Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Hospitalized With a Central Line.

OBJECTIVES: Patients hospitalized with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to determine whether the adoption of a VTE protocol would change rates of medical VTE prophylaxis (low molecular weight heparin) in patients with IBD and a central venous catheter (CVC), while subsequently decreasing the incidence of VTE in this population. METHODS: A protocol for VTE prophylaxis in IBD was established in March of 2018. Every patient hospitalized with an IBD flare and central venous access from March 2013 to March 2020 was identified. Study data, including patient demographics, rates of Doppler ultrasound (US), and rates of VTE were collected using International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes, CPT codes, and chart review retrospectively. Determination of an IBD flare was based on physician global assessment. Groups were compared with independent-sample t tests and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: A total of 313 hospitalizations across 187 different patients were identified that met criteria including IBD and central venous access. VTE prophylaxis increased from 5.24% (n = 12) prior to the intervention to 63.10% (n = 53) after the intervention [chi-square (1, N = 313) = 125.0192, P < 0.001]. Rate of Doppler US increased from 9.17% (n = 21) prior to the intervention to 17.86% (n = 15) after the intervention [chi-square (1, N = 313) = 4.5562, P < 0.05]. Diagnosis of VTE increased from 0.87% (n = 2) prior to the intervention to 7.14% (n = 6) after the intervention [chi-square (1, N = 313) = 9.6992, P < 0.01]. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics pre- versus post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of Doppler US and VTE prophylaxis use increased significantly after implementation of a VTE protocol. Rates of VTE diagnosis also increased, though we suspect this may be due to missed diagnoses prior to implementation of the protocol and increased risk awareness after the protocol was established.

Measuring the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Emergency Department at a Quaternary Children's Hospital.

AIM OF STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as it relates to American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines during cardiac arrests in a pediatric emergency department at a quaternary children's hospital. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-quality CPR increases the likelihood of survival from pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, optimal performance of high-quality CPR during transition of care between prehospital and pediatric emergency department providers is challenging, and survival without comorbidities remains extremely low for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of data collected from a free-standing children's hospital emergency department and level 1 trauma center. RESULTS: There were 23 pediatric CPR events for subjects younger than 18 years in the emergency department during the time of the study. Median chest compression (CC) fraction was 85% overall with the AHA goal of 80%. Compliance with this recommendation was achieved in all age groups. The CC rate averaged 112 for the entire sample. Median depth was 2.06 cm in subjects younger than 1 year, 3.95 cm in subjects 1 year old to younger than 8 years, and 5.33 cm in subjects 8 years old to younger than 18 years. These compression depth rates fell below the AHA recommendations, with the exception of those 8 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, CC fraction and CC rate were found to meet AHA targets for all age groups, whereas CC depth only met AHA targets for the 8- to 18-year-old group. The most difficult parameter was CC depth for the group of subjects younger than 1 year.

The appropriate use of neurostimulation: new and evolving neurostimulation therapies and applicable treatment for chronic pain and selected disease states. Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee.

INTRODUCTION: The International Neuromodulation Society (INS) has determined that there is a need to provide an expert consensus that defines the appropriate use of neuromodulation technologies for appropriate patients. The Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) was formed to give guidance to current practice and insight into future developments. METHODS: The INS executive board selected members of the international scientific community to analyze scientific evidence for current and future innovations and to use clinical experience to fill in any gaps in information. The NACC used PubMed and Google Scholar to obtain current evidence in the field and used clinical and research experience to give a more complete picture of the innovations in the field. RESULTS: The NACC has determined that currently approved neurostimulation techniques and technologies have expanded our ability to treat patients in a more effective and specific fashion. Despite these advances, the NACC has identified several additional promising technologies and potential applications for neurostimulation that could move this field forward and expand the applicability of neuromodulation. CONCLUSIONS: The NACC concludes that the field of neurostimulation is an evolving and rapidly changing one that will lead to improved patient access, safety, and outcomes.

Low-dose intrathecal rituximab is a safe and potentially effective treatment for pediatric neuroimmunologic disorders.

Historically, treatment options for refractory neuroimmunologic disorders have been limited. Use of intrathecal rituximab has been described in a few case reports but experience in pediatric patients is limited. Here, we report our experience with intrathecal rituximab in 5 pediatric patients with refractory neuroimmunologic conditions. Patients were identified based on treatment-refractory symptoms despite first and second-line therapies and treated according to a standardized protocol. Although individual outcomes varied, intrathecal rituximab showed a favorable safety profile and was well-tolerated. Three out of five patients showed evidence of a positive clinical response assessed by modified Rankin score or Mitchell-Pike Opsoclonus-Myoclonus score. Findings from this retrospective observational study suggest that intrathecal rituximab is a safe and potentially effective therapy in carefully selected patients with refractory neuroimmunologic disorders despite appropriate first and second-line therapies.