Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Respir Res ; 19(1): 129, 2018 06 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29945606

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common disorder associated with other respiratory tract diseases such as asthma and inhalant allergy. However, the prevalence of these co-morbidities varies considerably in the existing medical literature and by phenotype of CRS studied. The study objective was to identify the prevalence of asthma, inhalant allergy and aspirin sensitivity in CRS patients referred to secondary care and establish any differences between CRS phenotypes. METHODS: All participants were diagnosed in secondary care according to international guidelines and invited to complete a questionnaire including details of co-morbidities and allergies. Data were analysed for differences between controls and CRS participants and between phenotypes using chi-squared tests. RESULTS: The final analysis included 1470 study participants: 221 controls, 553 CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNPs), 651 CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNPs) and 45 allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). The prevalence of asthma was 9.95, 21.16, 46.9 and 73.3% respectively. The prevalence of self-reported confirmed inhalant allergy was 13.1, 20.3, 31.0 and 33.3% respectively; house dust mite allergy was significantly higher in CRSwNPs (16%) compared to CRSsNPs (9%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of self- reported aspirin sensitivity was 2.26, 3.25, 9.61 and 40% respectively. The odds ratio for aspirin sensitivity amongst those with AFRS was 28.8 (CIs 9.9, 83.8) p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of asthma and allergy in CRS varies by phenoytype, with CRSwNPs and AFRS having a stronger association with both. Aspirin sensitivity has a highly significant association with AFRS. All of these comorbidities are significantly more prevalent than in non-CRS controls and strengthen the need for a more individualised approach to the combined airway.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/efectos adversos , Asma/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Rinitis/epidemiología , Sinusitis/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Administración por Inhalación , Asma/diagnóstico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Sinusitis/diagnóstico , Estadística como Asunto/tendencias , Reino Unido/epidemiología
2.
BMJ Open ; 5(4): e006680, 2015 Apr 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25926143

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical revision rate in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in the UK CRS Epidemiology Study (CRES). Previous evidence from National Sinonasal Audit showed that 1459 patients with CRS demonstrated a surgical revision rate 19.1% at 5 years, with highest rates seen in those with polyps (20.6%). SETTING: Thirty secondary care centres around the UK. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 221 controls and 1249 patients with CRS were recruited to the study including those with polyps (CRSwNPs), without polyps (CRSsNPs) and with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). INTERVENTIONS: Self-administered questionnaire. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The need for previous sinonasal surgery. RESULTS: A total of 651 patients with CRSwNPs, 553 with CRSsNPs and 45 with AFRS were included. A total of 396 (57%) patients with CRSwNPs/AFRS reported having undergone previous endoscopic nasal polypectomy (ENP), of which 182 of the 396 (46%) reported having received more than one operation. The mean number of previous surgeries per patient in the revision group was 3.3 (range 2-30) and a mean duration of time of 10 years since the last procedure. The average length of time since their first operation up to inclusion in the study was 15.5 years (range 0-74). Only 27.9% of all patients reporting a prior ENP had received concurrent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS; n=102). For comparison, surgical rates in patients with CRSsNPs were significantly lower; 13% of cases specifically reported ESS, and of those only 30% reported multiple procedures (χ(2) p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that there is a high burden of both primary and revision surgery in patients with CRS, worst in those with AFRS and least in those with CRSsNPs. The burden of revision surgery appears unchanged in the decade since the Sinonasal Audit.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Rinitis/cirugía , Sinusitis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos Nasales/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino Unido , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA