Comparison of CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS Bleeding Risk Scores in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Compare the discriminative performance of two validated bleeding risk models for in-hospital bleeding events in a non-selected cohort of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. METHODS: CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) and ACUITY-HORIZONS (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY-Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) scores were calculated in 501 consecutive patients (median age 68 years (IQR 57-77), 31% female) admitted for ACS to the coronary care unit (CCU) of San Paolo Hospital in Milan (Italy). In-hospital haemorrhagic events and mortality were recorded and calibration and discrimination of the two risk models were evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the C-statistic, respectively. RESULTS: Overall bleeding events were observed in 32 patients and major bleedings in 11 (with an incidence of 6.4% and 2.2%, respectively). In-hospital mortality was 2.6%. Regarding major bleedings both risk scores demonstrated an adequate calibration (H-L test p>0.20) and a moderate discrimination with no significant difference in predictive accuracy between the two models (C-statistic 0.69 for CRUSADE and 0.73 for ACUITY-HORIZONS). We also tested the performance of the two risk models in predicting in-hospital mortality, showing an adequate calibration and a very good discrimination (C-statistic 0.88 and 0.89 for the CRUSADE and ACUITY-HORIZONS scores, respectively), with no significant difference in predictive accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: In our ACS population the CRUSADE and the ACUITY-HORIZONS risk scores showed a fairly good and comparable predictive accuracy regarding in-hospital bleeding events and they appeared to be very good predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease: (un)solved therapeutic dilemma?

Concomitant presence of atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention is a frequent occurrence. The choice of optimal antithrombotic therapy, in this context, is still challenging. To offer the best protection both in terms of stroke and stent thrombosis, triple therapy with oral anticoagulation and dual antiplatelet therapy would be required. Several drug combinations have been tested in recent years, including direct oral anticoagulants, with the aim of balancing ischemic and bleeding risk. Both pharmacokinetic aspects of the molecules and patient's characteristics should be analyzed in choosing oral anticoagulation. Then, as suggested by guidelines, triple therapy should start with a seven-day duration and the aim to prolong to thirty days in high thrombotic risk patients. Dual therapy should follow to reach twelve months after coronary intervention. Even not fully discussed by the guidelines, in order to balance ischemic and bleeding risk it should also be considered: 1) integrated assessment of coronary artery disease and procedural complexity of coronary intervention; 2) appropriateness to maintain the anticoagulant drug dosage indicated in technical data sheet; the lack of data on the suspension of antiplatelet drugs one year after percutaneous intervention; 3) the possibility of combination therapy with ticagrelor; and 4) the need to treat the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation during acute coronary syndrome. With data provided clinician should pursue a therapy as personalized as possible, both in terms of drug choice and treatment duration, in order to balance ischemic and bleeding risk.

Cardiac electrical instability in Erdheim-Chester disease: a case report.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare multisystemic disorder of non-Langerhans histiocytic cells with a pleomorphic clinical presentation. It affects bones, skin, central nervous system, pituitary gland, ocular tissue, kidneys and perirenal tissue and lungs. Cardiac involvement presents usually with pericardial effusion and right atrial masses, but rarely with conduction system infiltration and subsequent arrhythmic events. Following the discovery of mutations of activating signaling kinase proteins (BRAF, MEK, ALK), the therapeutic landscape has changed to a more precise targeted treatment. Currently vemurafenib is approved for patient with end-organ dysfunction and BRAF-V600E mutation and the prognosis has dramatically improved. Here we present a case of ECD with electrical instability as main clinically relevant manifestation of cardiac involvement.

Predictors of Mortality and Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Anterior STEMI: Results from a Single Center Study.

Anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (A-STEMI) has the worst prognosis among all infarct sites due to larger infarct size and the higher cardiac enzyme release. We retrospectively analyzed 584 A-STEMI undergoing urgent coronary angiography from October 2008 to April 2019. The median follow-up time was 1774 days with a minimum of a 1-year follow-up for 498 patients. In-hospital mortality was 8.6%, while long-term, all-cause mortality and 1-year mortality were 18.8% and 6.8%, respectively. The main predictors for in-hospital mortality were ejection fraction (LV-EF), baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), female gender and cardiogenic shock (CS) at admission, while long-term predictors of mortality were age, coronary artery disease (CAD) extension and LV-EF. Patients presenting with CS (6.5%) showed a higher mortality rate (in-hospital 68.4%, long term 41.7%). Among 245 patients (42%) with multivessel disease (MVD), complete revascularization (CR) during the index procedure was performed in 42.8% of patients and more often in patients with CS at admission (19.1% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.008). Short- and long-term mortality were not significantly influenced by the revascularization strategy (CR/culprit only). Our study confirmed the extreme fragility of A-STEMI patients, especially in case of CS at admission. LV-EF is a powerful predictor of a poor outcome. In MVD, CR during p-PCI did not show any advantage for either long- or short-term mortality compared to the culprit-only strategy.

Predictors of procedural and clinical outcome in rotational atherectomy: analysis of a single center registry.

BACKGROUND: Heavy calcified lesions can decrease effectiveness of drug eluted stents in preventing restenosis. Rotational atherectomy (RA) demonstrated to improve outcomes in patients with severely calcified lesions pretreated with debulking. However, its feasibility and its safety are continuously on stage. Our aim has been to identify predictors of clinical and procedural outcome in RA. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a population of patients referred to our cath lab for urgent or elective coronary catheterization treated with RA. The associations between clinical variables and clinical or procedural events were evaluated using logistic regression. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) from procedure date to last day of follow-up. MACE have been defined as follows: cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization and target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: The registry included 68 of the 1908 (3.6%) patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Procedural success was as high as 94% and more than 90% of cases were treated without any complication. The most common complication during PCI with RA was vessel dissection (8.8%) and no procedural death occurred. None of the clinical nor procedural characteristics were associated with burr entrapment or vascular access hematoma. We identified as independent predictor of treated vessel dissection the female sex (OR 16.9, 95% CI 1.55-183.77, P<0.05). Logistic regression revealed age (OR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02-1.33, P<0.02) as the only independent predictor of MACE. We therefore calculated the ROC curve on age in predicting MACE, that showed a C-statistics of 0.75 (95% CI 0.628 to 0.852, P=0.02), with 80 years old as the best threshold in defining high risk population. CONCLUSIONS: RA is a feasible and safe procedure. Females and elderly patients must be carefully selected in order to balance the risk/benefit ratio in these high-risk populations.

The paradox of clopidogrel use in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes: insight from the Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and acute coronary syndromes have a greater level of platelet aggregation and a poor response to oral antiplatelet drugs. Clopidogrel is still widely used in clinical practice, despite the current evidence favoring ticagrelor and prasugrel. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of clopidogrel use in the population of the multicenter prospective 'Acute Coronary Syndrome and Diabetes Registry' carried out during a 9-week period between March and May 2015 at 29 Hospitals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 559 consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients [mean age: 68.7±11.3 years, 50% ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)], with 'known DM' (56%) or 'hyperglycemia' at admission, were included in the registry; 460 (85%) patients received a myocardial revascularization. RESULTS: At hospital discharge, dual antiplatelet therapy was prescribed to 88% of the patients (clopidogrel ticagrelor and prasugrel to 39, 38, and 23%, respectively). Differences in P2Y12 inhibitor administration were recorded on the basis of history of diabetes, age, and clinical presentation (unstable angina/non-STEMI vs. non-STEMI). On univariate analysis, age older than 75 years or more, known DM, peripheral artery disease, previous myocardial infarction, previous revascularization, complete revascularization, previous cerebrovascular event, creatinine clearance, unstable angina/non-STEMI at presentation, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score, EuroSCORE, CRUSADE Bleeding Score, and oral anticoagulant therapy were significantly associated with clopidogrel choice at discharge. On multivariate analysis, only oral anticoagulant therapy and the CRUSADE Bleeding Score remained independent predictors of clopidogrel prescription. CONCLUSION: In the present registry of a high-risk population, clopidogrel was the most used P2Y12 inhibitor at hospital discharge, confirming the 'paradox' to treat sicker patients with the less effective drug. Diabetic status, a marker of higher thrombotic risk, did not influence this choice; however, bleeding risk was taken into account.

Real-world clopidogrel utilization in acute coronary syndromes: patients selection and outcomes in a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: With this study, we sought to identify patient characteristics associated with clopidogrel prescription and its relationship with in-hospital adverse events in an unselected cohort of ACSs patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied all consecutive patients admitted at our institution for ACSs from 2012 to 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on clopidogrel or novel P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) prescription and the relationship between clopidogrel use and patient clinical characteristics and in-hospital adverse events was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The population median age was 68 years (57-77 year) and clopidogrel was prescribed in 230 patients (46%). Patients characteristics associated with clopidogrel prescription were older age, female sex, non-ST-elevation ACS diagnosis, the presence of diabetes mellitus and anemia, worse renal and left ventricular functions and a higher Killip class. Patients on clopidogrel demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (4.8%) than prasugrel and ticagrelor-treated patients (0.4%), while a nonstatistically significant trend emerged considering bleeding events. However, on multivariable logistic regression analysis female sex, the presence of anemia and Killip class were the only variables independently associated with in-hospital death. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with clopidogrel showed a higher in-hospital mortality. However, clinical variables associated with its use identify a population at high risk for adverse events and this seems to play a major role for the higher in-hospital mortality observed in clopidogrel-treated patients.

Management of diabetic patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndromes: a prospective multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) present an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. An Italian Consensus Document indicated 'three specific must' to obtain in this subgroup of patients: optimal oral antiplatelet therapy, early invasive approach and a tailored strategy of revascularization for unstable angina/non-ST-elevation-myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI); furthermore, glycemia at admission should be managed with dedicated protocols. AIM: To investigate if previous recommendations are followed, the present multicenter prospective observational registry was carried out in Lombardia during a 9-week period between March and May 2015. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 559 consecutive ACS patients (mean age 68.7 ±â€Š11.3 years, 35% ≥75 years, 50% STEMI), with 'known DM' (56%) or 'hyperglycemia', this last defined as blood glucose value ≥ 126 mg/dl at admission, were included in the registry at 29 hospitals with an on-site 24/7 catheterization laboratory. Patients with known diabetes mellitus received clopidogrel in 51% of the cases, whereas most patients with hyperglycemia (72%) received a new P2Y12 inhibitor: according to clinical presentation in case STEMI prasugrel/ticagrelor were more prescribed than clopidogrel (70 vs. 30%, P < 0.001); on the contrary, no significant difference was found in case of UA/NSTEMI (48 vs. 52%, P = 0.57).Overall, 96% of the patients underwent coronary angiography and 85% received a myocardial revascularization (with percutaneous coronary intervention in 92% of cases) that was however performed in fewer patients with known diabetes mellitus compared with hyperglycemia (79 vs. 90%, P = 0.001).Among UA/NSTEMI, 85% of patients received an initial invasive approach, less than 72 h in 80% of the cases (51% <24 h); no difference was reported comparing known diabetes mellitus to hyperglycemia. Despite similar SYNTAX score, patients with known diabetes mellitus had a higher rate of Heart Team discussion (29 vs. 12%, P = 0.03) and received a surgical revascularization in numerically more cases.Most investigators (85%) followed a local protocol for glycemia management at admission, but insulin was used in fewer than half of the cases; diabetes consulting was performed in 25% of the patients and mainly in case of known diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Based on data of the present real world prospective registry, patients with ACS and known diabetes mellitus are treated with an early invasive approach in case of UA/NSTEMI and with a tailored revascularization strategy, but with clopidogrel in more cases; glycemia management is taken into account at admission.

APpropriAteness of percutaneous Coronary interventions in patients with ischaemic HEart disease in Italy: the APACHE pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To first explore in Italy appropriateness of indication, adherence to guideline recommendations and mode of selection for coronary revascularisation. DESIGN: Retrospective, pilot study. SETTING: 22 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-performing hospitals (20 patients per site), 13 (59%) with on-site cardiac surgery. PARTICIPANTS: 440 patients who received PCI for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome were independently selected in a 4:1 ratio with half diabetics. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients who received appropriate PCI using validated appropriate use scores (ie, AUS≥7). Also, in patients with stable CAD, we examined adherence to the following European Society of Cardiology recommendations: (A) per cent of patients with complex coronary anatomy treated after heart team discussion; (B) per cent of fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for borderline stenoses in patients without documented ischaemia; (C) per cent of patients receiving guideline-directed medical therapy at the time of PCI as well as use of provocative test of ischaemia according to pretest probability (PTP) of CAD. RESULTS: Of the 401 mappable PCIs (91%), 38.7% (95% CI 33.9 to 43.6) were classified as appropriate, 47.6% (95% CI 42.7 to 52.6) as uncertain and 13.7% (95% CI 10.5% to 17.5%) as inappropriate. Median PTP in patients with stable CAD without known coronary anatomy was 69% (78% intermediate PTP, 22% high PTP). Ischaemia testing use was similar (p=0.71) in patients with intermediate (n=140, 63%) and with high PTP (n=40, 66%). In patients with stable CAD (n=352) guideline adherence to the three recommendations explored was: (A) 11%; (B) 25%; (C) 23%. AUS was higher in patients evaluated by the heart team as compared with patients who were not (7 (6.8) vs 5 (4.7); p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of heart team approaches and adherence to guideline recommendations on coronary revascularisation in a real-world setting is limited. This pilot study documents the feasibility of measuring appropriateness and guideline adherence in clinical practice and identifies substantial opportunities for quality improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02748603.

A rare case of large intracoronary thrombosis in advanced breast cancer patient treated with epirubicin and cisplatin.

: Cancer is associated with a prothrombotic or hypercoagulable state. Intracoronary thrombosis is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication in cancer patients. We describe a rare case of large nonocclusive intracoronary thrombosis successfully treated by means of medical therapy.

A comparison between two different definitions of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is associated with significantly increased mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The prognostic value of CI-AKI depends on the definitions used to define it. We compare the predictive accuracy of long-term mortality of two definitions of CI-AKI on consecutive patients undergoing pPCI for STEMI. METHODS: Incidence, risk factors and long-term prognosis of CI-AKI were assessed according to two different definitions: the first as an increase in serum creatinine ≥ 25% or ≥ 0.5 mg/dl from baseline within 72 h after pPCI (contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) criteria), the second one according to Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classification system. RESULTS: A total of 402 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 12 ± 4 months. Long-term mortality rate was 9.5%. Independent predictors of long-term mortality were: older age, basal renal impairment, left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, in-hospital major bleedings and CI-AKI. A significant correlation was found between mortality and CI-AKI as assessed by both CIN (HR 4.84, 95% CI: 2.56-9.16, p=0.000) and AKIN (HR 9.70, 95% CI: 5.12-18.37, p=0.000) definitions. The area under the receiver operating curve was significantly larger for predicting mortality with AKIN classification than with CIN criteria (0.7984 versus 0.7759; p=0.0331). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI treated by pPCI, CI-AKI is a frequent complication irrespective of the criteria used for its definition. AKIN, however, seems to provide a better accuracy in predicting long-term mortality than CIN criteria.

Acute myocardial infarction as first manifestation of left atrial myxoma in a young woman: role of echocardiography.

We report the case of a young woman with an acute myocardial infarction secondary to coronary embolization from a left atrial myxoma, as unusual presentation of a cardiac tumor.We also describe the role of transthoracic echocardiograpy in the multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment of this life-threatening condition.

Stress echocardiography for risk stratification of patients with chest pain and normal or slightly narrowed coronary arteries.

One hundred twenty-five patients (60 +/- 10 years old, 60 women) with known (35, previous myocardial infarction) or suspected (90) coronary artery disease (CAD) and no more than 50% coronary stenoses underwent pharmacologic (48 dipyridamole and 77 dobutamine) stress echocardiography (SE) and prospective follow-up (36 +/- 22 months) for cardiac death, nonfatal infarction, and unstable angina. The ability of clinical and SE variables to predict the outcome was assessed by the Cox model. A significant increase in the global chi-square of the model indicated an incremental prognostic value. Nine events occurred: 2 fatal and 5 nonfatal infarctions and 2 hospitalizations for unstable angina. Hypertension, positive SE, and peak wall motion score index were multivariate predictors of outcome, but SE provided an 87.5% increase in the global chi-square (P <.001). Patients with positive SE had a significantly lower event-free survival compared with those with negative SE. Therefore, we conclude that SE provides incremental prognostic information in patients with chest pain without critical coronary artery disease.

[Upstream administration of oral antiplatelet agents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention]. / Utilizzo upstream degli antiaggreganti piastrinici orali nei pazienti con infarto miocardico acuto con sopraslivellamento del tratto ST trattati con angioplastica primaria.

Current guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) recommend the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and an ADP receptor blocker "as early as possible" before angiography (upstream), though this suggestion is not based on the results of randomized clinical trials designed to investigate pre-hospital rather than in-hospital drug administration. The present review analyzed randomized clinical trials, registries and observational studies that assessed clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor administration in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI to evaluate if their upstream use may be justified in clinical practice. A significant difference favoring early clopidogrel administration has been demonstrated in observational studies. No evidence is available for prasugrel and ticagrelor; however, the initial delay of their antiplatelet effect in STEMI patients could support an upstream strategy to obtain complete platelet inhibition in the first hours after PCI and prevent major adverse events (e.g., stent thrombosis) despite an increased risk of major bleeding, particularly in case of urgent bypass surgery. Data from specifically designed randomized clinical trials are warranted to establish whether early administration of prasugrel and ticagrelor may favor reperfusion and improve clinical outcome with an acceptable risk-benefit ratio.

Female gender and contrast-induced nephropathy in primary percutaneous intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are at high risk for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), a complication that has been demonstrated to negatively affect outcomes. It has been suggested that, when compared to males, female patients present higher incidence of CIN and higher mortality after primary PCI. However, the specific role of gender in this setting remains ill-defined given its complex interplay with several co-morbidities and clinical characteristics. We investigated the relationship of patients' variables, including gender, with CIN and mortality after primary PCI. METHODS: In a single center study in 323 consecutive patients undergoing primary PCI, the development of CIN and mortality during an 18-month median follow-up period was assessed. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine (≥25% or ≥0.5 mg/dl) from baseline occurring at any time during the first 3 post-procedural days. RESULTS: CIN occurred in 23 female and 26 male patients (25.0% vs 11.2%, p=0.003), while cumulative mortality was 10.6%. Women presented unfavorable basal characteristics and underwent myocardial reperfusion less quickly. At multivariable analysis, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (odds ratio [OR] 7.32 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.60-21, p<0.001) and female gender (OR 2.49 95%CI 1.22-5.07, p=0.01) predicted CIN, whereas the occurrence of CIN (hazard ratio [HR] 3.65 95%CI 1.55-8.59, p=0.003) and a Mehran risk score (MRS)≥6 (HR 1.76 95%CI 1.13-2.74, p=0.01) independently predicted long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: After primary PCI, female gender and LVEF are associated with an increased risk of CIN, whereas MRS and development of CIN predict long-term mortality.

[Multidisciplinary management of patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes mellitus: from antithrombotic therapy to treatment of hyperglycemia]. / Gestione multidisciplinare del paziente con sindrome coronarica acuta e diabete mellito: dalla terapia antitrombotica al trattamento dell'iperglicemia.

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) present a significantly higher risk of developing ischemic complications as compared to nondiabetic patients. Multiple mechanisms contribute to DM patients' enhanced prothrombotic status, including impaired fibrinolysis and coagulation, as well as endothelial and platelet dysfunction. Therefore, antithrombotic agents generally, and antiplatelet agents in particular, represent a logical secondary preventive strategy to reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events in DM patients with ACS. However, DM patients often show attenuated responses to antiplatelet therapies for ACS patients. DM patients benefit from early coronary angiography and revascularization. Although randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that surgical revascularization is associated with an improved prognosis compared to percutaneous coronary intervention, a tailored revascularization strategy should be provided for each patient. The type of revascularization should be decided on the basis of SYNTAX score, surgical risk profile, and feasibility of total arterial revascularization in case of surgery. An accurate diagnosis and prompt treatment of hyperglycemia should also be provided for all patients. The present multidisciplinary document provides practical recommendations regarding diagnosis of DM and the management of hyperglycemia, from the acute phase to discharge. It is aimed at favoring early detection of hyperglycemia and identification of diabetic patients so as to provide adequate glucose control.

Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a single center randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third cause of acute deterioration of renal function in hospitalized patients. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of saline infusion, saline infusion plus N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and sodium bicarbonate (SB) infusion to prevent CIN in patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: We prospectively studied 156 patients with a baseline creatinine level > or = 1.2 mg/dL. The primary endpoint was the development of CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine concentration > or = 25% over the baseline value within 5 days from contrast exposure. RESULTS: Contrast-induced nephropathy developed in 23 patients (14.7%). Incidence of the primary endpoint was similar in the 3 groups of treatment, occurring in 7 patients (14%) in the saline infusion group, in 9 (17%) in the saline infusion plus NAC group, and in 7 (14%) in the SB infusion group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that neither the addition of NAC nor the administration of SB add further benefit in CIN prevention, compared to standard hydration with isotonic saline infusion.