Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ; 96(4): 627-636, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34590734

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To support patient-centred care and the collaboration of patients and clinicians, we developed and pilot tested a conversation aid for patients with thyroid nodules. DESIGN, PATIENT AND MEASUREMENTS: We developed a web-based Thyroid NOdule Conversation aid (TNOC) following a human-centred design. A proof of concept observational pre-post study was conducted (TNOC vs. usual care [UC]) to assess the impact of TNOC on the quality of conversations. Data sources included recordings of clinical visits, post-encounter surveys and review of electronic health records. Summary statistics and group comparisons are reported. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were analysed (32 in the UC and 33 in the TNOC cohort). Most patients were women (89%) with a median age of 57 years and were incidentally found to have a thyroid nodule (62%). Most thyroid nodules were at low risk for thyroid cancer (71%) and the median size was 1.4 cm. At baseline, the groups were similar except for higher numeracy in the TNOC cohort. The use of TNOC was associated with increased involvement of patients in the decision-making process, clinician satisfaction and discussion of relevant topics for decision making. In addition, decreased decisional conflict and fewer thyroid biopsies as the next management step were noted in the TNOC cohort. No differences in terms of knowledge transfer, length of consultation, thyroid cancer risk perception or concern for thyroid cancer diagnosis were found. CONCLUSION: In this pilot observational study, using TNOC in clinical practice was feasible and seemed to help the collaboration of patients and clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Nódulo Tiroideo , Toma de Decisiones , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Participación del Paciente , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico
2.
Endocrine ; 83(2): 449-458, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37695453

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We pilot-tested an encounter conversation aid to support shared decision making (SDM) between patients with thyroid nodules and their clinicians. OBJECTIVE: Characterize the clinician feedback after providing care to patients with thyroid nodules using a tool to promote SDM conversations during the clinical encounter, and evaluate how clinicians used the tool during the visit. METHODS: Mixed method study in two academic centers in the U.S., including adult patients presenting for evaluation of thyroid nodules and their clinicians. We thematically analyzed interviews with clinicians after they used the SDM tool in at least three visits to characterize their feedback. Additionally, investigators evaluated visits recordings to determine the extent to which clinicians engaged patients in the decision-making process (OPTION score, scale 0 to 100, higher levels indicating higher involvement), the tool's components used (fidelity), and encounter duration. Using a post-visit survey, we evaluated the extent to which clinicians felt the tool was easy to use, helpful, and supportive of the patient-clinician collaboration. RESULTS: Thirteen clinicians participated in the study and used the SDM tool in the care of 53 patients. Clinicians thought the tool was well-organized and beneficial to patients and clinicians. Clinicians noticed a change in their routine with the use of the conversation aid and suggested it needed to be more flexible to better support varying conversations. The median OPTION score was 34, the fidelity of use 75%, and the median visit duration 17 min. In most encounters, clinicians agreed or strongly agreed the tool was easy to use (86%), helpful (65%), and supported collaboration (62%). CONCLUSION: Clinicians were able to use a SDM tool in the care of patients with thyroid nodules. Although they wished it were more flexible, they found on the whole that its use in the clinical encounter was beneficial to patients and clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Nódulo Tiroideo , Adulto , Humanos , Retroalimentación , Participación del Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Toma de Decisiones
3.
Endocrine ; 80(1): 124-133, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36534326

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To characterize the feedback of patients with thyroid nodules receiving care using a shared decision making (SDM) tool designed to improve conversations with their clinicians related to diagnostic options (e.g. thyroid biopsy, ultrasound surveillance). METHODS: Investigators qualitatively analyzed post-encounter interviews with patients to characterize their feedback of a SDM tool used during their clinical visits. Additionally, investigators counted instances of diagnostic choice awareness and of patients' expression of a diagnostic management preference in recordings of clinical encounters of adult patients presenting for evaluation of thyroid nodules in which the SDM tool was used. RESULTS: In total, 53 patients (42 (79%) women); median age 62 years were enrolled and had consultations supported by the SDM tool. Patients were favorable about the design of the SDM tool and its ability to convey information about options and support patient-clinician interactions. Patients identified opportunities to improve the tool through adding more content and improve its use in practice through training of clinicians in its use. There was evidence of diagnostic choice awareness in 52 (98%) of these visits and patients expressed a diagnostic management preference in 40 (76%). CONCLUSION: User centered design including feedback from patients and real life observation supports the use of the SDM tool to facilitate collaboration between patients and clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Nódulo Tiroideo , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Retroalimentación , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico , Nódulo Tiroideo/terapia , Participación del Paciente , Derivación y Consulta
4.
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep ; 9: 23247096211009412, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853424

RESUMEN

A 67-year-old male was admitted with shortness of breath and diarrhea. His COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test was positive, and he was found to be in acute heart failure. Troponin levels were elevated, echocardiogram showed ejection fraction of 24%, and his electrocardiogram was normal. Inflammatory markers were elevated. Further testing revealed suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone and elevated free thyroxine (T4). Differential diagnosis at this point included possible myocarditis from the viral illness, exacerbation of heart failure from the viral infection or from thyrotoxicosis was considered. Patient's heart failure improved with initiation of heart failure therapies; however, biochemically, his thyroid function tests (TFTs) did not improve, despite empiric methimazole. Thyroid antibody tests were unremarkable. Thyroid ultrasound showed mildly enlarged thyroid gland with no increased vascularity and 5-mm bilateral cysts. Thyroid dysfunction was attributed to subacute thyroiditis from COVID-19, methimazole was tapered, and prednisone was initiated. The patient's TFTs improved. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative that clinicians keep a broad differential in individuals presenting with heart failure, and obtaining baseline TFTs may be reasonable. Rapid treatment of the underlying thyroiditis is important in these patients to improve the cardiovascular outcomes. In our experience, steroid therapy showed a rapid improvement in the TFTs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Tiroiditis Subaguda/complicaciones , Tiroiditis Subaguda/diagnóstico , Anciano , COVID-19/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Tiroiditis Subaguda/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen ; 25(1): 37-45, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19075298

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To provide further empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of animal-assisted therapy in nursing home residents with dementia. METHODS: Participants were 56 residents of 2 suburban Maryland nursing homes and had a diagnosis. Activities of daily living performance was assessed via the minimum data set and cognitive functioning assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Engagement with dog-related stimuli was systematically assessed via the observational measurement of engagement. RESULTS: Mean engagement duration was significantly lower for the small dog. Highest mean engagement duration was found for the puppy video, followed by the real dog and lowest was for the dog-coloring activity. Positive attitudes were found toward the real dogs, robotic dog, the puppy video, and the plush dog. No significant differences were found in engagement duration among our dog-related stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing homes should consider animal-assisted therapy and dog-related stimuli, as they successfully engage residents with dementia.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Asistida por Animales/métodos , Demencia/epidemiología , Demencia/psicología , Vínculo Humano-Animal , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Animales , Demencia/diagnóstico , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA