Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Australian COPS Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation plays a crucial role in clinical manifestations and complications of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Colchicine, a commonly used treatment for gout, has recently emerged as a novel therapeutic option in cardiovascular medicine owing to its anti-inflammatory properties. We sought to determine the potential usefulness of colchicine treatment in patients with ACS. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 17 hospitals in Australia that provide acute cardiac care service. Eligible participants were adults (18-85 years) who presented with ACS and had evidence of coronary artery disease on coronary angiography managed with either percutaneous coronary intervention or medical therapy. Patients were assigned to receive either colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily for the first month, then 0.5 mg daily for 11 months) or placebo, in addition to standard secondary prevention pharmacotherapy, and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, ACS, ischemia-driven (unplanned) urgent revascularization, and noncardioembolic ischemic stroke in a time to event analysis. RESULTS: A total of 795 patients were recruited between December 2015 and September 2018 (mean age, 59.8±10.3 years; 21% female), with 396 assigned to the colchicine group and 399 to the placebo group. Over the 12-month follow-up, there were 24 events in the colchicine group compared with 38 events in the placebo group (P=0.09, log-rank). There was a higher rate of total death (8 versus 1; P=0.017, log-rank) and, in particular, noncardiovascular death in the colchicine group (5 versus 0; P=0.024, log-rank). The rates of reported adverse effects were not different (colchicine 23.0% versus placebo 24.3%), and they were predominantly gastrointestinal symptoms (colchicine, 23.0% versus placebo, 20.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of colchicine to standard medical therapy did not significantly affect cardiovascular outcomes at 12 months in patients with ACS and was associated with a higher rate of mortality. Registration: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12615000861550.

Utility of Zwolle Risk Score in Guiding Low-Risk STEMI Discharge.

BACKGROUND: Despite emerging evidence suggesting that selected patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated successfully with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) may be considered for early discharge, STEMI patients are typically hospitalised longer to monitor for serious complications. METHODS: We assessed the feasibility of identifying low-risk STEMI patients in our institution for early discharge using the Zwolle risk score (ZRS). We evaluated consecutive STEMI patients who underwent successful PPCI within the period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. Low-risk was defined as ZRS≤3. Demographic, angiographic characteristics, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, stroke, congestive cardiac failure, and non-fatal myocardial infarction, were recorded. RESULTS: There were 183 STEMI patients in our study cohort (mean age 62.0±12.2 years, 77.0% male). The median ZRS was 2 (interquartile range 1-4) with 132 (72.1%) patients classified as low-risk. The overall 30-day MACE and mortality rates were 10.4% and 3.3% respectively. None of the 35 (26.5%) low-risk patients who were discharged within 72 hours experienced MACE at 30 days. Low-risk STEMI patients had significantly shorter median LOS (86.3 vs. 93.2 hours, p=0.002), lower 30-day MACE (4.5% vs. 25.5%, p<0.0001) and mortality (0% vs. 11.8%, p<0.0001) compared to high-risk group (ZRS>3). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses for ZRS in predicting 30-day MACE and mortality yielded C-statistics of 0.79 (95%CI 0.68-0.90, p<0.0001) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.95-1.00, p<0.0001) respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-risk STEMI patients stratified by Zwolle risk score, who were treated successfully with PPCI, experienced low 30-day MACE and mortality rates, indicating that early discharge may be safe in these patients. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate the safety of ZRS-guided early discharge of STEMI patients, as well as the economic and psychological impacts.

Ultrarapid Iron Polymaltose Infusions Are Safe for Management of Iron Deficiency.

Introduction: Iron deficiency is a common condition, especially among patients with kidney and heart failure and inflammatory bowel disease. Intravenous iron is the preferred method of treatment in these patients, but it usually requires prolonged iron polymaltose infusions or multiple administrations of alternative preparations. The aim of the study was to confirm the safety and patient acceptance of ultrarapid iron polymaltose infusions as an alternative to slower treatments and ferric carboxymaltose. Method: An open-label, phase 4 safety study was conducted at a tertiary hospital, with consenting participants diagnosed with iron deficiency and requiring iron polymaltose up to 1,500 mg receiving the infusion over 15 min. The acute adverse event (AE) rates and their severities were compared to historical controls of 1- and 4-h iron polymaltose infusions from a retrospective study of 648 patients from the same study site. Delayed AEs as well as participant infusion acceptability were also studied. Results: Three hundred participants over a 2-year period received ultrarapid infusions of iron polymaltose with an acute AE rate of 18.7% and severe AE rate of 1.0%. The total and mild infusion AE rates were higher compared to those of slower infusions (p < 0.001), but comparable for moderate and severe AEs. Delayed reactions occurred in 12.5% of participants, with over 95% of them preferring repeat ultrarapid infusions if required again. Conclusion: Iron polymaltose can be safely infused at ultrarapid rates when compared to slower infusions, with similar safety to ferric carboxymaltose, offering greater convenience for patients and reduced healthcare costs.

Introdução: A deficiência de ferro é uma condição comum, especialmente nos doentes com insuficiência renal e cardíaca e doença inflamatória intestinal. O ferro intravenoso é o método de tratamento preferido nestes doentes, mas normalmente requer infusões prolongadas ferropolimaltose ou múltiplas administrações de preparações alternativas. O objectivo deste estudo foi confirmar a segurança e a aceitação das infusões de ferro polimaltose ultrarápidas como alternativa às infusões mais lentas e à carboximaltose férrica. Métodos: Estudo de segurança aberto, fase 4, num hospital terciário, incluindo doentes com ferropenia com necessidades de ferro-polimaltose até 1500 mg, que receberam a infusão durante 15 minutos. As taxas de eventos adversos (AE) agudos e as suas gravidades foram comparadas com controlos históricos de infusões de ferro-polimaltose de uma e quatro horas de duração, a partir de um estudo retrospectivo de 648 pacientes do mesmo centro. Foram também avaliados os EA diferidos, bem como a aceitabilidade da infusão dos participantes. Resultados: Trezentos participantes receberam infusões ultrarápidas de ferro-polimaltose durante um período de 2 anos, com uma taxa de EA agudos de 18,7%, e uma taxa de EA graves de 1,0%. As taxas globais de AE e de AE ligeiros foram superiores às da infusão lenta (p < 0,001), mas comparável para os AEs moderados e graves. Reações tardias ocorreram em 12,5% dos participantes. Mais de 95% deles manifestaram preferência por repetir as infusões ultrarápidas, se necessidade subsequente de terapêutica. Conclusão: A infusão ultra-rápida de ferro-polimaltose é segura quando comparada com infusões mais lentas, com segurança também semelhante à carboximaltose férrica, oferecendo maior comodidade e menores custos de saúde.

Door-in-door-out times for patients with large vessel occlusion ischaemic stroke being transferred for endovascular thrombectomy: a Victorian state-wide study.

Background: Time to reperfusion is an important predictor of outcome in ischaemic stroke from large vessel occlusion (LVO). For patients requiring endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), the transfer times from peripheral hospitals in metropolitan and regional Victoria, Australia to comprehensive stroke centres (CSCs) have not been studied. Aims: To determine transfer and journey times for patients with LVO stroke being transferred for consideration of EVT. Methods: All patients transferred for consideration of EVT to three Victorian CSCs from January 2017 to December 2018 were included. Travel times were obtained from records matched to Ambulance Victoria and the referring centre via Victorian Stroke Telemedicine or hospital medical records. Metrics of interest included door-in-door-out time (DIDO), inbound journey time and outbound journey time. Results: Data for 455 transferred patients were obtained, of which 395 (86.8%) underwent EVT. The median DIDO was 107 min (IQR 84-145) for metropolitan sites and 132 min (IQR 108-167) for regional sites. At metropolitan referring hospitals, faster DIDO was associated with use of the same ambulance crew to transport between hospitals (75 (63-90) vs 124 (99-156) min, p<0.001) and the administration of thrombolysis prior to transfer (101 (79-133) vs 115 (91-155) min, p<0.001). At regional centres, DIDO was consistently longer when patients were transported by air (160 (127-195) vs 116 (100-144) min, p<0.001). The overall door-to-door time by air was shorter than by road for sites located more than 250 km away from the CSC. Conclusion: Transfer times differ significantly for regional and metropolitan patients. A state-wide database to prospectively collect data on all interhospital transfers for EVT would be helpful for future study of optimal transport mode at regional sites and benchmarking of DIDO across the state.

In-hospital 'CODE STEMI' improves door-to-balloon time in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Reducing time to reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is essential in improving outcomes. Consequently, numerous strategies have been employed to reduce median door-to-balloon time (DTBT). METHODS: CODE STEMI is an ED physician-activated STEMI notification system. On activation, an announcement is made over the hospital's public announcement (PA) system. We prospectively analysed all in-hours STEMI patients who had primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) Pre-CODE STEMI (2014) and after CODE STEMI was implemented (2015). The primary end-points were median DTBT and the proportion of STEMI patients achieving a DTBT ≤90 min. The secondary end-points were in-hospital outcomes, and a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and hospital readmission rates at 30 days and 12 months. RESULTS: There were 41 and 42 patients in Pre-CODE STEMI and CODE STEMI groups respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar. DTBT was significantly reduced by 22.1 min from 67.1 ± 34.9 min Pre-CODE STEMI to 45.0 ± 22.7 min (P = 0.001) in the CODE STEMI group. Door-to-door time (DTDT) was also reduced from 46.3 ± 30.9 min to 29.4 ± 23.3 min (P = 0.006). A greater proportion of CODE STEMI patients achieved the target DTBT ≤90 min (95.2% vs 73.2%, P = 0.007). CODE STEMI patients had less systolic dysfunction measured by a left ventricle ejection fraction of ≤40% (10.0% vs 27.8%, P = 0.07). There were trends to lower in-hospital mortality rates (4.8% vs 9.8%, P = 0.43), MACE at 30 days and 12 months (4.8% vs 9.8%, P = 0.43; 11.9% vs 22.0%, P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: The novel in-hospital in-hours CODE STEMI notification system significantly reduced DTBT in patients undergoing PPCI.