RESUMEN
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are roundworms that parasitize insects with the aid of symbiotic bacteria. These nematodes have been used both as model organisms and for biological control of pests. The specialized third stage of an EPN, known as an infective juvenile (IJ) must forage to find a host with strategies varying from species to species (cruising, ambushing, and intermediate). Some IJs move more than others to find a host, despite an increased risk of predation and desiccation. This hints at potential underlying benefits (e.g., increased invasion) for EPNs that move more. We assessed whether EPNs that moved farther down a soil column also exhibit higher levels of invasion when compared to nematodes that remained at or near their point of origin. We found that movers in the cruisier and intermediate species: Steinernema riobrave, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, and H. indica had higher invasion rates compared to their counterparts that did not move. S. carpocapsae, an ambusher, did not exhibit invasion differences between EPNs that moved versus those that did not. For the three cruiser/intermediate EPNs we tested, our results support our hypothesis that EPNs that tend to move more enjoy related benefits such as increased invasion potential. Further studies are required to explore other parameters that may interact with movement. The results of this study can potentially be used to develop EPN strains that move more and invade more, and thus can potentially be more effective biological control agents.
Asunto(s)
Mariposas Nocturnas , Rabdítidos , Animales , Larva , Control Biológico de Vectores/métodos , SueloRESUMEN
Maintenance of an aggregated population structure implies within-species communication. In mixed-species environments, species-specific aggregations may reduce interspecific competition and promote coexistence. We studied whether movement and aggregation behavior of three entomopathogenic nematode species changed when isolated, as compared to mixed-species arenas. Movement and aggregation of Steinernema carpocapsae, S. feltiae and S. glaseri were assessed in sand. Each species demonstrated significant aggregation when alone. Mixed-species trials involved adding two species of nematodes, either combined in the center of the arena or at separate corners. While individual species became less aggregated than in single-species conditions when co-applied in the same location, they became more aggregated when applied in separate corners. This increased aggregation in separate-corner trials occurred even though the nematodes moved just as far when mixed together as they did when alone. These findings suggest that maintenance of multiple species within the same habitat is driven, at least in part, by species-specific signals that promote conspecific aggregation, and when the species are mixed (as occurs in some commercial formulations involving multiple EPN species), these signaling mechanisms are muddled.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: In our center, five Gamma Knife proceduralists differed in opioid administration practices prior to Leksell frame removal, providing the opportunity to improve the care of patients with brain metastases by studying whether opioid medications improve pain scores and patient satisfaction during Gamma Knife treatment in a prospective, pseudorandomized fashion. METHODS: We prospectively administered a questionnaire to patients undergoing Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for metastases between November, 2017 and July, 2018. Using multivariable methods, we assessed whether opioid pain medication administration influenced the change in pain scores after frame removal, and whether they influenced patient satisfaction on how often their pain was controlled, and their overall satisfaction. RESULTS: We included 142 patients. Mean age was 65.2 ± 10.8 years and 52.7% were female. Morphine was the most commonly administered medication. Pain increases were greater around frame removal than placement. Opioids were not associated with any difference in the change in pain scores before and after frame removal, or patient satisfaction. Patients with higher pre-removal pain scores had smaller increases in pain scores after removal; they also had worse pain control and overall satisfaction with their treatment. CONCLUSION: Morphine administration prior to frame removal did not improve pain scores or pain control satisfaction. Absence of efficacy may be related to delayed onset of action, and stronger and faster-acting agents should be explored. Pre-removal pain scores were associated with decreased pain control and overall satisfaction, further identifying earlier and stronger pain treatment as a potential area for improvement.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Radiocirugia/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dolor , Derivados de la MorfinaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A multi-site Phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of Veliparib, a Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase [PARP] enzyme inhibitor, when administered with temozolomide (TMZ) alone and then with temozolomide and radiation (RT) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: Given the potential for myelosuppression when a PARP inhibitor is combined with chemotherapy, the first 6 patients accrued were given Veliparib 10 mg bid and TMZ 75 mg/m2/d daily for six weeks. If this was well tolerated, the same doses of Veliparib and TMZ would be tested along with standard radiation with plans to dose escalate the Veliparib in subsequent patient cohorts. Once a maximal tolerated dose was determined, a 78 patient phase II study was planned. Peripheral blood pharmacokinetics were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. In the first 6 patients who received 6 weeks of TMZ with Veliparib only one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. The next 12 patients received 6 weeks of RT + TMZ + veliparib and 4/12 (33%) had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. As a result, Veliparib was reduced by 50% to 10 mg BID every other week, but again 3/3 patients had dose limiting hematologic toxicities. The trial was then terminated. The mean clearance (± SD) CL/F of Veliparib for the initial dose (27.0 ± 9.0 L/h, n = 16) and at steady-state for 10 mg BID (23.5 ± 10.4 L/h, n = 18) were similar. Accumulation for BID dosing was 56% (± 33%). CONCLUSIONS: Although Veliparib 10 mg BID administered with TMZ 75 mg/m2 for six weeks was well tolerated, when this regimen was combined with standard partial brain irradiation it was severely myelosuppressive even when the dose was reduced by 50%. This study again highlights the potential of localized cranial radiotherapy to significantly increase hematologic toxicity of marginally myelosuppressive systemic therapies.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Humanos , Temozolomida/uso terapéutico , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Bencimidazoles , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumor progression among patients with brain metastases previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery represents a common diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective pilot study to determine whether PET/CT with 18F-fluciclovine, a widely available amino acid PET radiotracer, repurposed intracranially, can accurately diagnose equivocal lesions. METHODS: Adults with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a follow-up tumor-protocol MRI brain equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression underwent an 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT of the brain within 30 days. The reference standard for final diagnosis consisted of clinical follow-up until multidisciplinary consensus or tissue confirmation. RESULTS: Of 16 patients imaged from 7/2019 to 11/2020, 15 subjects were evaluable with 20 lesions (radiation necrosis, n = 16; tumor progression, n = 4). Higher SUVmax statistically significantly predicted tumor progression (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.011). Lesion SUVmean (AUC = 0.875; p = 0.018), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.813; p = 0.007), and SUVpeak-to-normal-brain (AUC = 0.859; p = 0.002) also predicted tumor progression, whereas SUVmax-to-normal-brain (p = 0.1) and SUVmean-to-normal-brain (p = 0.5) did not. Qualitative visual scores were significant predictors for readers 1 (AUC = 0.750; p < 0.001) and 3 (AUC = 0.781; p = 0.045), but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3). Visual interpretations were significant predictors for reader 1 (AUC = 0.898; p = 0.012) but not for reader 2 (p = 0.3) or 3 (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective pilot study of patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiosurgery presenting with a contemporary MRI brain with a lesion equivocal for radiation necrosis versus tumor progression, 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT repurposed intracranially demonstrated encouraging diagnostic accuracy, supporting the pursuit of larger clinical trials which will be necessary to establish diagnostic criteria and performance.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Radiocirugia , Adulto , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/etiología , Necrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Necrosis/etiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Low-grade glioma (LGG) exhibits longer median survival than high-grade brain tumors, and thus impact of our therapies on patient quality of life remains a crucial consideration. This study evaluated the effects of concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation (RT + TMZ) or observation on quality of life (QOL) in patients with low-grade glioma. METHODS: We completed a retrospective cross-sectional study of adults with LGG who underwent surgery with known molecular classification from 1980 to 2018. Postoperatively, patients were either observed or received adjuvant concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation. EQ-5D and PHQ-9 depression screen were completed before outpatient visits every 2-3 months. Baseline score was defined as ± 30 days within initial operation. RESULTS: Of the 63 patients (mean age 44 ± 17 years, 51% female) with baseline EQ-5D or PHQ-9 depression screen data and at least one follow-up measure, 30 (48%) were observed and 33 (52%) received RT + TMZ. No significant decline was seen in EQ-5D or PHQ-9 scores at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline scores for all patients. At each time point, there was no significant difference between those who were observed or received adjuvant therapy. The linear mixed model estimating PHQ-9 value or EQ-5D index demonstrated that there was no significant difference in PHQ-9 or EQ-5D index between treatment groups (p = 0.42 and p = 0.54, respectively) or time points (p = 0.24 and p = 0.99, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study found no significant decline in patient QOL or depression scores as assessed by patient- reported outcome measures for patients with low-grade glioma up to 2 years following surgery. We found no difference between RT + TMZ compared to observation during this time frame. Additional follow-up can help identify the longer-term impact of treatment strategy on patient experience.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Quimioradioterapia , Glioma , Calidad de Vida , Temozolomida , Espera Vigilante , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Glioma/patología , Glioma/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Temozolomida/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate the effects of concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiation therapy on neurocognitive function in patients with low-grade glioma (LGG). MATERIALS/METHODS: We included adult patients with LGG who were treated postoperatively with radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Patients were evaluated with comprehensive psychometric tests at baseline (prior to RT + TMZ) and at various time intervals following RT + TMZ. Baseline cognitive performance was analyzed by sex, age, education history, history of seizures, IDH mutation status, and 1p/19q codeletion status. Changes in neurocognitive performance were evaluated over time. RESULTS: Thirty-seven LGG patients (mean age 43.6, 59.5% male) had baseline neurocognitive evaluation. Patients with an age > 40 years old at diagnosis and those with an education > 16 years demonstrated superior baseline verbal memory as assessed by HVLT. No other cognitive domains showed differences when stratified by the variables mentioned above. A total of 22 LGG patients had baseline and post RT + TMZ neurocognitive evaluation. Overall, patients showed no statistical difference between group mean test scores prior to and following RT + TMZ on all psychometric measures (with the exception of HVLT Discrimination). CONCLUSION: Cognitive function remained stable following RT + TMZ in LGG patients evaluated prospectively up to 2 years. The anticipated analysis of RTOG 0424 will provide valuable neurocognitive outcomes specifically for high risk LGG patients treated with RT + TMZ.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Cognición , Femenino , Glioma/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Temozolomida/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
We used a phylogenetic framework to examine the relationship between entomopathogenic nematode (EPN) vertical dispersal and infectivity when EPNs are exposed to a mixture of compounds found in late-stage EPN-infected insect cadavers. EPNs from five phylogenetically close and distant species (Heterorhabditis bacteriophora, H. georgiana, H. megidis, H. indica and Steinernema feltiae) were exposed to cadaver macerate produced by their own species' infection and by H. bacteriophora infected hosts. We found that only three of the five species (H. bacteriophora, H. indica and S. feltiae) responded to exposure to their own macerate by increasing rates of dispersal. When we exposed all five species to a H. bacteriophora infected host macerate, we found that only H. bacteriophora responded by increasing dispersal, and that the most distantly related species (S. feltiae) essentially halted dispersal. These findings suggest that (1) responses to cadaver macerate vary, and (2) there may be a relationship between inherent dispersal rates and sensitivity to macerate exposure, as the most rapidly dispersing species (H. megidis) showed no response to macerate exposure.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Dovitinib is an oral, potent inhibitor of FGFR and VEGFR, and can be a promising strategy in patients with recurrent or progressive glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS: This was an open label phase II study of two arms: Arm 1 included anti-angiogenic naïve patients with recurrent GBM and Arm 2 included patients with recurrent GBM that had progressed on prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Nineteen subjects were enrolled in Arm 1 and 14 subjects in Arm 2. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) in Arm 1 and time to progression (TTP) in Arm 2. The secondary endpoints were toxicity, objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival. RESULTS: Patients in Arm 2 (compared to Arm 1) tended to have longer intervals from diagnosis to study entry (median 26.9 vs. 8.9 months, p = 0.002), experienced more recurrences (64%, had 3-4 prior recurrences compared to 0, p < 0.0001) and tended to be heavily pretreated (71% vs. 26-32% p = 0.04 or 0.02). 6-month PFS was 12% ± 6% for the Arm 1 and 0% for Arm 2. TTP was similar in both treatment arms (median 1.8 months Arm 1 and 0.7-1.8 months Arm 2, p = 0.36). Five patients (15%) had grade 4 toxicities and 22 patients (67%) had grade 3 toxicities. There were no significant differences between the two arms with respect to the amount of change in the levels of biomarkers from baseline. CONCLUSION: Dovitinib was not efficacious in prolonging the PFS in patients with recurrent GBM irrespective of prior treatment with anti-angiogenic therapy (including bevacizumab).
Asunto(s)
Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Inconsistency in entomopathogenic nematode (EPN) efficacy is still one of the biggest challenges for the wider adoption of EPNs as biocontrol agents. Previous studies demonstrated that extracts from EPN-infected hosts enhance dispersal and efficacy, two key factors in success of EPNs. Some active components in the insect host cadavers responsible for dispersal, ascarosides, have been identified as nematode pheromones. We hypothesized that pheromone extracts increase dispersal of EPN infective juveniles (IJs) leading to increased efficacy. First, we determined whether pheromone extracts improved IJ movement/dispersal in soil columns baited with Tenebrio molitor larvae. We found that pheromone extracts induced higher numbers of Steinernema carpocapsae and Steinernema feltiae IJs to move towards T. molitor larvae in the bottom of the column compared to IJs treated with infected cadaver macerate and water, positive and negative controls, respectively. Furthermore, the number of S. carpocapsae IJs that invaded T. molitor larvae was higher for the pheromone extract treatment than the controls. S. feltiae IJs that were pretreated with pheromone extracts and macerate (positive control) infected T. molitor at the same rate but invasion was superior to IJs that were treated with water. Consistent with the soil column tests, both S. carpocapsae and S. feltiae IJs treated with pheromone extracts performed better in killing larvae of two economically important insect larvae, pecan weevil, Curculio caryae, and black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens, in greenhouse tests compared to IJs treated with water. We demonstrated pheromone-mediated behavioral manipulation of a biological control agent to enhance pest control potential. Conceivably, nematodes can be exposed to efficacy-enhancing pheromones prior to field application.
Asunto(s)
Feromonas , Infecciones por Rhabditida/parasitología , Rabdítidos , Animales , Bioensayo , Agentes de Control Biológico , Dípteros/parasitología , Larva/parasitología , Mariposas Nocturnas/parasitología , Control Biológico de Vectores , Rabdítidos/patogenicidad , Suelo/parasitología , Gorgojos/parasitologíaRESUMEN
To retrospectively analyze and assess the outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with anaplastic meningioma (AM) (WHO Grade III). Clinical data and outcome [overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival] from 18 patients with Grade III meningioma (AM, based on World Health Organization 2016 definition) initially treated between March 2000 and June 2015 were analyzed. Eleven patients (61%) were male, median age at diagnosis was 63 (range 48-86), and 55% (10/18 patients) had good performance status (KPS ≥ 80). Eight patients (45%) had lower grade disease (Grade I-n = 2; Grade II-n = 6) prior to being upgraded to AM. Ten patients had fractionated radiation after primary surgery, eight patients had salvage fractionated RT, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) boost along with primary RT in 1 patient, and salvage SRS to 18 separate areas in 14 patients. Salvage chemotherapy was mainly considered in third or fourth recurrences. 13 (72%) patients recurred and 10 (56%) have died. Median PFS was 14.5 months (95% CI 6.9-22.2). The 5-year survival rate was 40 ± 15% and median OS was 55.8 months (95% CI 27.7-80.3). Of all factors examined, only Karnofsky performance status (KPS) affected outcome (PFS p = 0.0003; OS p = 0.0003). With median OS of 55 months (4.6 years) our results are consistent with existing reports of the poor outcomes for AM patients. From the available data, surgical resection followed by RT and salvage radiosurgery and/or chemotherapy can lead to extended survival; however the benefit may decrease with successive treatments.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiología , Meningioma/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/patología , Neoplasias Meníngeas/terapia , Meningioma/patología , Meningioma/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
To investigate late toxicity among patients with newly-diagnosed brain metastases undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with concurrent systemic therapies with or without whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Patients with newly-diagnosed brain metastasis who underwent SRS at a single tertiary-care institution from 1997 to 2015 were eligible for inclusion. The class and timing of all systemic therapies were collected for each patient. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of radiographic radiation necrosis (RN). Multivariable competing risks regression was used to adjust for confounding. During the study period, 1650 patients presented with 2843 intracranial metastases. Among these, 445 patients (27%) were treated with SRS and concurrent systemic therapy. Radiographic RN developed following treatment of 222 (8%) lesions, 120 (54%) of which were symptomatic. The 12-month cumulative incidences of RN among lesions treated with and without concurrent therapies were 6.6 and 5.3%, respectively (p = 0.14). Concurrent systemic therapy was associated with a significantly increased rate of RN among lesions treated with upfront SRS and WBRT (8.7 vs. 3.7%, p = 0.04). In particular, concurrent targeted therapies significantly increased the 12-month cumulative incidence of RN (8.8 vs. 5.3%, p < 0.01). Among these therapies, significantly increased rates of RN were observed with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (14.3 vs. 6.6%, p = 0.04) and EGFR TKIs (15.6 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.04). Most classes of systemic therapies may be safely delivered concurrently with SRS in the management of newly-diagnosed brain metastases. However, the rate of radiographic RN is significantly increased with the addition of concurrent systemic therapies to SRS and WBRT.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Encéfalo/patología , Irradiación Craneana/efectos adversos , Necrosis/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estado de Ejecución de Karnofsky , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Traumatismos por Radiación/mortalidad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Little is known on the natural history, recurrence patterns, neurocognitive outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival in long-term survivors (≥10 years) from brain metastasis (BM). In this study, the records of 1953 patients who underwent treatment for BM with a potential for ≥10 years of follow-up were reviewed. Cox regression analysis identified factors predictive for overall survival (OS). The median age at brain metastasis diagnosis was 60 years and the median OS was 6.4 months. The 1-year OS rate was 29.9, 12.1 % at 2 years, 3.0 % at 5 years, and 1.3 % at 10 years. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with worse OS included gender (males, HR 1.2), multiple brain metastases (HR 1.3), no surgery (HR 1.8), and no stereotactic radiosurgery (HR 1.8) (p < 0.0001 each). Fifty-six patients (2.9 %) survived ≥5 years; 23 patients (1.2 %) survived ≥10 years and the median survival for ≥10 year survivors was 18.5 years. Six of the 10-year survivors had an intracranial recurrence, five occurred within 11 years from the first treatment. Presence of a solitary lesion or single lesion at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis was associated with improved survival. Eight of the ≥10 year survivors (34.8 %) had no neurological symptoms at last follow-up; none of the 10-year survivors were documented to have a neurologic death. Our study demonstrates that patients with favorable prognostic features should undergo multimodality treatment. Albeit rare, patients who are alive 10 years after treatment for their brain metastases may be considered cured from their intracranial disease.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Radiocirugia/métodos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Single session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection alone for brain metastases larger than 2 cm results in unsatisfactory local control. We conducted a phase I trial for brain metastases(>2cm) to determine the safety of preoperative SRS at escalating doses. METHODS: Radiosurgery dose was escalated at 3 Gy increments for 3 cohorts based on maximum tumor dimension starting at: 18 Gy for >2-3 cm, 15 Gy for >3-4 cm, and 12 Gy for >4-6 cm. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade III or greater acute toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients/36 lesions were enrolled. For tumor size >2-3 cm, patients were enrolled up to the second dose level (21 Gy); for >3-4 cm and >4-6 cm cohorts the third dose level (21 Gy and 18 Gy, respectively) was reached. There were 2 DLTs in the >3-4 cm arm at 21Gy. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SRS for >2-3 cm was not reached; and was 18 Gy for both >3-4 cm arm and >4-6 cm arm. With a median follow-up of 64.0 months, the 6- and 12-month local control rates were 85.9% and 76.6%, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 radiation necrosis at 5 months. The 2-year rate of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was 0%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative SRS with dose escalation followed by surgical resection for brain metastases greater than 2 cm in size demonstrates acceptable acute toxicity. The phase II portion of the trial will be conducted at the maximum tolerated SRS doses.
RESUMEN
We present two cases of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-associated hemangioblastomas in the CNS treated with the newly approved HIF-2α inhibitor, belzutifan. The first case is a 31-year-old female with confirmed pathogenic germline VHL mutation who presented with multiple hemangioblastomas. The patient was started on belzutifan, and a brisk reduction in perilesional edema was observed after 2 months of treatment. The second patient is a 30-year-old male with familial VHL disease. Imaging revealed multiple cerebellar hemangioblastomas, and follow-up imaging after three cycles of belzutifan revealed a reduction in perilesional edema. Both patients tolerated belzutifan well, with only anemia and fatigue. We highlight our initial experience and early imaging findings associated with belzutifan in VHL disease-associated CNS hemangioblastomas.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS: Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Oncología Médica/normas , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Consenso , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In addition to established prognostic factors in low-grade glioma (LGG), studies suggest a sexual dimorphism with male sex portending worse prognosis. Our objective was to identify the effect of sex on presentation and outcomes in LGG. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with LGG (World Health Organization 2016 grade 2 glioma). Patients with IDH wild-type tumors were excluded. Patients were matched between male and female sex by age, treatment, and surgery via propensity score matching. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed by sex. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), next intervention-free survival (NIFS), progression-free survival, and malignant transformation-free survival. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression multivariable analysis with backward elimination were completed. RESULTS: Of the 532 patients identified, 258 (48%) were men. Men were more likely to present with seizure (69.38% vs 56.57%, P = .002), but no other statistically significant differences between sexes at presentation were identified. Five-year OS was higher in women at 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-91%) versus 78% (95% CI, 73%-84%) in men (P = .0045). NIFS was significantly higher in female patients at 68% (95% CI, 62%-74%) versus 57% (95% CI, 51%-64%) in men (P = .009). On multivariable analysis, female sex was independently associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.16-2.05; P = .002), NIFS (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.42; P = .004), and malignant transformation-free survival (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.24-2.12; P = .0004). In patients with molecularly defined LGG (IDH and 1p19q status; n = 291), female sex remained independently associated with improved OS (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.16-2.77; P = .008) and NIFS (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-1.96; P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, female sex was independently associated with improved outcomes. These findings support intrinsic sex-specific differences in LGG behavior, justifying further studies to optimize management and therapeutics based on sex.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Adolescente , Adulto , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Femenino , Glioma/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Caracteres SexualesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has developed a guideline on appropriate radiation therapy for brain metastases. ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS: "Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline"2 was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Endorsement Panel subsequently reviewed the content and the recommendations. RESULTS: The ASCO Endorsement Panel determined that the recommendations from the ASTRO guideline, published May 6, 2022, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorses "Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline."2. RECOMMENDATIONS: Within the guideline, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is recommended for patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and up to four intact brain metastases, and conditionally recommended for patients with up to 10 intact brain metastases. The guideline provides detailed dosing and fractionation recommendations on the basis of the size of the metastases. For patients with resected brain metastases, radiation therapy (SRS or whole-brain radiation therapy [WBRT]) is recommended to improve intracranial disease control; if there are limited additional brain metastases, SRS is recommended over WBRT. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases ineligible for surgery and/or SRS, WBRT is recommended with hippocampal avoidance where possible and the addition of memantine is recommended. For patients with brain metastases, limiting the single-fraction V12Gy to brain tissue to ≤ 10 cm3 is conditionally recommended.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Oncología por Radiación , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Irradiación Craneana , Humanos , Sociedades , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Current therapies for recurrent or progressive high-grade gliomas (HGG, WHO grade 3-4) produce a 6-month progression-free survival of only 10-25%. Migration and invasion by HGG is mediated in part by matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) which promote remodeling of the extracellular matrix. Several HIV protease inhibitors (HIVPI) decrease the expression of MMPs in astrocytes and microglia. Given these mechanisms of antitumor activity of HIVPI, we evaluated the efficacy of ritonavir/lopinavir, a combination HIVPI, in patients with progressive or recurrent HGG in an open label phase II trial. Nineteen patients were treated in this study. Patients received ritonavir/lopinavir (400 mg/100 mg) orally twice daily. All patients were treated until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. A complete response was seen in one patient (5%). Three patients (16%) had stable disease as the best response. Fifteen patients (79%) had progressive disease. The 6-month progression free survival (PFS(6)) was 11% (2 of 19 patients). Ritonavir/lopinavir was well tolerated in patients with heavily pretreated refractory HGG, and no grade 3 or 4 toxicity was seen. The activity at the dose and schedule used in this study, however, was modest and the study did not meet its efficacy endpoint.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Proteasa del VIH/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Lopinavir , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To update the 2000 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice parameter on anticonvulsant prophylaxis in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. METHODS: Following the 2017 AAN methodologies, a systematic literature review utilizing PubMed, EMBASE Library, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was performed. The studies were rated based on the AAN therapeutic or causation classification of evidence (class I-IV). RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles were selected for final analysis. There were limited high-level, class I studies and mostly class II and III studies. The AAN affirmed the value of these guidelines. RECOMMENDATIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors who have not had a seizure, clinicians should not prescribe antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to reduce the risk of seizures (level A). In brain tumor patients undergoing surgery, there is insufficient evidence to recommend prescribing AEDs to reduce the risk of seizures in the peri- or postoperative period (level C). There is insufficient evidence to support prescribing valproic acid or levetiracetam with the intent to prolong progression-free or overall survival (level C). Physicians may consider the use of levetiracetam over older AEDs to reduce side effects (level C). There is insufficient evidence to support using tumor location, histology, grade, molecular/imaging features when deciding whether or not to prescribe prophylactic AEDs (level U).