Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in heart failure: clinical, prognostic, and echocardiographic outcome.

PURPOSE: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) patients is associated with a lower rate of cardiac events compared with medical therapy. This study deals with the clinical, echocardiographic, and prognostic outcomes in these patients. Prognostic scores, as MAGGIC (Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure) score, may help to predict the outcomes. METHODS: From a single center, 47 patients with AF, HF, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% underwent CA. The primary endpoints were NYHA functional class, LVEF, and MAGGIC score. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 59 years; 49% had paroxysmal AF. At 12 months, a significant improvement of NYHA class (median before II [interquartile range (IQR) II-III] vs median after I [IQR I-II]) and of LVEF (median before 44% [IQR 37-47] vs median after 55% [IQR49-57]) was observed (p value < 0.001). The MAGGIC 1-year and 3-year probability of death was estimated before (mean score 13 [IQR 11-17]) and at 12-month (mean score 11 [IQR 8-13]), showing a significant decrease in the probability of death (p value <0.001). At 12-month, a lower LVEF was associated with more HF hospitalizations (p value 0.035). Coronary artery disease (CAD) (HR 5, p value 0.035) and MAGGIC score (HR 1.2, p value 0.030) were predictors of HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: CA for AF in HF patients was associated with a significant improvement of NYHA functional class and LVEF and a higher life expectation. CAD history, LVEF < 40%, and MAGGIC score before ablation were predictors of HF hospitalization.

Advantages of the integration of ICE and 3D electroanatomical mapping and ultrasound-guided femoral venipuncture in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate how the integration of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and ultrasound-guided femoral venipuncture (USGVC) may affect the safety of catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: From a single center 374 patients with AF underwent 3D electroanatomic mapping-guided CA with or without the integration of ICE and USGVC. The primary endpoints were periprocedural complications, fluoroscopy time, and procedure time between the two groups. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 60 years. Sixteen patients had major complications (4.3%); 10 of these (2.7%) had major vascular complications. Thirty-seven patients had minor complications (9.9%) that did not require intervention. There were fewer major complications in the CA with the aid of ICE and USGVC than in the conventional approach (1% vs 7%, p = 0.004). The combined approach required less fluoroscopy time than the conventional procedure (median with ICE + USGVC 14 min (interquartile range (IQR) 8-21) vs median without ICE + USGVC 22 min (IQR 17-32)), p < 0.001, and less radiofrequency time (median with ICE + USGVC 1686 s (IQR 1367-1998) vs median time without ICE + USGVC: 1792 s (IQR 1390-2400)), p = 0.012. After adjustment for confounding factors, only the use of ICE + USGVC (hazard ratio: 0.139; p = 0.05) was a significantly protective factor against major complications. CONCLUSION: The use of ICE and USGVC in CA of AF is associated with significantly fewer major complications and lower fluoroscopy and radiofrequency time, so these aids increased the safety of the procedure.