The Impact of Breast Cancer Type, Staging, and Treatment on Vascular Complications of Immediate Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced cancer staging have a greater risk of developing venous thromboembolism than noncancer patients. The impact of breast cancer stage and treatment on outcomes after autologous free-flap breast reconstruction (ABR) is not well-established. The objective of this retrospective study is to determine the impact of breast cancer characteristics, such as cancer stage, hormone receptor status, and neoadjuvant treatments, on vascular complications of ABR. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted examining patients who underwent ABR from 2009 to 2018. Breast cancer stage, cancer types, hormone receptor status, and treatments were collected in addition to demographic data. Intraoperative vascular concerns, postoperative vascular concerns, and flap loss were analyzed. Univariate analysis and fixed-effects models were used to associate breast cancer characteristics with outcomes. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant hormone therapy was associated with increased risk for intraoperative vascular concern (odds ratio, 1.059 [ P = 0.0441]). Neoadjuvant trastuzumab was associated with decreased risk of postoperative vascular concern (odds ratio, 0.941 [ P = 0.018]). Breast cancer stage, somatic genetic mutation, receptor types, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant radiation had no effect on any vascular complications of ABR. CONCLUSION: Autologous free-flap breast reconstruction is a reliable reconstructive option for patients with all stages and types of breast cancer. There is potentially increased risk of intraoperative microvascular compromise in patients who have neoadjuvant hormone therapy. Trastuzumab is potentially protective against postoperative microvascular compromise. Patients should feel confident that, despite higher stage cancer, they can pursue their desired reconstructive option without fear of vascular compromise.

A Systematic Review of Idiopathic Secondary Stenosis Following Index Surgery for Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Primary craniosynostosis is a congenital craniofacial disorder in which cranial sutures prematurely close. Iatrogenic secondary stenosis is abnormal cranial suture closure caused by surgical manipulation of the suture. In contrast, idiopathic secondary stenosis develops in a suture that did not undergo surgical manipulation. The objective of this systematic review was to consolidate and characterize the incidence, classification, and management of idiopathic secondary stenosis in the literature. METHODS: Literature from PubMed, Web Of Science, and EMBASE from 1970 to March 2022 was reviewed. The following information was extracted for individual patients: incidence of idiopathic secondary stenosis, index primary craniosynostosis, primary surgical correction, presenting signs of secondary stenosis, management, and further complications. RESULTS: Seventeen articles detailing 1181 patients were included. Ninety-one developed idiopathic secondary stenosis (7.7%). Only 3 of these patients were syndromic. The most common index craniosynostosis was sagittal synostosis (83.5%). The most common suture undergoing idiopathic secondary stenosis was the coronal suture (91.2%). Patients presented at a median age of 24 months. The most common presenting sign was a radiologic finding (85.7%), although some patients presented with headache or head deformity. Only 2 patients, both syndromic, had complications following surgical correction of secondary stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Idiopathic secondary stenosis is a rare, long-term complication following index surgical repair of craniosynostosis. It can occur following any surgical technique. It most commonly affects the coronal suture but can affect any of the sutures, including pansynostosis. Surgical correction is curative in nonsyndromic patients.

Complications of Aesthetic Surgical Tourism Treated in the USA: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Medical tourism has grown increasingly popular in the past few decades. Cosmetic surgery centers have developed in vacation locales, offering procedures at lower prices. However, surgeons and patients alike are often unprepared for management of complications after patients return to the USA. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of US cosmetic surgery tourism patients and the complications faced by US healthcare providers. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases up to February 2022; included articles were full-text, English language, and reported complications of patients receiving postoperative care in the USA after cosmetic surgery abroad. Two independent reviewers performed screening for article eligibility with a 3rd for conflict resolution. Patient demographics, procedure characteristics, and outcomes were extracted and aggregated. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included, describing 214 patients. Most patients were female (98.1%, n = 210), middle-aged, and Hispanic. The most common destination country was the Dominican Republic (82.7%, n = 177) and the most common surgical procedure was abdominoplasty (35.7%, n = 114). Complications were mainly infectious (50.9%, n = 112) and required prolonged treatment periods often greater than two months, with high rates of hospitalization (36.8%) and surgical management (51.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic surgery tourism is a growing industry with adverse implications for the US healthcare system and patients themselves. This review aims to serve as a reference to prepare plastic surgeons for the scope of complications associated with cosmetic tourism and improve counseling to better prepare patients for the financial and health risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Outcomes of Extended Pedicle Technique vs Free Nipple Graft Reduction Mammoplasty for Patients With Gigantomastia.

BACKGROUND: Optimal reduction mammoplasty techniques to treat patients with gigantomastia have been debated and can involve extended pedicles (EP) or free nipple grafts (FNG). OBJECTIVES: The authors compared clinical, patient-reported, and aesthetic outcomes associated with reduction mammoplasty employing EP vs FNG. METHODS: A multi-institutional, retrospective study of adult patients with gigantomastia who underwent reduction mammoplasty at 2 tertiary care centers from 2017 to 2020 was performed. Gigantomastia was defined as reduction weight >1500 g per breast or sternal notch-to-nipple distance ≥40 cm. Surgeons at 1 institution employed the EP technique, whereas those at the other utilized FNG. Baseline characteristics, preoperative and postoperative BREAST-Q, and clinical outcomes were collected. Aesthetic outcomes were assessed in 1:1 propensity score-matched cases across techniques. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were provided to reviewers across the academic plastic surgery continuum (students to faculty) and non-medical individuals to evaluate aesthetic outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria (21 FNG, 31 EP). FNG patients had a higher incidence of postoperative cellulitis (23% vs 0%, P < 0.05) but no other differences in surgical or medical complications. Baseline BREAST-Q scores did not differ between groups. Postoperative BREAST-Q scores revealed greater satisfaction with the EP technique (P < 0.01). The aesthetic assessment of outcomes in 14 matched pairs of patients found significantly better aesthetic outcomes in all domains with the EP procedure (P < 0.05), independent of institution or surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional study suggests that, compared with FNG, the EP technique for reduction mammoplasty provides superior clinical, patient-reported, and aesthetic outcomes for patients with gigantomastia.

Preoperative Computed Tomography Morphological Features Indicative of Incisional Hernia Formation After Abdominal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate key morphometric features identifiable on routine preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging indicative of incisional hernia (IH) formation following abdominal surgery. BACKGROUND: IH is a pervasive surgical disease that impacts all surgical disciplines operating in the abdominopelvic region and affecting 13% of patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Despite the significant costs and disability associated with IH, there is an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of hernia. METHODS: A cohort of patients (n=21,501) that underwent colorectal surgery was identified, and clinical data and demographics were extracted, with a primary outcome of IH. Two datasets of case-control matched pairs were created for feature measurement, classification, and testing. Morphometric linear and volumetric measurements were extracted as features from anonymized preoperative abdominopelvic CT scans. Multivariate Pearson testing was performed to assess correlations among features. Each feature's ability to discriminate between classes was evaluated using 2-sided paired t testing. A support vector machine was implemented to determine the predictive accuracy of the features individually and in combination. RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients were analyzed (106 matched pairs). Of 117 features measured, 21 features were capable of discriminating between IH and non-IH patients. These features are categorized into three key pathophysiologic domains: 1) structural widening of the rectus complex, 2) increased visceral volume, 3) atrophy of abdominopelvic skeletal muscle. Individual prediction accuracy ranged from 0.69 to 0.78 for the top 3 features among 117. CONCLUSIONS: Three morphometric domains identifiable on routine preoperative CT imaging were associated with hernia: widening of the rectus complex, increased visceral volume, and body wall skeletal muscle atrophy. This work highlights an innovative pathophysiologic mechanism for IH formation hallmarked by increased intra-abdominal pressure and compromise of the rectus complex and abdominopelvic skeletal musculature.

Use of Cosmetic Facial Injectables After Facial Aesthetic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Over the last 2 decades, both invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic procedures have proliferated. Aesthetic surgeons often recommend injectable treatments after cosmetic facial surgery for multiple reasons. However, literature is lacking on how cosmetic surgery affects postoperative facial injectable use. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of facial injectable use after cosmetic facial surgery. METHODS: All adult patients operated on by a single surgeon between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had any of the following cosmetic facial surgeries were included: rhytidectomy, blepharoplasty, rhinoplasty, or genioplasty. Patient demographics, clinical history, intraoperative factors, and use of cosmetic facial injectables (neurotoxin, facial fillers, deoxycholic acid, poly-l-lactic acid) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients who underwent facial cosmetic surgery were reviewed, of whom 158 were included. Of these, 89 patients had rhytidectomy (56.3%), 112 had blepharoplasty (70.9%), 28 had rhinoplasty (17.7%), and 7 had genioplasty (4.4%). Injectables were administered to 44.3% of patients after their surgery (n = 73), compared with only 17.7% before surgery (n = 28) (P < 0.001). The most common postoperative injectables were neurotoxins (48.5%) and facial fillers (46.0%), followed by deoxycholic acid (2.7%) and poly-l-lactic acid (2.7%). Multivariate regression revealed factors positively correlated with future injectable use were index blepharoplasty or rhinoplasty, and history of preoperative neurotoxin injection (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic facial injectables are an important consideration in achieving and maintaining optimal facial aesthetics. Their use, especially neurotoxins and facial fillers, has increased among patients postoperatively. These results highlight the contribution of injectable procedures in the context of multidimensional care for augmenting facial aesthetics.

A Meta-Analysis of Traumatic Orbital Apex Syndrome and the Effectiveness of Surgical and Clinical Treatments.

PURPOSE: Traumatic orbital apex syndrome (TOAS) commonly occurs secondary to trauma and irreversible ischemic optic neuropathy occurs as early as 2 hours after injury. Multiple treatment options have been described, however, there is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal treatment of these patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed Database from 1970 to 2020 was conducted, using the search terms "orbital apex," "syndrome," and "traumatic" with the Boolean operators "AND" or "OR." Papers that did not describe TOAS, describe patient outcomes or treatments, and those without available full English text were excluded. Patients were clustered and compared based on treatment received with the primary outcomes of improvement in vision or ophthalmoplegia. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-seven papers were identified, of which 22 were included, representing 117 patients with TOAS. A total of 75.9% patients underwent decompressive surgery, 82.6% received steroids, and 72.2% received nerve growth factors. Fewer than 20% of patients were treated with antibiotics, diuretics, hormones, or hyperbaric oxygen. Overall, 51.7% of patients experienced improvement in vision and 85.2% in ophthalmoplegia at 6 months. Patients treated with surgical decompression (66.7% versus 16.7%, P < 0.01) or steroids (60.0% versus 0%; P < 0.01) were more likely to have improvement in vision than those without treatment. Nerve growth factors did not improve vision. Ophthalmoplegia did not improve with any treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of TOAS tend to be poor, with overall low recovery of vision, though surgical decompression or steroid treatment did suggest improved visual outcomes. Further standardized patient data is needed to elucidate the comparative effectiveness of these interventions.

Access to Breast Cancer Treatment and Reconstruction in Rural Populations: Do Women Have a Choice?

BACKGROUND: Federal law mandates complete insurance coverage for breast reconstruction and considers it an "essential" aspect of breast cancer treatment, on par with mastectomy and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, a significant proportion of women do not undergo reconstruction. The objective of this study is to assess care gaps in breast cancer treatment and reconstruction in rural populations. METHODS: All hospitals in Upstate New York were surveyed regarding what components of breast cancer care they provide, including breast surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology, and plastic surgery. Survey results were correlated with population data to determine how many women might be impacted by geographic barriers to care. RESULTS: Of 135 hospitals, only 56% offered any component of breast cancer treatment, while 30% offer breast surgery, 44% offer radiation oncology, and 42% offer plastic surgery. Microsurgical breast reconstruction was offered at just 14% of hospitals. Only 11% of hospitals were complete cancer care centers, which offer all the essential elements of breast cancer care (breast surgery, reconstructive surgery, medical oncology, and radiation) and all reconstructive options (including microvascular). Based on population data, 21% of Upstate New Yorkers live in counties without access to any form of breast reconstruction, 44% live in counties without microsurgical reconstruction, 30% live in counties without a hospital that staffs all members of the cancer care team, and 47% live in counties without a complete cancer care center. CONCLUSIONS: Geographic barriers play a large role in the lack of access to breast cancer care and reconstruction.

High-Resolution Maxillofacial Computed Tomography Is Superior to Head Computed Tomography in Determining the Operative Management of Facial Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography of the head (CTH) and maxillofacial bones (CTMF) can be performed concurrently, but CTMF is frequently ordered separately, after facial fractures identified on CTH scans. This study aims to evaluate whether obtaining additional CTMF after CTH changes operative management of patients with facial trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with facial trauma who presented to our level 1 trauma center between January 2009 and May 2019. CTH and CTMF were reviewed for each patient. Fracture numbers and patterns were compared to determine if CTMF provided additional information that necessitated change in management, based on predetermined criteria. RESULTS: A total of 1215 patients were assessed for facial trauma. Of them, 899 patients underwent both CTH and CTMF scans. CTH identified 22.7% less fractures than CTMF (P < 0.001); specifically, more orbital, nasal, naso-orbito-ethmoid, zygoma, midface, and mandible fractures (P < 0.001). Of all patients 9.2% (n = 83) of patients with nonoperative fractures on CTH were reclassified as operative on CTMF; 0.6% (n = 5) with operative patterns on CTH were reclassified as nonoperative on CTMF, and 18.1% (n = 163) experienced a changed in their operative plan though operative fractures were seen on both imaging modalities. Additional findings seen on CTMF delegated change in the operative plan in 27.9% (n = 251) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: CTMF scans are necessary to determine operative intervention. As CTH and CTMF are constructed from the data, physicians should consider ordering both scans simultaneously for all patients with facial trauma to limit radiation exposure, control costs, and avoid delays in care.

Outcomes of Immediate Titanium Cranioplasty Following Post-Craniotomy Infection.

When craniotomy complicated by secondary infection requires debridement and craniectomy, the bony defect is typically not reconstructed immediately. Due to concerns about placing a prosthetic material in an infected field, cranioplasty has traditionally been delayed by weeks or months after craniectomy. However, surgeons have begun performing single-stage cranioplasty after craniectomy in an effort to reduce the morbidity associated with multiple procedures and reduce overall healthcare costs. The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze outcomes of immediate cranioplasty performed after bone flap debridement secondary to infection. A literature review from January 1, 1998 through January 1, 2019 was conducted, examining the data on immediate titanium cranioplasty and its complication and reoperation rates. A meta-analysis of these articles was then performed. Variables studied included incidence of infection post-cranioplasty, wound healing complications, need for unplanned reoperation, and mortality. In total, there were 40 patients who underwent immediate cranioplasty after bone flap debridement. Overall, there was a 5% rate of postoperative infection, a 12.5% rate of unplanned return to the operating room, 7.5% rate of CSF fistula or leak, a 2.5% rate of hematoma, and a 2.5% rate of mortality within the immediate post-op period. Although there are insufficient data in the literature to rigorously compare these immediate cranioplasties in a direct way with the more traditional delayed type; the outcomes of immediate cranioplasty procedures secondary to craniectomy for infection were similar to the outcomes of delayed cranioplasty after craniectomy for any reason. Given these results, immediate titanium cranioplasty should be considered in select patients.

Missing the Mark: Evaluating the Validity of the Ventral Hernia Screen in Detecting Recurrence.

PURPOSE: Hernia recurrence is a primary metric in evaluating the success of ventral hernia repair (VHR). Current screening methods for hernia recurrence, including the validated Ventral Hernia Screening (VHS) questionnaire, have not yet been critically evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of the VHS for hernia recurrence. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent primary VHR utilizing poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh at a single-institution from January 2016 to December 2021 who completed at least one VHS during their postoperative follow-up. All patients who screened positive underwent follow-up diagnostic computed tomography or physical examination for confirmation of hernia recurrence. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed for each item and the VHS as a whole. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients who completed 119 VHS questionnaires were included. The median time to VHS administration was 3.6 years (range .8-6.3 years). The VHS tool had a sensitivity of 40.0%, specificity of 71.1%, PPV of 5.7%, and NPV of 96.4%. Individual items of the VHS also produced poor screening effects, with sensitivities between 20 and 40%, specificities between 79 and 97%, PPVs between 4 and 25%, and NPVs from 95 to 97%. CONCLUSION: The VHS was a poor positive predictive tool for hernia recurrence, with both a low PPV and sensitivity. Many patients may be unaware of when they truly have hernia recurrence in the long term. More rigorous tools need to be developed to monitor recurrence following VHR.

Prepectoral versus Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive approach after mastectomy. Prepectoral implants offer advantages over submuscular implants, such as less animation deformity, pain, weakness, and postradiation capsular contracture. However, clinical outcomes after prepectoral reconstruction are debated. The authors performed a matched-cohort analysis of outcomes after prepectoral and submuscular reconstruction at a large academic medical center. METHODS: Patients treated with implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy from January of 2018 through October of 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were propensity score exact matched to control demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative differences. Outcomes assessed included surgical-site occurrences, capsular contracture, and explantation of either expander or implant. Subanalysis was done on infections and secondary reconstructions. RESULTS: A total of 634 breasts were included (prepectoral, 197; submuscular, 437). A total of 292 breasts were matched (146 prepectoral:146 submuscular) and analyzed for clinical outcomes. Prepectoral reconstructions were associated with greater rates of SSI (prepectoral, 15.8%; submuscular, 3.4%; P < 0.001), seroma (prepectoral, 26.0%; submuscular, 10.3%; P < 0.001), and explantation (prepectoral, 23.3%; submuscular, 4.8%; P < 0.001). Subanalysis of infections revealed that prepectoral implants have shorter time to infection, deeper infections, and more Gram-negative infections, and are more often treated surgically (all P < 0.05). There have been no failures of secondary reconstructions after explantation in the entire population at a mean follow-up of 20.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with higher rates of infection, seroma, and explantation compared with submuscular reconstructions. Infections of prepectoral implants may need different antibiotic management to avoid explantation. Secondary reconstruction after explantation can result in long-term success. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Patient-reported outcomes: A primer for plastic surgeons.

Surgical care today is no longer evaluated only on clinical outcomes but also on holistic patient wellbeing. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a representation of the patient's perspective on their results and wellbeing. The aim of this review is to establish PROs as the center of healthcare and plastic surgery, to delineate important PROs in plastic surgery practice and research, to discuss the future of PROs within our discipline, and to encourage surgeons to incorporate PROs into their practice. PROs are an important parallel of clinical outcomes in that they can use the patient's perspective to 1) support clinical findings, 2) detect differences in care when there are no clear clinical differences, 3) track progress longitudinally, and 4) support systemic improvements in healthcare. Plastic surgery as a field is naturally aligned with PROs because, as a discipline, we focus on patient form and function. The emerging forefronts of plastic surgery such as lymphedema care, gender-affirming care, peripheral nerve surgery, migraine surgery, and breast implant illness are critically dependent on PROs. In the next decade, we predict that there will be a continued proliferation of robust PRO measures and integration into healthcare delivery. Outcomes research in surgery should continue to evolve as surgeons provide increasingly more benefits to improve patient wellbeing. Plastic surgeons must continue to play a prominent role in the future of PROs.

Pressure Ulcer Trends in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Assessment from 2008-2019.

INTRODUCTION: Decubitus ulcers are a morbid and costly problem faced by healthcare systems and patients across the country. We aim to examine current patterns and characteristics of patients admitted to the hospital with a pressure ulcer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a nationally representative sample of hospital discharge records, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), patients with a diagnosis of pressure ulcer 2008-2019 were identified. Patient volume, demographic and clinical data were analyzed for change over time. RESULTS: The volume of pressure ulcer patients as a proportion of all hospital patients remained constant from 2008 to 2019 (P = .479). During the study period, the proportion of ulcer patients that underwent an ulcer-related procedure significantly decreased (P < .001) while the proportion of ulcers considered severe significantly increased (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests the prevalence of decubitus ulcers remained stable during the time period, with increased severity but reduced frequency of operative intervention.

Shifting the Goalpost in Ventral Hernia Care: 5-year Outcomes after Ventral Hernia Repair with Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate Mesh.

PURPOSE: Ventral hernia repair (VHR) can be augmented with biosynthetic poly-4-hydroxybutryate mesh (P4HB). Long-term outcomes, including quality of life outcomes, after VHR with P4HB mesh are not well established. Our study sought to assess these outcomes 5 years after repair. METHODS: Patients who received VHR using P4HB by the senior author between 01/2015 and 09/2017 were retrospectively identified. Patients were prospectively interviewed for quality of life assessment using the Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey (HerQLes) and Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ) and screened for recurrence. Those who screened positive were asked to follow up in clinic to confirm recurrence. Both 5-year quality of life and recurrence were univariately assessed with patient and operative factors. RESULTS: 51 patients met inclusion criteria. 43 patients completed 5-year quality of life assessment (84.3% response rate). Quality of life scores at all postoperative time periods were greater than preoperative scores. Further, quality of life at 5 years is greater than that assessed 0-2 years following VHR. Most patients achieve their best quality of life in the 5-year time period. Thirty-five patients had clinical follow-up in the 5-year time period, 7 experienced recurrences (20% recurrence rate). There was no difference in 5-year quality of life assessment between those who had a recurrence and those who did not. CONCLUSION: Patient quality of life following VHR with P4HB improves immediately and continues to improve 5 years following repair. There are no differences in quality of life with onset of recurrence. Quality of life should be the primary outcome of success in VHR.

Reoperation Through a Prosthetic-Reinforced Abdominal Wall and Its Association With Postoperative Outcomes and Longitudinal Health Care Utilization.

Importance: Prosthetic reinforcement of critically sized incisional hernias is necessary to decrease hernia recurrence, but long-term prosthetic-mesh footprint may increase complication risk during subsequent abdominal operations. Objective: To investigate the association of prior incisional hernia repair with mesh (IHRWM) with postoperative outcomes and health care utilization after common abdominal operations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing inpatient abdominal surgical procedures during the period of January 2009 to December 2016, with at least 1 year of follow-up within 5 geographically diverse statewide inpatient/ambulatory databases (Florida, Iowa, Nebraska, New York, Utah). History of an abdominal operation was ascertained within the 3-year period preceding the index operation. Patients admitted to the hospital with a history of an abdominal operation (ie, bariatric, cholecystectomy, small- or large-bowel resection, prostatectomy, gynecologic) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. Patients with prior IHRWM were propensity score matched (1:1) to controls both with and without a history of an abdominal surgical procedure based on clinical and operative characteristics. Data analysis was conducted from March 1 to November 27, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of adverse postoperative outcomes (surgical and nonsurgical). Secondary outcomes included health care utilization determined by length of hospital stay, hospital charges, and 1-year readmissions. Logistic and Cox regression determined the association of prior IHRWM with the outcomes of interest. Additional subanalyses matched and compared patients with prior IHR without mesh (IHRWOM) to those with a history of an abdominal operation. Results: Of the 914 105 patients undergoing common abdominal surgical procedures (81 123 bariatric [8.9%], 284 450 small- or large-bowel resection [31.1%], 223 768 cholecystectomy [24.5%], 33 183 prostatectomy [3.6%], and 291 581 gynecologic [31.9%]), all 3517 patients (age group: 46-55 years, 1547 [44.0%]; 2396 majority sex [68.1%]) with prior IHRWM were matched to patients without a history of abdominal surgical procedures. After matching, prior IHRWM was associated with increased overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60), surgical complications (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.34-1.70), length of hospital stay (mean increase of 1.03 days; 95% CI, 0.56-1.49 days; P < .001), index admission charges (predicted mean difference of $11 896.10; 95% CI, $6096.80-$17 695.40; P < .001), and 1-year unplanned readmissions (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002). This trend persisted even when comparing matched patients with prior IHRWM to patients with a history of abdominal surgical procedures, and the treatment outcome disappeared when comparing patients with prior IHRWOM to those without a previous abdominal operation. Conclusions and Relevance: Reoperation through a previously prosthetic-reinforced abdominal wall was associated with increased surgical complications and health care utilization. This risk appeared to be independent of a history of abdominal surgical procedures and was magnified by the presence of a prosthetic-mesh footprint in the abdominal wall.

Analysis of shunted hydrocephalus follow-up: What do routine clinic visits yield? What factors affect revision surgery presentation and outcomes?

Frequency and duration of outpatient clinic follow-up for patients with shunted hydrocephalus varies among clinicians and assessment of follow-up regimens is lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate whether routine clinic visits alter care and whether they identify patients requiring shunt revision surgery, as well as, to better understand how patients utilize the outpatient clinic and present for shunt revision evaluation. This is a single-centered retrospective study of 154 patients requiring shunt revision surgery from 2009 to 2018 who had at least one prior clinic evaluation. The median age for shunt placement and revision were 3 months and 11 years old, respectively. Routine clinic visits led to a change in care for 16 patients (10.4%); including additional imaging, follow-up, or a combination of the two. With regards to revision surgery, days from prior shunt surgery, Chiari II/myelomeningocele pathology, and shunt type (p < 0.01) did affect time to presentation. Four patients (2.6%) requiring revision surgery were identified at routine clinic follow-up, while 92 (59.7%) and 47 (30.5%) presented to the emergency department and clinic sick visit, respectively. Presentation to clinic resulted in a statistically significant decrease in shunt revision surgery length-of-stay compared to presentation to the emergency department or inpatient admission for another condition. Even with increased emergency room utilization, increased clinic connectivity, and improved patient education, routine clinic visits remain an important component in the follow-up of patients with shunted hydrocephalus by helping to guide clinical care and identify patients requiring shunt revision surgery.