Outcome and long-term treatment protocol for topical tacrolimus in oral lichen planus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Topical tacrolimus has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP). However, long-term effects and its optimal application protocol with gradual reduction have not been studied. Accordingly, we analysed the clinical response of OLP to tacrolimus in our daily clinical practice with a focus on the optimal long-term therapeutic scheme. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients diagnosed with OLP and treated with topical tacrolimus (0.03% oral rinse) in a clinical setting between 2015 and 2020. The objective clinical response was measured by a 4-point scale (complete remission, major remission, partial remission and no response), and subjective impairment by a 3-point scale (severe, moderate and none). RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (74% women; median age: 66 years) were included. Fifty-six (98%) patients had prior treatment with topical steroids. After introduction of tacrolimus, objective remission (major or complete) was reached by 28%, 62%, 87% and 97% of patients after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. Subjective remission was reported by 16%, 48%, 69% and 83% after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment respectively. The treatment frequency could be gradually reduced from initially twice daily to once daily or less in 28%, 61%, 78% and 87% after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months respectively; 41% of patients completely suspended the treatment at one point, but 67% of them experienced a relapse after a median time of 3.3 months. Four patients (7%) developed a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) during the observation period. Otherwise, there were only few and minor side-effects. CONCLUSION: Topical tacrolimus can be an effective second-line therapy for OLP refractory to potent topical corticosteroids. The therapy frequency can often be reduced during the maintenance period. Both signs of clinical activity and subjective impairment should guide therapy. Regular follow-up is necessary to recognize possible SCC.

Clinical outcomes of different implant types in mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a retrospective analysis with up to 20 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical and radiological outcomes of hybrid-design- (HD) and bone-level (BL) implants for bar-retained mandibular implant-overdentures (IODs). METHODS: For this retrospective study, edentulous patients who had received maxillary complete dentures and mandibular bar-retained IODs were invited for a follow-up assessment. Implant survival, implant success and health of peri-implant tissues were assessed on an implant level-based analysis. Patient-based parameters served to identify risk factors for peri-implant bone loss, presence of peri-implantitis and success. RESULTS: Eighty patients (median age 72.72 [67.03; 78.81] years, 46 females) with 180 implants (median follow-up 12.01 [10.82; 21.04] years) were assessed. There was no difference concerning the rate of implant failure (p = 0.26), or peri-implantitis (p = 0.97) between HD and BL implants. Solely in one study group, there was the presence of peri-implant pus. Implant success was higher in BL implants with one group being notably higher than the comparing groups (p = 0.045). For bone loss, a width of keratinized mucosa (KM) ≤ 1 mm (p = 0.0006) and the presence of xerostomia (p = 0.09) were identified as risk factors. Smoking (p = 0.013) and a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.03) were a risk factor for peri-implantitis. As risk factors for reduced implant success, a small width of KM (p = 0.003) and the presence of xerostomia (p = 0.007) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: For mandibular bar-retained IODs, both BL and HD implants are mostly successful. A minimum of 1 mm KM around implants and normal salivary flow are relevant factors for implant success and stable peri-implant bone levels. Smoking and a high BMI are potential risk factors for peri-implantitis.

A randomized controlled trial comparing surgical excisional biopsies using CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser and scalpel.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03001791) compared excisional biopsies of fibrous hyperplasia performed using a CO2 laser (140Hz, 400µs, 33mJ), Er:YAG laser (35Hz, 297µs, 200mJ, air-water cooling), or scalpel (15c blade). Clinical parameters recorded were duration of the intervention, intraoperative bleeding, need for electrocauterization and/or suturing, postoperative side effects, complications, pain, and intake of analgesics. Histopathological linear measurements of the thermal damage zone were performed on the laser biopsies. Results showed that the duration of the intervention was significantly shorter for both lasers compared to the scalpel (P<0.001). Intraoperative bleeding occurred less frequently with the CO2 laser (P<0.001). Additional electrocautery was used in 92% of Er:YAG laser interventions (P<0.001). Postsurgical complications, pain, and the intake of analgesics did not differ between the groups. The measured thermal damage zones differed significantly between the CO2 laser (median of 72.6µm) and Er:YAG laser (30.9µm) (P<0.001). This RCT showed that CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser, and scalpel are all adequate for excisional biopsies of small lesions in the oral mucosa. While patient postoperative morbidity is similar, the ideal instrument can be selected according to the surgical advantages preferred for the individual situation.

Risk factors for external root resorption of maxillary second molars due to impacted third molars as evaluated using cone beam computed tomography.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate risk factors for external root resorption (ERR) on maxillary second molars (MxM2) in association with impacted third molars (MxM3) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The angles between the axes of MxM2/MxM3 (inclination) were measured. Further, ERR on MxM2 was classified as absent, slight, moderate, or severe. Contact location between MxM3 and MxM2, the size of the dental follicle, type of impaction, root formation, and patient demographic characteristics were also assessed. Half of the 84 MxM2 showed ERR (slight 36.9%, moderate 6.0%, severe 7.1%). Patient age was a significant factor for the presence of ERR (P = 0.03). The inclination was also a relevant factor, with transverse MxM3 exhibiting the highest risk of ERR (P = 0.02). The cervical third (28.6%) showed a significantly lower risk percentage of ERR compared to the apical (73.7%) and middle thirds (60.6%) of the root (P = 0.004). Based on these findings, clinicians assessing the need for surgical removal should be able to selectively identify impacted MxM3 at risk of causing ERR on MxM2 early on, especially when the MxM3 is located in close contact with the apical and middle thirds of the MxM2 roots and has a transverse inclination.

Risk factors for root resorption of second molars associated with impacted mandibular third molars.

External root resorption (ERR) affecting mandibular second molars (M2) may occur when the adjacent third molar (M3) is impacted in close proximity. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the presence, severity, and location of ERR on M2 due to M3 using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and to identify associated factors. The angle between the axis of M2 and M3 was measured. ERR on M2 was classified as absent, slight, moderate, or severe. The location of contact between M3 and M2, the size of the dental follicle, and patient demographic characteristics were recorded. A total of 433 patients with 640 M3 were included. A male predilection was found with regard to ERR (P=0.0004). ERR was identified on 31.9% of M2 and was slight in 30.2%, moderate in 1.4%, and severe in 0.3% of cases. The presence of ERR was associated with direct contact between M2 and M3 (P<0.0001), the angle between M2 and M3 (P<0.0001), the inclination of M3 (P=0.001), and the location of contact (P=0.0005). This study showed ERR to be a frequent finding. ERR is associated with a mesioangular position of M3 in more than one third of cases, and a proximity ≤0.5mm between M2 and M3 favours ERR.