[The medical curriculum need not take the religious beliefs and cultural background of the students into consideration]. / De medische opleiding hoeft geen rekening te houden met de geloofsovertuiging en cultuuropvattingen van studenten.

Newly graduated doctors must be able to solve a limited number of patient-specific problems in an adequate manner. The patient is at the centre of attention here, not the doctor. Accepting religious beliefs and cultural differences as an excuse for not learning something would mean that other excuses would also be accepted more readily, thus changing the primary goals of the medical curriculum.

Decarboxylated-S-adenosylmethionine excretion: a biochemical marker of ornithine decarboxylase inhibition by alpha-difluoromethylornithine.

In an attempt to define a biochemical marker of ornithine decarboxylase inhibition in humans, alpha-difluoromethylornithine hydrochloride (DFMO), an irreversible ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor, was infused i.v. in seven cancer patients over 10-day courses at doses of 10-90 g/day and 24-h urinary excretion of polyamines and decarboxylated-S-adenosylmethionine was determined before, during, and after treatment. DFMO produces marked increases in urinary decarboxylated-S-adenosylmethionine excretion, up to 84 times pretreatment values. This response appears to be time dependent, requiring several days to reach a maximum and lasting at least 4-5 days after stopping DFMO. In contrast, urinary excretion of the polyamines putrescine, cadaverine, spermidine, N1-monoacetylspermidine, N8-monoacetylspermidine, and spermine, were not consistently altered by DFMO. We conclude that urinary excretion of decarboxylated-S-adenosylmethionine represents a valid biochemical indicator of ornithine decarboxylase inhibition in humans, whereas urinary polyamines are of no value.

Activated ras genes in human seminoma: evidence for tumor heterogeneity.

The incidence of mutations in cellular ras genes was determined in human seminoma, a germ cell tumor of the testis, with the aid of specific oligonucleotide probe hybridization. To eliminate the large number of nonneoplastic cells present in seminomas, aneuploid tumor cell nuclei were isolated from the tumor tissue by flow sorting. Mutations were detected in 40% of the seminomas at codons 12 or 61 of either the Ki-ras or the N-ras gene. No correlation was found with histopathological or clinical features. In some seminomas the mutant gene was present in only a fraction of the tumor cell population, suggesting tumor heterogeneity for ras gene mutations. Yet, flow cytometric measurement of nuclear DNA contents and histological examination of tumor tissue did not reveal two different tumor cell populations. We conclude from these observations that ras mutation is probably not the initial genetic event in the development of seminoma.

Two schedules of teniposide with or without cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial to investigate the value of the addition of cisplatin to teniposide (VM26) and to investigate the schedule dependence of the topoisomerase II inhibitor VM26, in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-five NSCLC patients were randomized to receive VM26 120 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 or 360 mg/m2 on day 1 only, either as a single drug or in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Response rates, side effects, and survival were compared according to the 2 x 2 factorial design of this study. RESULTS: The response rate of the two cisplatin-containing arms was superior to that of the two arms that contained VM26 only (22% v 6%, P < .001); progression-free survival and survival times were also longer in the cisplatin-containing arms (median, 4.3 v 2.2 months, P = .003; median 7.2 v 5.9 months, P = .008, respectively). Toxicity was significantly higher in the cisplatin-containing arms; the most frequent side effects were leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. The schedule of VM26 did not significantly influence the response rate, progression-free survival interval, or survival duration. However, the response rate of the 1-day administration was significantly lower than that of the 3-day administration when given as single drugs. CONCLUSION: The addition of cisplatin to VM26 improves the response rate, progression-free survival interval, and survival duration over VM26 alone, although at the cost of a significant increase in toxicity. Cisplatin should be considered as the basis for combination chemotherapies in advanced NSCLC.

Enhanced myelotoxicity due to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course in patients with small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) priming on peripheral-blood cell counts during standard-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with relapsed small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) were treated with two chemotherapy courses. Six patients received G-CSF priming only before the first course (group A) and the other six patients only before the second course (group B). Each patient served as his own control. Patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (CEE), or with vincristine, ifosfamide, mesna, and carboplatin (VIMP) every 4 weeks. G-CSF was administered subcutaneously 5 microg/kg/d for 6 days until 48 hours before the first or second chemotherapy course. RESULTS: Priming caused a lowering of the WBC nadir, with a median value of 0.95 x 10(9)/L (P = .004), and of absolute neutrophil nadir, with a median value of 0.48 x 10(9)/L (P = .03). There was a trend for a lower platelet (PLT) nadir after G-CSF priming (P = .09). G-CSF priming resulted in a prolonged duration of WBC count less than 3.0 x 10(9)/L of +4.25 days (P = .04), and of WBC count less than 1.0 x 10(9)/L of +0.50 days (P = .03). The duration of neutropenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L seemed longer in primed courses (+3.75 days, P = .18). The duration of PLT counts less than 100 x 10(9)/L was prolonged by 1.5 days (P = .04). Hemoglobin (Hgb) levels were not influenced by G-CSF priming. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administration until 48 hours before the next chemotherapy course increases chemotherapy-associated leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. This may be of special concern when G-CSF is administered during dose-densified chemotherapy.

Randomized study of paclitaxel-cisplatin versus cisplatin-teniposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

PURPOSE: To compare two cisplatin based chemotherapy schedules in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 332 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1 either in combination with teniposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 (arm A) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion on day 1 (arm B); cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were ineligible; patient characteristics were well balanced between the two arms: 71% were male, 71% had less than 5% weight loss, 89% had a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 0 to 1, 51% had adenocarcinoma, and 61% had stage IV disease. Hematologic toxicity was significantly more severe in arm A (leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4: 66% v 19%, 83% v 55%, 36% v 2% in arms A and B, respectively), which resulted in more febrile neutropenia (27% v 3% in arms A and B, respectively), dose reductions, and treatment delays. There were a total of nine toxic deaths, six due to neutropenic sepsis: five in arm A and one in arm B. In contrast, arthralgia/myalgia (grade 2 or 3, 4% v 17%), peripheral neurotoxicity (grade 2 or 3, 6% v 29%), and hypersensitivity reactions (1% v 7%, all grades) were significantly more frequent in arm B. The frequency and severity of other toxicities were comparable between the two arms. Responses were one complete and 44 partial on arm A (28%) and two complete and 61 partial (41%) on arm B (P = .018). There was no significant difference in survival, with median and 1-year survivals 9.9 versus 9.7 months and 41% versus 43%, respectively in arm A and B. Progression-free survival was 4.9 and 5.4 months in arm A and B, respectively. Selected centers participated in a quality-of-life (QoL) assessment, which was performed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and LC-13 administered at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter. Arm B achieved a better score at week 6 for emotional, cognitive and social functioning, global health status, fatigue, and appetite loss, which was lost at 12 weeks. In conclusion, arm B appears superior to arm A with regard to response rate, side effects, and QoL. CONCLUSION: Although survival was not improved, arm B offers a better palliation for advanced NSCLC patients than arm A.

Chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been evaluated with response rate, survival and quality of life as criteria. The data were collected from 142 phase II and III trials. The three main conclusions are: (1) multivariate landmark analyses show that a response to chemotherapy has an independent significant value for prognosis, and all studies of chemotherapy vs. best supportive care show some survival benefit in favour of chemotherapy; (2) NSCLC patients are a heterogeneous group with a large variation of known and unknown prognostic factors, such as the treatment centre, for both response and survival; and (3) retrospective analysis of the data show that response rate and survival are significantly correlated at response rate over 30% and in limited disease patients. The following recommendations are made: (1) new drugs should be compared in randomised phase II trials with a standard active drug; (2) randomised phase III trials of single agents or best supportive care vs. combination chemotherapy should be repeated in a well-defined subgroup of patients with a high performance score and limited tumour load; and (3) the palliative effect of chemotherapy in randomised trials in patients with symptoms should be investigated with relief of symptoms and quality of life as endpoints.

Testing the possible non-cross resistance of two equipotent combination chemotherapy regimens against small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

The Goldie-Coldman hypothesis of alternating non-cross resistant combination chemotherapy regimens for small-cell lung cancer has never been adequately evaluated. In previously reported studies non-cross resistance and/or equipotency of the combinations used had not been tested before the phase III study was started. We describe two combination chemotherapy regimens with comparable efficacy against small-cell lung cancer and present a phase II test of their possible non-cross resistance. Patients clinically resistant to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (CDE), were treated with the second-line regimen consisting of vincristine, ifosfamide, mesna and carboplatin (VIMP) (n = 25). This resulted in 1 complete and 14 partial responses, response rate 60% [95% confidence interval (CI): 38.7-78.9%]. Patients clinically resistant to vincristine, carboplatin (n = 22) or ifosfamide, mesna, carboplatin (n = 21) were treated with CDE, resulting in 6 complete responses and 16 partial responses, response rate 51% (95% CI: 35.5-66.7%). The clinical value of such a degree of non-cross resistance has to be evaluated in a phase III study.

Disease monitoring by the tumour markers cyfra 21.1 and TPA in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

We evaluated the use of two tumour markers Cyfra 21.1 and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) for disease monitoring. Assessment of response to WHO criteria was compared to response assessment according to changes in the tumour marker levels. The criteria defined for marker response were a 65% decrease for a partial response and a 40% increase for progressive disease. When response evaluations with a positive lead time were included, 72% of 115 evaluations for Cyfra 21.1 and 59% of 107 evaluations for TPA yielded the same result. Most discordant evaluations were caused by those evaluations whereby the patient achieved a partial response according to the WHO criteria and had normalisation of the marker. Less cases with a positive lead time, more negative lead times, and more patients with progressive disease without an increase of the marker were seen with TPA compared to Cyfra 21.1. In conclusion, Cyfra 21.1 follows the changes in the tumour load better than TPA. Rising levels of both markers nearly always indicate disease progression, and such knowledge easily obtained may prevent the continuation of ineffective treatment.

Ifosfamide in advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophageal-gastric junction area. Rotterdam Esophageal Tumor Study Group.

25 previously untreated patients with inoperable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or oesophageal-gastric junction area were treated with ifosfamide 6 g/m2 over 48 hours, combined with mesna 6 g/m2. 1 complete response and 1 partial response were seen among 23 patients evaluable, with a response duration of 29+ months and 7 months, respectively. Toxicity was not severe: grade 3 infection in 2 patients, grade 3 leucopenia in 3 patients and grade 3 nausea in 4 patients. No life-threatening episodes or central nervous system toxicity were encountered. Ifosfamide has limited activity in adenocarcinoma of the oesophageal-gastric junction area.

Correlation between changes in the tumour markers CA-M26 and CA-M29 and standard response evaluation in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

In this study we correlated response evaluated by standard WHO criteria to strict defined criteria of tumour marker response in 63 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Pretreatment sensitivity at first evaluation was 71% and 85% for CA-M26 and CA-M29, respectively. Of the 156 evaluations for CA-M26 and 178 for CA-M29 in 26 and 30 patients with evaluable lesions 72% and 67% were concordant with the results of the clinical evaluations. When the discordant evaluations due to lead time were included the concordances were 87% for CA-M26 and 83% for CA-M29. Of the 70 evaluations for CA-M26 and 92 for CA-M29 in 19 and 24 patients with non-evaluable lesions 59% and 72% were concordant with the results of the clinical evaluations. Most importantly, progressive disease according to the changes in the marker level nearly always predicted disease progression. Such knowledge obtained in a simple way may prevent continuation of ineffective treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

A phase I study of local treatment of liver metastases with recombinant tumour necrosis factor.

15 patients with therapy-resistant liver metastases were treated in a phase I study with recombinant tumour necrosis factor (rTNF). rTNF was injected into a liver metastasis by ultrasound guidance, using a 50 micrograms escalating dose schedule (3 patients/dosage) ranging from 100 to 350 micrograms per injection. Influenza-like symptoms such as fever, chills, nausea and vomiting were the main clinical side-effects. 2 patients experienced transient hypotension, probably due to concomitant use of morphine. Other toxicities, as reported after systemic use of rTNF, such as decrease in leucocytes and platelet counts, renal or liver toxicity were not observed. No difference was seen in subpopulations of lymphocytes (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16+ and CD19+) prior to and after rTNF injection. In 8 patients stable disease occurred in rTNF-treated metastases. The maximal dose used by this route of administration is 350 micrograms per injection. Based on these observations we conclude that the toxicity of rTNF injected into liver metastases by sonographic control is transient and mild. The results suggest that intratumoral administration of rTNF might play a role in local tumour control.

Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: an EORTC Phase III trial.

Alternating chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer has been tested in several studies. Some have shown positive results that have not been confirmed in other studies. In all of the studies, however, the degree of non-cross-resistance in the regimens was questionable. The EORTC Lung Cancer Study Group developed two equipotent regimens: (i) standard (CDE)-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide; (ii) (VIMP)-vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, mesna, both non-cross-resistance. These two combinations were alternated and compared with the standard chemotherapy regimen in a group of 143 patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Median survival was 7.6 months in the standard arm and 8.7 in the alternating arm (P = 0.243). Median time to progression was 5.8 and 6.4 months, respectively (P = 0.166). Median response duration was 7.0 and 6.8 months (P = 0.221). The use of two alternating regimens with a proven degree of non-cross-resistance did not result in any improvement in survival in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer.

Genitourinary group phase II study of chemotherapy in stage T3-4 N0-X M0 transitional cell cancer of the bladder: prognostic factor analysis.

The aim of this study was to examine prognostic factors for survival of patients with invasive bladder cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by further treatment. From 1986 to 1990, 149 eligible patients with T3-4 N0-X M0 bladder cancer were entered into a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of cisplatin and methotrexate. Patients received two or four courses of chemotherapy, depending on the absence or presence, respectively, of a major clinical response after two courses. 136 patients were evaluable for clinical response after two courses of chemotherapy, and 75 patients were evaluable for pathological response after two or four courses. A multivariate analysis, based on pretreatment variables and the post-treatment variables, clinical response and pathological response, showed that performance status, tumour size and clinical response after two courses of chemotherapy were the only independent prognostic factors for all eligible patients. A second multivariate analysis in the selected subgroup of patients, who underwent a cystectomy, showed that the G-cagetory and pathological response were the only independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, in this group of patients, the response to chemotherapy was a strong and independent prognostic factor in addition to other independent variables. However, it was not accurate or strong enough to allow an impact on the choice of locoregional therapy.

Prognostic significance of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of the tumour marker, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS), in 203 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and related this to several other known prognostic factors. TPS was significantly correlated with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase and alkaline phosphatase, and the median level of TPS in patients with stage 4 disease was significantly higher as compared to stage 3A and 3B disease. In the univariate analysis, performance status, stage of disease, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, a histology of undifferentiated large cell carcinoma and TPS all had a statistically significant association with survival. Multivariate analysis showed that stage of disease, performance status, histology and TPS were the most important prognostic factors. TPS has prognostic significance for survival in patients with advanced NSCLC, independent from performance status and stage of disease.

Phase I study of a weekly schedule of a fixed dose of cisplatin and escalating doses of paclitaxel in patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.

The objective of this study was to determine the toxicities and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a dose-dense schedule with a fixed dose of cisplatin and escalating doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or irresectable squamous cell-, adeno-, or undifferentiated carcinoma of the oesophagus. Patients received paclitaxel over 3 h followed by a 3-h infusion of a fixed dose of cisplatin of 70 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36 and 43. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 80 mg/m(2). Patients were re-treated if white blood cell count (WBC) was >/=1 x 10(9) cells/l, except for day 29 when the WBC had to be >/=3 x 10(9) cells/l. Six patients were treated at each dose level. The dose of paclitaxel was increased by 10 mg/m(2) per level. Of the 24 patients enrolled, 13 had adenocarcinoma, 10 had squamous cell carcinoma and one had an undifferentiated carcinoma. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 22 of 24 patients were evaluable for response. The paclitaxel dose could be escalated to 110 mg/m(2). At this dose, 3 out of 6 patients developed dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) including neutropenic enterocolitis with sepsis, vomiting and diarrhoea. Diarrhoea grades 3 and 4 was seen in 4 (17%) patients. Two of these patients died of neutropenic enterocolitis. Neutropenia grades 3 or 4 was seen in 20 (83%) patients, but apart from the two patients with neutropenic enterocolitis no other infectious complications were seen. Mild to moderate sensory neurotoxicity was seen in 11 (46%) patients (grade 1 in 8 patients and grade 2 in 3 patients). Other toxicities were mild and easily manageable. Of the 22 evaluable patients, 11 (50%) patients achieved a partial or complete response with a median duration of 13 months. Ten patients with either locally advanced disease or supraclavicular or celiac lymph nodes received additional local treatment after response to chemotherapy, seven patients are still without evidence of disease after a median follow-up of 32 months. Paclitaxel at a dose 100 mg/m(2) infused over 3 h followed by a 3-h infusion of 70 mg/m(2) cisplatin can be recommended for further studies in patients with metastatic or unresectable oesophageal cancer. Occurring diarrhoea should be handled with caution because it may be a sign of neutropenic enterocolitis. The response rate of this dose-dense schedule seems encouraging.

Comparison of two carboplatin-containing regimens with standard chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer in a randomised phase II study. The EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative group.

The EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative group performed a randomised phase II study in patients with small cell lung cancer comparing the standard cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/etoposide (CDE) regimen with two regimens containing the new and active cisplatin derivative, carboplatin, 400 mg/m2 in combination with ifosfamide, a drug without important myelotoxicity, at a dose of 5 g/m2 (IMP) or the non-myelotoxic drug vincristine twice 2 mg (VP). Of 178 evaluable patients, 63 received CDE [30 limited disease (LD), 33 extensive disease (ED)], 55 received IMP (22 LD, 33 ED) and 60 (26 LD, 34 ED) were treated with VP. The response duration was not statistically different: CDE 31 weeks, IMP 29 weeks and VP 21 weeks. The time to progression after CEE was 28 weeks, IMP 24 weeks and VP 17 weeks. This was significantly shorter after VP than after CDE (P = 0.017). The 60% response rate of the VP combination was low compared with CDE (83%) and IMP (77%). Toxicity of all three regimens was acceptable, and dose reduction for myelosuppression was necessary in only a minority of the patients. We conclude from this study that the combination of carboplatin, at the maximally tolerated dose of 400 mg/m2, in combination with ifosfamide 5 g/m2, is an active regimen with efficacy comparable with the standard CDE regimen.

Etoposide in malignant pleural mesothelioma: two phase II trials of the EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

Intravenous and oral etoposide (VP 16-213) were tested in two sequential phase II trials in chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. In the first trial, etoposide was given intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 150 mg/m2 on days 1, 3 and 5 every 3 weeks. The second trial investigated a daily oral dose of 100 mg for 21 days followed by a 2-week treatment-free period, and then recycling. In both trials, the treatment was given until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or patient refusal. In the i.v. trial, 49 patients were included, 2 patients were ineligible. The oral trial recruited 45 patients, 4 patients were not eligible. In both trials, the main side-effects were moderate leucopenia, alopecia, nausea and vomiting. Two partial responses (4%) and three partial responses (7%) were reported in the i.v. and oral trials, respectively. The median survival was 29 weeks and 38 weeks in the i.v. and oral trials, respectively. In conclusion, further investigation of etoposide in malignant mesothelioma is not recommended.

Introduction to the treatment of lung cancer.

Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Its incidence has declined in men but is increasing in women, assuring that this largely preventable disease will continue to affect millions. In small cell lung cancer, the advent of chemotherapy in the 1970s and continued refinements in the 1980s yielded improved median survivals in patients with both limited disease and extensive disease and improved long-term survival in limited-disease patients. Reinduction chemotherapy was shown in the 1980s to improve survival in patients who had achieved a complete remission to initial chemotherapy, and a consensus subsequently developed regarding standard induction chemotherapy for patients with small cell lung cancer. The prognosis for patients with small cell lung cancer depends largely on delivering the optimal combination chemotherapy to achieve early, maximal cell kill with manageable toxicity. Future challenges include comparing newer combinations and novel schedules of administration with "standard" chemotherapy, optimizing the use of complementary treatment modalities, and refining prognostic factors to better define treatment and improve outcome. In patients with non-small cell lung cancer, single-modality treatment has been compared with combined-modality therapy in numerous randomized trials, with consistent survival benefits accrued by patients in combined-modality treatment arms. The recent availability of novel cytotoxic and cytostatic agents has prompted additional comparisons of new combination-chemotherapy regimens, with or without other treatment modalities, in patients with lung cancer. Questions for the future include defining the most effective chemotherapy to eradicate distant metastases and understanding which modalities offer superior local control.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable (stage I and II) and locally advanced (stage IIIA-N2) non-small cell lung cancer.

In 1995, a randomized intergroup study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by either surgery or radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer was started under the auspices of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 08941). The objective of this study is to investigate whether surgery or radiotherapy represents superior locoregional treatment, in terms of survival and quality of life, for patients with stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer who have achieved a response after three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A phase II side study will investigate the clinical and pathologic response rate (if applicable), as well as acute and late side effects during or after consecutive surgery and/or radiotherapy of combination paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) and carboplatin. It is planned that paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 will be given as a 3-hour infusion, followed by a 30-minute infusion of carboplatin at a dose based on a target area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg x min/mL. This phase II study was started in October 1996. Depending on the response rate and early and late side effects observed in this well-defined, prognostically favorable group of patients, it will be decided whether and how to use the same combination chemotherapy in an ongoing randomized trial currently being conducted by the Dutch Lung Cancer Study Group (DLCSG 94-2). In the latter trial, patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer are randomized to immediate surgery or two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Responding patients will receive another two courses of chemotherapy before surgery; nonresponders will go directly to surgery.