Graded cutaneous electrical vs thermal stimulation in humans shows different insular and cingulate cortex activation.

Pain can result from various sensory input modalities. To elucidate the differences of cortical responses to graded electrical and thermal stimulation, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) results of two studies using the same stimulation paradigms but different modalities with 15 healthy subjects each are compared. During painful electrical stimulation contralateral dorsal posterior insula and ventral posterior anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activated more. During thermal stimulation, there was more activation in ipsilateral primary motor area (MI)/primary sensory area (SI) complex and premotor areas as well as dorsal posterior ACC. Thus electrostimulation preferably activates structures of the lateral pain projection system resulting in contralateral dorsal posterior insula and ventral posterior ACC activation. During thermal stimulation, more dorsal areas of the posterior ACC activated. The activation of ipsilateral MI/SI complex and premotor areas may be attributed to the slower perception of thermal stimuli and resulting re-evaluation. This has to be taken into account in the interpretation of other cross-modality studies as well.

Comparison of inversion recovery and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed sequences for the staging of cervical lymphoma.

In a retrospective analysis with two readers blinded to the clinical information, coronal short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images were compared to contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted imaging (T1 CEfs) in 51 cases of cervical lymphoma. Interrater reliability was good to excellent. Although sensitivity and subjective quality of the STIR sequence were higher than those of the T1 CEfs sequence (sensitivity 85%/72%, respectively), specificity (82%/95%) as well as positive likelihood ratio (4.65/15.93) was much lower. Therefore, contrast-enhanced sequences should be included in the primary staging of lymphoma.

Caudate nucleus and insular activation during a pain suppression paradigm comparing thermal and electrical stimulation.

Pain modulation is an integral function of the nervous system. It is needed to adapt to chronic stimuli. To gain insights into pain suppression mechanisms, two studies concerning the suppression of the feeling of pain with different stimulation modalities (heat vs. electrical stimuli) but using the same stimulation paradigms were compared: 15 subjects each had been stimulated on both hands under the instruction to suppress the feeling of pain. Anterior insula and DLPFC activation was seen in both single modality studies and seems to be a common feature of pain suppression, as it is absent in the interaction analyses presented here. During the task to suppress the feeling of pain, there were no consistent activations stronger under thermostimulation. But during electrostimulation, there was significantly stronger activation than during thermal stimulation in the caudate nucleus bilaterally and in the contralateral posterior insula. This may be attributed to the higher sensory-discriminative content and more demand on subjective rating and suppression of the painful electrical stimulus, compared to thermostimulation. The caudate nucleus seems to play an important role not only in the motor system but also in the modulation of the pain experience.

The role of periaqueductal gray and cingulate cortex during suppression of pain in complex regional pain syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I) is a frequent and debilitating condition with unclear etiology. Hypothesizing that maladaptive central processes play a crucial role in CRPS, the current study set out to explore cerebral activation during a task to suppress the feeling of pain under constant painful stimulation. METHODS: Ten individuals with CRPS I with symptoms on their left hand were subjected to electrical stimulation of both index fingers subsequently in a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment. Their data were compared with 15 healthy controls. RESULTS: Concerning psychophysical measures, patients succeeded similarly as healthy controls in suppressing the feeling of pain. However, during constant painful stimulation and with the task to suppress the feeling of pain, there were significant differences in the interaction analyses of the corresponding cortical activation. DISCUSSION: Patients differ from healthy controls by the activation pattern of cerebral areas that belong to the descending opioid pain suppression pathway: PAG and cingulate cortex are activated significantly less during suppression of pain, regardless of whether the symptomatic or asymptomatic hand was stimulated. Thus, there is a generalized functional change in individuals with CRPS I. However, it cannot be deducted whether the abnormality is causative or merely an effect, possibly maladaptive.

Different activation of opercular and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) in patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS I) compared with healthy controls during perception of electrically induced pain: a functional MRI study.

OBJECTIVES: Although the etiology of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS 1) is still debated, many arguments favor central maladaptive changes in pain processing as an important causative factor. METHODS: To look for the suspected alterations, 10 patients with CRPS affecting the left hand were explored with functional magnetic resonance imaging during graded electrical painful stimulation of both hands subsequently and compared with healthy participants. RESULTS: Activation of the anterior insula, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and caudate nucleus was seen in patients during painful stimulation. Compared with controls, CRPS patients had stronger activation of the PCC during painful stimulation of the symptomatic hand. The comparison of insular/opercular activation between controls and patients with CRPS I during painful stimulation showed stronger (posterior) opercular activation in controls than in patients. DISCUSSION: Stronger PCC activation during painful stimulation may be interpreted as a correlate of motor inhibition during painful stimuli different from controls. Also, the decreased opercular activation in CRPS patients shows less sensory-discriminative processing of painful stimuli.These results show that changed cerebral pain processing in CRPS patients is less sensory-discriminative but more motor inhibition during painful stimuli. These changes are not limited to the diseased side but show generalized alterations of cerebral pain processing in chronic pain patients.

Cortical correlates of perception and suppression of electrically induced pain.

Two neuroimaging studies using fMRI were conducted in order to assess the cortical processes involved in the perception and suppression of pain. In the first study, 15 healthy subjects were stimulated with variable intensities of electrical pulses during a discrimination task. In the second study, the same subjects had to try to suppress the feeling of pain during tonic stimulation. The discrimination task resulted in cortical activation of contralateral SI, corresponding in extent to the intensity of the stimulus. Activation of contralateral operculum/posterior insula (SII) and non-dominant dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with non-painful stimuli changed to activations of non-dominant anterior insula upon painful stimulation. In the second study, all subjects succeeded in suppressing the feeling of pain during previously painful levels of stimulation. During this suppression task, activations changed from anterior to posterior insula; also there was a suppression of activity in the anterior cingulated cortex (ACC) and caudate nucleus. Subjects seem to be able to suppress to a certain degree the feeling of pain under constant (and previously painful) stimulation. The cortical correlate seems to be a shift of cerebral activation from anterior to posterior right insula and a suppression of activity in the ACC and caudate nucleus.

MR neurography with multiplanar reconstruction of 3D MRI datasets: an anatomical study and clinical applications.

INTRODUCTION: Extracranial MR neurography has so far mainly been used with 2D datasets. We investigated the use of 3D datasets for peripheral neurography of the sciatic nerve. METHODS: A total of 40 thighs (20 healthy volunteers) were examined with a coronally oriented magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequence with isotropic voxels of 1 x 1 x 1 mm and a field of view of 500 mm. Anatomical landmarks were palpated and marked with MRI markers. After MR scanning, the sciatic nerve was identified by two readers independently in the resulting 3D dataset. RESULTS: In every volunteer, the sciatic nerve could be identified bilaterally over the whole length of the thigh, even in areas of close contact to isointense muscles. The landmark of the greater trochanter was falsely palpated by 2.2 cm, and the knee joint by 1 cm. The mean distance between the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve and the knee-joint gap was 6 cm (+/-1.8 cm). The mean results of the two readers differed by 1-6%. CONCLUSION: With the described method of MR neurography, the sciatic nerve was depicted reliably and objectively in great anatomical detail over the whole length of the thigh. Important anatomical information can be obtained. The clinical applications of MR neurography for the brachial plexus and lumbosacral plexus/sciatic nerve are discussed.