The Association Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Disc Pathology and Provocative Discography at the Lumbar Level.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to show that degenerative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings variably increase discography pain by level. METHODS: Lumbar discography and magnetic resonance imaging of 736 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate/multivariate logistic regressions calculated the odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval, P < 0.05). RESULTS: L3-4 multivariate regression OR for a degenerative disc is 9.9; for bulge, 10.9; for annular tear, 38.9; for herniation, 51.5; and for degenerative facet, 2.158. Endplate changes were not significant. L4-5 OR for a degenerative disc is 4.52; for bulge, 13.74, for tear, 19.13; for herniation, 28.65; for endplate edema, 3.47; and fatty change, 3.84. Degenerative facet ORs were not significant. L5-S1 OR for a degenerative disc is 6.86; for bulge, 5.65; for tear, 40.56; and for herniation, 77.98. Endplate changes and degenerative facet OR's were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing degeneration increases pain at L5-S1 followed by L3-4. Endplate signal is significant only at L4-5.

Modic changes on MR images as studied with provocative diskography: clinical relevance--a retrospective study of 2457 disks.

PURPOSE: To assess the value of vertebral body endplate signal intensity (Modic) changes on magnetic resonance (MR) images in predicting a painful disk, with provocative diskography as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lumbar spine diskograms and prediskogram MR images of 736 patients (2457 disks) were retrospectively reviewed as part of an institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant protocol. Each disk was assigned a Modic subtype: type 0, normal; type 1, nonfatty high signal intensity; type 2, fatty; and type 3, sclerosis. Statistical analysis involved use of a 2 x 2 contingency table of diskogram results for each of the subtypes. The subtype sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Similar analyses of other MR variables (such as disk herniation, high signal intensity zone, and spondylolisthesis) and type 1 signal intensity changes also were performed. RESULTS: Type 1 changes (n = 155) had a high PPV (0.81; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.87) for a provocative diskogram. Type 2 changes (n = 126) had a lower PPV (0.64; 95% CI: 0.55, 0.72) for a positive diskogram. Type 3 changes (n = 21) had a PPV (0.57; 95% CI: 0.34, 0.78) that was not significant for a positive diskogram. The PPV of an endplate with a type 1 change (hereafter, type 1 endplate) for a tear in the annulus fibrosis of the disk was also insignificant (0.14; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.20). A similar analysis between a type 1 endplate and the presence of a disk herniation (PPV, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.34) and between a type 1 endplate and vertebral body spondylolisthesis (PPV, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.35) were significant. CONCLUSION: Type 1 signal intensity changes on MR images have a high positive predictive value in the identification of a pain generator.