Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Headache ; 50(5): 877-81, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19178576

RESUMEN

Hemicrania continua (HC) belongs to the group of primary headaches and it is characterized by a strictly unilateral, continuous headache of moderate intensity, with superimposed exacerbations of severe intensity that are accompanied by trigeminal autonomic features. The syndrome is completely responsive to indomethacin. Here we report a case of a 49-year-old man with HC, which may be viewed as a combination of different types of headache, ie, chronic tension-type headache and trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia. The analysis of this case raises interesting issues regarding the proper place of HC among the primary headache forms.


Asunto(s)
Hemicránea Paroxística/clasificación , Hemicránea Paroxística/diagnóstico , Estenosis Carotídea/clasificación , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Estenosis Carotídea/tratamiento farmacológico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemicránea Paroxística/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/clasificación , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Cefalea de Tipo Tensional/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cefalalgia Autónoma del Trigémino/clasificación , Cefalalgia Autónoma del Trigémino/diagnóstico , Cefalalgia Autónoma del Trigémino/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Headache ; 49(2): 227-34, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19222596

RESUMEN

AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate a clinical population of patients with hemicrania continua (HC), looking at the diagnostic problems they have encountered and their use of healthcare resources and at issues relating to the effectiveness of treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We directly interviewed 25 patients fulfilling the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition diagnostic criteria for HC selected among 1612 subjects attending the INI Grottaferrata Headache Clinic over a 3-year period. RESULTS: No patient had received a correct diagnosis before being seen at our headache clinic. In total, 85% of the patients consulted a physician within 5 months of the onset of the symptoms but mean time to diagnosis was 5 years (SD 4.9). The average number of physicians seen before the condition was properly diagnosed was 4.6 (SD 2.2). General practitioners (100%), neurologists (80%), ear, nose, and throat surgeons (44%), ophthalmologists (40%), and dentists (32%) were the physicians most commonly consulted. All the patients had previously received an incorrect diagnosis. Migraine (52%), CH (28%), sinus headache (20%), and dental pain (20%) were the most common wrong diagnoses reported. Some 36.0% of patients had undergone ineffective invasive treatments. The patients had tried, on average, 3.6 (SD 2.1) classes of drugs. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (92%), triptans (32%), antidepressants (32%), and antiepileptics (24%) were the most commonly used. Patients rated 73.7% of medications as ineffective, 22.5% (all NSAIDs) as partially effective, and 3.7% (rofecoxib and nimesulide) as effective. CONCLUSIONS: Hemicrania continua may be misdiagnosed and mistreated even by neurologists. There is a need for greater awareness and understanding of this condition.


Asunto(s)
Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Adulto , Femenino , Cefalea/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación y Consulta
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA