Optimizing international otolaryngology service trips: Perceptions from learners versus volunteers.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Optimizing value of medical service trips (MSTs) requires alignment of the services provided with the needs and desires of hosts. Our aim was to understand which MST services Vietnamese otolaryngologists find most beneficial and contrast to those believed most important by volunteers. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Otolaryngologists from a tertiary care institution travel to Vietnam yearly. In March 2018, surveys were distributed to Vietnamese otolaryngology faculty, residents, and US otolaryngology volunteers. The value of 11 MST-provided services were graded on a five-point Likert scale. Services included observing US otolaryngology volunteers perform surgery, US otolaryngology volunteer lectures, paper/electronic lecture material, instrument donation, minifellowships in the United States, among others. Respondents also voted for the single most important service. Responses were analyzed via Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: A total of 153 survey responses were recorded. There were 52% respondents who identified as male and 39% as female. The highest-valued services by Vietnamese otolaryngologists were didactic lectures given by US otolaryngology volunteers (4.6/5 ± 0.6), and reviewing cases with US otolaryngology volunteers in the clinic (4.4/5 ± 0.9). The least important services were instrument donation and seeing US otolaryngology volunteers assist with surgery (≤4.1/5). The highest-value services perceived by US otolaryngology volunteers were reviewing cases in the clinic and sponsoring minifellowships (4.9 ± 0.4). Vietnamese faculty perceived the single most important service to be US volunteer lectures (20/74 votes), whereas Vietnamese residents perceived minifellowships to be most important (13/34 votes) CONCLUSIONS: Vietnamese otolaryngologists desire an education-focused relationship with US otolaryngology volunteers, with didactic lectures and sponsored US fellowships having the highest value and performance of surgeries having less value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:E305-E310, 2020.

Postoperative Analgesic Requirement and Pain Perceptions after Nonaerodigestive Head and Neck Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Little data exist on associations between patient factors and postoperative analgesic requirement after head and neck (H&N) surgeries. Such information is important for optimizing postoperative care considering concerns regarding opioid misuse. We analyzed factors associated with narcotic use and pain perception following H&N surgery sparing the upper aerodigestive tract. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From May to October 2017, data were collected for patients undergoing nonaerodigestive H&N procedures requiring hospitalization. Patients completed a preoperative survey querying chronic pain history, narcotic usage, and postoperative pain expectation. Demographics, surgical data, postoperative narcotic use defined by morphine milligram equivalents (MME), pain scores, and Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients, 44 (57.9%) females and 32 (42.1%) males with a mean age of 54.0 years, met inclusion criteria. The most common procedures were parotidectomy (27.6%) and total thyroidectomy (19.7%). Average cumulative 24-hour postoperative MME and calculated MME per hospital day (MME/HD, cumulative MME for hospitalization divided by length of stay) were 40.5 ± 30.6 and 60.8 ± 60.1, respectively. Average pain score throughout the initial 24 hours after surgery was 3.7/10 ± 2.0. Female sex and prior chronic pain diagnosis were associated with higher OBAS after multivariate linear adjustments. CONCLUSION: Postoperative narcotic requirement in nonaerodigestive H&N surgery is overall low. Female sex and prior chronic pain diagnosis may be associated with higher postoperative OBAS, a validated assessment of pain and opioid-related side effects. This study may serve as a comparison for future studies evaluating narcotic-sparing analgesia and pain perception in nonaerodigestive H&N surgery.

Sex bias in basic science and translational otolaryngology research.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Recent studies revealed sex bias in surgical research. Although many diseases exhibit sex-based clinically relevant differences, otolaryngology research has not been evaluated for sex reporting and sex-based analysis. We postulate that a similar bias is prevalent in otolaryngology literature. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. METHODS: Articles published from 2016 to 2017 in The Laryngoscope, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and JAMA Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery were reviewed. Articles with animal subjects, human subject cells, or commercial cell lines were included. Data collected included study type, cell/animal sex, and sex-based data analysis. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four basic/translational research articles were identified. Sixty-nine (47.9%) of those lacked sex reporting. Of 75 studies that reported sex, 22 (29.3%) included both sexes, and 11 (14.7%) analyzed data by sex. One hundred five (72.9%) used animal subjects, of which 54 (51.9%) lacked sex breakdown. Among animal studies, 48/105 included only one sex, and three articles analyzed data by sex. Fifty-four studies used commercial cell lines (N = 23) or human/animal subject cells (N = 31). Among cell groups, 28/54 (51.9%) were of unknown sex, and seven were single sex. Eight (14.8%) studies included data analysis by sex. Domestic studies exhibited a lower rate of sex reporting in both animal and cell studies, and a lower rate of sex-based analysis in cell studies. CONCLUSIONS: Sex may influence outcomes significantly but is underreported and underanalyzed in basic/translational otolaryngology research. Because this research frequently lays the groundwork for clinical trials and standards of care, future research must address these sex-based discrepancies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:613-618, 2019.

Sex bias: Is it pervasive in otolaryngology clinical research?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Recent initiatives highlight substantial sex bias in biomedical research. The objective was to determine whether sex bias is present in otolaryngology and whether sex is appropriately analyzed as an independent variable in otolaryngology clinical research. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review. METHODS: We systematically reviewed all 2016 articles in three major otolaryngology journals: The Laryngoscope, JAMA Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Extracted data included study origin, location, subspecialty, number/sex of subjects, ≥50% sex matching (SM≥50 ), and sex-based statistical analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred of 1,209 articles comprising original clinical research were reviewed including 8,997,345,495 subjects (males: 3,898,559,264 [43.3%]; females: 5,095,592,583 [56.6%]; and unknown: 3,193,648 [0.04%]). There were 533/600 (88.8%) studies that included both sexes, eight (1.3%) included females only, five (0.8%) included males only, and 56 (9.3%) did not document participant sex. Only 280 studies (46.7%) analyzed data by sex, and 330 studies (60.7%) had SM≥50 . Sex-based statistical analysis and SM≥50 were similar in domestic and international studies (48.7% vs. 42.8% and 60.9% vs. 62%, respectively). Database studies performed sex-based statistical analysis more frequently than single and multi-institutional studies (79.1% vs. 40.4% and 43.4%, P < .00001). Analysis by sex was more frequently performed in head and neck surgery (53.6%) and pediatric otolaryngology (51.3%), whereas SM≥50 was highest in pediatric otolaryngology (86.8%) and otology (82.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Sex bias exists in the clinical otolaryngology literature, with less than half the studies analyzing sex. Acknowledging the intertwinement of sex with disease pathophysiology and outcomes is important. Eliminating sex bias in research and clinical care should become a major focus for otolaryngologists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:858-864, 2019.

Sex-based outcomes in type I thyroplasty for nonparalytic glottic incompetence.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical outcomes for type I Gore-Tex thyroplasty (GMT) for nonparalytic glottic incompetence (GI) have been reported in the literature. Given differences in male and female laryngeal anatomy, sex-based outcomes should also be evaluated. We endeavored to evaluate sex-specific post-GMT voice outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing GMT for nonparalytic GI. Multidimensional voice outcome measures including voice-related quality of life (VRQOL), Glottal Function Index (GFI), and grade/roughness/breathiness/asthenia/strain (GRBAS) were analyzed at postoperative time frames: 0 to 3 months, 3 to 9 months, and 9 to 18 months. RESULTS: Eighty-five subjects (43 females, 42 males) with mean age 53.5 undergoing GMT for nonparalytic GI from 2005 to 2017 met inclusion criteria. Etiologies included vocal fold hypomobility (N = 36, 42%), paresis (N = 18, 21%), vocal fold atrophy (N = 17, 20%), and scarring (N = 14, 17%). Females had significantly greater improvement on VRQOL at 0 to 3 months and 9 to 18 months timeframes compared to males, with mean change in VRQOL: 41.3 versus 22.4 (P = 0.0002) and 42.5 versus 20.8 (P = 0.002), respectively. Similarly, women had significantly greater improvement in GFI at 0 to 3 months follow-up (mean difference - 10.8 vs. -4.9, respectively, P = 0.0002). There was no statistically significant sex difference in GRBAS at any follow-up interval. CONCLUSION: Following GMT, females had greater improvement in patient-reported voice outcomes in the early postoperative period. No significant difference between sexes was noted in perceptual measures (GRBAS). Sex-specific outcomes should be evaluated for clinical interventions to improve specificity of preoperative counseling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 129:2543-2548, 2019.

Sex bias in rhinology research.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of general surgery literature has revealed noteworthy sex bias and underreporting. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of sex bias and underreporting in rhinology. METHODS: All articles in 2016 issues of Rhinology, the American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy (AJRA), and the International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology (IFAR) were reviewed. Of 369 articles, 248 met inclusion criteria. Excluded studies were cadaveric, meta-analysis/review, and editorial. Data collected included study type, demographics, and sex-based statistical analysis. RESULTS: There were 202 clinical and 46 basic science/translational studies. From 188 of 202 clinical studies with known sex, 1 included participants of a single sex. Sex matching >50% (SM50 ) was found in 81.9%, and 55.9% performed sex-based statistical analysis. Domestic clinical studies performed sex-based analysis more frequently than international (54.9% vs 44.4%) and exhibited a higher rate of SM50 (84.5% vs 80.3%), though these differences were not statistically significant. For basic/translational studies, 54.5% (24/44) provided sex breakdown. Among these, 29.2% included 1 sex, and 8.3% performed sex-based analysis. Of 10 using animals, 70.0% utilized 1 sex. The remaining 30.0% did not report sex. None of 4 cell line studies reported cell sex. Less than half (46.2%) of domestic and 56.3% of international studies reported sex breakdown; 7.7% of domestic and 3.0% of international studies performed sex-based analysis. CONCLUSION: Although sex may impact outcomes, research without sex reporting and analysis is prevalent, particularly among basic science/translational studies. Future research must account for sex in demographics and analysis to best inform evidence-based clinical guidelines.

Outcomes of Open vs Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery in Patients 70 Years or Older.

Importance: The use of skull base surgery in patients 70 years or older is increasing, but its safety in this age group has not been evaluated to date. Objectives: To describe outcomes in a cohort of patients 70 years or older undergoing skull base surgery and to evaluate whether age, type of disease process, and approach (endoscopic vs traditional open surgery) are associated with increased intraoperative and postoperative complications in this population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a population-based sample of 219 patients 70 years or older from a database of 1720 patients who underwent skull base surgery at University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, a tertiary referral center, between October 2007 and June 2017. Data were collected from June 2016 to July 2017 and analyzed in July 2017 and August 2017. Exposure: Skull base surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data collected included demographic characteristics, surgical approach, and disease process. Intraoperative findings and postoperative complications were analyzed by age, surgical approach, and malignancy status. Results: Of the 219 patients, 166 were aged 70.0 to 79.9 years and 53 patients were older than 80 years (mean [SD] age, 76.4 [4.7] years); 120 (54.8%) were men and 160 (73.7%) were white. There were 161 (73.5%) endoscopic and 58 (26.5%) open operations. The most common pathologic processes among the 219 patients were nonsellar malignant (81 [37.0%]), nonsellar benign (53 [24.2%]), and pituitary (49 [22.4%]) tumors. The most common intraoperative and postoperative complications were intraoperative major bleeding (5 of 219 patients [2.3%]) and postoperative bleeding (9 [4.1%]). Thirty-day mortality was zero. There was no clinically meaningful difference in complications between patients aged 70.0 to 79.9 years vs those older than 80 years, endoscopic vs open surgery, or benign vs malignant neoplasms. Specifically, between the endoscopic and open surgery groups, there was no difference in intraoperative major bleeding (3.9%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 12.9%), postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (-0.6%; 95% CI, -3.4% to 5.6%), or postoperative bleeding (1.5%; 95% CI, -3.9% to 10.6%). Conclusions and Relevance: Skull base surgery is a safe option in persons 70 years or older, with similar outcomes across age ranges, surgical approaches, and disease processes.

Surgical simulation and applicant perception in otolaryngology residency interviews.

OBJECTIVE: The traditional resident applicant interview involves multiple oral interviews. The implementation of surgical simulations adds an additional dimension of assessment but can be perceived in a stressful way by applicants. The purpose of this project is to describe low-fidelity simulations that were implemented for the 2016 to 2017 residency interviews and obtain applicant perception of these simulations. METHODS: Six simulation modules were created, which reflected tasks used in six subspecialties within otolaryngology (pediatrics, otology, laryngology, facial plastics, rhinology, and head/neck). Applicants were guided in the procedures by both an attending and resident. Afterward, applicants were anonymously surveyed on their perception of the tasks using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Somewhat Disagree, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Somewhat Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree). RESULTS: A total of 41 applicants were interviewed. The following were measured: enjoyable (98.5% strongly agree, 2.5% somewhat agree; mean: 4.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.92, 5.02), educational (88% strongly agree, 12% somewhat agree; mean: 4.88; 95% CI, 4.78, 4.98), recommended for future use (92.7% strongly agree, 7.3% somewhat agree; mean: 4.93; 95% CI, 4.85, 5.01), and stressful (63.5% strongly disagree, 19.5% somewhat disagree, 17% neutral; mean: 1.54; 95% CI, 1.30, 1.78). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a low-fidelity multi-station surgical simulation experience is feasible in an interview day. Majority of applicants viewed the simulations in a positive manner. Surgical simulations may provide a useful holistic evaluation of an applicant in future interviews, especially if done in a setting that minimizes stress and maximizes the educational experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 2503-2507, 2018.