Role of targeted biopsy, perilesional biopsy, random biopsy, and their combination in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by mpMRI/transrectal ultrasonography fusion biopsy in confirmatory biopsy during active surveillance program.

BACKGROUND: Based on the findings of different trials in biopsy naïve patients, target biopsy (TB) plus random biopsy (RB) during mpMRI-guided transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy (FB) are often also adopted for the biopsy performed during active surveillance (AS) programs. At the moment, a clear consensus on the extent and modalities of the procedure is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the increase in diagnostic accuracy achieved by perilesional biopsy (PL) and different RB schemes during FB performed in AS protocol. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We collected prospectively the data of 112 consecutive patients with low- or very-low-risk prostate cancer; positive mpMRI underwent biopsy at a single academic institution in the context of an AS protocol. INTERVENTION(S): mpMRI/transrectal US FB with Hitachi RVS system with 3 TB and concurrent transrectal 24-core RB. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The diagnostic yield of the different possible biopsy schemes (TB only; TB + 4 perilesional (PL) cores; TB + 12-core RB; TB + 24-core RB) was compared by the McNemar test. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were adopted to identify predictors of any cancer, Gleason grade group (GGG) ≥2 cancers, and the presence of GGG≥2 cancers in the larger schemes only. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The detection rate of GGG ≥2 cancers increased to 30%, 39%, and 49% by adding 4 PL cores, 14, and 24 RB cores, respectively, to TB cores (all p values <0.01). On the whole, TB alone, 14-core RB, and 24-core-RB identified 38%, 47%, and 56% of all the GGG ≥2 cancers. Such figures increased to 62% by adding to TB 4 PL cores, and to 80% by adding 14 RB cores. Most of the differences were observed in PI-RADS 4 lesions. CONCLUSIONS: We found that PL biopsy increased the detection rate of GGG ≥2 cancers as compared with TB alone. However, the combination of those cores missed a large percentage of the CS cancers identified with larger RB cores, including a 20% of CS cancers diagnosed only by the combination of TB plus 24-core RB.

Bilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection vs. unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection and dynamic sentinel node biopsy in clinical N1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the role of unilateral inguinal lymph-node dissection (ILND) plus contralateral dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) vs. bilateral ILND in clinical N1 (cN1) penile squamous cell carcinoma (peSCC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within our institutional database (1980-2020, included), we identified 61 consecutive cT1-4 cN1 cM0 patients with histological confirmed peSCC who underwent either unilateral ILND plus DSNB (26) or bilateral ILND (35). RESULTS: Median age was 54 years (Interquartile range [IQR]: 48-60 years). Median follow-up was 68 months (IQR 21-105 months). Most patients had pT1 (23 %) or pT2 (54.1%), as well as G2 (47.5%) or G3 (23%) tumors, while lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was present in 67.1% of cases. Considering a cN1 and a cN0 groin, overall 57 out of 61 patients (93.5%) had nodal disease in the cN1 groin. Conversely, only 14 out of 61 patients (22.9%) had nodal disease in the cN0 groin. 5-year IR-free survival was 91% (Confidence interval [CI] 80%-100%) for bilateral ILND group and 88% (CI 73%-100%) for the ipsilateral ILND plus DSNB group (P-value 0.8). Conversely, 5-year CSS was 76% (CI 62%-92%) for bilateral ILND group and 78% (CI 63%-97%) for the ipsilateral ILND plus contralateral DSNB group (P-value 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cN1 peSCC the risk of occult contralateral nodal disease is comparable to cN0 high risk peSCC and the gold standard, namely bilateral ILND, may be replaced by unilateral ILND and contralateral DSNB without affecting positive node detection, IRRs and CSS.

Successful Multidisciplinary Repair of Severe Bilateral Uretero-Enteric Stricture with Inflammatory Reaction Extending to the Left Iliac Artery, after Robotic Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Neobladder.

Uretero-enteric anastomotic strictures (UES) after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) represent the main cause of post-operative renal dysfunction. The gold standard for treatment of UES is open uretero-ileal reimplantation (UIR), which is often a challenging and complex procedure associated with significant morbidity. We report a challenging case of long severe bilateral UES (5 cm on the left side, 3 cm on the right side) after RARC in a 55 years old male patient who was previously treated in another institution and who came to our attention with kidney dysfunction and bilateral ureteral stents from the previous two years. Difficult multiple ureteral stent placement and substitutions had been previously performed in another hospital, with resulting urinary leakage. An open surgical procedure via an anterior transperitoneal approach was performed at our hospital, which took 10 h to complete, given the massive intestinal and periureteral adhesions, which required very meticulous dissection. A vascular surgeon was called to repair an accidental rupture that had occurred during the dissection of the external left iliac artery, involved in the extensive periureteral inflammatory process. Excision of a segment of the external iliac artery was accomplished, and an interposition graft using a reversed saphenous vein was performed. Bilateral ureteroneocystostomy followed, which required, on the left side, the interposition of a Casati-Boari flap harvested from the neobladder, and on the right side a neobladder-psoas-hitching procedure with intramucosal direct ureteral reimplantation. The patient recovered well and is currently in good health, as determined at his recent 24-month follow-up visit. No signs of relapse of the strictures or other complications were detected. Bilateral ureteral reimplantation after robotic radical cystectomy is a complex procedure that should be restricted to high-volume centers, where multidisciplinary teams are available, including urologists, endourologists, and general and vascular surgeons.

Surgical treatment of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): Management and prognostic role of R1 resections.

BACKGROUND: Surgery represents the best treatment for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The aim of this study is to analyse outcomes of surgical management in order to evaluate the influence of microscopically R1 margins on survival and recurrence in patients affected by GISTs. METHODS: The study reviewed retrospective data from 74 patients surgically treated for primary GISTs without metastasis at diagnosis. Clinical and pathological findings, surgical procedures, information about follow up and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Recurrence rate was low and no patients died in the R1 group during the follow up period. The difference in recurrence free survival for patients undergoing an R0 (n = 54) versus an R1 (n = 20) resections was not statistically significant (76% versus 85% at 3 years, logrank test p-value = 0,14; 63% versus 86% at 5 years, logrank test p-value = 0,48) CONCLUSIONS: Microscopically positive margin has no influence on overall and relapse-free survival in GIST patients. Thus, when R0 surgery implies major functional sequelae, it may be decided to accept possible R1 margins, especially for low risk tumors.