Perinatal Oral Health Among Underserved Women: A Call to Action for North Carolina Patients, Providers and Policymakers.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge gaps exist among providers and pregnant women about the importance and safety of oral health care around pregnancy. This article describes the current state of perinatal oral health and healthcare among underserved women in North Carolina (NC) and provides policy recommendations to improve their access to and utilization of dental services. METHODS: A descriptive analysis is provided using (a) 2016 oral health surveillance data of a convenience sample of 459 pregnant women across NC, (b) 2014-2016 Medicaid dental provider and dental services utilization data for the Medicaid for Pregnant Women (MPW) program, and (c) 2017 Medicaid dental benefits policy. Surveillance data was not linked to Medicaid dental services utilization data. RESULTS: Less than 20% of pregnant women surveyed reported having a dental visit during pregnancy and oral screenings revealed 33% had untreated caries. Medicaid data showed a steady decline since 2014 in percentage of MPW beneficiaries utilizing any dental service-less than 10% as of 2016. MPW dental benefits lapse at delivery because dental care is not considered pregnancy-related in NC policy. Only 20% of practicing NC dentists provided care to MPW beneficiaries in 2015. DISCUSSION: Inadequacies in oral health knowledge, beliefs and practices exist among pregnant women, health care professionals and policymakers. Statewide efforts are needed to promote a standard of perinatal care that emphasizes collaborative practice and addresses existing barriers at the patient, provider and policy levels.

Risk Indicators of Urgent and Extensive Dental Treatment Needs in U.S. Air Force Recruits.

INTRODUCTION: Dental Readiness Classifications (DRCs) enable the Military Health System to prioritize dental care in garrison, minimizing dental emergencies and mission degradation during deployments. Over half (52.4%) of 2008 military recruits presented with high-priority urgent needs classified as DRC3 upon initial dental examination and 18.1% required extensive treatment, needing 7 or more restorations, in order to achieve operational dental readiness. The purpose of this study is to identify risk indicators for urgent and extensive dental treatment needs in current U.S. Air Force (USAF) recruits so that Dental Corps leadership can target interventions to maximize oral health, prioritize resources, and reduce health expenditures in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary data analysis was performed of deidentified survey and clinical exam data from the 2018 to 2019 USAF Recruit Oral Health Surveillance study conducted at Lackland Air Force Base from February 2018 to February 2019. Select demographic and self-reported variables were analyzed with two outcome variables: urgent (DRC3) and urgent and extensive (DRC3 + 7) dental treatment needs. Univariate log binomial regression was performed to determine relative risk of DRC3 and DRC3 + 7 by independent variable. The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences institutional review board approved the study as an exempt protocol. RESULTS: Among the 1,335 recruits studied, the overall prevalence of urgent dental needs was 21.5%, whereas 5.5% of participants had both urgent and extensive needs. The study group included participants who were mostly male (69%), were non-Hispanic white (60%), aged 17 to 19 years (48%), were high school educated (47%), had private dental insurance coverage (50%) and self-reported: no need for dental care in the past year (65%), excellent or good condition of teeth (63%), were toothbrushing more than once a day (58%), and had daily consumption of one to three servings of sugary beverages (62%) and foods (69%). Statistically significant differences in relative risk for DRC3 were found for all independent variables except gender and education level. Risk indicators significant for DRC3 and DRC3 + 7 were aged 25 to 29 years; Other and Black race/ethnicity; Medicaid insurance; uninsured; self-reported fair, poor, or unsure current condition of teeth; and past year needed care but did not go (P < .05). The majority of DRC3 and DRC3 + 7 cases were in the small subset of recruits who self-reported fair, poor, or unknown current condition of teeth or need for dental care in the past year without a dental visit. CONCLUSIONS: Among USAF recruits, oral health disparities are observed in certain groups. The study findings can inform targeted utilization of resources and interventions to efficiently optimize oral health and operational dental readiness and decrease dental expenditures. Additionally, a two-question screening tool is proposed to facilitate priority assignment for dental examination during boot camp. This tool has the potential to correctly identify nearly 90% of those with urgent and extensive dental treatment needs at half the typical workload.

Oral health status of adults in North Carolina assisted living facilities.

OBJECTIVES: The specific aims of this study were to describe the baseline oral health status of persons residing in North Carolina assisted living facilities and determine how identified oral health problems vary according to resident and facility demographic variables. METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive epidemiologic study used a statewide random sample of 40 assisted living facilities and a convenience sample of 854 assisted living residents. Dental hygienists and dentists conducted oral screenings on residents using the Association of State and Territorial Dental Director's Basic Screening Survey for Older Adults tool. RESULTS: Nearly one-third of participants were younger than 65. Overall, poorer oral health was noted for non-Hispanic black residents, Medicaid recipients, residents of small facilities (20-60 beds), and residents of facilities located in the Coastal Plains region of the state. Oral health also worsened with increasing length of residence yet seemed to improve with age. The overall rate of edentulism was 29 percent, half of whom did not have complete dentures. Nearly half (48.6 percent) of residents had untreated decay. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for policy and public health programming that addresses the broad racial and socioeconomic factors that contribute to disparities among the institutionalized. Furthermore, the oral health disparities between institutionalized and community-dwelling older adults reflect the need for policy that requires and ensures access to a minimum level of oral health care throughout the duration of a resident's stay. Programming to support such policy should include development of an oral health workforce that is competent in geriatric oral health care.