Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Endoscopy ; 55(1): 36-41, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35584782

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Under-reporting of clinical trial results can lead to negative consequences that include inhibiting propagation of knowledge, limiting the understanding of how devices work, affecting conclusions of meta-analyses, and failing to acknowledge patient participation. Therefore clinical trial transparency, through publication of trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov or in manuscript form, is important. We aimed to examine clinical trial transparency in endoscopic clinical trials. METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for endoscopy trials up to October 2019. Adherence to the reporting of results to the database or in publication form was recorded for each trial. RESULTS: The final analysis included 923 trials, of which 801 were completed and 122 were either terminated or suspended. Results were available either on ClinicalTrials.gov or in publication for 751/923 trials (81.4 %). Other fields have reported a publication rate of 40 %-63 %. Results were available on ClinicalTrials.gov for 168 trials (18.2 %) and in the form of a publication for 720 trails (78.0 %). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with other fields in medicine, endoscopy clinical trials have a high rate of clinical trial transparency. However, there is room for improvements as close to one-fifth of trials fail to report results and 81.8 % do not report results to ClinicalTrials.gov.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Bases de Datos Factuales
2.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 117(1): 180-183, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534127

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is limited information on the transparency of gastroenterology clinical trials. METHODS: The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for trials focused on most common gastrointestinal diseases up to August 2018. Adherence to reporting of results to the database or in publication form was recorded for each trial along with trial characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 2,429 trials included in the final analysis, 1824 (75%, 95% confidence interval: 73.4%-76.8%) had results on ClinicalTrials.gov or in the form of a publication. However, only 534 (29%) had results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. DISCUSSION: Improvement of clinical trial transparency is needed in gastroenterology.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/organización & administración , Gastroenterología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/terapia , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA