[One Health: a perspective of the informal ministerial network : "What if the One Health approach became the guiding theme of cooperation at the national, European and global level?"] / One Health: Eine Sichtweise des informellen ministeriellen Netzwerkes : "Was wäre, wenn der One-Health-Ansatz zum Leitmotiv von Kooperation auf nationaler, europäischer und globaler Ebene würde?".

In the view of the German government, the One Health approach is a pioneering compass for inter- and transdisciplinary thinking, networking, and action. To protect the health of humans, animals, plants, and ecosystems, it should always receive attention at all its interfaces and activities. The One Health approach has gained political importance in recent years and is being taken into account in several strategies.This article reports on the current strategies using a One Health approach. These include the German Antibiotic Resistance Strategy, the German Strategy for Adaptation to Climate Change, the global initiative Nature for Health, and the international pandemic agreement, which is currently being drafted and in which prevention also plays an important role. The issues of biodiversity loss and climate protection must be placed in a common context that takes into account the interdependencies of the health status of humans, animals, plants, and ecosystems. By involving relevant disciplines at different levels as a matter of course, we can succeed in making a joint contribution to sustainable development, as required by the United Nations' Agenda 2030. This perspective guides Germany's global engagement in global health policy toward greater stability, freedom, diversity, solidarity, and respect for human rights. Thus, a holistic approach such as One Health can contribute to achieving sustainability and strengthening democratic principles.

[Generation of an FAQ page on Dealing with Multi-resistant Pathogens at the Interface of Veterinary and Human Medicine]. / Konzeption von Frequently Asked Questions zum Umgang mit multiresistenten Erregern an der Schnittstelle von Veterinär- und Humanmedizin.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this work were the systematic and evidence-based generation and answering of frequently asked questions (FAQ) regarding contact with multi-drug resistant pathogens (MDR) including aspects of veterinary and human medicine for the public health service (PHS) and the general population. METHODS: In order to determine the information needs of the population, guideline-based expert interviews with veterinarians and physicians were conducted in five surveys. In addition, information about the project was published in two journals and the participants were asked to submit open questions from their daily routine with respect to MDR. The results of the interviews and project calls were divided into categories, and frequently mentioned topics were prepared as FAQ. For answering the FAQ, a systematic literature search in the databases Pubmed and Wiley Online Library was conducted. A panel of experts subsequently evaluated the FAQ drafts, and a consensus was reached in case of conflicting results. Thereafter, the FAQs were evaluated by physicians and veterinarians of the PHS. RESULTS: Nine FAQs were generated in total. In addition to a survey of the current state of research, recommendations were made for private dealing with non-medical contact with MDR at the interface of human and veterinary medicine. The recommendations depended on the respective setting and the type of animal contact. Different recommendations were given for the handling of MDR in pets, farm animals, animals in communal facilities and animals used for animal-assisted therapies. The most important measure against the spread of MDR between humans and animals proved to be regular and careful handwashing. CONCLUSION: Mixed methods were used to ensure the quality of the FAQ. Limitations were found in the literature search. Not all submitted questions could be answered with the available literature. In the future, the FAQ should be continuously updated and extended.

[Shortage of physicians in rural areas and in the public health service : A critical analysis of the evidence on the role of medical education and training]. / Ärztemangel in der hausärztlichen Versorgung auf dem Lande und im Öffentlichen Gesundheitsdienst : Eine kritische Analyse der Evidenz bezüglich der Rolle von Aus- und Weiterbildung.

BACKGROUND: A shortage of medical personnel has been seen for several decades in at least two sectors of the healthcare system: primary care in remote areas as well as medical care in the state public health departments (Öffentliches Gesundheitswesen). Strategies to reduce these problems are being sought. OBJECTIVE: This review examines the proposals, practical initiatives and empirical studies in under- and postgraduate medical education in order to estimate their potential impact on the solution of these problems. The analysis covers both Germany and Anglo-Saxon countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is based on a literature search in PubMed and Medline covering the last 20 years. With regard to Germany, programmatic documents and studies published in the German Journal of General Practice (Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin) were also included. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Foreign empirical studies identify almost equal two factors with regard to primary care in remote areas: the recruitment of students from rural areas combined with special educational programs with a rural primary care orientation both in under- and postgraduate medical education. These programs should include several and longer practical working periods in primary care units and be well coordinated between the medical school and the local teaching physicians. As for the state public health sector, comparable initiatives are still lacking.

[Public Health Practice - Results of the Working Group 12 of the Forum Future Public Health, Berlin 2016]. / Praxis von Public Health.

This report focuses on the topic of Public Health in practice. The article summarizes the discussion of the Working Group 12. A first diagram shows how broad the definition of "Public Health practice" can be. Challenges as well as visions were articulated. In order to ensure individual and diverse health promotion for all, public health must be integrated as a central vision for the future in the daily routine and in the various living environments of the people as part of social life. To achieve this goal, public health actors in general and the public health service in particular must work closely with policy makers, cost-bearers, science and teaching and complement each other's work, while respecting their spheres of action. A precondition is adequate financial and human resources. Public health therefore deals with the design of living environments as well as with political structures and strategies.