RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasty is a leading cause of revision surgery, inferior function, complications, and death. The administration of topical, intrawound vancomycin (vancomycin powder) has appeared promising in some studies, but others have found it ineffective in reducing infection risk; for that reason, a high-quality systematic review of the best-available evidence is needed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Does topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) reduce PJI risk in hip and knee arthroplasty? (2) Does topical vancomycin lead to an increased risk of complications after hip and knee arthroplasty? METHODS: A search of Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases as of June 2020 was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing topical vancomycin in addition to standard infection prevention regimens (such as routine perioperative intravenous antibiotics) with standard regimens only in primary hip and knee arthroplasty were identified. Patients 18 years or older with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were included. No restrictions on maximal loss to follow-up or PJI definition were imposed. Studies were excluded if they included patients with a history of septic arthritis, used an antibiotic other than vancomycin or a different route of administration for the intervention, performed additional interventions that differed between groups, or omitted a control group. A total of 2408 studies were screened, resulting in nine eligible studies reviewing 3371 patients who received topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) during a primary THA or TKA and 2884 patients who did not receive it. Groups were comparable with respect to duration of follow-up and loss to follow-up when reported. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, showing moderate-to-high quality for the included studies. The risks of PJI and overall complications in the topical vancomycin group were compared with those in the control group. RESULTS: One of nine studies found a lower risk of PJI after primary THA or TKA, while eight did not, with odds ratios that broadly bracketed the line of no difference (range of odds ratios across the nine studies 0.09 to 1.97). In the six studies where overall complications could be compared between topical vancomycin and control groups in primary THA or TKA, there was no difference in overall complication risks with vancomycin (range of ORs across the six studies 0.48 to 0.94); however, we caution that these studies were underpowered to detect differences in the types of uncommon complications associated with vancomycin use (such as allergy, ototoxicity, and nephrotoxicity). CONCLUSION: In the absence of clear evidence of efficacy, and without a sufficiently large evidence base reporting on safety-related endpoints, topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) should not be used in routine primary THA and TKA. Adequately powered, multicenter, prospective trials demonstrating clear reductions in infection risk and large registry-driven audits of safety-related endpoints are required before the widespread use of topical vancomycin can be recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis Articulares/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Prótesis Articulares/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: It is estimated that one-quarter to half of all hospital waste is produced in the operating room. Recycling of surgical waste in the perioperative setting is uncommon, even though there are many recyclable materials. The objective of this study was to determine the amount of waste produced in the preoperative and operative periods for several orthopedic subspecialties and to assess how much of this waste was recycled. Methods: Surgical cases at 1 adult and 1 pediatric tertiary care hospital in Calgary, Alberta, were prospectively chosen from 6 orthopedic subspecialties over a 1-month period. Waste was collected, weighed and divided into recyclable and nonrecyclable categories in the preoperative period and into recyclable, nonrecyclable, linen and biological categories in the intraoperative period. Waste bags were weighed using a portable hand-held scale. The primary outcome was the amount of recyclable waste produced per case. Secondary outcomes included the amount of nonrecyclable, biological and total waste produced. An analysis of variance was performed to test for statistically significant differences among subspecialties. Results: This study included 55 procedures. A total of 341.0 kg of waste was collected, with a mean mass of 6.2 kg per case. Arthroplasty produced a greater amount of recyclable waste per case in the preoperative (2017.1 g) and intraoperative (938.6 g) periods as well as total recyclable waste per case, resulting in a greater ratio of waste recycling per case then nearly all other subspecialties in the preoperative (86%) and intraoperative (14%) periods. Arthroplasty similarly produced a greater amount of nonrecyclable waste per case (5823.6 g) than the other subspecialties, most of which was produced during the intraoperative period (5512.9 g). Overall an average of 27% of waste was recycled per case. Conclusion: Among orthopedic subspecialties, arthroplasty is one of the largest waste producers and it has the highest potential for recycling of materials. Effective recycling programs in the operating room can reduce our ecological footprint by diverting waste from landfills, as our study revealed that nearly three-quarters of this waste is recyclable.
Contexte: On estime qu'un quart à la moitié de tous les déchets produits en hôpital proviennent des salles d'opération. Le recyclage des déchets produits en contexte opératoire est assez rare, bien que de nombreux matériaux soient recyclables. Cette étude visait à déterminer la quantité de déchets produits pendant les périodes préopératoire et peropératoire pour plusieurs surspécialités orthopédiques, et à évaluer la quantité de déchets recyclés. Méthodes: Pour y arriver, on a étudié de façon prospective pendant 1 mois les chirurgies effectuées dans 2 hôpitaux de soins tertiaires de Calgary (Alberta), 1 hôpital pédiatrique et 1 hôpital pour adulte, pour 6 surspécialités orthopédiques. Nous avons recueilli les déchets, les avons pesés et les avons répartis dans les catégories « recyclable ¼ et « non recyclable ¼ pour la période préopératoire, et « recyclable ¼, « non recyclable ¼, « textile ¼ et « biologique ¼ pour la période peropératoire. Les sacs de déchets ont été pesés à l'aide d'une balance portative. L'issue principale était la quantité de déchets produits par cas, et l'issue secondaire, la quantité de déchets non recyclables et biologiques et la quantité totale de déchets. On a ensuite procédé à une analyse de la variance pour déterminer la présence de différences statistiquement significatives entre les surspécialités. Résultats: Au total, 55 opérations ont été étudiées, et 341,0 kg de déchets ont été recueillis, pour une moyenne de 6,2 kg par cas. Les arthroplasties produisaient une plus grande quantité de déchets recyclables par cas dans les périodes préopératoire (2017,1 g) et peropératoire (938,6 g) ainsi qu'une plus grande quantité totale de déchets recyclables par cas, ce qui leur donne un meilleur ratio de recyclage par cas que pratiquement toutes les autres surspécialités dans les périodes préopératoire (86 %) et peropératoire (14 %). De même, les arthroplasties produisaient une plus grande quantité de déchets non recyclables par cas (5823,6 g) que les autres surspécialités, et la plupart de ces déchets étaient produits pendant la période peropératoire (5512,9 g). En moyenne, 27 % de l'ensemble des déchets étaient recyclés. Conclusion: Parmi les surspécialités orthopédiques, l'arthroplastie est l'une de celles qui produisent le plus de déchets et qui ont le plus grand potentiel de recyclage. Notre étude a révélé que près des trois quarts des déchets sont recyclables; ainsi, des programmes de recyclage efficaces en salle d'opération peuvent réduire notre empreinte écologique en empêchant l'enfouissement de certains déchets.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Ortopédicos/instrumentación , Ortopedia/métodos , Reciclaje/métodos , Administración de Residuos/métodos , Humanos , Quirófanos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Loss of energy supply to neurons during stroke induces a rapid loss of membrane potential that is called the anoxic depolarization. Anoxic depolarizations result in tremendous physiological stress on the neurons because of the dysregulation of ionic fluxes and the loss of ATP to drive ion pumps that maintain electrochemical gradients. In this review, we present an overview of some of the ionotropic receptors and ion channels that are thought to contribute to the anoxic depolarization of neurons and subsequently, to cell death. The ionotropic receptors for glutamate and ATP that function as ligand-gated cation channels are critical in the death and dysfunction of neurons. Interestingly, two of these receptors (P2X7 and NMDAR) have been shown to couple to the pannexin-1 (Panx1) ion channel. We also discuss the important roles of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) in responses to ischemia. The central challenge that emerges from our current understanding of the anoxic depolarization is the need to elucidate the mechanistic and temporal interrelations of these ion channels to fully appreciate their impact on neurons during stroke.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/metabolismo , Isquemia Encefálica/patología , Encéfalo/irrigación sanguínea , Encéfalo/patología , Canales Iónicos/metabolismo , Neuronas/patología , Animales , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Muerte Celular , Conexinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Neuronas/metabolismo , Receptores Purinérgicos/metabolismo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/metabolismo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/patologíaRESUMEN
Our "reservoir-wave approach" to arterial hemodynamics holds that measured arterial pressure should be considered to be the sum of a volume-related pressure (i.e., reservoir pressure, P(reservoir)) and a wave-related pressure (P(excess)). Because some have questioned whether P(reservoir) (and, by extension, P(excess)) is a real component of measured physiological pressure, it was important to demonstrate that P(reservoir) is implicit in Westerhof's classical electrical and hydraulic models of the 3-element Windkessel. To test the validity of our P(reservoir) determinations, we studied a freeware simulation of the electrical model and a benchtop recreation of the hydraulic model, respectively, measuring the voltage and the pressure distal to the proximal resistance. These measurements were then compared with P(reservoir), as calculated from physiological data. Thus, the first objective of this study was to demonstrate that respective voltage and pressure changes could be measured that were similar to calculated physiological values of P(reservoir). The second objective was to confirm previous predictions with respect to the specific effects of systematically altering proximal resistance, distal resistance, and capacitance. The results of this study validate P(reservoir) and, thus, the reservoir-wave approach.
Asunto(s)
Arterias/fisiología , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Modelos CardiovascularesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures represent a small proportion of all paediatric fractures, but are likely to be associated with a high-energy mechanism, multiple injuries, and significant morbidity and mortality. Operative fixation of unstable pelvic fractures is accepted. However, there remains a paucity of data on functional outcomes and complications following pelvic fractures in the skeletally immature. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review was performed, searching Medline, Embase, and Cochrane central review. The primary outcome was functional outcome after pelvic fractures in the paediatric population following operative or non-operative treatment. Secondary outcomes included mechanism of injury, associated injuries, mortality rate, and method of surgical fixation if required. Where possible, weighted totals of the data set were performed. RESULTS: In total, 23 studies were included in this review. Only eight studies reported functional outcomes, with limb length discrepancy and limp being the most common complication. Only 8.8% of all pelvic fractures underwent surgical fixation. Motor vehicle collision was the most common cause of injury, and extremity fracture was the most common associated injury. CONCLUSION: Paediatric pelvic fractures are caused by high-energy mechanisms and have significant morbidity and mortality. There remains a paucity of information on functional outcomes after these injuries.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical management of patients with acute and chronic ankle instability (CAI) has historically focused on the lateral ligament complex. Recent studies in CAI patients have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy demonstrate concomitant injury to the deltoid ligament complex We performed a systematic review to determine if consistent clinical, diagnostic imaging, or arthroscopic findings of deltoid ligament injury in the setting of CAI have been described. In addition, we sought to determine if treatment options and/or clinical outcomes have been described. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Articles were included if they had a majority of patients 18 years of age or older, focused on deltoid ligament injury in ankle instability, and reported diagnostic and/or treatment methods. Articles were excluded if the study focused on the deltoid ligament in the acute fracture setting. All included articles were assessed for diagnostic criteria, treatments, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Our search yielded 157 articles, of which a total of 13 were included in our study. Arthroscopy was described as the gold standard to diagnose and evaluate the severity of deltoid ligament injury, however, little objective data on the arthroscopic diagnosis of deltoid ligament insufficiency was reported. MRI was the imaging modality of choice to evaluate deltoid ligament injury and had a high sensitivity and specificity when compared with arthroscopy. No standard MRI diagnostic criteria for deltoid ligament injury were identified in the literature. Specific treatment techniques and long-term outcomes were not well described in the manuscripts included in this review. CONCLUSION: There is limited knowledge on deltoid ligament insufficiency in the setting of chronic ankle instability. Criteria for characterizing deltoid ligament damage with diagnostic imaging appear to be evolving, but there is no standard classification. Only 1 author has described a method to evaluate deltoid ligament competency on arthroscopic examination. There are currently no objective data to guide treatment decisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.