Endolymphatic sac tumor: single-institution series of seven cases with updated review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Endolymphatic sac tumour (ELST) is a rare low-grade locally aggressive neoplasm arising from the endolymphatic duct or sac. It presents mostly with vestibulo-cochlear symptoms either sporadically or as part of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome. Micro-neurosurgical excision remains the cornerstone of therapy with the role of radiotherapy (RT) being controversial. This is a clinico-pathological analysis of consecutive ELST patients presenting to a single-institution in India. METHODS: Neuropathology database of a tertiary-care comprehensive cancer centre was searched electronically to identify consecutive patients with histopathological diagnosis of ELST registered at the institute over last one decade. Data regarding demographic profile, clinical presentation, histopathological features, treatment details and outcomes were retrieved from electronic medical records for this retrospective analysis. RESULTS: Electronic search identified seven unique patients with biopsy-proven ELST registered at the institute between 2009 and 2020. Median age of the study cohort was 39 years (range 24-65 years) with strong male predilection (5:2 ratio) and left-sided preponderance (71%). Most common presenting symptoms were hearing loss (86%) and earache (71%) on affected side followed by headache (43%). All patients underwent maximal safe resection at initial diagnosis and were followed-up closely with periodic surveillance imaging. Two patients underwent salvage RT using high-precision conformal techniques at recurrence/progression. CONCLUSION: ELST is a rare low-grade locally aggressive neoplasm that arises generally as part of VHL syndrome or sometimes sporadically. Gross total resection provides the best chance of cure with RT being reserved for unresectable disease, large residue, medical inoperability, or as salvage therapy for recurrent/progressive tumor.

Efficacy and safety of extended adjuvant temozolomide compared to standard adjuvant temozolomide in glioblastoma: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: This study was designed to compare outcomes of extended adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) vs standard adjuvant TMZ following radiotherapy (RT) plus concurrent TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology. Only prospective clinical trials randomly assigning adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma after concurrent RT/TMZ to 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (control arm) or extended (>6 cycles) adjuvant TMZ (experimental arm) were eligible. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival, while progression-free survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Hazard ratio (HR) for progression and death with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for individual primary study and pooled using random-effects model. Toxicity was defined as proportion of patients with ≥grade 3 hematologic toxicity and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Any P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Systematic literature review identified five randomized controlled trials comparing standard (6 cycles) vs extended (>6 cycles) adjuvant TMZ in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Outcome data could be extracted from 358 patients from four primary studies. Extended adjuvant TMZ was not associated with statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.61-1.10; P = .18) or death (HR = 0.87, 95% CI:0.60-1.27; P = .48) compared to standard adjuvant TMZ. Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity though somewhat higher with extended adjuvant TMZ, was not significantly different between the two arms (RR = 2.01, 95% CI: 0.83-4.87; P = .12). Conclusions: There is low-certainty evidence that extended adjuvant TMZ is not associated with significant survival benefit or increased hematologic toxicity in unselected patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma compared to standard adjuvant TMZ.