Direct Comparison of Metastasis-Related miRNAs Expression Levels in Circulating Tumor Cells, Corresponding Plasma, and Primary Tumors of Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) are important in liquid biopsies in which peripheral blood is used to characterize the evolution of solid tumors. We evaluated the expression levels of miR-21, miR-146a, miR-200c, and miR-210 in CTCs of breast cancer patients with verified metastasis and compared their expression levels in corresponding plasma and primary tumors. METHODS: Expression levels of the miRNAs were quantified by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) in (a) 89 primary breast tumors and 30 noncancerous breast tissues and (b) CTCs and corresponding plasma of 55 patients with metastatic breast cancer and 20 healthy donors. For 30 of these patients, CTCs, corresponding plasma, and primary tumor tissues were available. RESULTS: In formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, these miRNAs were differentially expressed between primary breast tumors and noncancerous breast tissues. miR-21 (P < 0.001) and miR-146a (P = 0.001) were overexpressed, whereas miR-200c (P = 0.004) and miR-210 (P = 0.002) were underexpressed. In multivariate analysis, miR-146a overexpression was significantly [hazard ratio 2.969 (1.231-7.157), P = 0.015] associated with progression-free survival. In peripheral blood, all miRNAs studied were overexpressed in both CTC and corresponding plasma. There was a significant association between miR-21 expression levels in CTCs and plasma for 36 of 55 samples (P = 0.008). In plasma, ROC curve analysis revealed that miR-21, miR-146a, and miR-210 could discriminate patients from healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Metastasis-related miRNAs are overexpressed in CTCs and corresponding plasma; miR-21 expression levels highly correlate in CTCs and plasma; and miR-21, miR-146a, and miR-210 are valuable plasma biomarkers for discriminating patients from healthy individuals.

Quantification of circulating miRNAs in plasma: effect of preanalytical and analytical parameters on their isolation and stability.

Circulating miRNAs are intensively evaluated as promising blood-based biomarkers. This growing interest in developing assays for circulating miRNAs necessitates careful consideration of the effects of preanalytical and analytical parameters on the isolation, stability, and quantification of circulating miRNAs. By using quantitative stem-loop RT-PCR, we compared the relative efficiencies of four miRNA isolation systems and different storage conditions. The effect of the data normalization procedure on the quantification of circulating miRNA levels in plasma from 30 healthy individuals and 30 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma was estimated by measuring endogenous hsa-miR-21 and hsa-miR-16 and exogenous cel-miR-39 that was spiked in all samples at the same concentration. Silica column-based RNA extraction methods are more effective and reliable with respect to TRIzol LS. Endogenous circulating miRNA levels are unstable when plasma is stored at 4°C, and samples should be kept at -70°C, where the extracted miRNAs remain stable for up to 1 year. When normalization is based on combined endogenous and exogenous control miRNAs, differences in miRNA recovery and differences in cDNA synthesis between samples are compensated. Using this normalization procedure and hsa-miR-21 as a biomarker, we could clearly discriminate healthy individuals from patients with cancer. Experimental handling and the use of exogenous and endogenous controls for normalization are critical for the reliable quantification of circulating miRNA levels in plasma.