Population pharmacokinetic rationale for intravenous contezolid acefosamil followed by oral contezolid dosage regimens.

Contezolid is a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic with a promising safety profile. Oral contezolid and its intravenous (IV) prodrug contezolid acefosamil (CZA) are in development for treatment of diabetic foot and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). The prodrug CZA is converted to active contezolid via intermediate MRX-1352. This study aimed to provide the pharmacokinetic rationale for safe, effective, and flexible dosage regimens with initial IV CZA followed by oral contezolid. We simultaneously modeled plasma concentrations from 110 healthy volunteers and 74 phase 2 patients with ABSSSI via population pharmacokinetics (using the importance sampling estimation algorithm), and optimized dosage regimens by Monte Carlo simulations. This included data on MRX-1352, contezolid, and its metabolite MRX-1320 from 66 healthy volunteers receiving intravenous CZA (150-2400 mg) for up to 28 days, and 74 patients receiving oral contezolid [800 mg every 12 h (q12h)] for 10 days. The apparent total clearance for 800 mg oral contezolid with food was 16.0 L/h (23.4% coefficient of variation) in healthy volunteers and 17.7 L/h (53.8%) in patients. CZA was rapidly converted to MRX-1352, which subsequently transformed to contezolid. The proposed dosage regimen used an IV CZA 2000 mg loading dose with 1000 mg IV CZA q12h as maintenance dose(s), followed by 800 mg oral contezolid q12h (with food). During each 24-h period, Monte Carlo simulations predicted this regimen to achieve consistent areas under the curve of 91.9 mg·h/L (range: 76.3-106 mg·h/L) under all scenarios. Thus, this regimen was predicted to reliably achieve efficacious contezolid exposures independent of timing of switch from IV CZA to oral contezolid.IMPORTANCEThis study provides the population pharmacokinetic rationale for the dosage regimen of the intravenous (IV) prodrug contezolid acefosamil (CZA) followed by oral contezolid. We developed the first integrated population model for the pharmacokinetics of the MRX-1352 intermediate prodrug, active contezolid, and its main metabolite MRX-1320 based on data from three clinical studies in healthy volunteers and phase 2 patients. The proposed regimen was predicted to reliably achieve efficacious contezolid exposures independent of timing of switch from IV CZA to oral contezolid.

Mental health outcomes in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with bimekizumab: Analysis of phase 2/3 randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psoriasis have increased risk of suicidal ideation and behavior (SIB) and depression. Bimekizumab, a biologic that inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F, received Food and Drug Administration approval in 2023 for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, following 2021 European Medicines Agency approval. OBJECTIVE: To report SIB and depression in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated in bimekizumab clinical trials. METHODS: Mental health changes, including neuropsychiatric events, were actively monitored across 9 bimekizumab clinical trials in psoriasis phase 2/3 trials. The patient-reported electronic Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (measuring SIB) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (measuring depression) were administered, monitored by an independent Neuropsychiatric Adjudication Committee. RESULTS: Throughout 7166 patient-years (PY) of bimekizumab exposure, the adjudicated SIB rate was 0.13/100PY; SIB ranges for the general psoriasis population and patients receiving anti-IL-17A/anti-IL-23 therapies are 0.09 to 0.54/100PY and 0.09 to 0.19/100PY, respectively. At week 16, 92.9% vs 81.1% of bimekizumab- vs placebo-treated patients had no/minimal depression. Newonset positive electronic Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale responses and mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores were low for bimekizumab-treated patients. LIMITATIONS: Patient exclusion for significant/severe prespecified SIB/depression history. CONCLUSION: The long-term adjudicated SIB rate with bimekizumab was low and within ranges reported in the general psoriasis patient population and psoriasis patients treated with anti-IL-17A/anti-IL-23 biologics. Screening/monitoring questionnaires reported low SIB and depression levels.

Content validity of the ASQoL for use in a non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis population: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: The ankylosing spondylitis quality of life (ASQoL) instrument is widely used to assess health-related quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We assessed the relevance of the ASQoL items in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), a distinct subgroup within the axSpA disease spectrum. METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional, qualitative interview study recruited patients from clinic settings. Interviews from patients with axSpA who participated in a prior qualitative study were also used. Patients initially underwent a concept elicitation interview using open-ended questions to evaluate relevance of the concepts measured by the ASQoL. They then completed the ASQoL and underwent a cognitive interview to assess their understanding of the items, instructions and response options. Transcripts from patients who participated in the previous qualitative study (who did not complete the ASQoL or undergo cognitive interview) were evaluated to identify expressions of the concepts in the ASQoL. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients with nr-axSpA participated. The concept elicitation interview findings supported the relevance of the ASQoL items. Cognitive interviews determined that the ASQoL was easily understood; the 13 new patients chose a response for each item that matched their experience with nr-axSpA. Transcripts for the five previously interviewed patients confirmed the concepts presented in the ASQoL items were relevant and important to their experience of living with nr-axSpA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results represent an important first step in confirming the relevance of the concepts in the ASQoL to patients with nr-axSpA, supporting quantitative assessment of ASQoL validity in this population.

Similar eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid plasma levels achieved with fish oil or krill oil in a randomized double-blind four-week bioavailability study.

BACKGROUND: Long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC n-3-PUFA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) provide multiple health benefits for heart, brain and eyes. However, consumption of fatty fish, the main source of LC n-3-PUFAs is low in Western countries. Intakes of LC n-3-PUFA can be increased by taking dietary supplements, such as fish oil, algal oil, or krill oil. Recently, conflicting information was published on the relative bioavailability of these omega-3 supplements. A few studies suggested that the phospholipid form (krill) is better absorbed than the fish oil ethyl ester (EE) or triglyceride (TG) forms. Yet studies did not match the doses administered nor the concentrations of DHA and EPA per supplement across such comparisons, leading to questionable conclusions. This study was designed to compare the oral bioavailability of the same dose of both EPA and DHA in fish oil-EE vs. fish oil-TG vs. krill oil in plasma at the end of a four-week supplementation. METHODS: Sixty-six healthy adults (n = 22/arm) were enrolled in a double blind, randomized, three-treatment, multi-dose, parallel study. Subjects were supplemented with a 1.3 g/d dose of EPA + DHA (approximately 816 mg/d EPA + 522 mg/d DHA, regardless of formulation) for 28 consecutive days, as either fish oil-EE, fish oil-TG or krill oil capsules (6 caps/day). Plasma and red blood cell (RBC) samples were collected at baseline (pre-dose on Day 1) and at 4, 8, 12, 48, 72, 336, and 672 h. Total plasma EPA + DHA levels at Week 4 (Hour 672) were measured as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: No significant differences in total plasma EPA + DHA at 672 h were observed between fish oil-EE (mean = 90.9 ± 41 ug/mL), fish oil-TG (mean = 108 ± 40 ug/mL), and krill oil (mean = 118.5 ± 48 ug/mL), p = 0.052 and bioavailability differed by < 24 % between the groups. Additionally, DHA + EPA levels were not significantly different in RBCs among the 3 formulations, p = 0.19, providing comparable omega-3 indexes. CONCLUSIONS: Similar plasma and RBC levels of EPA + DHA were achieved across fish oil and krill oil products when matched for dose, EPA, and DHA concentrations in this four week study, indicating comparable oral bioavailability irrespective of formulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02427373.

A single-dose, 3-way crossover pharmacokinetic comparison between immediate-release oxycodone hydrochloride with aversion technology (IRO-A, Oxecta), IRO-a with Niacin, and Oxycodone Hydrochloride (Roxicodone) in healthy adults under fasting conditions.

Snorting and intravenous use are common routes of administration for advanced opioid abusers. A tablet form of immediate-release oxycodone (IRO) developed using Aversion Technology combines immediate release (IR) oxycodone HCl with inactive functional excipients that are intended to discourage tampering associated with intranasal and intravenous abuse (IRO-A; Oxecta, Pfizer). The purpose of this single-dose, open-label, randomized, 3-period, 3-treatment crossover study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of IRO-A to the marketed immediate-release oxycodone HCl (IRO; Roxicodone, Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc., Newport, KY). IRO-A was also compared with IRO-A with niacin, a product previously developed containing the same functional excipients plus niacin as an aversive agent to discourage oral overconsumption. Healthy adults (N = 40) aged 18-55 years received single 15-mg doses of IRO-A, IRO-A with niacin (60 mg), or IRO after fasting overnight. Naltrexone was administered to diminish opioid effects. Doses were separated by a ≥7-day washout. Plasma samples taken at designated time points were analyzed using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios for ln-transformed parameters for IRO-A and IRO were 92%, 104%, and 104% for Cmax, AUClast (AUC is area under the concentration-time curve), and AUCinf; 90% confidence intervals were within the accepted 80%-125% range. IRO-A was also bioequivalent to IRO-A with niacin. Adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and typical of opioid therapy (nausea, headache, vomiting). Flushing only occurred when the subjects received the IRO-A with niacin treatment (9/37 subjects). The results demonstrated that IRO-A is bioequivalent to IRO and IRO-A with niacin. With features designed to discourage tampering associated with common forms of abuse, IRO-A may provide an alternative to conventional immediate-release oxycodone formulations.

Opioid use surrounding diagnosis and follow-up in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis: Results from US claims databases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe patients' use of opioids in the year preceding and year following new diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared with patients without the/se diseases. METHODS: This study used US IBM® MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) and Medicaid data and included three cohorts, comprised of incident cases of AS, PsA, or RA (2010-2017). Three matched comparator patients (without the incident disease) were selected for each patient within the disease cohort. Opioid use and appropriate treatment exposure (as defined by US guideline recommendations) in the 12-month baseline and follow-up periods were evaluated using descriptive analyses. RESULTS: Prevalence of claims for opioids was higher for disease cohorts vs. comparators in CCAE; 36.4% of patients with AS, 29.5% with PsA, and 44.4% with RA did not have any claim for guideline-appropriate therapy in follow-up. Prevalence of claims for opioids was also higher for disease cohorts vs. comparators in Medicaid; 30.6% of patients with AS, 36.6% with PsA, and 65.4% with RA did not have any claim for guideline-appropriate therapy in follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AS, PsA, or RA, there was high reliance on opioids at and around the time of diagnosis. Significant proportions of patients were not on appropriate treatment as defined by professional society post-diagnosis guidelines; this discordance between actual patient therapies and treatment recommendations may suggest a need for better awareness of appropriate pain management and treatment strategies in rheumatic diseases. Key Points • This study analysed opioid use among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and adds to current knowledge by expanding beyond assessment of opioid use at diagnosis, to the year before and after diagnosis. • Opioid use was found to be highly prevalent in AS, PsA, and RA in the year prior to diagnosis and, interestingly, was still seen during the year after diagnosis. • Opioids are neither disease modifying, nor a targeted/recommended treatment for chronic autoimmune diseases. In addition to their association with significant economic costs, opioids are potentially hazardous and are not better than alternative treatments with superior safety profiles. • The reasons behind opioid prescribing patterns should be explored further to support movement to targeted therapies.

Impact of Disease Burden of Patients with Psoriasis on Biologic Therapy Switching: Real-World Evidence from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Due to variable psoriasis symptoms, disease progression, and individual responses to therapy, patients may start, stop, or switch biologic therapies. Real-world data on the associated disease burden of patients with psoriasis who do and do not switch biologics are incomplete. METHODS: This study compared disease burden among patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (July 2017-December 2021) who switched biologics and those who did not within 4-12 months following initiation. Disease-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded, including skin pain, itching, activity impairment, and effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Disease severity was measured by body surface area (BSA) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Unadjusted and adjusted regression models were used to compare study outcome measures between the two groups. RESULTS: This study included 2145 patients, with 159 classified as switchers and 1986 as non-switchers. The most common reason for switching therapy was failure to maintain initial response (51.7%; n = 78). Moderate-to-severe disease (BSA ≥ 3) was found among 83.0% (n = 132) of switchers versus 26.1% (n = 516) of non-switchers. PASI > 5 was reported among 49.7% (n = 79) of switchers versus 8.6% (n = 171) of non-switchers. Differences in skin pain, itching, and effects on HRQoL between switchers and non-switchers were larger in magnitude for bio-experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who switched biologic therapy experienced a greater disease burden of psoriasis across PROs than non-switchers. Patient-centered factors may be important drivers of biologic switching. Our findings suggest the association between switching and disease burden may be stronger among patients with prior biologic therapy experience.

Patients with psoriasis often need treatment over a long period of time. Common treatments include biologic medications, which help to reduce inflammation. Different patients may experience different psoriasis symptoms, and these symptoms can lead to changes in biologic over time. It is important that we understand how psoriasis severity and patients' day-to-day well-being affect switching of psoriasis biologic medications.In this study, we used information from a database of patients with psoriasis. The database includes information on patients' psoriasis-related medication history, including whether they change their medication. We looked at data from patients who switched and patients who did not switch their biologic medication, and examined differences in their skin pain, itching, tiredness, difficulty participating in normal activities, and effects on day-to-day well-being. Patterns between these two groups were also studied on the basis of whether patients had used biologic medications before or whether they had a related condition, called psoriatic arthritis, in addition to psoriasis.Overall, we found that patients who changed their biologic medication had experienced more difficult psoriasis symptoms than those who had not changed their medication, such as itching and skin pain. These symptoms had a greater impact on switching biologic medication in patients who had used a biologic medication before than for those who were using their first biologic medication.

The advent of a new pseudoephedrine product to combat methamphetamine abuse.

BACKGROUND: The personal and societal effects of methamphetamine abuse are well documented. The ease of accessibility to methamphetamine and the quality of the "high" it produces makes the drug highly desired by its abusers. Over time, many methamphetamine users will also become methamphetamine cooks, where pseudoephedrine in over-the-counter cold products is converted to methamphetamine through a simple, albeit extremely dangerous, process. New laws limiting access to these products have had limited success. No existing commercial pseudoephedrine products offer significant impediments to slow or limit the extraction and conversion of pseudoephedrine in clandestine methamphetamine laboratories. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: A new pseudoephedrine 30 mg tablet product using Impede technology (Nexafed®) to deter methamphetamine production has recently been introduced into the marketplace. Using methods designed to mimic clandestine laboratory processes, the ability of this product to disrupt extraction and conversion of pseudoephedrine to methamphetamine yet provide therapeutic effectiveness was evaluated. RESULTS: Impede™ technology tablets limited the extraction and/or conversion of pseudoephedrine to methamphetamine when compared to a commercially marketed pseudoephedrine product (Sudafed®). Nexafed® tablets were also shown to be bioequivalent to the same control product, thus ensuring therapeutic equivalence. CONCLUSIONS: With the advent of new pseudoephedrine products in the marketplace with features to limit the extraction and conversion of pseudoephedrine to methamphetamine, new tools are now available to minimize the clandestine manufacture of the drug and potentially limit its social impact.

Skin Clearance is Associated with Reduced Treatment Failure in Patients with Psoriasis: Real-World Evidence from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Complete and near-complete skin clearance have become achievable treatment goals for patients with psoriasis receiving systemic biologic therapies. However, there is limited real-world evidence regarding the impact of the degree of skin clearance on biologic treatment patterns among these patients. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study assessed the relationship between degree of skin clearance following initiation of a systemic biologic therapy and treatment failure among patients from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (April 2015-August 2021). Patients had Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score > 5 at systemic biologic therapy initiation and ≥ 1 follow-up visit(s) within 15 months of initiation. Treatment failure (discontinuation due to poor response/adverse event; addition of non-biologic therapy) and degree of skin clearance (measured by PASI) were assessed following biologic initiation. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association between PASI response level and treatment failure over follow-up. RESULTS: This study included 2701 patient initiations from 2516 unique patients with 3846 total visits over follow-up. Over half of the patient initiations (n = 1412; 52.3%) were among patients with PASI >10. Treatment failure occurred in 1.3% of visits at which PASI100 was achieved, while those achieving PASI90 - < 100 and PASI75 - < 90 had treatment failure rates of 3.4% and 3.5%, respectively. After adjustment for confounders, the risk of treatment failure was two to three times higher in the PASI90 - < 100 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.35, 5.02; p = 0.004) and PASI75 < 90 (HR = 2.97; CI 1.58, 5.58; p = 0.001) groups compared to the PASI100 group. The risk of treatment failure was more than 20 times higher in the < PASI75 group versus the PASI100 group (HR = 22.26; CI 13.32, 37.21; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients are more likely to remain on a systemic biologic therapy if they achieve near-complete or complete skin clearance, supporting the continued need to target skin clearance as a treatment goal in psoriasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02707341.

Many people with psoriasis are often treated with biologic medications that work to improve symptoms associated with psoriasis, including inflammation. These medications can lead to clear or almost-clear skin for many people. However, there is limited information available about how achieving this goal affects whether patients continue taking their biologic medication or add a new non-biologic medication. The data source for this study was a database of patients with psoriasis (the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry) that records how clear patients' skin is and what medications they take. Over 1 year after starting a biologic medication, approximately 1 out of every 100 patients that achieved clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication, and approximately 3 out of every 100 patients with almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication. Meanwhile, around 20 out of every 100 patients that did not have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication stopped using that medication. Furthermore, patients who did not have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication had more than 20 times greater risk of stopping their medication than those who did have clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication. These results suggest that patients are more likely to remain on their biologic medication if they experience clear or almost-clear skin after taking a biologic medication and that patients and their providers should aim for this goal when taking a biologic medication.

Durability of Near-Complete Skin Clearance in Patients with Psoriasis Using Systemic Biologic Therapies: Real-World Evidence from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Near-complete skin clearance has become a rapidly achievable treatment goal for patients with psoriasis receiving systemic biologic therapies. However, real-world evidence for durability of near-complete skin clearance and risk factors associated with loss of near-complete skin clearance is limited. METHODS: This study described durability of near-complete skin clearance (≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index from initiation; PASI90) and identified clinical factors or patient characteristics associated with loss of PASI90 among patients with psoriasis from the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry (April 2015-August 2021). Included patients had PASI > 5 at biologic initiation and achieved PASI90 at approximately 6 months from initiation (index). A Kaplan-Meier estimate described time to loss of treatment response over 24 months follow-up from index. Proportional hazards regression was used to identify independent predictors of loss of treatment response. RESULTS: This study included 687 patient initiations (instances of patients initiating a biologic). Following achievement of PASI90, treatment response was maintained in more than half of patient initiations (54%). Treatment response was maintained at 6, 12, and 18 months from index in an estimated 73% (95% [confidence interval] CI 70-77%), 60% (95% CI 56-63%), and 50% (95% CI 47-54%) of patient initiations, respectively. Adjusted hazards regression suggested non-White race, full-time employment, greater body weight, concomitant psoriatic arthritis, prior use of biologics, and clinically meaningful skin symptoms were associated with loss of treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: Among real-world patients with psoriasis who achieved PASI90 with biologic therapy, about one-quarter lost response at 6 months, and half lost response at 18 months. Prior use of a biologic therapy and clinically meaningful skin symptoms at index, including itch and skin pain, were associated with loss of treatment response. Therefore, dermatologists may consider focusing on patient-reported symptoms as part of any intervention designed to reduce the likelihood of loss of response to biologic therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02707341.

Many people with psoriasis are treated with biologic medications that work to improve symptoms associated with psoriasis, including inflammation. These medications can lead to almost clear skin for many people. However, there is limited information available about how long almost clear skin can be maintained with biologic medications, and what predicts who is likely to lose it. To explore these questions, we examined a database of patients with psoriasis (the CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry) that records how clear patients' skin is and the medications they take. Out of every 100 patients, 54 maintained almost clear skin and stayed on their original medication for 2 years after first having almost clear skin. Out of every 100 patients, 73, 60, and 50 maintained almost clear skin and remained on their original medication at 6, 12, and 18 months after they had achieved this response. The results indicated that patients who were not White, worked full time, previously used a biologic medication, or had itchy and/or painful skin after they had achieved almost-clear skin were more likely to change their medication and/or no longer have almost-clear skin. These results suggest that dermatologists may consider focusing on patient-reported characteristics when deciding how to treat their patients, to reduce the likelihood that they lose their response to the medication they are prescribed.

Pharmacokinetics, Metabolism, and Excretion of Intravenous [14C]Difelikefalin in Healthy Subjects and Subjects on Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Difelikefalin, a selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist, is the first approved treatment for moderate-to-severe pruritus in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) in the USA and Europe. The purpose of this open-label study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and disposition of [14C]difelikefalin following a single intravenous dose in subjects with normal renal function and subjects on HD. METHODS: Twelve adult males (n = 6 healthy subjects; n = 6 subjects on HD) received single intravenous doses of [14C]difelikefalin containing 100 µCi (total doses of 1.7-3.0 µg/kg difelikefalin). Blood, urine, feces, and dialysate samples (when applicable) were collected after dosing. RESULTS: The median time to maximum concentration was similar for HD and healthy subjects, occurring at 5 min post-dose. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was approximately 11-fold higher in HD versus healthy subjects; mean plasma half-life was 38.0 h and 2.6 h, respectively. In healthy subjects, 80.5% of the dose was recovered in urine, and 11.3% was recovered in feces. In subjects on HD, 58.8% of the dose was recovered in feces, and 19.5% was recovered in dialysate [for subjects on HD with residual kidney function (n = 3), 11.2% was recovered in urine]. Based on plasma AUClast, parent [14C]difelikefalin was the most abundant analyte in systemic circulation (> 99% of total exposure) for both cohorts. Metabolite profiles in urine and feces suggested minimal metabolism of the parent compound. CONCLUSION: In subjects on HD, difelikefalin total exposure was higher and plasma half-life was longer compared with subjects with intact renal function. Metabolism was low in both healthy subjects and subjects on HD, with unchanged drug representing > 99% of systemic circulation; however, the route of excretion was primarily into urine versus feces in healthy subjects, and feces versus dialysate in subjects on HD. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03947970.

Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: expanding the spectrum of an old disease: A narrative review.

ABSTRACT: Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) represents a distinct phenotype within the spectrum of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), which is characterized by a range of clinical manifestations. Despite a high disease burden that is comparable to ankylosing spondylitis (also known as radiographic axSpA), there is an unmet need to recognize and effectively manage patients with active nr-axSpA.A targeted literature search was conducted in OVID (MEDLINE and Embase databases) to identify articles on nr-axSpA, including its definition, demographics, epidemiology, burden, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and treatment guidelines.The lack of adequate epidemiological data and incomplete understanding of nr-axSpA among rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists contributes to delayed referrals and diagnosis. This delay results in a substantial burden on patients, physically and psychologically, and the healthcare system. Targeted therapies, such as biologics, including inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor or interleukin-17A, have been approved and utilized for the management of nr-axSpA, and other novel therapeutics with different mechanisms of action are in development. Raising awareness among US internists regarding the prevalence of nr-axSpA, disease burden, clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, and available treatments is important for improved disease management.Future clinical investigations focusing on the development of markers that aid early diagnosis and predict treatment response may also improve the management of nr-axSpA. This review provides an overview of nr-axSpA with the aim of raising awareness of the disease among US internists, with an overarching goal to contribute toward the improved recognition and timely referral of these patients to rheumatologists for diagnosis and management.

Phase I studies of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of DS-1211, a tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase inhibitor.

Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) hydrolyzes and inactivates inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), a potent inhibitor of calcification; therefore, TNAP inhibition is a potential target to treat ectopic calcification. These two first-in-human studies evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of single (SAD) and multiple-ascending doses (MAD) of DS-1211, a TNAP inhibitor. Healthy adults were randomized 6:2 to DS-1211 or placebo, eight subjects per dose cohort. SAD study subjects received one dose of DS-1211 (range, 3-3000 mg) or placebo, whereas MAD study subjects received DS-1211 (range, 10-300 mg) once daily, 150 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), or placebo for 10 days. Primary end points were safety and tolerability. PK and PD assessments included plasma concentrations of DS-1211, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and TNAP substrates (PPi, pyridoxal 5'-phosphate [PLP], and phosphoethanolamine [PEA]). A total of 56 (DS-1211: n = 42; placebo: n = 14) and 40 (DS-1211: n = 30; placebo: n = 10) subjects enrolled in the SAD and MAD studies, respectively. In both studies, adverse events were mild or moderate and did not increase with dose. PKs of DS-1211 were linear up to 100 mg administered as a single dose and 150 mg b.i.d. administered as a multiple-dose regimen. In multiple dosing, there was minimal accumulation of DS-1211. Increased DS-1211 exposure correlated with dose-dependent ALP inhibition and concomitant increases in PPi, PLP, and PEA. In two phase I studies, DS-1211 appeared safe and well-tolerated. Post-treatment PD assessments were consistent with exposure-dependent TNAP inhibition. These data support further evaluation of DS-1211 for ectopic calcification diseases.

Occurrence of Possible Rheumatologic Immune-Related Adverse Events (rh-irAEs) Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Current epidemiologic literature of rheumatologic immune-related adverse events (rh-irAEs) consists of clinical trials, case reports, or smaller, single-center series. We evaluate the occurrence of rh-irAEs during immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy from US commercial claims data. METHODS: Patients newly initiating ICI therapy in commercial claims data were eligible for inclusion. Rh-irAEs were defined using ≥ 1 International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 or ICD-10-Clinical Modification (CM) claims for selected events, ranging from joint pain and myalgia to ankylosing spondylitis and psoriasis. The percentage of patients experiencing rh-irAEs after ICI initiation was determined. RESULTS: A total of 5722 patients initiating an ICI between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2018, were included; 201 patients (3.5%) had a history of rheumatic disease. Among the 5521 patients without a history of rheumatic disease, 29.6% experienced ≥ 1 rh-irAE in follow-up, decreasing to 22.6% when assessing events for which there was no diagnostic history. Limiting to claims for rh-irAE with a rheumatologist provider, the proportion of patients experiencing an event decreased to 0.9%. Among patients with a history of rheumatic disease, 71.6% experienced ≥ 1 rh-irAE. Limiting to events for which the patient did not have a history during baseline, 35.3% experienced an event. CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of rh-irAEs during ICI use is higher in patients with pre-existing rheumatic disease compared to those with no pre-existing rheumatic disease. However, the most common events were not definitive rheumatic diseases but rather symptoms, such as pain in joints. Occurrence of events associated with a rheumatologist provider was substantially lower, suggesting that either patients are not referred to a rheumatologist or referral does not result in confirmation of the diagnosis by the rheumatologist.

Phase 1 Clinical Trials of Small Molecules: Evolution and State of the Art.

BACKGROUND: Phase 1 studies comprise the first exposure of a promising new chemical entity in healthy volunteers or, when appropriate, in patients. To assure a solid foundation for subsequent drug development, this first step must carefully assess the safety and tolerance of a new compound and often provide some indication of potential effect, so that a safe dose or dose range can be confidently selected for the initial Phase 2 efficacy study in the target patient population. METHODS: This review was based on a literature search using both Google Scholar and PubMed, dated back to 1970, using search terms including "healthy volunteers", "Phase 1", and "normal volunteers", and also based on the authors' own experience conducting Phase 1 clinical trials. This paper reviews the history of Phase 1 studies of small molecules and their rapid evolution, focusing on the critical single and multiple dose studies, their designs, methodology, use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, application of potentially helpful biomarkers, study stopping criteria, and novel study designs. RESULTS: We advocate for determining the safe dose range of a new compound by conducting careful dose escalation in a well-staffed inpatient setting, defining the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) by reaching the minimally intolerated dose (MID). The dose immediately below the MID is then defined as the MTD. This is best accomplished by using appropriately screened patients for the target indication, as patients in many CNS indications often tolerate doses differently than healthy non-patients. Biomarkers for safety and pharmacodynamic measures can also assist in further defining a safe and potentially effective dose range for subsequent clinical trial phases. CONCLUSION: Phase 1 studies can yield critical insights into the pharmacology of a new compound in man and offer perhaps the only development period in which the dose range can be safely and thoroughly explored. Phase 1 studies often contain multiple endpoint objectives, the reconciliation of which can present a dilemma for drug developers and study investigators alike, but which can crucially determine whether a compound can survive to the next step in the drug development process.

The Annual Diagnostic Prevalence of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Axial Spondyloarthritis in the United States Using Medicare and MarketScan Databases.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in the United States and examine treatment patterns for these diseases. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study drew from 2006-2014 data in the US Medicare Fee-for-Service and IBM MarketScan databases. AS and axSpA diagnoses were identified through International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes. Diagnostic prevalence (per 10,000 patients) was calculated as patients with AS and axSpA with full insurance coverage in each calendar year divided by the total patients with full insurance coverage in the same year. Two diagnosis definitions were used: definition 1 (D1), one or more relevant ICD-9 codes from hospital claims or two or more relevant ICD-9 codes from outpatient claims; definition 2 (D2), one or more codes from hospital/outpatient claims. Primary analyses assessed annual AS and axSpA prevalence (D1); sensitivity analyses assessed annual (D2) and 2-year prevalence. Patterns in prevalence and treatment use were analyzed descriptively; no statistical tests were performed. RESULTS: An increase in AS prevalence (per 10,000 patients) was seen from 2006 to 2014 in primary analyses (Medicare: 2.12-3.60; MarketScan: 0.85-1.42) and sensitivity analyses. A similar trend occurred for axSpA (Medicare: 4.39-6.52; MarketScan: 1.33-2.21). For Medicare, the proportion of patients with AS (D1) using tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFis), conventional synthetic antirheumatic drugs (csARDs), nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and glucocorticoids remained relatively stable; for MarketScan, TNFi-treated patients increased (51.7% to 65.7%) and NSAID-treated patients decreased (63.5% to 55.7%). CONCLUSION: AS and axSpA prevalence may have increased in the United States between 2006 and 2014. Reasons are unknown, but this may be due to increased disease awareness, among other factors.

A Single-Dose, Two-Way Crossover, Open-Label Bioequivalence Study of an Amphetamine Extended-Release Oral Suspension in Healthy Adults.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of a new extended-release amphetamine oral suspension (AMP XR-OS) with a standard extended-release mixed amphetamine salts product, Adderall XR®. Method: In this single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment crossover study, 42 healthy adult volunteers received 15 mL of AMP XR-OS in one period and a 30 mg Adderall XR capsule in another period (both containing 18.8 mg of amphetamine base) under fasted conditions. Blood samples were analyzed for d- and l-amphetamine concentrations, and pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-5, AUC5-last, and AUCinf were calculated to determine bioequivalence. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Results: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the log-transformed Cmax, AUC0-5, AUC5-last, and AUCinf fell within the accepted 80% to 125% range for establishing bioequivalence for d- and l-amphetamine. The most common adverse events were nausea and decreased appetite. Conclusion: AMP XR-OS is bioequivalent to Adderall XR in healthy adult participants.

Barriers to treatment optimization and achievement of patients' goals: perspectives from people living with rheumatoid arthritis enrolled in the ArthritisPower registry.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated patients' own treatment goals in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this real-world, cross-sectional study of US patients with RA was to identify factors that patients believed influenced their physician's treatment decisions. Secondary objectives included reasons patients tolerated sub-optimal disease control and their perceived barriers to treatment optimization. METHODS: Eligible participants were enrolled in the ArthritisPower registry, ≥ 19 years, had physician-diagnosed RA, unchanged treatment within 3 months of baseline, prior/current disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (DMARDs), and computer/smartphone access. In December 2017, participants completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Computerized Adaptive Tests (PROMIS-CAT) for pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and physical function. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) provided disease activity scores (0-30). Participants completed an online survey on barriers to treatment optimization, including self-perception of disease compared to RAPID3/PROMIS scores. RESULTS: A total of 249 participants met inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Mean age (SD) was 52 (11) years, and the majority were female (92%) with high RAPID3 disease activity (175/249 [70%]; median score 18). The main reason participants did not change treatment was their physician's recommendation (66%; n = 32). Of participants with high RAPID3 disease activity, 66 (38%) were offered a treatment change; 19 (29%) of whom declined the change. Most participants who intensified treatment did so because their symptoms had remained severe or worsened (51%; n = 65); only 16 (25%) participants intensified because they had not reached a specified treatment goal. Among participants who self-reported their disease activity as "none/low" or "medium" (n = 202; 81% of cohort), most still had RAPID3 high disease activity (137/202 [68%]; score > 12). Most PROMIS scores showed moderate agreement with participants' self-assessment of health status, in contrast to RAPID3 (weighted kappa: 0.05 [95% CI - 0.01, 0.11]). CONCLUSIONS: Most participants trusted their rheumatologist's treatment decisions and prioritized their physician's treatment goals over their own. Patients should be encouraged to share their treatment goals/expectations with their rheumatologist, in line with the treat-to-target approach. RAPID3 may be inappropriate for setting patient-centric treatment goals given the poor agreement with self-reported disease activity; most PROMIS scores showed better alignment with patients' own assessments.

Opioid Use in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Is Common in the United States: Outcomes of a Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of chronic opioid use in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and to compare the characteristics of patients with and without chronic opioid use. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with AS identified in the Truven Health MarketScan Research database between January 1, 2012, and March 31, 2017. Commercial and Medicaid claims data were examined using both specific (720.0 and M45.x) and broader (720.x and M45.x) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding definitions. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years on the date of first qualifying ICD code occurrence (the index date). Demographics and clinical characteristics were assessed in the 12-month period preceding the index date. The 12-month followup period was used to assess prevalence and characteristics of chronic opioid use. RESULTS: Chronic opioid use was common among patients with commercial claims (23.5% of ICD 720.0 patients; 27.3% of ICD 720.x patients), and especially those with Medicaid claims (57.1% and 76.7%, respectively). The proportion of patients with claims for anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies during followup was often low, and for Medicaid patients was lower among those with chronic opioid use (29.6% of ICD 720.0 patients; 2.3% of ICD 720.x patients) than those without (47.1% and 7.1%, respectively). Among chronic opioid users in all cohorts, the cumulative supply of opioids was typically high (≥ 270 days in the followup period); most opioids prescribed were Schedule II. CONCLUSION: Patients with AS receive opioids with disturbing frequency. The infrequent prescription of recommended therapies to these patients reflects a need to optimize treatment further through education of patients and healthcare professionals alike.

Evaluation of the administration time effect on the cumulative cortisol suppression and cumulative lymphocytes suppression for once-daily inhaled corticosteroids: a population modeling/simulation approach.

Inhaled glucocorticoids continue to be first-line therapy in asthma. To improve improving patient compliance, newer inhaled glucocorticoids have been developed for once-a-day treatment. This study was interested in identifying the optimal time of dosing using 2 surrogate markers of glucocorticoid action. A previously published study on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (cortisol and blood lymphocyte suppression) of the inhaled glucocorticoids budesonide and fluticasone propionate was reanalyzed using a population pharmacokinetic approach. A stochastic numerical simulation using NONMEM assessed the effects of time of dosing on cortisol (side effect parameter) and blood lymphocytes (side effect and effect parameter). The effects on cortisol were more pronounced when the glucocorticoids were given in the morning, whereas the effects on lymphocytes (an effect controlled by endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoids) were maximized when dosing occurred in the late afternoon or evening. Twice-daily dosing of the same dose resulted in smaller differences between maximum and minimal effects. These were of no clinical relevance. Simulations for once-daily dosing support clinical studies that reported a higher antiasthmatic effect and lower cortisol suppression when once-daily dosing occurs in the evening.