Iltamiocel Autologous Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Stratified, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

AIMS: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of iltamiocel investigational autologous muscle cell therapy in females with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: Adult females were randomized 2:1 to iltamiocel (150 × 106 cells) or placebo and stratified by severity and prior SUI surgery. The primary objective was efficacy based on the frequency of stress incontinence episodes (SIE) recorded in a 3-day diary at 12 months posttreatment. After 12 months, placebo participants could elect to receive open-label iltamiocel. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed using all patients as treated populations. RESULTS: The study enrolled 311 patients, 297 were randomized to either iltamiocel (n = 199) or placebo (n = 98). Of the 295 participants that completed 12 months blinded follow-up, the proportion achieving the primary endpoint of ≥ 50% SIE reduction was not statistically different between treatment groups (52% vs. 53.6%; p = 0.798). A significantly greater proportion of iltamiocel participants in the prior SUI surgery stratum group achieved ≥ 75% SIE reduction compared with placebo, (40% vs. 16%; p = 0.037). Treatment response was maintained at 24 months in 78.4% and 64.9% of iltamiocel participants who achieved ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% SIE reduction, respectively, at Month 12. Adverse events related to the treatment were reported in 19 (9.5%) iltamiocel participants and 6 (6.1%) placebo participants. CONCLUSION: The study did not meet its primary endpoint however, iltamiocel cell therapy is safe and may be ideally suited to female patients who have undergone prior surgery for SUI. Additional study in this group of patients with high unmet medical needs is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01893138; EudraCT number: 2014-002919-41.

Transvaginal Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Anterior and Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective comparative cohort study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh compared to native tissue repair (NTR) in the surgical correction of anterior and apical compartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP) over a 36-month follow-up period. METHODS: Prospective comparative cohort study to prove superiority for efficacy and non-inferiority for serious adverse events (SAEs). The setting was 49 sites across the United States, Canada, Europe, and Australia. Women with bothersome POP symptoms indicated for vaginal surgery with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) scores of Ba ≥0 and C ≥ -1/2 total vaginal length were included. Interventions included vaginal NTR or single-incision transvaginal mesh based on shared decision-making. POP recurrence, the primary efficacy endpoint, was defined as anatomical prolapse beyond the hymenal ring, subjective perception of protrusion or bulge, or retreatment in the target compartment. The primary safety endpoint consisted of the proportion of device and/or procedure-related SAEs in the target compartment. Secondary endpoints included surgical parameters, quality of life, postoperative pain, and sexual function. RESULTS: POP recurrence rate at 12 months was 13.1% in the Mesh-arm and 11.5% in the NTR-arm (P = 0.44). The primary safety endpoint was met, with the Mesh-arm demonstrating statistically non-inferior outcomes compared to the NTR-arm in the incidence of device and/or procedure-related SAEs in the target compartment through 12 months (P < 0.01). At 36 months, the surgical POP recurrence rate was 26.7% in the Mesh-arm and 27.0% in the NTR-arm. CONCLUSIONS: At 12- and 36-month follow-up, transvaginal mesh was not superior, but non-inferior in terms of efficacy and safety when compared to NTR for patients with combined anterior and apical compartment prolapse.

Transvaginal Mesh Compared With Native Tissue Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal mesh repair and native tissue repair, in response to a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 522 study order to assess co-primary endpoints of superiority and noninferiority. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, parallel cohort, multi-center trial comparing transvaginal mesh with native tissue repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The primary endpoints were composite treatment success at 36 months comprised of anatomical success (defined as pelvic organ prolapse quantification [POP-Q] point Ba≤0 and/or C≤0), subjective success (vaginal bulging per the PFDI-20 [Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory]), and retreatment measures, as well as rates of serious device-related or serious procedure-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints included a composite outcome similar to the primary composite outcome but with anatomical success defined as POP-Q point Ba<0 and/or C<0, quality-of-life measures, mesh exposure and mesh- and procedure-related complications. Propensity score stratification was applied. RESULTS: Primary endpoint composite success at 36 months was 89.3% (201/225) for transvaginal mesh and 80.2% (389/485) for native tissue repair, demonstrating noninferiority at the preset margin of 12% (propensity score-adjusted treatment difference 6.5%, 90% CI -0.2% to 13.2%). Using the primary composite endpoint, transvaginal mesh was not superior to native tissue repair (P=.056). Using the secondary composite endpoint, superiority of transvaginal mesh over native tissue repair was noted (P=.009), with a propensity score-adjusted difference of 10.6% (90% CI 3.3-17.9%) in favor of transvaginal mesh. Subjective success for both the primary and secondary endpoint was 92.4% for transvaginal mesh, 92.8% for native tissue repair, a propensity score-adjusted difference of -4.3% (CI -12.3% to 3.8%). For the primary safety endpoint, 3.1% (7/225) of patients in the transvaginal mesh (TVM) group and 2.7% (13/485) of patients in the native tissue repair (NTR) group developed serious adverse events, demonstrating that transvaginal mesh was noninferior to native tissue repair (-0.4%, 90% CI -2.7% to 1.9%). Overall device-related and/or procedure-related adverse event rates were 35.1% (79/225) in the TVM group and 46.4% (225/485) in the NTR group (-15.7%, 95% CI -24.0% to -7.5%). CONCLUSION: Transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of anterior and/or apical vaginal prolapse was not superior to native tissue repair at 36 months. Subjective success, an important consideration from the patient-experience perspective, was high and not statistically different between groups. Transvaginal mesh repair was as safe as native tissue repair with respect to serious device-related and/or serious procedure-related adverse events. FUNDING SOURCE: This study was sponsored by Boston Scientific and developed in collaboration with FDA personnel from the Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, Division of Epidemiology. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01917968.

Interacting hepatic PAI-1/tPA gene regulatory pathways influence impaired fibrinolysis severity in obesity.

Fibrinolysis is initiated by tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) and inhibited by plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1). In obese humans, plasma PAI-1 and tPA proteins are increased, but PAI-1 dominates, leading to reduced fibrinolysis and thrombosis. To understand tPA-PAI-1 regulation in obesity, we focused on hepatocytes, a functionally important source of tPA and PAI-1 that sense obesity-induced metabolic stress. We showed that obese mice, like humans, had reduced fibrinolysis and increased plasma PAI-1 and tPA, due largely to their increased hepatocyte expression. A decrease in the PAI-1 (SERPINE1) gene corepressor Rev-Erbα increased PAI-1, which then increased the tPA gene PLAT via a PAI-1/LRP1/PKA/p-CREB1 pathway. This pathway was partially counterbalanced by increased DACH1, a PLAT-negative regulator. We focused on the PAI-1/PLAT pathway, which mitigates the reduction in fibrinolysis in obesity. Thus, silencing hepatocyte PAI-1, CREB1, or tPA in obese mice lowered plasma tPA and further impaired fibrinolysis. The PAI-1/PLAT pathway was present in primary human hepatocytes, and associations among PAI-1, tPA, and PLAT in livers from obese and lean humans were consistent with these findings. Knowledge of PAI-1 and tPA regulation in hepatocytes in obesity may suggest therapeutic strategies for improving fibrinolysis and lowering the risk of thrombosis in this setting.