Comparison of an oncology clinical decision-support system's recommendations with actual treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE: IBM(R) Watson for Oncology (WfO) is a clinical decision-support system (CDSS) that provides evidence-informed therapeutic options to cancer-treating clinicians. A panel of experienced oncologists compared CDSS treatment options to treatment decisions made by clinicians to characterize the quality of CDSS therapeutic options and decisions made in practice. METHODS: This study included patients treated between 1/2017 and 7/2018 for breast, colon, lung, and rectal cancers at Bumrungrad International Hospital (BIH), Thailand. Treatments selected by clinicians were paired with therapeutic options presented by the CDSS and coded to mask the origin of options presented. The panel rated the acceptability of each treatment in the pair by consensus, with acceptability defined as compliant with BIH's institutional practices. Descriptive statistics characterized the study population and treatment-decision evaluations by cancer type and stage. RESULTS: Nearly 60% (187) of 313 treatment pairs for breast, lung, colon, and rectal cancers were identical or equally acceptable, with 70% (219) of WfO therapeutic options identical to, or acceptable alternatives to, BIH therapy. In 30% of cases (94), 1 or both treatment options were rated as unacceptable. Of 32 cases where both WfO and BIH options were acceptable, WfO was preferred in 18 cases and BIH in 14 cases. Colorectal cancers exhibited the highest proportion of identical or equally acceptable treatments; stage IV cancers demonstrated the lowest. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that a system designed in the US to support, rather than replace, cancer-treating clinicians provides therapeutic options which are generally consistent with recommendations from oncologists outside the US.

Antianemic effect of once weekly regimen of epoetin alfa 40,000 units in anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is a common problem in the cancer population that is the result of clinical consequences. It also has adverse effects on patients' perceived quality of life. Good management of anemia in the cancer population is therefore essential. A recent published clinical trial has demonstrated statistically significant increases in hemoglobin levels and significantly increased QOL assessment following the administration of recombinant erythropoietin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, the safety, and the quality of life by using once weekly dosing of Epoetin alfa (Eprex, Janssen-cilag) 40,000 units in the treatment of anemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. SETTING: Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This was an open label, non-randomized study, in 41 adult male and female anemic cancer patients who had non-myeloid malignancies in the upper area of the body part and hemoglobin ranging from 9-11 g/dL receiving chemotherapy at least 8 weeks with or without concurrent radiotherapy. The subjects were treated with Epoetin alfa 40,000 units once a week subcutaneously. If, the hemoglobin did not increase by > 1.0 g/dl after 4 weeks of treatment, the dose of Epoetin alfa was then increased to 60,000 units per dose subcutaneously at week 5. The Epoetin alfa treatment would continue for a total of 16 weeks. Clinical outcome was evaluated based on quality of life by using the linear analog scale assessment (LASA) and the functional assessment of cancer therapy-anemia (CU-QOL) instrument. Analyses were performed to determine the incremental change in QOL associated with hemoglobin increases. RESULTS: Seventy six percent of patients receiving Epoetin alfa subcutaneously showed good response with hemoglobin increases of > or = 1 g/dL (Hb level before and after = 9.82 +/- 0.78 g/dL and 12.56 +/- 1.49 g/dL, respectively; p < 0. 001). Improvement of all primary cancer- and anemia-specific QOL domains, including energy level and ability to do daily activities evaluated from LASA and fatigue assessed from CU-QOL, were significantly greater (p < 0.01) for week 16 (233.94 +/- 56.01 and 18.45 +/- 13.07) compared to the baseline (202.58 +/- 36.74 and 25.09 +/- 11.00). Epoetin alfa was well tolerated in all patients. CONCLUSION: Once weekly dosing of Epoetin alfa 40,000 units therapy is safe and effective in remodeling anemia and significantly improves the quality of life in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Therefore, the physician should maintain hemoglobin concentration of cancer patients in normal level to improve their quality of life through the chemotherapy period.

Pemetrexed alone and in combination with platinum compounds in the management of malignant mesothelioma.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an aggressive but rare malignancy with a dismal prognosis. It is traditionally resistant to chemotherapy. Antifolate agents have recently shown promising data in the treatment of this malignancy. Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate inhibitor of thymidylate synthase and other folate-dependent enzymes that has emerged as one of the most active agents in this disease. Several phase I/II trials of pemetrexed as a single agent or in combination with a platinum drug have demonstrated considerable activity in mesothelioma. In a recently published phase III randomized study, pemetrexed/cisplatin showed a significant improvement in survival, response rate, and quality of life compared with single-agent cisplatin. In addition, several trials reported that folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation significantly reduced the toxicity observed with the use of pemetrexed without affecting the efficacy of the drug.

Retrospective review of extra-pulmonary small cell carcinoma at King Chulalongkorn memorial hospital cases during 1998-2005.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review cases of extra-pulmonary small cell carcinoma (EPSCC), including their clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and pathological reports of patients who were diagnosed with EPSCC from 1998 to 2005. RESULTS: Overall 21 EPSCC patients were eligible for this study. The most common primary sites were the gastrointestinal organs and the nasal cavity. Eleven patients (52.3%) had limited disease (LD) and 10 patients (47.7%) had extensive disease (ED). Nine patients underwent radical surgery alone, four received only radical radiation and two received only palliative chemotherapy. Two patients received adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy following surgical resection and one received a combination of all three treatment modalities. Three patients declined specific treatment and were treated with best supportive care. The median overall survival in the ED group was only 3 months (range 1-16 months), compared to 30 months (range 20-61 months) for LD. EPSCC of pancreas demonstrated a favorable clinical outcome with treatment, whereas primary EPSCC of the liver, esophagus and rectum had an aggressive natural history and a poor response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Our report suggests that EPSCC may have a different biology from that of pulmonary small cell carcinoma. When detected at an early stage, EPSCC may have an excellent prognosis with treatment. Additional studies involving more patients with EPSCC are warranted to further define the optimal roles of each treatment modality.