Social Ecological Influences on Nicotine/Tobacco Use Among Gender-Varying and Gender-Stable Adolescents and Adults in the USA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our study examined individual-, interpersonal-, community-, and policy-level associations with nicotine/tobacco use among gender-varying and gender-stable U.S. individuals. METHODS: Data from Waves 2-4 (2014/15-2016/18) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (n = 33,197 U.S. adolescents and adults aged ≥14 years) and state-level gender minority policy data were used. Using multivariable logistic regression, the odds of past-30-day nicotine/tobacco use at W4 were estimated as a function of gender stability/variability, psychological distress, number of tobacco products used by family/friends, anti-tobacco marketing exposure, and change in gender minority-related policies from 2015 to 2017. RESULTS: Gender-varying individuals had higher odds of nicotine/tobacco use compared with gender-stable individuals (AOR range = 1.7-2.3, p < .01). In the overall sample, positive change in gender minority policy protections (tallied from medium to high) was associated with lower odds of any nicotine/tobacco, other tobacco, and poly-tobacco use (AOR = 0.8, p < .05) compared to states with no change in their negative policies. Anti-tobacco marketing exposure was associated with lower odds of any tobacco, cigarette, e-cigarette, and poly-tobacco use compared with those who had no anti-tobacco marketing exposure (AOR = 0.9, p < .05). Higher psychological distress (AOR range = 1.7-2.4, p < .001) and an increasing number of tobacco products used by family/friends (AOR range = 1.1-1.3, p < .001) were associated with increased odds of nicotine/tobacco use. CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel prevention and intervention strategies are needed to reduce the risk of nicotine/tobacco use among gender-varying and gender-stable individuals.

Prior work has shown that individuals whose gender identity changes over time (i.e., gender-varying) have higher risk for nicotine/tobacco use compared with individuals whose gender identity remains consistent over time (i.e., gender-stable). This study examined individual-, interpersonal-, community-, and policy-level associations with nicotine/tobacco use among gender-varying and gender-stable U.S. adolescents and adults. We analyzed data from Waves 2­4 (2014/15­2016/18) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study (n = 33,197 U.S. adolescents and adults aged 14 years and above) and state-level gender identity policy data from the Movement Advancement Project. Among the overall sample, we found that a positive change in state-level policy protections was associated with lower odds of any nicotine/tobacco, other tobacco, and poly-tobacco use compared with states that had no change in their negative policies. Exposure to anti-tobacco marketing was associated with lower odds of any tobacco, cigarette, e-cigarette, and poly-tobacco use compared with those who had no exposure to anti-tobacco marketing. Higher psychological distress and an increasing number of tobacco products used by close friends and family were associated with increased odds of nicotine/tobacco use. Multilevel prevention and intervention strategies are needed to reduce the risk of nicotine/tobacco use among gender-varying and gender-stable individuals.

Immigration Policy is Health Policy: News Media Effects on Health Disparities for Latinx Immigrant and Indigenous Groups.

Legal exclusions and cultural factors reproduce barriers to health care by enforcing boundaries between citizens and immigrants, leading to a range of health risks and disparities for Latinx immigrant and Indigenous communities. This study utilized a mixed-methods examination of news media and ethnographic interviews guided by a decolonial-inspired framework to demonstrate the linkages between policy discourse and health behaviors. Both newspaper articles and interviews with affected stakeholders show how immigrants and their families experience more significant health risks because of policy changes and proposals. Regardless of the political regime, media discourses that promote fear and threat sustain the overall effects of immigration policy enforcement strategies on health. Immigration policy is health policy, and these laws should be evaluated in terms of their impact on public health, in addition to other factors. Furthermore, the news media is a contextual factor for health promotion strategies and a target for health advocates working with immigrant and Indigenous communities.