Self-Reported Adherence to Trifluridine and Tipiracil Hydrochloride for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: A novel oral agent that consists of trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TFTD) has been established as salvage-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Adherence to TFTD is crucial to maintaining appropriate curative effects. This study sought to clarify adherence to TFTD and identify candidate factors deteriorating adherence at our institution. METHODS: A total of 50 consecutive mCRC patients who received TFTD monotherapy between June 1, 2014 and July 31, 2015 were analyzed in this study. Adherence to TFTD was checked by pharmacists using a self-reported treatment diary and interviewing nonadherents at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. The adherence rate was defined as the number of patient intakes per 20 scheduled intakes in one cycle. We retrospectively surveyed the factors from the electronic patient record associated with reduced adherence. We measured relative dose intensity, defined as the dose intensity divided by the initial dose (each in milligrams per square meter per week). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were as follows: males/females, 20/30; median age, 61 years (range, 34-83 years); performance status 0/1, 37/13. Median relative dose intensity of TFTD was 91.0%. Adherence rates were 95.0% for the first cycle of TFTD, 97.3% for the second cycle, 98.0% for the third cycle, and 98.2% for the fourth cycle. Factors associated with deteriorated adherence to TFTD were nausea/vomiting/decreased appetite (27.1%, 23 instances), pain (25.9%, 22 instances), neutropenia (11.8%, 10 instances), and missed dose (4.7%, 4 instances). Increased nonadherence to TFTD was associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1, while increased TFTD adherence in the first cycle was associated with prior regimens ≥4. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of treatment-related gastrointestinal disorder is the main factor affecting adherence to TFTD. Intensive supportive care in the management of these symptoms could assist adequate adherence to TFTD in mCRC patients.

Risk Factors Exacerbating Hand-Foot Skin Reaction Induced by Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin with or without Bevacizumab Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) ± bevacizumab therapy is associated with a high incidence of hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), hindering treatment. However, timing of onset and risk factors remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the development of HFSR and risk factors for its exacerbation to a serious condition in CapeOx ± bevacizumab therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively examined patients with colorectal cancer receiving CapeOx ± bevacizumab therapy between October 1, 2009, and March 31, 2012. The observation period was defined as lasting until completion of 8 cycles. The relationship between cumulative dose of capecitabine and cumulative proportion of patients developing HFSR was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier methods. Risk factors for exacerbation of HFSR to a serious condition were assessed by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Data for 203 patients were analyzed. For patients treated at cumulative capecitabine doses of 100 000 mg/m(2) and 200 000 mg/m(2), Grade 1 HFSR occurred in ≥80% and ≥90%, respectively, and moderate-to-severe HFSR (Grade 2+) occurred in ≥10% and ≥20%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed significant associations with diabetes (odds ratio [OR] = 4.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.86-12.34; P = 0.001), concomitant use of bevacizumab (OR = 6.01; 95% CI = 2.20-16.41; P = 0.001), history of fluorinated pyrimidine administration (OR = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.10-5.33; P = 0.027), and early onset (within 21 days) of Grade 1 HFSR (OR = 3.78; 95% CI = 1.64-8.70; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HFSR in CapeOx therapy is a cumulative toxicity and risk of exacerbation to a serious condition increases with diabetes, concomitant use of bevacizumab, history of fluorinated pyrimidine administration, and onset of Grade 1 HFSR within 21 days.

Patients' self-reported adherence to capecitabine on XELOX treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: findings from a retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) has been established as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Adherence is particularly important with capecitabine to maintain appropriate curative effect. In this study, we monitored the adherence to capecitabine on XELOX treatment and investigated which factors might decrease compliance. METHODS: The study included 242 consecutive patients who received XELOX treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer between October 2009 and March 2012. Adherence to capecitabine was checked by pharmacists with a patient-reported treatment diary at a pharmaceutical outpatient clinic. Adherence rate was defined as the number of times that a patient took capecitabine in a 14-day cycle/28 prescribed doses. We retrospectively surveyed median relative dose intensities of capecitabine and the factors deteriorating adherence across eight cycles from electronic patient records and examined differences in compliance rates according to age. RESULTS: The study included 144 male and 98 female patients. The overadherence rate was 1.5% (n=23). The median adherence rate was 93.5% (n=242) in the first cycle of XELOX treatment, which gradually rose to 96.1% (n=148) in the eighth cycle. The median relative dose intensity of capecitabine was 79.2%. The main factors contributing to decreased adherence to capecitabine were diarrhea (22.5%, 352 instances) and nausea/vomiting (13.8%, 215 instances). The rate of missed dose was 12.1%. Analysis of adherence issues in relation to patient age showed a trend toward worse adherence to capecitabine therapy in the group of patients aged ≥80 years (hazard ratio =3.83; 95% confidence interval 2.48-5.91, P<0.001 versus 70-80 years group and versus <70 years group, chi-square test). CONCLUSION: Patient-reported adherence to capecitabine on XELOX treatment in clinical practice is high but adversely affected by side effects. Patients aged 80 years or more exhibit a significant decrease in compliance compared with younger patients.

Investigation of Regorafenib-induced Hypothyroidism in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Hypothyroidism is one of the side-effects caused by regorafenib. In the Japanese subset of the CORRECT study, hypothyroidism developed in 1.5% of the patients, but was not grade 3 or higher in any patient. Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that has the same mechanism of action as sunitinb. However, the reported incidence of sunitinb-related hypothyroidism varies widely, ranging from 16.0% in clinical trials to 35.4% in post-marketing surveillance studies. In general, symptoms of hypothyroidism include fatigue and dysphonia. Hyperthyroidism must, therefore, be appropriately managed in order to maintain patient quality of life and avoid a critical level of hypothyroidism. During the first cycle of treatment with regorafenib, the incidence of abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) elevation was 31.4%. Our results suggest that thyroid function tests should be performed from day 1 of treatment with regorafenib. It would be prudent to consider routine monitoring of thyroid function in all patients who receive regorafenib and to recommend endocrinological consultation as necessary.