Changes in the corrected carotid flow time can predict spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in patients undergoing cesarean delivery: an observational study.

PURPOSE: Spinal anesthesia is a standard technique for cesarean delivery; however, it possesses a risk of hypotension. We hypothesised that the changes in the corrected flow time induced by the Trendelenburg position could predict the incidence of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled. Before anesthesia induction, corrected flow time was measured in the supine and Trendelenburg positions (FTc-1 and FTc-2, respectively). Additionally, a percent change in corrected flow time induced by the Trendelenburg position was defined as ΔFTc. The primary endpoint was to investigate the ability of ΔFTc to predict the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension until delivery. The receiver operating characteristics curves to assess the ability of FTc-1, FTc-2, and ΔFTc to predict the incidence of hypotension were generated. RESULTS: Finally, 40 patients were included, and of those, 26 (65%) developed spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. The areas under the curve for FTc-1, FTc-2, and ΔFTc were 0.591 (95% CI: 0.424 to 0.743) (P = 0.380), 0.742 (95% CI: 0.579 to 0.867) (P = 0.004), and 0.882 (95% CI: 0.740 to 0.962) (P < 0.001) respectively, indicating ΔFTc as the best predictor among these three parameters. The best threshold for ΔFTc was 6.4% (sensitivity: 80.8% (95% CI: 53.8 to 96.2), specificity: 85.7% (95% CI: 42.9 to 100.0)). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that changes in the corrected carotid flow time induced by the Trendelenburg position could serve as a good predictor of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension for cesarean delivery.

Agreement between non-invasive and invasive arterial blood pressure during surgery in the prone position: an error grid analysis.

PURPOSE: Prone position has recently gained renewed importance as a treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome and spine and brain surgeries. Our study aimed to perform an error grid analysis to examine the clinical discrepancies between arterial blood pressure (ABP) and non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) in the prone position and to investigate the risk factors influencing these differences. METHODS: Error grid analysis was performed retrospectively on 1389 pairs of 100 consecutive prone positioning cases. This analysis classifies the difference between the two methods into five clinically relevant zones, from "no risk" to "dangerous risk". Additionally, multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the risk zones of mean blood pressure (MBP), as classified by error grid analysis and the covariate of interest. RESULTS: Error grid analysis showed that the proportions of measurement pairs in risk zones A-E for systolic blood pressure were 96.8%, 3.2%, 0.1%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. In contrast, the MBP proportions were 74.0%, 25.1%, 0.9%, 0.1%, and 0%. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression analysis revealed that the position of arms (next to the head) was a significant factor (adjusted odds ratio: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.38-8.33, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Error grid analysis revealed a clinically unacceptable discrepancy between ABP and NIBP for MBP during prone positioning surgery. The position of the arms next to the head was associated with increased clinical discrepancy between the two MBP measurement methods.

Fixing the anesthesia research crisis in Japan.

To explore the current status of anesthesia research activity in Japan, we analyzed the number of abstracts presented at the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) annual meetings by several factors including gender, society branches, and subspecialty categories. The number of abstracts at JSA annual meetings has declined sharply since 2016 with no gender gap. A decrease in the neurological field predated the overall decline, but other subspecialty categories showed a similar decline. Although the Tokyo, Tokai-Hokuriku, and Kyushu branches were responsible for more than half of the reduction, the trend was similar among all branches. In a survey regarding academic activities of university hospital residents and faculty, Ph.D. aspirants' rate was only 20-30%. Residents had never presented an abstract at scientific conferences and never published any papers at nearly 40% and 30% of the university hospitals, respectively. Our survey suggests that junior anesthetists are losing interest in research. Senior faculty and mentors must redouble efforts to embed and encourage research in departments and by anesthetists in training. If a revival of anesthesia research in Japan does not occur then a service only specialty awaits.