Absolute oral bioavailability and possible metabolic pathway of panduratin A from Boesenbergia rotunda extract in beagle dogs.

CONTEXT: Attempts are ongoing to develop medications to fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. Our previous study revealed the in vitro anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of fingerroot [Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) Mansf. (Zingiberaceae)] and its phytochemical, panduratin A. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetic profiles of panduratin A as a pure compound and in a fingerroot extract formulation in beagle dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 healthy dogs were randomly divided into three groups, a single dose of 1 mg/kg panduratin A by intravenous and multiple doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg panduratin A fingerroot extract formulation by oral administration for seven consecutive days. The plasma concentration of panduratin A was determined by LCMS. RESULTS: The peak concentrations of a single dose of 5 and 10 mg/kg panduratin A fingerroot extract formulation were 12,416 ± 2,326 and 26,319 ± 8,221 µg/L, respectively. Increasing the oral dose of fingerroot extract formulation, equivalent to panduratin A 5-10 mg/kg, showed dose proportionality, with an approximately 2-fold increase in Cmax and AUC. The absolute oral bioavailability of panduratin A in the fingerroot extract formulation was approximately 7-9%. The majority of panduratin A was biotransformed into several products via oxidation and glucuronidation, and predominantly excreted via the faecal route. CONCLUSION: The oral formulation of fingerroot extract was safe in beagle dogs, and increasing dose showed dose proportionality in terms of the systemic exposure of panduratin A. This information will support the phytopharmaceutical product development of fingerroot extract against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Assessing developmental and transcriptional effects of PM2.5 on zebrafish embryos.

Investigating fine particulate matter (PM2.5) toxicity is crucial for health risk assessment and pollution control. This study explores the developmental toxicity of two PM2.5 sources: standard reference material 2786 (NIST, USA) and PM2.5 from Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute (CNMI, Thailand) located in the Bangkok Metropolitan area. Zebrafish embryos exposed to these samples exhibited embryonic mortality, with 50% lethal concentration (LC50) values of 1476 µg/mL for standard PM2.5 and 512 µg/mL for CNMI PM2.5. Morphological analysis revealed malformations, including pericardial and yolk sac edema, and blood clotting in both groups. Gene expression analysis highlighted source-specific effects. Standard PM2.5 downregulated sod1 and cat while upregulating gstp2. Inflammatory genes tnf-α and il-1b were upregulated, and nfkbi-αa was downregulated. Apoptosis-related genes bax, bcl-2, and casp3a were downregulated. CNMI PM2.5 consistently downregulated all examined genes. These findings underscore PM2.5 source variability's significance in biological system impact assessment, providing insights into pollutant-gene expression interactions. The study emphasizes the need for source-specific risk assessment and interventions to address PM2.5 exposure's health impacts effectively.

Oral sub-chronic toxicity of fingerroot (Boesenbergia rotunda) rhizome extract formulation in Wistar rats.

Background: Boesenbergia rotunda (fingerroot) rhizome extract contains two major bioactive components, panduratin A and pinostrobin. In our previous study, we found the anti-inflammatory effects of the fingerroot extract against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in golden Syrian hamsters. In the present study, we evaluated the sub-chronic toxicity of a fingerroot extract formulation over 90 consecutive days of oral administration. Methods: We enhanced the water solubility of a fingerroot extract by formulating it with cyclodextrin, containing panduratin A (29% w/w) and pinostrobin (32% w/w). This formulation was administered to male and female Wistar rats at doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg/day for a duration of 90 days. Additionally, two recovery groups, comprising a control group and a high-dose group, were designated for a 14-day observation period to assess the persistence and reversibility of potential adverse effects. Throughout the experiment, we performed clinical and health observations, followed by hematological testing, clinical biochemistry analysis, necropsy examination, and histopathological evaluation at the end of the experiment. Results: The administration of the fingerroot extract formulation at doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg/day did not result in mortality or clinical signs of toxicity. No clinically significant findings were associated with the oral administration of the fingerroot extract formulation. Conclusion: The fingerroot extract formulation showed no serious adverse effects at doses up to 100 mg/kg/day in Wistar rats under the experimental condition. Consequently, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 100 mg/kg/day. This finding contributes significance for future developments involving fingerroot extract in herbal medicinal products targeting chronic inflammation.

Drug-Herb Interactions among Thai Herbs and Anticancer Drugs: A Scoping Review.

More than half of Thai patients with cancer take herbal preparations while receiving anticancer therapy. There is no systematic or scoping review on interactions between anticancer drugs and Thai herbs, although several research articles have that Thai herbs inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) or efflux transporter. Therefore, we gathered and integrated information related to the interactions between anticancer drugs and Thai herbs. Fifty-two anticancer drugs from the 2020 Thailand National List of Essential Medicines and 75 herbs from the 2020 Thai Herbal Pharmacopoeia were selected to determine potential anticancer drug-herb interactions. The pharmacological profiles of the selected anticancer drugs were reviewed and matched with the herbal pharmacological activities to determine possible interactions. A large number of potential anticancer drug-herb interactions were found; the majority involved CYP inhibition. Efflux transporter inhibition and enzyme induction were also found, which could interfere with the pharmacokinetic profiles of anticancer drugs. However, there is limited knowledge on the pharmacodynamic interactions between anticancer drugs and Thai herbs. Therefore, further research is warranted. Information regarding interactions between anticancer drugs and Thai herbs should provide as a useful resource to healthcare professionals in daily practice. It could enable the prediction of possible anticancer drug-herb interactions and could be used to optimize cancer therapy outcomes.