Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078373

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Radiotherapy in cancer patients with a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter defibrillator might damage the device and possibly result in malfunction of the device. We aimed to examine device malfunction and change in lead parameters in this group. METHODS: The medical records of pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients who underwent radiotherapy at Aalborg University Hospital between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2021, were reviewed. Treatment was planned according to risk of device malfunction, assessed using local guidelines. Bootstrap linear regression was used to identify possible differences in lead parameters depending on beam energy and anatomical location. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients with a pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator who received a total of 122 radiotherapy courses in the study period were identified. No device malfunctions or significant changes in lead parameters during radiotherapy were observed. Only the left ventricle lead threshold and impedance were found to be significantly different when compared by beam energy; however, these changes were relatively small and unlikely to be of clinical relevance. CONCLUSION: No device malfunction or clinically relevant changes in lead parameters were identified in this study, suggesting that radiotherapy of pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients can be regarded as safe when following relevant safety precautions.

2.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 46(2): 108-113, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36333921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation and flutter are often treated with external electrical cardioversion (ECV) in patients with potentially electrically sensitive cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED). Long-term follow-up data on contemporary CIED undergoing ECV is sparse. The aim is to investigate shock-related complications and impact on CIEDs. METHODS: All ECV procedures from 2010 to 2020 in patients with CIED performed at a tertiary university hospital were identified in the Danish National Patient Registry. Changes in device measurements after ECV were retrospectively studied and procedure-related complications were identified by review of medical records. RESULTS: We analyzed 763 ECV procedures in 372 patients, median device implant time 1.9 years. The mean age of patients was 69.9 ± 9.9 years of which 73.4% were men. We identified two cases of device programming changes and four cases of premature battery depletion (≤3 years after device implant). Minor changes in device measurements were found for impedances, sensing, and pacing thresholds. No patients died due to ECV-related device dysfunctions within the first 12 months after cardioversions. CONCLUSION: External cardioversion in patients with contemporary pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators seems safe in the majority of patients. Clinically important changes in device function following cardioversion were rarely observed but may be critical for device function. In an observational study, causality between cardioversion and device dysfunction cannot be established. For patient safety, we suggest that routine device interrogation after cardioversion still should be part of standard care.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Desfibriladores Implantables , Marcapaso Artificial , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Eur Heart J ; 43(47): 4946-4956, 2022 12 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36263789

RESUMEN

AIMS: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is a severe complication to modern management of cardiac arrhythmias. The CIED type and the type of surgery are recognized as risk factors for CIED infections, but knowledge of patient-related risk factors is scarce. This study aimed to identify lifelong patient-related risk factors for CIED infections. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive Danish patients undergoing a CIED implantation or reoperation between January 1996 and April 2018 were included. The cohort consisted of 84 429 patients undergoing 108 494 CIED surgeries with a combined follow-up of 458 257 CIED-years. A total of 1556 CIED explantations were classified as either pocket (n = 1022) or systemic CIED infection (n = 534). Data were cross-linked with records from the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Using multiple-record and multiple-event per subject proportional hazard analysis, specific patient-related risk factors were identified but with several variations amongst the subtypes of CIED infection. CIED reoperations were associated with the highest risk of pocket CIED infection but also CIED type, young age, and prior valvular surgery [hazard ratio (HR): 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-2.04]. Severe renal insufficiency/dialysis (HR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.65-3.49), dermatitis (HR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.92-4.05), and prior valvular surgery (HR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.59-2.75) were associated with the highest risk of systemic CIED infections. Congestive heart failure, ischaemic heart disease, malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and temporary pacing were not significant at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Specific comorbidities and surgical procedures were associated with a higher risk of CIED infections but with variations amongst pocket and systemic CIED infection. Pocket CIED infections were associated with CIED reoperations, young age and more complex type of CIED, whereas systemic CIED infections were associated with risk factors predisposing to bacteraemia.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Marcapaso Artificial , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , Electrónica , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Electrocardiol ; 63: 153-158, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31668456

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The overall risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with pacemaker (PM) in comparison to control cohort is unknown. PURPOSE: To investigate the risk of AF after implantation of a PM in an AF-naive population in comparison to an age- and sex-matched PM- and AF-free population cohort. METHODS: All patients with a dual chamber PM (DDD) implanted between 2000 and 2014 without a known history of AF were included (n = 17,428). To compare, a general population cohort without pacemaker and a cohort with loop recorder was identified. Outcome was the cumulative incidence of AF within the first 2 years from 3-months after device implantation. RESULTS: At the end of first 3-months after device implantation, 16,383 patients were free of AF and were included in the current study. In comparison to controls (n = 86,167), patients with PM had higher cumulative incidence of AF (5.2% vs 2.7%, P < 0.001)). Due to interaction with age, patients were divided into three age-groups) and the relative risk for the diagnosis of AF were: < 70 years (HR 4.46, 95% CI 3.65-5.44); 70-79 years (HR 2.60, 95% CI 2.27-2.98); and ≥ 80 years (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.15-1.45). For comparison between PM and loop-recorder cohort (1:1 matching), 2202 patients were available in both groups. The incidence of AF within the first 2-years in the both groups was 7.9% vs. 8.4% (loop vs pacemaker). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PM have an increased risk of being diagnosed with AF in comparison to general cohort likely due to continuous monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Marcapaso Artificial , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Electrocardiografía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Sistema de Registros
5.
Eur Heart J ; 40(23): 1862-1869, 2019 06 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31155647

RESUMEN

AIMS: Device-related infection (DRI) is a severe complication to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) therapy. Device-related infection incidence and its risk factors differ between previous studies. We aimed to define the long-term incidence and incidence rates of DRI for different types of CIEDs in the complete Danish device-cohort and identify patient-, operation- and device-related risk factors for DRI. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Danish Pacemaker (PM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) Register, we included consecutive Danish patients undergoing CIED implantation or reoperation from January 1982 to April 2018, resulting in 97 750 patients, 128 045 operations and follow-up of in total 566 275 device years (DY). We identified 1827 DRI causing device removals. Device-related infection incidence during device lifetime was 1.19% (1.12-1.26) for PM, 1.91% (1.71-2.13) for ICD, 2.18% (1.78-2.64) for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-pacemakers (CRT-P), and 3.35% (2.92-3.83) for CRT-defibrillators (CRT-D). Incidence rates in de novo implantations were 2.04/1000 DY for PM, 3.84 for ICD, 4.38 for CRT-P, and 6.76 for CRT-D. Using multiple-record and multiple-event per subject proportional hazard analysis, we identified implantation of complex devices (ICD and CRT), reoperations, prior DRI, male sex, and younger age as significantly associated with higher DRI risk. CONCLUSION: Overall risk of infection was low in PM implantations but considerably higher in CRT systems and after reinterventions. These data support the importance of evaluating all patients considered for CIED therapy thoroughly, in order to identify potential modifiable risk factors and reduce the risk of early reoperations.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Remoción de Dispositivos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
6.
Europace ; 21(7): 1096-1105, 2019 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31505593

RESUMEN

AIMS: A sub-analysis of the ESC-EHRA European Lead Extraction ConTRolled (ELECTRa) Registry to evaluate the clinical impact of antithrombotic (AT) on transvenous lead extraction (TLE) safety and efficacy. METHODS AND RESULTS: ELECTRa outcomes were compared between patients without AT therapy (No AT Group) and with different pre-operative AT regimens, including antiplatelets (AP), anticoagulants (AC), or both (AP + AC). Out of 3510 pts, 2398 (68%) were under AT pre-operatively. AT patients were older with more comorbidities (P < 0.0001). AT subgroups, defined as AP, AC, or AP + AC, were 1096 (31.2%), 985 (28%), and 317 (9%), respectively. Regarding AP patients, 1413 (40%) were under AP, 1292 (91%) with a single AP, interrupted in 26% about 3.8 ± 3.7 days before TLE. In total, 1302 (37%) patients were under AC, 881 vitamin K antagonist (68%), 221 (17%) direct oral anticoagulants, 155 (12%) low weight molecular heparin, and 45 (3.5%) unfractionated heparin. AC was 'interrupted without bridging' in 696 (54%) and 'interrupted with bridging' in 504 (39%) about 3.3 ± 2.3 days before TLE, and 'continued' in 87 (7%). TLE success rate was high in all subgroups. Only overall in-hospital death (1.4%), but not the procedure-related one, was higher in the AT subgroups (P = 0.0500). Age >65 years and New York Heart Association Class III/IV, but not AT regimens, were independent predictors of death for any cause. Haematomas were more frequent in AT subgroups, especially in AC 'continued' (P = 0.025), whereas pulmonary embolism in the No-AT (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: AT minimization is safe in patients undergoing TLE. AT does not seem to predict death but identifies a subset of fragile patients with a worse in-hospital TLE outcome.


Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Electrodos Implantados , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Marcapaso Artificial , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Falla de Equipo , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound ; 17(1): 19, 2019 Oct 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31601248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nearly one-third of heart failure (HF) patients do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) despite having left bundle branch block (LBBB). The aim of the study was to investigate a novel method of quantifying left ventricular (LV) contractile asymmetry in HF. METHODS: Patients with HF and LBBB undergoing CRT (n = 89, 37.1% females, 68 ± 9 years, ischemic etiology in 61%, LV ejection fraction 27.1 ± 7.1%) were analyzed. LV longitudinal systolic strain rate values were extracted from curved anatomical M-mode plots of standard long-axis 2D-echocardiography images and cubic spline interpolation was used to generate a 3D-phantom. Index of contractile asymmetry (ICA) was calculated based on standard deviation of differences in strain rate of opposing walls. Average ICA was individually assessed pairwise in 12 opposing 30-degree LV sectors. Reduction in LV end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥15% after 6 months was considered as positive response to CRT. RESULTS: CRT response was found in 66 (74.2%) patients. Responders with both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy had a higher and more extensive contractile asymmetry at baseline and achieved a greater ICA reduction after CRT than non-responders. Higher baseline ICA predicted higher degree and wider extent of ICA improvement. Also, both ICA at baseline and reduction of ICA correlated with the degree of ESV reduction after CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of asymmetrical LV activation in 3D by ICA provides valuable insights into LV contraction in case of LBBB and is a promising tool for improved patient selection for CRT.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo de Rama/terapia , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Ecocardiografía Tridimensional/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Contracción Miocárdica/fisiología , Selección de Paciente , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Anciano , Bloqueo de Rama/fisiopatología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología
8.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound ; 17(1): 10, 2019 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The association of a Classical left bundle branch block (LBBB) contraction pattern and better outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has only been studied using vendor-specific software for echocardiographic speckle-tracked longitudinal strain analysis. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a Classical LBBB contraction pattern on longitudinal strain analysis using vendor-independent software is associated with clinical outcome in CRT recipients with LBBB. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including CRT recipients with LBBB, heart failure, and left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35%. Speckle-tracked echocardiographic longitudinal strain analysis was performed retrospectively on echocardiograms using vendor-independent software. The presence of a Classical LBBB contraction pattern was determined by consensus of two readers. The primary end point was a composite of time to death, heart transplantation or LV assist device implantation. Secondary outcome was ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume. Intra- and inter-reader agreement of the longitudinal strain contraction pattern was assessed by calculating Cohen's κ. RESULTS: Of 283 included patients, 113 (40%) were women, mean age was 66 ± 11 years, and 136 (48%) had ischemic heart disease. A Classical LBBB contraction pattern was present in 196 (69%). The unadjusted hazard ratio for reaching the primary end point was 1.93 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-2.76, p < 0.001) when comparing patients without to patients with a Classical LBBB contraction pattern. Adjusted for ischemic heart disease and QRS duration < 150 milliseconds the hazard ratio was 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.43, p = 0.01). Of the 123 (43%) patients with a follow-up echocardiogram, 64 of 85 (75%) of patients with a Classical LBBB contraction pattern compared to 13 of 38 (34%) without, had ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume (p < 0.001). Cohen's κ were 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.00) and 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.54) for intra- and inter-reader agreement, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using vendor-independent strain software, a Classical LBBB contraction pattern is associated with better outcome in CRT recipients with LBBB, but inter-reader agreement for the classification of contraction pattern is only moderate.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo de Rama/fisiopatología , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Comercio , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Contracción Miocárdica/fisiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Bloqueo de Rama/diagnóstico , Bloqueo de Rama/terapia , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programas Informáticos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología
9.
Am Heart J ; 179: 136-41, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27595688

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure (HF) caused by coronary artery disease is well documented. However, the effect of primary prophylactic ICDs in patients with systolic HF not due to coronary artery disease is much weaker. In addition, HF management has improved, since the landmark ICD trials and a large proportion of patients now receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) where the effect of ICD treatment is unknown. METHODS: In the DANISH study, 1,116 patients with symptomatic systolic HF not caused by coronary artery disease have been randomized to receive an ICD or not, in addition to contemporary standard therapy. The primary outcome of the trial is time to all-cause death. Follow-up will continue until June 2016 with a median follow-up period of 5 years. Baseline characteristics show that enrolled patients are treated according to current guidelines. At baseline, 97% of patients received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, 92% received a ß-blocker, 58% a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and 58% were scheduled to receive CRT. Median age was 63 years (range, 21-84 years) at baseline, and 28% were women. CONCLUSION: DANISH will provide pertinent information about the effect on all-cause mortality of a primary prophylactic ICD in patients with symptomatic systolic HF not caused by coronary artery disease on contemporary standard therapy including CRT.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/terapia , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
10.
Europace ; 18(4): 479-91, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26041870

RESUMEN

An increasing number of patients with implantable cardiac rhythm devices undergo radiotherapy (RT) for cancer and are thereby exposed to the risk of device failure. Current safety recommendations seem to have limitations by not accounting for the risk of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators malfunctioning at low radiation doses. Besides scant knowledge about optimal safety measures, only little is known about the exact prevalence of patients with devices undergoing RT. In this review, we provide a short overview of the principles of RT and present the current evidence on the predictors and mechanisms of device malfunctions during RT. We also summarize practical recommendations from recent publications and from the industry. Strongly associated with beam energy of photon RT, device malfunctions occur at ∼3% of RT courses, posing a substantial issue in clinical practice. Malfunctions described in the literature typically consist of transient software disturbances and only seldom manifest as a permanent damage of the device. Through close cooperation between cardiologists and oncologists, a tailored individualized approach might be necessary in this patient group in waiting time for updated international guidelines in the field.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Marcapaso Artificial , Falla de Prótesis , Radioterapia/efectos adversos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/normas , Desfibriladores Implantables/normas , Cardioversión Eléctrica/normas , Seguridad de Equipos , Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial/normas , Seguridad del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Diseño de Prótesis , Radioterapia/normas , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 38(3): 343-56, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25601489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) may develop malfunction during external beam radiotherapy (RT). We aimed to describe clinical practice in PM/ICD patients undergoing RT and to assess the rate and predictors of device malfunctions. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of all PM/ICD patients undergoing RT at four centers in Western Denmark during 2003-2012. Logistic regression was applied to identify predictors of PM/ICD malfunctions. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty patients were included. The annual rate of RT courses in PM/ICD patients increased by 199% from 1.45 treatments per 100,000 person-years in 2003 to 4.33 in 2012. Safety measures included supplementary evaluations of PM/ICD (38.3%), reprogramming (1.5%), relocation of the device (3.5%), and application of a magnet to the ICD during RT (10.8%). At device evaluations after the RT (n = 453), malfunctions were detected in 10 (2.5%) PMs and four (6.8%) ICDs. Electrical resets constituted 11 (78.6%) of the malfunctions, and no failures were life-threatening or warranted PM/ICD removal. Factors associated with device malfunctions in logistic regression analysis were beam energy ≥15 MV (odds ratio [OR] 5.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-20.76) and location of tumor below the diaphragm (OR 4.31; 95% CI, 1.42-13.12). However, the effect of tumor location declined (OR 2.27; 95% CI, 0.65-7.95) after adjustment for beam energy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of RT in PM/ICD patients is increasing, the damaging effects of RT on the devices seem to be usually transient. Our data suggest that high beam energy plays the pivotal role in inducing impairments in these devices.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo
12.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 25(5): 485-490, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24329999

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Phrenic nerve stimulation is a major obstacle in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Activation characteristics of the heart and phrenic nerve are different with higher chronaxie for the heart. Therefore, longer pulse durations could be beneficial in preventing phrenic nerve stimulation during CRT due to a decreased threshold for the heart compared with the phrenic nerve. We investigated if long pulse durations decreased left ventricular (LV) thresholds relatively to phrenic nerve thresholds in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eleven patients, with indication for CRT and phrenic nerve stimulation at the intended pacing site, underwent determination of thresholds for the heart and phrenic nerve at different pulse durations (0.3-2.9 milliseconds). The resulting strength duration curves were analyzed by determining chronaxie and rheobase. Comparisons for those parameters were made between the heart and phrenic nerve, and between the models of Weiss and Lapicque as well. In 9 of 11 cases, the thresholds decreased faster for the LV than for the phrenic nerve with increasing pulse duration. In 3 cases, the thresholds changed from unfavorable for LV stimulation to more than a factor 2 in favor of the LV. The greatest change occurred for pulse durations up to 1.5 milliseconds. The chronaxie of the heart was significantly higher than the chronaxie of the phrenic nerve (0.47 milliseconds vs. 0.22 milliseconds [P = 0.029, Lapicque] and 0.79 milliseconds vs. 0.27 milliseconds [P = 0.033, Weiss]). CONCLUSION: Long pulse durations lead to a decreased threshold of the heart relatively to the phrenic nerve and may prevent stimulation of the phrenic nerve in a clinical setting.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Nervio Frénico/fisiopatología , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Estimulación Eléctrica , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Europace ; 16(4): 612-6, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23933852

RESUMEN

AIMS: Radiotherapy (RT) for malignancies can harm pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). There is some evidence that, besides cumulative dose, the damaging radiation effects increase with beam energy. The aim of this study was to determine whether modern PMs and ICDs are more sensitive to high-energy than to low-energy photon beams. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two groups of unused PMs and explanted ICDs (five PMs and one ICD in each) were subjected to irradiations in a phantom with 6 and 18 megavolt (MV) photons, respectively. The devices were exposed to radiation at doses of 2 gray (Gy) daily to simulate two clinical scenarios with the PM/ICD in the RT field. A cumulative dose of 150 Gy was given to each device, corresponding to approximately twice the therapeutic dose. In the 6 MV group, one episode of PM malfunction was detected after reaching 150 Gy. In the 18 MV group, a total of 14 episodes of malfunction were detected starting at 30 Gy in all five PMs. No episodes appeared in the ICD, at the respective treatment groups. This corresponded to a hazard ratio of 9.11 [∼95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-79.69] by Cox regression analysis between the two groups. In a repeated measures logistic regression model comparing the incidence rate of malfunctions, the odds ratio was 18.29 (∼95% CI: 1.52-219.41). CONCLUSION: Photon beam energy plays a considerable role in inducing implantable cardiac device malfunctions. Low-energy RT may be safer in PM/ICD patients despite relatively high radiation dose to the device.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Falla de Equipo , Marcapaso Artificial , Radioterapia de Alta Energía/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Modelos Logísticos , Ensayo de Materiales , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Fotones/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
14.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 24(11): 1255-8, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23869746

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patients treated with a temporary pacemaker (TPM) due to atrioventricular (AV) block are often monitored after discontinuation of AV node blocking drugs to evaluate the indication for permanent pacing. However, the impact of drug discontinuation is sparsely documented. We investigated to what extent drug discontinuation abolished the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: All hospital records of patients who received a TPM at Aalborg Hospital, Denmark, between January 2000 and March 2011 (n = 575) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with AV block who were treated with a TPM and concomitant cessation of drug therapy were included if there was no other underlying mechanism causing the AV block. AV blocking drugs included antiarrhythmic agents classes II-IV and digoxin. Fifty-five patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Forty-seven patients had an indication for a PPM at the initial hospital admission, despite drug discontinuation. Of the remaining 8 patients who were discharged without a PPM, 3 subsequently experienced events: 2 had recurrence of AV block requiring a PPM, and 1 experienced syncope. Thus, in total, 49 (89%) patients had a final indication for a permanent pacemaker (PPM). Of patients receiving beta-blocker monotherapy, 26 (96%) had an indication for a PPM. TPM implantation was complicated by infection or displacement in 11% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of patients treated with a TPM due to AV block and who receive beta-blockers alone or in combination with digoxin have a final indication for a PPM despite cessation of drug treatment. TPM are frequently associated with complications.


Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/terapia , Nodo Atrioventricular/efectos de los fármacos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Marcapaso Artificial , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/diagnóstico , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/fisiopatología , Nodo Atrioventricular/fisiopatología , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Dinamarca , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente , Alta del Paciente , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
J Clin Med ; 11(23)2022 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36498801

RESUMEN

Prospective studies applying fluoroscopy for assessment of right ventricular (RV) lead position have failed to show clear benefits from RV septal pacing. We investigated the impact of different RV lead positions verified by computed tomography (CT) on the risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). We retrospectively included 153 patients who underwent routine fluoroscopy-guided pacemaker implantation between March 2012 and May 2020. All patients had normal pre-implant left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients attended a follow-up visit including contrast-enhanced cardiac CT and transthoracic echocardiography. Patients were classified as septal or non-septal based on CT analysis. The primary endpoint was PICM (LVEF < 50% with ≥10% decrease after implantation). Based on CT, 48 (31.4%) leads were septal and 105 (68.6%) were non-septal. Over a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 16 patients (33.3%) in the septal group developed PICM compared to 31 (29.5%) in the non-septal group (p = 0.6). Overall, 13.1% deteriorated to LVEF ≤ 40%, 5.9% were upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy device, and 14.4% developed new-onset atrial fibrillation, with no significant differences between the groups. This study demonstrated a high risk of PICM despite normal pre-implant left ventricular systolic function with no significant difference between CT-verified RV septal or non-septal lead position.

16.
Heart Rhythm ; 19(6): 901-908, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35124230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Device-related infection (DRI) is a severe complication of treatment with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Identification of the causative pathogen is essential for optimal treatment, but conventional methods often are inadequate. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to improve microbiological diagnosis in DRI using sonication and next-generation sequencing analysis. The primary objective was identification of causative pathogens. The secondary objective was estimation of the sensitivity of different microbiological methods in detecting the causative pathogen. METHODS: Consecutive patients with clinical signs of DRI between October 2016 and January 2019 from 3 tertiary centers in Denmark were included in the study. Patients underwent a diagnostic approach, including blood cultures and perioperative collection of microbiological samples (pocket swab, pocket tissue biopsies, generator, and leads). Conventional culturing was performed, and device components were sonicated and examined with an amplicon-based metagenomic analysis using next-generation sequencing. The results were compared with a reference standard-identified causative pathogen. RESULTS: In 110 patients with clinical signs of pocket (n = 50) or systemic DRI (n = 60), we collected 109 pocket swabs, 220 pocket tissue biopsies, 106 generators, 235 leads, and a minimum 1 set of blood cultures from 102 patients. Combining all findings, we identified the causative pathogen in 95% of cases, irrespective of DRI type. The usability of each microbiological method differed between DRI types. In pocket DRI, next-generation sequencing analysis of generators achieved sensitivity of 90%. For systemic DRI, blood cultures reached sensitivity of 93%. CONCLUSION: Using a strategy including sonication and next-generation sequencing, we identified the causative pathogen in 95% of DRI. Sensitivity of microbiological methods differed according to the type of DRI.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardiopatías , Marcapaso Artificial , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Desfibriladores Implantables/microbiología , Electrónica , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Marcapaso Artificial/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Sonicación/métodos
17.
ESC Heart Fail ; 9(2): 1287-1293, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35106935

RESUMEN

AIMS: Prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) reduce mortality in patients with ischaemic heart failure (HF), whereas the effect of ICD in patients with non-ischaemic HF is less clear. We aimed to investigate the association between concomitant coronary atherosclerosis and mortality in patients with non-ischaemic HF and the effect of ICD implantation in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were included from DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients with Non-Ischaemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality), randomizing patients to ICD or control. Study inclusion criteria for HF were left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% and increased levels (>200 pg/mL) of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Of the 1116 patients from DANISH, 838 (75%) patients had available data from coronary angiogram and were included in this subgroup analysis. We used Cox regression to assess the relationship between coronary atherosclerosis and mortality and the effect of ICD implantation. Of the included patients, 266 (32%) had coronary atherosclerosis. Of these, 216 (81%) had atherosclerosis without significant stenoses, and 50 (19%) had significant stenosis. Patients with atherosclerosis were significantly older {67 [interquartile range (IQR) 61-73] vs. 61 [IQR 54-68] years; P < 0.0001}, and more were men (77% vs. 70%; P = 0.03). During a median follow-up of 64.3 months (IQR 47-82), 174 (21%) of the patients died. The effect of ICD on all-cause mortality was not modified by coronary atherosclerosis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.94; 0.58-1.52; P = 0.79 vs. HR 0.82; 0.56-1.20; P = 0.30], P for interaction = 0.67. In univariable analysis, coronary atherosclerosis was a significant predictor of all-cause mortality [HR, 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04-1.91; P = 0.03]. However, this association disappeared when adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors (age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and estimated glomerular filtration rate) (HR 1.05, 0.76-1.45, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure, ICD implantation did not reduce all-cause mortality in patients either with or without concomitant coronary atherosclerosis. The concomitant presence of coronary atherosclerosis was associated with increased mortality. However, this association was explained by other risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda
18.
J Geriatr Cardiol ; 18(11): 897-907, 2021 Nov 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34908927

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate complications within 30-days following first-time ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), including a composite of cardiac tamponade, hematoma requiring intervention, stroke or death, in patients ≥ 75 years of age, compared to patients aged 65-74 years. In addition, one-year all-cause mortality and AF relapse were compared. METHODS & RESULTS: All patients receiving their first catheter ablation for AF between 2012 and 2016 were identified using Danish nationwide registries. Patients aged 65-74 years served as the reference group for patients ≥ 75 years. Relapse of AF within one year was defined as cardioversion following a three-month blanking period, re-ablation or confirmed relapse within follow-up. The composite complication outcome did not differ between the two age groups, with 39/1554 (2.8%) in patients 65-74 years of age, versus 5/199 (2.5%) in older patients (adjusted HR = 0.94), 95% CI: 0.37-2.39, P = 0.896). Patients ≥ 75 years or older had no increased hazard of death within 30 days after the procedure, with an incidence of 3/1554 (0.2%) in younger patients and 2/199 (1.0%) in patients ≥ 75 years of age (adjusted HR = 4.71, 95% CI: 0.78-28.40, P = 0.091). There was no difference in relapse of AF after one year between age groups (≥ 75 years adjusted HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.78-1.26, P = 0.969). CONCLUSION: In patients ≥ 75 years of age selected for catheter ablation for AF, the incidence of periprocedural complications, as well as one-year freedom from AF showed no statistical difference, when compared to patients 65-74 years of age.

19.
Europace ; 12(7): 941-6, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20356911

RESUMEN

AIMS: Marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) may have antiarrhythmic effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of intravenously administered n-3 PUFA on the inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study, patients with an ICD underwent two electrophysiological studies using the stimulation possibilities in the ICD preceded by intravenous infusion of either a lipid emulsion delivering 3.9 g n-3 PUFA or placebo (0.9% saline). The level of stimulation required to induce sustained monomorphic VT was ranked in order from least to most aggressive, and non-inducibility was ranked highest. The content of n-3 PUFA in plasma free fatty acids (FFA), plasma phospholipids, and platelet phospholipids was measured by gas chromatography. Eight patients were included, and six of these completed the study. The content of n-3 PUFA as FFA and in platelet phospholipids increased more after n-3 PUFA infusion than after placebo (P<0.001). Of the five patients who were inducible after placebo, two were no longer inducible after n-3 PUFA infusion and another two required stronger stimulation to induce VT. The difference in the stimulation required after placebo and after n-3 PUFA was borderline significant (P=0.063, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). CONCLUSION: Intravenous n-3 PUFA tended to decrease VT inducibility, but a larger study is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Cardiotónicos/administración & dosificación , Desfibriladores Implantables , Ácidos Grasos Omega-3/administración & dosificación , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Cruzados , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Efecto Placebo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Heart Rhythm ; 16(2): 213-219, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30170227

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that vectorcardiographic measures predict left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling and clinical outcome in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to compare predictive abilities of different vectorcardiographic measures (QRS area and sum absolute QRS-T integral) and transformation methods (Kors and inverse Dower) and to assess the independent association between the best predictor and outcomes in CRT recipients. METHODS: This retrospective study included CRT recipients with a digital baseline electrocardiogram, QRS duration ≥120 ms, and ejection fraction ≤35%. The end point was a composite of heart transplantation, LV assist device implantation, or all-cause death. Analyses were performed for the overall cohort and for a prespecified subgroup of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). RESULTS: Of 705 included patients with a mean age of 66.6 ± 11.5 years, 492 (70%) were men, 374 (53%) had ischemic heart disease, and 465 (66%) had LBBB. QRS area from vectorcardiograms derived via the Kors transformation demonstrated the best predictive value. In multivariable Cox regression, patients with a smaller QRS area (≤ 95 µVs) had an increased hazard in the overall cohort (adjusted hazard ratio 1.65; 95% CI 1.25-2.18 P < .001) and in the LBBB subgroup (adjusted hazard ratio 1.95; 95% CI 1.38-2.76 P < .001). QRS area was associated with outcome in patients with QRS duration <150 ms (unadjusted hazard ratio 3.85; 95% CI 2.02-7.37 P < .001) and in patients with QRS duration ≥150 ms (unadjusted hazard ratio 1.76; 95% CI 1.32-2.34 P < .001). CONCLUSION: Vectorcardiographic QRS area is associated with survival free from heart transplantation and LV assist device implantation in CRT recipients.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo de Rama/fisiopatología , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Vectorcardiografía/métodos , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Remodelación Ventricular , Anciano , Bloqueo de Rama/diagnóstico , Bloqueo de Rama/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA