Assessment of a Contralateral Esophagus-Sparing Technique in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer Treated With High-Dose Chemoradiation: A Phase 1 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Severe acute esophagitis occurs in up to 20% of patients with locally advanced lung cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy to at least 60 Gy once daily and represents a dose-limiting toxic event associated with poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether formalized sparing of the contralateral esophagus (CE) is associated with reduced risk of severe acute esophagitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center phase 1 nonrandomized clinical trial assessing an empirical CE-sparing technique enrolled patients from July 2015 to January 2019. In total, 27 patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (with or without solitary brain metastasis) or limited-stage small cell lung carcinoma with gross tumor within 1 cm of the esophagus were eligible. INTERVENTIONS: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy to 70 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction concurrent with standard chemotherapy with or without adjuvant durvalumab. The esophageal wall contralateral to gross tumor was contoured as an avoidance structure to guide a steep dose falloff gradient. Target coverage was prioritized over CE sparing, and 99% of internal and planning target volumes had to be covered by 70 Gy and at least 63 Gy, respectively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the rate of at least grade 3 acute esophagitis as assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. RESULTS: Of 27 patients enrolled, 25 completed chemoradiation therapy. Nineteen patients had non-small cell lung carcinoma, and 6 had small cell lung carcinoma. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years (range, 51-81 years), and 15 patients (60%) were men. Thirteen patients (52%) had stage IIIA cancer, 10 (40%) had stage IIIB cancer, and 2 (8%) had stage IV cancer. The median CE maximum dose was 66 Gy (range, 44-71 Gy); the median volume of CE receiving at least 55 Gy was 1.4 cm3 (range, 0-5.3 cm3), and the median volume of CE receiving at least 45 Gy was 2.7 cm3 (range, 0-9.2 cm3). The median combined percentage of lung receiving at least 20 Gy was 25% (range, 11%-37%). The median follow-up was 33.3 months (range, 11.1-52.2 months). Among the 20 patients who had treatment breaks of 0 to 3 days and were thus evaluable for the primary end point, the rate of at least grade 3 esophagitis was 0%. Other toxic events observed among all 25 patients included 7 (28%) with grade 2 esophagitis, 3 (12%) with at least grade 2 pneumonitis (including 1 with grade 5), and 2 (8%) with at least grade 3 cardiac toxic event (including 1 with grade 5). There was no isolated local tumor failure. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 57% (95% CI, 33%-75%), and the 2-year overall survival rate was 67% (95% CI, 45%-82%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This phase 1 nonrandomized clinical trial found that the CE-sparing technique was associated with reduced risk of esophagitis among patients treated uniformly with chemoradiation therapy (to 70 Gy), with no grade 3 or higher esophagitis despite tumor within 1 cm of the esophagus. This technique may be translated into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02394548.

Proton Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Craniopharyngioma.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) is used for pediatric craniopharyngioma in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage settings. Proton RT may be useful owing to tumor proximity to eloquent anatomy. We report clinical outcomes for a large cohort treated with proton therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of pediatric patients (≤21 years) treated with surgery and proton therapy for craniopharyngioma between August 2002 and October 2018. Clinical characteristics, treatment course, and outcomes were recorded. Acute toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Late toxicity was assessed using neuroendocrine, neuro-ophthalmologic, and neuropsychological testing. RESULTS: Among 77 patients, median age at diagnosis was 8.6 years (range, 1.3-20); median age at radiation was 9.6 years (range, 2.3-20.5). Most common presenting symptoms were headache (58%), visual impairment (55%), and endocrinopathy (40%). Patients underwent a median of 2 surgical interventions (range, 1-7) before protons. At initial surgery, 18% had gross total resection, 60% had subtotal resection, and 22% had biopsy/cyst decompression. Median RT dose was 52.2 Gy (relative biologic effectiveness). Common acute toxicities were headache (29%), fatigue (35%), and nausea/vomiting (12%). Only 4% developed any acute grade 3 toxicity. Nine patients experienced cyst growth requiring replanning or surgical decompression. At a median of 4.8 years from RT (range, 0.8-15.6), there were 6 local failures and 3 deaths, 2 related to disease progression. Effect of tumor and treatment contributed to late toxicity including Moyamoya syndrome (13%), visual impairment (40%), and endocrine deficiency requiring hormone replacement (94%). Subclinical decline in functional independence and adaptive skills in everyday life was detected at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery and proton therapy results in excellent disease control for pediatric craniopharyngioma. Severe acute toxicity is rare. Late toxicities from tumor, surgery, and radiation remain prevalent. Endocrine and ophthalmology follow-up is necessary, and neuropsychological testing may identify patients at risk for treatment-related cognitive and adaptive functioning changes.