Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(4): 1174-1177, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30817505

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized prospective study was to investigate the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of bupivacaine versus bupivacaine plus dexamethasone-soaked nasal packing in patients scheduled for endoscopic nasal surgery. METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists groups I and II patients aged 18 to 65 years and scheduled for endoscopic nasal surgery were assigned into 2 groups. Group B received 8 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 2 mL saline, and group BD received 8 mL 0.5% bupivacaine and 8 mg (2 mL) dexamethasone-soaked nasal packing. In the postoperative period, 1000 mg paracetamol was administered and repeated every 6 hours. Postoperative pain scores, additional analgesia requirements and nausea-vomiting were recorded. RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in group BD than in group B at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours, and during tampon removal (P < 0.05), but there was no difference between the groups' 24-hour visual analog scale scores (P = 0.115). Postoperative additional analgesia use was statistically significantly higher in group B than in group BD (25/30 versus 13/30 respectively, P = 0.001). Postoperative nausea and vomiting was statistically higher in group B than in group BD (11/30 versus 4/30 respectively, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: The addition of dexamethasone to bupivacaine via soaked nasal packing in endoscopic nasal surgery reduced postoperative pain scores, additional analgesia requirements, and PONV. The authors recommended a combination of bupivacaine plus dexamethasone-soaked nasal packing after endoscopic nasal surgery.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales , Bupivacaína , Dexametasona , Endoscopía , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales , Dolor Postoperatorio , Administración Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Vendajes , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Bupivacaína/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/métodos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven
2.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 68(3): 260-265, 2018.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29478705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are different ultrasound probe positions used for internal jugular venous catheter placement. Also, in-plane or out of plane needle approach may be used for catheterization. Transverse short-axis classic approach is the most popular performed approach in literature. "Syringe-Free" is a new described technique that is performed with oblique long-axis approach. We aimed to compare performance of these two approaches. METHODS: This study was conducted as a prospective and randomized study. 80 patients were included the study and divided into two groups that were named Group C (transverse short-axis classic approach) and Group SF (oblique long-axis syringe-free approach) by a computer-generated randomization. The primary outcome was mean time that guidewire is seen in the internal jugular vein (performing time). The secondary outcomes were to compare number of needle pass, number of skin puncture and complications between two groups. RESULTS: Demographic and hemodynamic data were not significantly different. The mean performing time was 54.9±19.1s in Group C and 43.9±15.8s in Group SF. Significant differences were found between the groups (p=0.006). Mean number of needle pass was 3.2(±2.1) in Group C and 2.1(±1.6) in Group SF. There were statistically significant differences between two groups (p=0.002). The number of skin puncture was 1.6(±0.8) and 1.2(±0.5) in Group C and SF, respectively (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: "Syringe-Free" technique has lower performing time, number of needle pass and skin puncture. Also, it allows to follow progress of guide-wire under continuous ultrasound visualization and the procedure does not need assistance during catheter insertion. Namely, "Syringe-Free" is effective, safe and fast technique that may be used to place internal jugular venous catheter.

3.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 68(3): 260-265, May-June 2018. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-958284

RESUMEN

Abstract Background and objectives: There are different ultrasound probe positions used for internal jugular venous catheter placement. Also, in-plane or out of plane needle approach may be used for catheterization. Transverse short-axis classic approach is the most popular performed approach in literature. "Syringe-Free" is a new described technique that is performed with oblique long-axis approach. We aimed to compare performance of these two approaches. Methods: This study was conducted as a prospective and randomized study. 80 patients were included the study and allocated into two groups that were named Group C (transverse short-axis classic approach) and Group SF (oblique long-axis syringe-free approach) by a computer-generated randomization. The primary outcome was mean time that guidewire is seen in the Internal jugular vein (performing time). The secondary outcomes were to compare number of needle pass, number of skin puncture and complications between two groups. Results: Demographic and hemodynamic data were not significantly different. The mean performing time was 54.9 ± 19.1 s in Group C and 43.9 ± 15.8 s in Group SF. Significant differences were found between the groups (p = 0.006). Mean number of needle pass was 3.2 (± 2.1) in Group C and 2.1 (± 1.6) in Group SF. There were statistically significant differences between two groups (p = 0.002). The number of skin puncture was 1.6 (± 0.8) and 1.2 (± 0.5) in Group C and SF, respectively (p = 0.027). Conclusion: "Syringe-Free" technique has lower performing time, number of needle pass and skin puncture. Also, it allows to follow progress of guide-wire under continuous ultrasound visualization and the procedure does not need assistance during catheter insertion. Namely, "Syringe-Free" is effective, safe and fast technique that may be used to place internal jugular venous catheter.


Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: Há diferentes posições do probe do ultrasom que são utilizadas para a colocação de cateter em veia jugular interna. Além disso, a aproximação da agulha no plano ou fora do plano pode ser usada para o cateterismo. A abordagem transversal clássica no eixo curto é a abordagem mais popular na literatura. Sem seringa é uma nova técnica descrita, realizada com a abordagem oblíqua no eixo longo. Nosso objetivo foi comparar o desempenho dessas duas abordagens. Métodos: Este foi um estudo prospectivo e randômico. No total, 80 pacientes foram incluídos no estudo e divididos em dois grupos denominados Grupo C (abordagem transversal clássica no eixo curto) e Grupo SF (abordagem sem seringa oblíqua no eixo longo) por meio de randomização gerada por computador. O desfecho primário foi o tempo médio para a visibilização do fio-guia na veia jugular interna (tempo de execução). Os desfechos secundários foram o número de passagens da agulha, o número de punções da pele e as complicações entre os dois grupos. Resultados: Os dados demográficos e hemodinâmicos não foram significativamente diferentes. O tempo médio de execução foi de 54,9 ± 19,1 segundos no Grupo C e 43,9 ± 15,8 segundos no Grupo SF. Diferenças significativas foram observadas entre os grupos (p = 0,006). O número médio de passagens da agulha foi de 3,2 (± 2,1) no Grupo C e 2,1 (± 1,6) no Grupo SF. Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre os dois grupos (p = 0,002). O número de punções da pele foi de 1,6 (± 0,8) no Grupo C e 1,2 (± 0,5) C no Grupo SF (p = 0,027). Conclusão: A técnica sem seringa apresentou tempo de execução, número de passagens da agulha e número de punções da pele menores. Além disso, essa técnica permite acompanhar o progresso do fio-guia com visibilização ecográfica contínua e o procedimento não precisa de auxílio durante a inserção do cateter. Ou seja, sem seringa é uma técnica eficaz, segura e rápida que pode ser usada para a colocação de cateter em veia jugular interna.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Venas Yugulares , Jeringas , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA