring dialysis commonly suffer from pruritus with proportions between 22.0 and 90.0%. Few data on the characteristics and burden of such pruritus have been published. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the extent and profiles of pruritus in such patients related to skin lesions and care. METHODS: A non-interventional cross-sectional study in 14 centres for haemodialysis across Germany was conducted. The survey explored the prevalence, severity, and resulting burden of pruritus and skin lesions. RESULTS: In total, 302 patients with uraemia (56.5% male, mean age 66.0 ± 14.4 years, mean duration of dialysis 3.9 ± 4.8 years) were included. Skin lesions appeared since start of dialysis in 50.0% of patients, with xerosis (94.7%) and desquamation (25.8%) being the most frequent and disturbing findings. Pruritus was reported by 60.9% of patients undergoing dialysis with a current mean numerical rating scale of 5.1 ± 2.4 occurring most frequently in the back, legs, and arms. About 89.0% of patients with xerosis and 69.0% with desquamation reported self-medication. However, only 40.0% and 28.0% sought medical help, respectively, indicating a remarkable lack of healthcare. DISCUSSION: The current data suggest a more intensive focus on the skin symptoms and signs related to uraemia in the patients with dialysis and thus underline claims from a previous German large-scale study. Recommendations for early treatment and prevention of skin lesions in dialysis patients should be developed. Further research should be conducted focusing on recognizing subgroups of patients of particular vulnerability to pruritus and skin lesions, which may facilitate identifying patients at risk in an early moment. Moreover, a more specific tool for screening of skin lesions as well as pruritus may be useful since the existing instruments lack such specificity.

Assessing the quality of life of people with chronic wounds by using the cross-culturally valid and revised Wound-QoL questionnaire.

The Wound-QoL is an often used reliable and valid measure, originally developed in Germany. It has been sequentially translated and validated for other languages/countries, for the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic wounds. However, a study from the United States postulated its benefits from further adaptations. Furthermore, some patients struggled to provide an answer for some of the items. We aimed to test the cross-cultural structure and psychometric performance of the questionnaire to suggest necessary revisions. This cross-sectional analysis of existing data sets included 1185 patients from Germany, the US, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Israel. Patients in the U.S. Wound Registry completed the Wound-QoL during routine care. Different studies comprised the data collection in the other countries. Almost half of the patients were women (48.4%). Furthermore, 42.6% were diagnosed with leg ulcers. Their average age was 66 years. We used a confirmatory factor analysis and an unconstrained graded response model. We revised and shortened the Wound-QoL from 17 to 14 items. In addition, we supported the cross-cultural metric invariance of the revised Wound-QoL questionnaire. The new version with 14 items and three dimensions revealed good psychometric properties with Cronbach's alpha (α) of 0.913 for the total score, and 0.709-0.907 for different dimensions. Furthermore, we provided strict invariance for different clinical variables. In conclusion, the revised Wound-QoL is a reliable and cross-cultural instrument to measure the HRQoL on patients with chronic wounds. Future studies should analyse the revised Wound-QoL for convergent validity with generic HRQoL questionnaires as well as for determining its sensitivity to clinical change.

Effectiveness of a structured short intervention against stigmatisation in chronic visible skin diseases: Results of a controlled trial in future educators.

BACKGROUND: Chronic visible skin diseases are highly prevalent, and patients affected frequently report feeling stigmatised. Interventions to reduce stigmatisation are rare. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured short intervention in reducing stigmatising attitudes towards psoriasis in future educators. METHODS: The intervention consisted of four components: (1) self-reflection, (2) education on skin diseases, (3) contact between participants and a person with psoriasis and (4) practising of knowledge via case studies. A quasi-experimental, pre-post study design was chosen with a nonrandomized contemporaneous control group that attended regular lessons. The main outcomes were participants' desire for social distance, stereotype endorsement, illness-related misconceptions and intended behaviour. Intervention effects were analysed using mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance, with Bonferroni post-hoc tests for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 221 students attending vocational training as educators (n = 118 intervention group, n = 103 control group). While no effect of the intervention was found in social distance, small to large effect sizes were observed for intended behaviour (r = .14), illness-related misconceptions (r = .28) and stereotype endorsement (r = .42). The intervention group reported significantly higher satisfaction with the seminar compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the short intervention was effective at reducing stigmatising attitudes in future educators. In perspective, revised versions could help in reducing stigmatisation in various demographics and promote patient empowerment by acknowledging and including them as experts on their own behalf. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patient advocate groups were consulted and involved in the superordinate destigmatization research programme and intervention.

PHARMACOKINETIC BEHAVIOR OF MELOXICAM IN LOGGERHEAD (CARETTA CARETTA), KEMP'S RIDLEY (LEPIDOCHELYS KEMPII), AND GREEN (CHELONIA MYDAS) SEA TURTLES AFTER SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION.

The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of meloxicam administered subcutaneously (SQ) to three species of sea turtles: loggerheads (Caretta caretta), Kemp's ridley (Lepidochelys kempii), and greens (Chelonia mydas). A dose of 1 mg/kg was given to the Kemp's ridleys and greens, whereas the loggerheads received 2 mg/kg. After SQ administration, the half-life (t1/2) of meloxicam administered at 1 mg/kg in the Kemp's ridleys was 5.51 hr but could not be determined in the greens. The half-life of meloxicam administered at 2 mg/kg in the loggerheads was 2.99 hr. The maximum concentration (Cmax) for meloxicam after SQ administration at 1 mg/kg in the Kemp's ridleys was 6.76 µg/ml and in the greens was 9.35 µg/ml. The Cmax in loggerheads for meloxicam after SQ administration at 2 mg/kg was 3.63 µg/mL. Meloxicam administered SQ at a dose of 1 mg/kg to the Kemp's ridley and greens provided measurable plasma concentrations of meloxicam for 48 and 120 hr, respectively, with no adverse side effects. In loggerheads, meloxicam administered SQ at a dose of 2 mg/kg provided measurable plasma levels of meloxicam for only 24 hr. Plasma levels of meloxicam of greater than 0.5 µg/ml are considered to be therapeutic in humans. Results suggested that administration of meloxicam SQ at 1 mg/kg in Kemp's ridleys and greens would result in plasma concentrations greater than 0.5 µg/ml for 12 and 120 hr, respectively. The administration of 2 mg/kg meloxicam to loggerhead turtles resulted in plasma concentrations greater than 0.5 µg/ml for only 4 hr.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the U.S. English Wound-QoL questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in people with chronic wounds.

People with chronic wounds perceive an impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). For the assessment of HRQoL, valid instruments are needed. Therefore, the Wound-QoL questionnaire was originally developed and psychometrically validated for use in Germany. As the Wound-QoL is to be used in numerous countries, international versions are required. Therefore, this study aimed to psychometrically validate the U.S. English Wound-QoL version. Upon translation into U.S. English, psychometric testing was performed based on cross-sectional data deriving from the U.S. Wound Registry. Besides descriptive statistics, internal consistency and concurrent validity were tested. In addition, a graded response model was used. The sample consisted of 599 people with chronic wounds of different etiologies. Participants were between 18 and 95 years old, mean age was 63.7 (SD = 15.9) years. Gender was distributed almost equally, with 47.4% female patients. High internal consistency, low floor and ceiling effects of the subscales could be largely confirmed. The internal consistency of the global score was excellent, with α > .9. Concurrent validity between the Wound-QoL and pain, the surface area of the largest wound, total surface area, and total number of active wounds could be confirmed. In contrast, item response theory (IRT) analyses could not fully confirm the factorial model underlying the Wound-QoL subscales. Furthermore, the items regarding smell and discharge and the items on problems with hitting the wound against something, climbing stairs and feeling dependent on help from others showed a low item information in their belonging dimensions. In conclusion, the newly validated Wound-QoL is available for HRQoL measurement in people with chronic wounds in the United States. It showed good psychometric properties, demonstrating its reliability and validity. Therefore, the instrument may be used to assess HRQoL in clinical practice. However, IRT analyses showed that the instrument may benefit from future refinement.

Stigmatization caused by hair loss - a systematic literature review.

Hair loss is a symptom that can cause stigmatization and severe impairment of quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature on stigmatization of hair loss. Using predefined MeSH terms and keywords, a systematic search was performed in the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, PsycINFO and PsycNET. No time restriction was chosen (last update: May 07, 2019; PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019122966). A total of 98 studies were identified, of which eleven were selected for inclusion in this work. The Hairdex, a questionnaire on disease-specific quality of life, was the most frequently used instrument for the quantitative assessment of stigma. The studies were highly heterogeneous and values for stigmatization of androgenetic alopecia varied widely. However, regardless of the pathogenesis, patients with hair loss often suffer from stigmatization which limits their quality of life. Stigmatization of people with visible skin lesions has often been neglected in clinical practice and in daily contact with affected individuals. Studies that specifically address the stigma of hair loss are rare. Further studies are needed to achieve comparability within pathogeneses as well as with other visible dermatoses in order to better understand the enormous psychosocial burden of hair loss.

Cross-cultural selection and validation of instruments to assess patient-reported outcomes in children and adolescents with achondroplasia.

PURPOSE: Achondroplasia, as the most common form of disproportionate short stature, potentially impacts the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functioning of people with this condition. Because there are no psychometrically validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) condition-specific instruments for achondroplasia, this study selected and tested available generic, disease-specific and under development questionnaires for possible use in multinational clinical research. METHODS: A three-step approach was applied. First, a literature review and clinician/expert opinions were used to select relevant PRO questionnaires. Second, focus group discussions, including a group cognitive debriefing for piloting of the questionnaires with children/adolescents with achondroplasia and their parents, were performed in Spain and Germany. Third, a field-test study was conducted to test the psychometric properties of these instruments. RESULTS: Six questionnaires were identified as potentially relevant in children with achondroplasia. In each country, five focus groups including a cognitive debriefing were conducted, and the results narrowed the possibilities to three instruments as most appropriate to assess HRQOL (the generic PedsQL, the height-specific QoLISSY, and the achondroplasia-specific APLES). Results of the field study indicate the QoLISSY and the PedsQL questionnaires to be most appropriate for use in clinical research at this time. CONCLUSION: This selection study is a step forward in assessing the impact of achondroplasia on HRQOL. Of the instruments examined, the QoLISSY and the PedsQL both capture items relevant to children with achondroplasia and have met the psychometric validation criteria needed for use in research. The APLES instrument is a promising tool that should be revisited upon psychometric validation.

Health-related quality of life experiences in children and adolescents born with esophageal atresia: A Swedish-German focus group study.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal atresia (EA) is a rare malformation of the esophagus, which needs surgical treatment. Survival rates have reached 95%, but esophageal and respiratory morbidity during childhood is frequent. Child and parent perspectives and cultural and age-specific approaches are fundamental in understanding children's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and when developing a pediatric HRQoL questionnaire. We aimed to increase the conceptual and cross-cultural understanding of condition-specific HRQoL experiences among EA children from Sweden and Germany and investigate content validity for an EA-specific HRQoL questionnaire. METHODS: Eighteen standardized focus groups (FGs) with 51 families of EA children aged 2-17 years in Sweden (n = 30 families) and Germany (n = 21 families) were used to explore HRQoL experiences, which were content analyzed into HRQoL domains. The Swedish HRQoL domains were analyzed first and used as framework to evaluate HRQoL content reported in the German FGs. HRQoL experiences were then categorized as physical, social, and emotional HRQoL burden or resource. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred eight HRQoL statements were recorded. All nine EA-specific HRQoL domains identified in the Swedish FGs (eating, social relationships, general life issues, communication, body issues, bothersome symptoms, confidence, impact of medical treatment, and additional difficulties due to concomitant anomalies) were recognized in the FGs held in Germany, and no additional EA-specific HRQoL domain was found. The HRQoL dimensions referenced physical burden (n = 655, 34.5%), social burden (n = 497, 26.0%), social resources (n = 303, 15.9%), emotional burden (n = 210, 11.0%), physical resources (n = 158, 8.3%), and emotional resources (n = 85, 4.5%). CONCLUSION: This first international FG study to obtain the EA child and his or her parents' perspective on HRQoL suggests Swedish-German qualitative comparability of the HRQoL domains and content validity for a cross-cultural EA-specific HRQoL questionnaire. EA children make positive and negative HRQoL experiences, but prominently related to physical and social burden, which underlines appropriate follow-up care and future research.

Differences between patient- and proxy-reported HRQoL using the Wound-QoL.

The purpose of this study was to examine the patient- and proxy-report agreement on the Wound-quality of life (QoL) questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in patients with chronic wounds. Patients and their proxies (in this case, relatives) were recruited via different nursing services in Germany and asked to complete the Wound-QoL. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each Wound-QoL scale and the total score, and weighted Cohen's Kappa coefficients for individual items. Proxies tended to report lower health-related QoL in the Wound-QoL than their relatives with chronic wounds. Agreement between the two perspectives was moderate on single-item level and excellent on scale level. Proxy-reports can be helpful, if patients are unable to provide information, although caution remains when interpreting the results. However, the patient's own perspective remains preferable.

Development and validation of the Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease.

Background: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a specific Patient Benefit Index (PBI) version for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients and methods: A non-interventional longitudinal development study was conducted. The first phase comprised a qualitative pre-study with n = 50 patients, in which the PBI was adapted for peripheral arterial disease. The resulting Patient Benefit Index for peripheral arterial disease (PBI-PAD) was validated in the second phase at two points of measurement. The total PBI-PAD score was calculated by weighting item-wise the achievement of treatment goals with the initially assessed needs. Feasibility, internal consistency, and construct validity were analysed and the generic three level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and the disease-specific instrument Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VascuQoL) were used for convergent validation. Results: In the pre-study, the PBI-PAD, consisting of 12 items, was developed. N = 103 patients participated in the main study. At T2, data were available for n = 57 patients. Mean age was 71.0 years ± 9.1 and 66.7 % of the participants were male. The amount of missing values of the PBI-PAD score was low (< 4.0 %) and no relevant floor effects were observed. Both parts of the PBI (needs at T1 and benefits at T2) were internally consistent with Cronbach's alpha > 0.7. PBI-PAD total score correlated significantly with the T2-T1-differences of the EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) (r = 0.4, p = 0.007) and the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The PBI-PAD is a feasible, internally consistent, and valid instrument to assess patient-relevant benefits in PAD patients receiving minimally invasive treatment or surgical procedures. It can be recommended for use in routine care as well as in clinical studies.

Children's psychosocial functioning and parents' quality of life in paediatric short stature: The mediating role of caregiving stress.

OBJECTIVES: On the basis of the multidimensional model of the caregiving process, this study aimed (a) to compare the levels of quality of life (QoL) and psychological problems of children with short stature and the levels of caregiving stress and QoL of their parents, between diagnostic, treatment, and current height deviation groups, and (b) to examine the direct and indirect links, via caregiving stress, between children's psychosocial functioning and their parents' QoL. METHOD: The sample was collected in 5 European countries and comprised 238 dyads of 8- to 18-year-old children and adolescents with a clinical diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency or idiopathic short stature and one of their parents. The children completed self-report measures of height-related QoL (Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth Core Module) and psychological problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire); the parents reported on their own QoL (EUROHIS-QOL-8 Index) and caregiving stress (Quality of Life in Short Stature Youth Effects on Parents subscale). RESULTS: Children who were treated and who achieved normal height reported better QoL compared to those untreated and with current short stature. Parents of children with idiopathic short stature and current short stature presented greater caregiving stress than parents of children with growth hormone deficiency and achieved normal height. Children's better psychosocial functioning was indirectly associated with parents' better QoL, via less caregiving stress, and these links were invariant across diagnoses, treatment status, and current height deviation. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, along with growth hormone treatments, multidisciplinary interventions in paediatric endocrinology should be family-centred, by targeting both the children's psychosocial functioning and the parents' stress, in order to improve individual and family adaptation.

What is psoriasis? - Perception and assessment of psoriasis among the German population.

BACKGROUND: Delivery of health care to psoriasis patients plays an important role in the field of dermatology. Following the 2014 WHO resolution and the 2016 WHO global report, there has been an increase in the awareness of psoriasis among the general public. However, the perception of psoriasis by the general population remains unclear. The goal of the present study was to investigate the perception and assessment of psoriasis among the German population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Representative telephone survey among 2,001 adults using a standardized questionnaire. Analyses with respect to place of residence, age, gender and level of education were conducted in a descriptive manner. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of participants were familiar with the term "Psoriasis"; 86 %, with the German designation "Schuppenflechte". Ninety-three percent considered the disease to be a significant burden for affected individuals; 59 % stated that there were effective drugs available for psoriasis; 9 % considered the disease to be communicable. Ten percent reported that they would not want to live in the same household as an affected individual; 23 % did not want to share the same swimming pool; and 27 % did not want to be in a personal relationship with someone affected. Twelve percent stated to be familiar with the WHO resolution on psoriasis; 6 % with the World Psoriasis Day; and 3 % with the "Bitte berühren" ("Please touch") campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority of the German population is familiar with the term "Schuppenflechte", there is a significant lack of knowledge about the disease as well as prejudice toward affected individuals. Further measures are required to improve the level of information and decrease stigmatization.

Was ist Schuppenflechte? - Wahrnehmung und Bewertung der Psoriasis in der deutschen Bevölkerung.

HINTERGRUND: Die Versorgung der Psoriasis vulgaris nimmt in der Dermatologie einen wichtigen Stellenwert ein. Im Zuge der WHO-Resolution 2014 und des WHO Global Reports 2016 hat die öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit für die Psoriasis zugenommen. Unklar ist, wie Psoriasis in der Allgemeinbevölkerung wahrgenommen wird. Ziel ist die Erfassung der Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Psoriasis in der Bevölkerung. PATIENTEN UND METHODEN: Repräsentative Telefonumfrage mit 2001 Erwachsenen mittels eines standardisierten Fragebogens. Die Auswertungen erfolgten deskriptiv nach Region, Alter, Geschlecht und Bildungsstatus. ERGEBNISSE: Die Begriffe Psoriasis bzw. Schuppenflechte waren 29 % bzw. 86 % der Befragten, bekannt. 93 % schätzten die Krankheit als sehr belastend für die Betroffenen ein, 59 % nahmen an, dass es wirksame Medikamente gegen Schuppenflechte gibt und 9 % hielten diese Erkrankung für ansteckend. 10 % würden nicht mit einer betroffenen Person im Haushalt leben wollen, 23 % nicht mit Betroffenen ins Schwimmbad gehen und 27 % nicht in einer Partnerschaft sein. 12 % gaben an, die WHO-Resolution zur Psoriasis zu kennen, 6 % den Weltpsoriasistag und 3 % die Kampagne "Bitte berühren". SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Wenngleich einer Mehrheit in der deutschen Bevölkerung die Schuppenflechte bekannt ist, bestehen deutliche Wissensdefizite und teilweise Vorurteile gegenüber dieser Erkrankung. Weitergehende Maßnahmen zur besseren Information und zur Minderung der Stigmatisierung sind notwendig.