Safety of Shunting Strategies During Carotid Endarterectomy: A Vascular Quality Initiative Data Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate in hospital outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) according to shunt usage, particularly in patients with contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) or recent stroke. Data from CEAs registered in the Vascular Quality Initiative database between 2012 and 2020 were analysed, excluding surgeons with < 10 CEAs registered in the database, concomitant procedures, re-interventions, and incomplete data. METHODS: Based on their rate of shunt use, participating surgeons were divided in three groups: non-shunters (< 5%), selective shunters (5 - 95%), and routine shunters (> 95%). Primary outcomes of in hospital stroke, death, and stroke and death rate (SDR) were analysed in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. RESULTS: A total of 113 202 patients met the study criteria, of whom 31 147 were symptomatic and 82 055 were asymptomatic. Of the 1 645 surgeons included, 12.1% were non-shunters, 63.6% were selective shunters, and 24.3% were routine shunters, with 10 557, 71 160, and 31 579 procedures in each group, respectively. In the univariable analysis, in hospital stroke (2.0% vs. 1.9% vs. 1.6%; p = .17), death (0.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 0.4%; p = .71), and SDR (2.2% vs. 2.1% vs. 1.8%; p = .23) were not statistically significantly different among the three groups in the symptomatic cohort. The asymptomatic cohort also did not show a statistically significant difference for in hospital stroke (0.9% vs. 1.0% vs. 0.9%; p = .55), death (0.2% vs. 0.2% vs. 0.2%; p = .64), and SDR (1.0% vs. 1.1% vs. 1.0%; p = .43). The multivariate model did not show a statistically significant difference for the primary outcomes between the three shunting cohorts. On subgroup analysis, the SDRs were not statistically significantly different for patients with CCO (3.3% vs. 2.5% vs. 2.4%; p = .64) and those presenting with a recent stroke (2.9% vs. 3.4% vs. 3.1%; p = .60). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were found between three shunting strategies for in hospital SDR, including in patients with CCO or recent stroke.

Correlation between measured and predicted mismatch with valve hemodynamics in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A sex-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the reliability of predicted effective orifice area indexed (pEOAi) is scarce in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). AIMS: To assess the validity of the pEOAi in TAVR by correlating its value with echocardiography-derived hemodynamic data. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of TAVR patients from 2012 to 2021 with available echocardiograms was conducted. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was defined based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. The main endpoints were the congruence of measured effective orifice area indexed (EOAi) and pEOAi with the hemodynamic data obtained by echocardiography. The secondary endpoint included a correlation of predicted PPM (pPPM) and measured PPM (mPPM) with postoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) status. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients were included. pPPM was more frequent than mPPM (54 [17%]; all moderate PPM vs. 39 [12.3%]: 32 moderate and 7 severe PPM). Predicted and measured EOAi were statistically correlated with postprocedural transvalvular mean gradient and Doppler velocity index (all p < 0.001), including in both sex-based subgroups. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of pPPM for postprocedural transvalvular mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg were 16% and 97%, respectively. Only pPPM was significantly more prevalent in the group in which NYHA failed to improve than in those with symptom improvement (30.1% vs. 16%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Predicted PPM has an excellent NPV for postprocedural transvalvular mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg and seems to be a good predictor of NYHA status evolution as opposed to measured PPM. Predicted EOAi can be used in procedural planning to reduce the risk of PPM in both TAVR male and female patients.

Elements not Graded in the Cardiac Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines Might Improve Postoperative Outcome: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Enhanced Recovery Programs (ERPs) are protocols involving the whole patient surgical journey. These protocols are based on multimodal, multidisciplinary, evidence-based, and patient-centered approaches aimed at improving patient recovery after a surgical intervention. Such programs have shown striking positive results in different surgical specialties. However, only a few research groups have incorporated preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative evidence-based interventions in bundles used to standardize care and build cardiac surgery ERPs. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recently published evidence-based recommendations for perioperative care in cardiac surgery. Their recommendations included 22 perioperative interventions that may be part of any cardiac ERP. However, various components integrated in already-published cardiac ERPs were neither graded nor reported in these recommendations. The goals of the current review are to present published cardiac ERPs and their effects on patient outcomes and reported components incorporated into these ERPs and to discuss the objectives and scope of cardiac ERPs.

Daytime Variation of Clinical Outcome in Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the hypothesis of a nychthemeral variation in the tolerance to ischemia and reperfusion injury in adult cardiac surgeries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single academic center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients undergoing nonemergent aortic valve replacement (AVR) ± coronary artery bypass graft between January 2012 and May 2018 were included. They were divided into two groups (morning and afternoon) according to the time of the day at the beginning of surgery. Propensity score matching estimated by multivariate logistic regression with a 1:1 matching ratio was performed to ensure that the two groups were comparable. This allowed obtaining 269 pairs, for a total of 538 patients. INTERVENTION: The objective of the study was to assess whether there were differences in perioperative and postoperative outcomes between the morning and the afternoon groups. RESULTS: There was no between-group difference in the primary composite endpoints, namely the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output, and stroke during the 30 days following the surgery. Regarding cardiac biomarkers, there were no between-group differences for both postoperative evolution of troponin T plasma levels and the maximum postoperative troponin T plasma level. CONCLUSION: These results did not support the hypothesis that the timing of the surgery could influence the tolerance to ischemia and reperfusion injury, at least in patients undergoing nonemergent AVR or a combined AVR with coronary artery bypass graft.

Sex-Related Differences in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary outcomes after surgical management of thoracic aortic disease have improved; however, the impact of sex-related differences is poorly understood. METHODS: A total of 1653 patients (498 [30.1%] female) underwent thoracic aortic surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest between 2002 and 2017 in 10 institutions of the Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital death, stroke, and a modified Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined composite for mortality or major morbidity (stroke, renal failure, deep sternal wound infection, reoperation, prolonged ventilation). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS: Women were older (mean±SD, 66±13 years versus 61±13 years; P<0.001), with more hypertension and renal failure, but had less coronary disease, less previous cardiac surgery, and higher ejection fraction than men. Rates of aortic dissection were similar between women and men. Rates of hemiarch, and total arch repair were similar between the sexes; however, women underwent less aortic root reconstruction including aortic root replacement, Ross, or valve-sparing root operations (29% versus 45%; P<0.001). Men experienced longer cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, but similar durations of circulatory arrest, methods of cerebral perfusion, and nadir temperatures. Women experienced a higher rate of mortality (11% versus 7.4%; P=0.02), stroke (8.8% versus 5.5%; P=0.01), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined composite end point for mortality or major morbidity (31% versus 27%; P=0.04). On multivariable analyses, female sex was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.81; P<0.001), stroke (odds ratio, 1.90; P<0.001), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined composite end point for mortality or major morbidity (odds ratio, 1.40; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women experience worse outcomes after thoracic aortic surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest. Further investigation is required to better delineate which measures may reduce sex-related outcome differences after complex aortic surgery.

Changes in outcomes over time in intermediate-risk patients treated for severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the practice of treating patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Heart-Teams have improved their decision-making process to refer patients to the best and safest treatment. The evidence allowed centers to increase funding and TAVR volume and extend indications to different risk categories of patients. This study evaluates the outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated for severe AS in an academic center. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2019, 812 patients with AS underwent TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). A propensity score-matching analytic strategy was used to balance groups and adjust for time periods. Outcomes were recorded according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Guidelines; the primary outcome being 30-day mortality and the secondary outcomes being perioperative course and complications. RESULTS: No difference in mortality was seen but complications differed: more postoperative transient ischemic attacks, permanent pacemaker implantations, and perivalvular leaks in the transcatheter group, while more acute kidney injuries, atrial fibrillation, delirium, postoperative infections and bleeding, tamponade and need for reoperation in the surgical group as well as a longer hospital length-of-stay. However, over the years, morbidities/mortality decreased for all patients treated for AS. CONCLUSIONS: Data showed an improvement in morbidities/mortality for intermediate-risk patients treated with SAVR or TAVR. Increased funding allowed for a higher TAVR volume by increasing access to this technology. Also, the difference in complications could impact healthcare costs. By incorporating important metrics such as length-of-stay, readmission rates, and complications into decision-making, the Heart-Team can improve clinical outcomes, healthcare economics, and resource utilization.

Major transfusions remain frequent despite the generalized use of tranexamic acid: an audit of 3322 patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin has been reapproved for use in Europe and in Canada. We sought to determine if its reintroduction was still pertinent given the widespread administration of tranexamic acid, another antifibrinolytic shown to reduce bleeding and transfusions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: After institutional review board approval, we examined the cardiac surgery database (2012-2015; 3322 patients). Major transfusion was defined as 4 or more red blood cell units. A stratified multivariate logistic regression analysis identified predictors of major transfusion; 1064 patients were matched by propensity score to compare outcomes of patients with or without major transfusion. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was used in 2342 patients; 98.9% received tranexamic acid versus 15.2% (149/980) in off-pump coronary artery bypass graft patients. Major transfusion was required in 758 patients (23%). Age, low body mass index, low preoperative hemoglobin or platelet count, recent use of P2Y12 receptor blockers, chronic kidney disease, NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 30%, prior cardiac surgery, urgency, type of cardiac surgery, and duration of CPB were all independent predictors of major transfusions (all p < 0.05). Major transfusion was associated with a more than threefold increase in mortality (7.1% vs. 2.1%; p < 0.001) and increases in major adverse events (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of tranexamic acid, 23% of cardiac surgery patients require a major transfusion. We identified predictors of major transfusion and showed that major transfusion is associated with important increases in mortality and morbidity. We conclude that there is still a need for an effective and safe blood-sparing drug in cardiac surgery.

Microcirculatory response during on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is associated with a systemic inflammatory response, resulting in altered microcirculation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether beating heart surgery can preserve the microcirculation. METHODS: Sublingual microcirculation was characterized by a Sidestream Darkfield Imaging Microscope during off-pump (OPCABG) and on-pump (ONCABG) surgery. Microcirculatory parameters were evaluated during eight precise perioperative time points. RESULTS: The quality of the microcirculation decreased during early ONCABG. OPCABG resulted in a significantly better microcirculation compared to ONCABG for three of six parameters during surgery. However, by the end of surgery and postoperatively, the microcirculatory parameters were no different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: While the results do not show a marked preservation of the microcirculation during and after OPCABG compared to ONCABG, they coincide with the body temperature fluctuations of each group during and after surgery. Our work suggests that active warming could impact the microcirculation parameters.

Aortic dilation rates in patients with biscuspid aortic valve: correlations with cusp fusion phenotype.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to compare the pattern and rate of aortic dilation in patients with isolated non-surgical bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) with left-right fusion (L-R) and right-non coronary fusion (R-N). Although the etiology and optimal management of aortic dilation associated with BAV remain the subject of debate, recent data have suggested that L-R and R-N cusp fusion phenotypes represent distinct pathological entities. METHODS: Consecutive patients with BAV and at least two echocardiographic assessments made between 2006 and 2012 were reviewed. Patients with hemodynamically significant valvular disease, aortic aneurysm (> 50 mm) or unrepaired aortic coarctation were excluded. Longitudinal analyses of the aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction and ascending aortic diameters were performed using mixed-effect models. RESULTS: A total of 590 echocardiographic studies was analyzed in 212 patients (mean age 33 ± 14 years), of which 147 had L-R phenotype and 65 had R-N phenotype. The median follow up was 3.6 years. Baseline aortic diameters at the sinuses of Valsalva were larger in patients with L-R compared to R-N fusion (33.8 ± 5.3 mm versus 30.8 ± 4.8 mm; p < 0.001). At this level, the rate of aortic dilation was higher with L-R versus R-N fusion (0.41 ± 0.11 mm/year versus 0.01 ± 0.08 mm/year; p < 0.001). The rate of proximal ascending aortic dilation was also higher with L-R versus R-N fusion (0.58 ± 0.08 mm/year versus 0.18 ± 0.09 mm/year; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Aortic dilation rates vary according to the pattern of BAV cusp fusion, with faster rates of aortic sinus and ascending aortic dilation associated with the L-R compared to R-N phenotype.

Development and Validation Process of the Intensive Care Unit Omitted Nursing Care (ICU-ONC) Instrument Among French Canadian Nurses.

Background and Purpose: The purpose of this article is to document the development and validation process of an instrument adapted for French-speaking nurses and to measure the occurrence of omitted nursing care (ONC) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: An electronic Delphi panel, involving ICU nursing experts from the province of Quebec (Canada), was used to develop the intensive care unit omitted nursing care (ICU-ONC) instrument. For the validation process, an electronic cross-sectional survey was conducted. Results: A total of 564 nurses participated in the validation study. Exploratory factor analysis performed on 478 complete observations supports the presence of a single-factor structure for the 22-item ICU-ONC instrument. Coefficient alpha for the scale was .93, 95% confidence interval (CI) was [0.92, 0.94], item-partial total correlations ranged from .49 and .68, and the mean/median interitem correlations were .38 and .37, respectively. Moderate negative correlations were found between the ICU-ONC instrument overall score and two related constructs: nurses' perception of the quality as well as the safety of care. Conclusions: Our current understanding of ONC in the ICU is based on the results drawn from the administration of generic instruments to ICU nurses. The novel 22-item ICU-ONC instrument can help better estimate the occurrence of the phenomena in the ICU.

Hemiarch versus extended arch repair for acute type A dissection: Results from a multicenter national registry.

OBJECTIVE: We compared perioperative outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing hemiarch (HA) versus extended arch (EA) repair with or without descending aortic intervention. METHODS: Nine hundred twenty-nine patients underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair (2002-2021, 9 centers) including open distal repair (HA) with or without additional EA repair. EA with intervention on the descending aorta (EAD) included elephant trunk, antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic replacement, or uncovered dissection stent. EA with no descending intervention (EAND), included unstented suture-only methods. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, permanent neurologic deficit, computed tomography malperfusion resolution, and a composite. Multivariable logistic regression was also performed. RESULTS: Mean age was 66 ± 18 years, 30% (278 out of 929) were women, and HA was performed more frequently (75% [n = 695]) than EA (25% [n = 234]). EAD techniques included: dissection stent (39 out of 234 [17%]), thoracic endovascular aortic replacement (18 out of 234 [7.7%]), and elephant trunk (87 out of 234 [37%]). In-hospital mortality (EA: n = 49 [21%] and HA: n = 129 [19%]; P = .42), and neurological deficit (EA: n = 43 [18%] and HA: n = 121 [17%]; P = .74) were similar. EA was not independently associated with death (EA vs HA odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.77-1.54; P = .63) or neurologic deficit (EA vs HA odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.47-1.55; P = .59). Composite adverse events differed significantly (EA vs HA odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; P = .001). Malperfusion resolved more frequently after EAD (EAD: n = 32 [80%], EAND: n = 18 [56%], HA: n = 71 [50%]; P = .004), although multivariable analysis was not significant (EAD vs HA odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 0.83-5.66; P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: Extended arch interventions pose similar perioperative mortality and neurologic risks as Hemiarch. Descending aortic reinforcement may promote malperfusion restoration. Extended techniques should be approached with caution in acute dissection due to increased risk of adverse events.

The characteristics and factors associated with omitted nursing care in the intensive care unit: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Prior research showed that work environment features in acute care settings influence nurses' capacity to provide care and impacts patient outcomes (e.g., falls). However, little is known about this phenomenon in the intensive care unit. The objectives of this study were to describe the characteristics of omitted nursing care, and to examine the associations between work environment features, omitted nursing care and nurse-reported outcomes in the intensive care unit. METHODS: An electronic cross-sectional correlational study was conducted in the province of Quebec, Canada. Over September 2021, nurses were asked to complete the Healthy Work Environment Assessment Tool (HWEAT), the Intensive Care Unit Omitted Nursing Care instrument (ICU-ONC) and to report their perceptions of nurse-reported outcomes (e.g., quality of care). The associations between these variables were estimated using multivariable cluster-robust regression models, adjusted for nurse and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 493 nurses from 42 distinct hospitals participated to this study. On average, nurses felt that their work environment was acceptable, and that the quality and safety of patient care was good. Basic care activities (e.g., mobilisation) were most frequently reported as omitted as opposed to those related to surveillance and medical interventions. In multivariable analyses, higher work environment scores were associated with reduced omitted nursing care scores (p < 0.001) and better ratings for nurse-reported outcomes (p < 0.001). Also, higher omitted nursing care scores were associated with more negative perceptions about the quality and safety of care (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study portrays the characteristics and some factors associated with omitted nursing care in the intensive care unit. Further research should determine whether intensive care nurses' reports of organisational features and omitted nursing care are associated with objectively captured patient outcomes.

Anterolateral territory coronary artery bypass grafting strategies: a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial: the AMI-PONT trial.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to assess whether a composite coronary artery bypass grafting strategy including a saphenous vein graft bridge to distribute left internal mammary artery outflow provides non-inferior patency rates compared to conventional grafting surgery with separated left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending coronary graft and aorto-coronary saphenous vein grafts to other anterolateral targets. METHODS: All patients underwent isolated grafting surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and received ≥2 grafts/patients on the anterolateral territory. The graft patency (i.e. non-occluded) was assessed using multislice spiral computed tomography at 1 year. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2021, 208 patients were randomized to a bridge (n = 105) or conventional grafting strategy (n = 103). Patient characteristics were comparable between groups. The anterolateral graft patency was non-inferior in the composite bridge compared to conventional grafting strategy at 1 year [risk difference 0.7% (90% confidence interval -4.8 to 6.2%)]. The graft patency to the left anterior descending coronary was no different between groups (P = 0.175). Intraoperatively, the bridge group required shorter vein length for anterolateral targets (P < 0.001) and exhibited greater Doppler flow in the mammary artery pedicle (P = 0.004). The composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction or target vessel reintervention at 30 days was no different (P = 0.164). CONCLUSIONS: Anterolateral graft patency of the composite bridge grafting strategy is non-inferior to the conventional grafting strategy at 1 year. This novel grafting strategy is safe, efficient, associated with several advantages including better mammary artery flow and shorter vein requirement, and could be a valuable alternative to conventional grafting strategies. Ten-year clinical follow-up is underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01585285.

Five-Year Hospital Readmission After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the Association With Off-Pump Surgery and Sex.

Background Limited data exist on long-term readmission and its association with patient and procedural characteristics after coronary artery bypass grafting. We aimed to investigate 5-year readmission after coronary artery bypass grafting and specifically focus on the role of sex and off-pump surgery. Methods and Results We performed a post hoc analysis of the CORONARY (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting [CABG] Off or On Pump Revascularization) trial, involving 4623 patients. The primary outcome was all-cause readmission, and the secondary outcome was cardiac readmission. Cox models were used to investigate the association of outcomes with sex and off-pump surgery. Hazard function for sex was studied over time using a flexible, fully parametric model, and time-segmented analyses were performed accordingly. Rho coefficient was calculated for the correlation between readmission and long-term mortality. Median follow-up was 4.4 years (interquartile range, 2.9-5.4 years). The cumulative incidence rates of all-cause and cardiac readmission were 29.4% and 8.2% at 5 years, respectively. Off-pump surgery was not associated with either all-cause or cardiac readmission. The hazard for all-cause readmission in women over time was constantly higher than the hazard for men (hazard ratio [HR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.04-1.40]; P=0.011). Time-segmented analyses confirmed the higher risk for all-cause (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.05-1.40]; P<0.001) and cardiac (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.03-1.69]; P=0.033) readmission in women after the first 3 years of follow-up. All-cause readmission was strongly correlated with long-term all-cause mortality (Rho, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.48-0.66]), whereas cardiac readmission was strongly correlated with long-term cardiovascular mortality (Rho, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.13-0.86]). Conclusions Readmission rates are substantial at 5 years after coronary artery bypass grafting and are higher in women but not with off-pump surgery. Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT00463294.

Trends in sex-specific differences following aortic arch repair: results from the Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative.

Background: Previous data have shown that sex-related differences exist in aortic arch surgery, with female patients experiencing worse outcomes. Over time, as surgical techniques and strategies have improved, these improvements have benefitted female patients. Using a multicenter national aortic registry from the Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative (CTAC), we aimed to determine the relationship between sex and outcomes following aortic arch repair and to examine how these have changed over time. Methods: The multicenter prospective CTAC database of all aortic procedures performed under circulatory arrest from participating centers across Canada (n=9) was used. Patients were included who underwent elective or urgent/emergency arch reconstruction under circulatory arrest from 2002 to 2021. The primary composite endpoint was defined as the occurrence of one of the following endpoints: in-hospital mortality, stroke, dialysis-dependent renal failure, deep sternal wound infection, reoperation, or prolonged ventilation of >40 hours. Secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, in-hospital stroke, and a modified version of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined composite endpoint for mortality and major morbidity (MMOM). Results: A total of 2,592 patients who underwent aortic arch repair between 2002 and 2021 (31.4% female and 68.6% male patients). Operative mortality decreased through the study period for female patients. No change in operative mortality was observed in male patients or following elective repair. The composite endpoint improved for female patients over time in both elective and urgent surgery, while for male patients, rates improved for elective surgery and remained stable for urgent. Ultimately, female sex was not an independent predictor of adverse outcomes following aortic arch repair. Conclusions: Our results are congruent with existing data and are highly encouraging. It shows that multilevel improvements in our approach to aortic arch surgery have helped to serve female patients who were previously disadvantaged.

Conduit selection and early graft failure in coronary artery bypass surgery: A post hoc analysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) coronary artery bypass grafting study.

OBJECTIVES: Relative rates of early graft failure and conduit selection in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery remain controversial. Therefore, we sought to determine the incidence and determinants of graft failure of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA), radial artery, saphenous vein, and right internal mammary artery (RIMA) 1 year after CABG surgery. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) CABG study, involving patients from 83 centers in 22 countries. We completed an analysis of 3480 grafts from 1068 patients who underwent CABG surgery with complete computed tomography angiography data. The primary outcome was graft failure as diagnosed by computed tomography angiography 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Graft failure occurred in 6.4% (68/1068) for LIMA, 9.9% (9/91) for radial artery, 10.4% (232/2239) for saphenous vein, and 26.8% (22/82) for RIMA grafts. The RIMA had a greater rate of graft failure (26.8%) than radial artery (9.9%) and veins (10.4%) (adjusted odds ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-5.57; P = .008 and adjusted odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-3.21; P = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this international trial dataset, LIMA and radial artery performed as expected, whereas vein grafts performed better. However, high rates of RIMA failure are worrisome and highlight the need for a thorough evaluation of the patency and safety of the RIMA in CABG surgery.

Impact of early quantitative morbidity on 1-year outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVES: We applied the Clavien-Dindo Complications Classification (CDCC) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) to the CORONARY trial to assess whether quantitative early morbidity affects outcomes at 1 year. METHODS: All postoperative hospitalization and 30-day follow-up complications were assigned a CDCC grade. CCI were calculated for all patients (n = 4752). Kaplan-Meier analysis examined 1-year mortality and 1-year co-primary outcome (i.e. death, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction, new-onset renal failure requiring dialysis or repeat coronary revascularization) by CDCC grade. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the predictive value of CCI for both outcomes. RESULTS: For off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, median CDCC were 1 [interquartile range: 0, 2] and 2 [1, 2] (P < 0.001), while median CCI were 8.7 [0, 22.6] and 20.9 [8.7, 29.6], respectively (P < 0.001). In on-pump, there were more grade I and grade II complications, particularly grade I and II transfusions (P < 0.001) and grade I acute kidney injury (P = 0.039), and more grade IVa respiratory failures (P = 0.047). Patients with ≥IIIa complications had greater cumulative 1-year mortality (P < 0.001). The median CCI was 8.7 [0, 22.6] in patients who survived and 22.6 [8.7, 44.3] in patients who died at 1 year (P < 0.001). The CCI remained an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality and 1-year co-primary outcome after multivariable adjustment (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: On-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery had a greater number of complications in the early postoperative period, likely driven by transfusions, respiratory outcomes and acute kidney injury. This affects 1-year outcomes. Similar analyses have not yet been used to compare both techniques and could prove useful to quantify procedural morbidity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00463294; Unique Identifier: NCT00463294.

Coronary bioresorbable stents: Non-invasive quantitative evaluation of intra- and juxta-stent plaque composition-A computed tomography longitudinal study.

PURPOSE: Coronary bioresorbable stents (BRS) do not produce blooming artifacts on computed tomography (CT), in contrast to metallic stents, as they are made of a bioresorbable polymer and are radiolucent. They allow to evaluate the coronary plaque beneath. The low-attenuation plaque (LAP) suggests plaque vulnerability and is CT assessable. The aim of our study was to show the possibility of a non-invasive CT evaluation of the volume and the LAP composition of the intra- and juxta-stent plaque. METHODOLOGY: In our prospective longitudinal study, we recruited 27 consecutive patients (35 BRS stents total; mean age 60 +/- 9 years) with bioresorbable stents for a 256-slice ECG-synchronized CT evaluation at 1- and 12-months post stent implantation. Total plaque volume (mm3), absolute and relative (%) LAP volume per block in the pre- intra- and post-stent zones were analyzed; comparison 1- and 12-months post-implantation of BRS. Changes in the previously mentioned variables were assessed by the mixed effects models with and without spline, which also accounted for the correlation between repeated measurements. RESULTS: Our block or spline model analysis has shown no significant difference in plaque or absolute LAP volumes in pre- intra- and post-stent zones between 1 and 12 months. Interestingly, % LAP volume increases near-significantly in the distal block of the intrastent at 12-mo follow-up (from 23.38 ± 1.80% to 26.90 ± 2.22% (increase of 15%), p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of the repeated non-invasive quantitative analysis of the intrastent coronary plaque and of the in-stent lumen by CT scan.

Novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor improves cardiac recovery in a rodent model of donation after circulatory death.

OBJECTIVE: Organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) is a potential solution for the shortage of suitable organs for transplant. Heart transplantation using DCD donors is not frequently performed due to the potential myocardial damage following warm ischemia. Heat shock protein (HSP) 90 has recently been investigated as a novel target to reduce ischemia/reperfusion injury. The objective of this study is to evaluate an innovative HSP90 inhibitor (HSP90i) as a cardioprotective agent in a model of DCD heart. METHODS: A DCD protocol was initiated in anesthetized Lewis rats by discontinuation of ventilation and confirmation of circulatory death by invasive monitoring. Following 15 minutes of warm ischemia, cardioplegia was perfused for 5 minutes at physiological pressure. DCD hearts were mounted on a Langendorff ex vivo heart perfusion system for reconditioning and functional assessment (60 minutes). HSP90i (0.01 µmol/L) or vehicle was perfused in the cardioplegia and during the first 10 minutes of ex vivo heart perfusion reperfusion. Following assessment, pro-survival pathway signaling was evaluated by western blot or polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Treatment with HSP90i preserved left ventricular contractility (maximum + dP/dt, 2385 ± 249 vs 1745 ± 150 mm Hg/s), relaxation (minimum -dP/dt, -1437 ± 97 vs 1125 ± 85 mm Hg/s), and developed pressure (60.7 ± 5.6 vs 43.9 ± 4.0 mm Hg), when compared with control DCD hearts (All P = .001). Treatment abrogates ischemic injury as demonstrated by a significant reduction of infarct size (2,3,5-triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride staining) of 7 ± 3% versus 19 ± 4% (P = .03), troponin T release, and mRNA expression of Bax/Bcl-2 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The cardioprotective effects of HSP90i when used following circulatory death might improve transplant organ availability by expanding the use of DCD hearts.

Does "Obesity Paradox" Apply for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?

BACKGROUND: Data is controversial regarding the existence of an "obesity paradox" in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). We sought to investigate the prognostic value of the body mass index (BMI) on outcomes following TAVR. METHODS: This is an observational, single-center study involving all patients who underwent TAVR from 2009 to 2019. BMI was calculated in all patients before TAVR. The cohort was subdivided into four groups: underweight (<20 kg/m2), normal weight (≥20 to <25 kg/m2), overweight (≥25 to <30 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2). The main endpoint was all-cause 30-day and one-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (mean age 79.6 ± 7.8 years, mean STS score 5.3 ± 3.6) were included. Patients were grouped as follows: underweight (n = 35, 8.5%), normal weight (n = 121, 29.4%), overweight (n = 140, 34%) and obese (n = 116, 28.1%). Obese patients were younger, included more females and had lower STS score than the rest of the cohort whereas underweight patients were older, had higher STS score, more chronic kidney disease, more left ventricular dysfunction and more often underwent non-transfemoral TAVR. BMI predicted 30-day survival (AUC:0.692 [95%CI 0.522-0.862]; p = 0.030) with an optimal cut-off of 24.4 (sensitivity = 66.6%, specificity = 63.6%). On multivariate analysis, higher BMI trended toward lower 30-day mortality (HR = 0.87 [95%CI 0.75-1.01]; p = 0.071). Thirty-day mortality was higher in the underweight group (8.3%) in comparison with other BMI subgroups (normal weight 2.5%, overweight 1.4%, obese 0.9%; p = 0.045). However, no significant difference was found after adjustment of confounders (all p = NS). BMI did not predict one-year mortality. No significant difference in one-year survival was observed between the four BMI subgroups (log rank p = 0.925). CONCLUSION: BMI could represent an interesting prognostic tool for short-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. BMI < 20 kg/m2 was associated with higher 30-day mortality. Symptoms improved similarly in obese patients compared to lower BMI patients. For 30-day survivors, no evidence of the existence of an obesity paradox was observed in this cohort.