Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 24(12): 1798-807, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23810652

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between packing density and the incidence of coil compaction or recanalization of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) after coil packing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2004 and April 2012, coil packing was performed for 46 true visceral aneurysms (16 splenic, 11 pancreaticoduodenal, eight renal, six hepatic, three superior mesenteric, one right gastric, and one gastroepiploic) in 42 patients. The size and volume of the aneurysm, packing density, and the incidences of compaction and recanalization were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 37 months ± 8 (range, 11-80 mo). The mean packing density was 19% ± 8 (range, 5%-42%), mean aneurysm size was 19 mm ± 8 (range, 5-40 mm), and mean volume was 4,108 mm(3) ± 5,435 (range, 72-26,235 mm(3)). Compaction and recanalization occurred in two (4%) and 12 aneurysms (26%), respectively. The mean packing density was significantly lower in aneurysms with compaction or recanalization than in unaffected aneurysms (12% vs 22%; P = .00014). There was a significant difference in mean packing density between small (< 20 mm; 22%) and large (≥ 20 mm) aneurysms (15%; P = .0045). The mean size and volume were significantly larger for coil-compacted or recanalized aneurysms than for unaffected aneurysms (P < .05). In aneurysms with a packing density of at least 24%, no compaction or recanalization occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Coil compaction or recanalization after coil packing for VAAs more often occurs after insufficient embolization with low packing density and in patients with large aneurysms.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Vísceras/irrigación sanguínea , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma/diagnóstico , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama) ; 6(1): 14-20, 2021 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35910524

RESUMEN

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety between epirubicin-loaded DC Beads (DCB-TACE) and conventional TACE (cTACE) used in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 64 patients (mean age, 73.3 years; 44 men, 20 women) who underwent initial DCB-TACE between 2014 and 2015, and 66 patients (mean age, 71.3 years; 38 men, 28 women) who underwent initial cTACE between 2011 and 2013 as historical controls. Treatment effects on the target lesions at 3 months after TACE, the period until re-treatment of the target lesion, and adverse events after TACE were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed to estimate the factors influencing the treatment effects. Results: Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver version 2015, treatment response of the target lesions equivalent to a complete response and termed as TE4, was 51.0% (53/104) in the DCB-TACE group and 74.4% (64/86) in the cTACE group (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the TACE procedure, Child-Pugh score, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, alpha fetoprotein level, and tumor size were independent significant predictors of TE4. The frequencies of elevated serum AST and alanine transaminase levels after TACE were significantly lower in patients in the DCB-TACE group (p<0.001 each). No significant difference in biliary/liver damage was evident between the groups. Conclusion: The local efficacy of cTACE was higher than that of DCB-TACE. Adverse events were milder after DCB-TACE than after cTACE.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA