Right ventricular myocardial fibrosis evaluated by extracellular volume fraction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the clinical utility of anomalous discoveries on cardiac magnetic resonance, particularly the right ventricular extracellular volume (RV-ECV), among individuals who underwent surgical repair for Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane advanced search, and EMBASE. Our analysis involved a comparison of ECV levels between rTOF patients and controls, as well as an evaluation of the predictive value of ECV for future adverse events. RESULTS: We identified 16 eligible studies that encompassed 856 rTOF patients and 283 controls. Our meta-analysis showed a significant increase in LV-ECV among rTOF patients compared to control subjects (MD = 2.63, 95%CI: 1.35 to 3.90, p < 0.0001, I2 = 86%, p for heterogeneity < 0.00001). Moreover, RV-ECV was found to be substantially higher in patients compared to LV-ECV. Our meta-analysis also revealed a significant association between RV-ECV and adverse events (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.27, p = 0.005, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.62), while LV-ECV did not show any significant association with adverse events (HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.36, p = 0.16, I2 = 0%, p for heterogeneity = 0.46). CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis on RV-ECV confirmed the presence of RV fibrosis as one of the prognostic factors in rTOF patients.

Coronary flow reserve evaluated by phase-contrast cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of coronary sinus: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Phase-contrast cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) of the coronary sinus has emerged as a non-invasive method for measuring coronary sinus blood flow and coronary flow reserve (CFR). However, its clinical utility has not yet been established. Here we performed a meta-analysis to clarify the clinical value of CMR-derived CFR in various cardiovascular diseases. METHODS: An electronic database search was performed of PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Advanced Search, and EMBASE. We compared the CMR-derived CFR of various cardiovascular diseases (stable coronary artery disease [CAD], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [HCM], dilated cardiomyopathy [DCM]) and control subjects. We assessed the prognostic value of CMR-derived CFR for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with stable CAD. RESULTS: A total of 47 eligible studies were identified. The pooled CFR from our meta-analysis was 3.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.98-3.98) in control subjects, 2.50 (95% CI, 2.38-2.61) in stable CAD, 2.01 (95% CI, 1.70-2.32) in cardiomyopathies (HCM and DCM). The meta-analysis showed that CFR was significantly reduced in stable CAD (mean difference [MD] = -1.48; 95% CI, -1.78 to -1.17; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%; p for heterogeneity = 0.33), HCM (MD = -1.20; 95% CI, -1.63 to -0.77; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%; p for heterogeneity = 0.49), and DCM (MD = -1.53; 95% CI, -1.93 to -1.13; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%; p for heterogeneity = 0.45). CMR-derived CFR was an independent predictor of MACE for patients with stable CAD (hazard ratio = 0.52 per unit increase; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; p < 0.001; I2 = 84%, p for heterogeneity < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CMR-derived CFR was significantly decreased in cardiovascular diseases, and a decreased CFR was associated with a higher occurrence of MACE in patients with stable CAD. These results suggest that CMR-derived CFR has potential for the pathological evaluation of stable CAD, cardiomyopathy, and risk stratification in CAD.