Adaptability of the load sharing between the longissimus and components of the multifidus muscle during isometric trunk extension in healthy individuals.

PURPOSE: Redundancy of the musculoskeletal system implies multiple strategies are theoretically available to coordinate back extensor muscles. This study investigated whether coordination between back muscles during a tightly constrained isometric trunk extension task varies within and between individuals, and whether this changes following brief exposure to activation feedback of a muscle. METHODS: Nine healthy participants performed three blocks of two repetitions of ramped isometric trunk extension in side-lying against resistance from 0-30% of maximum voluntary contraction over 30 s (force feedback). Between blocks, participants repeated contractions with visual feedback of electromyography (EMG) from either superficial (SM) or deep multifidus (DM), in two conditions; 'After SM' and 'After DM'. Intramuscular EMG was recorded from SM, DM, and longissimus (LG) simultaneously with shear wave elastography (SWE) from SM or DM. RESULTS: In the 'Natural' condition (force feedback only), group data showed incremental increases in EMG with force, with minor changes in distribution of activation between muscles as force increased. SM was the most active muscle during the 'Natural' condition, but with DM most active in some participants. Individual data showed that coordination between muscles differed substantially between repetitions and individuals. Brief exposure to EMG feedback altered coordination. SWE showed individual variation, but findings differed from EMG. CONCLUSION: This study revealed substantial variation in coordination between back extensor muscles within and between participants, and after exposure to feedback, in a tightly constrained task. Shear modulus revealed similar variation, but with an inconsistent relationship to EMG. These data highlight highly flexible control of back muscles.

Exploration of shear wave elastography measures of the iliotibial band during different tasks in pain-free runners.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether shear wave velocity (SWV) of the iliotibial band (ITB): i) increases with active and passive static tasks, and a dynamic task, ii) differs between ITB regions, iii) changes after exposure to running. Additionally, it aimed to determine the between-day reliability. DESIGN: Case series & test-retest. SETTING: Human movement unit laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen runners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SWV was measured unilaterally in three regions of the ITB (proximal, middle and distal), during six tasks: rest and contraction (pre- and post-running), modified Ober test, standing, pelvic drop, and weight shift. RESULTS: Compared to rest, SWV was higher during contraction and Ober test in the distal and middle regions, and higher for the middle region in standing and pelvic drop. No differences were found between regions. A tendency of decreased SWV was observed after running. Compared to the start of the dynamic task, SWV was greater at the end of the movement. Reliability was moderate-to-good for the middle region in the standing tasks (ICCs = 0.68 to 0.84). CONCLUSION: SVW of the ITB was higher under passive or active tension. Comparisons between tasks/regions need to be considered in light of the small sample size and poor repeatability of some regions/conditions.

Shear modulus of multifidus and longissimus muscles measured using shear wave elastography correlates with muscle activity, but depends on image quality.

Shear wave elastography (SWE) estimates shear modulus in muscle. This is interpreted as an index of muscle stiffness, but depends on muscle characteristics. This study evaluated relationship between shear modulus and myoelectric activity of lumbar multifidus and longissimus muscles to assess its validity. Intramuscular electromyography (EMG) of multifidus (deep [DM], superficial [SM] fibres) at L4/5, longissimus [LG] at L2, were recorded in nine healthy participants. Participants performed isometric trunk extension in side-lying from 0 to 30% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with EMG amplitude feedback. Using SWE, two regions of interest (ROI) were investigated in each muscle. Generally, shear modulus was moderately correlated with root mean squared (RMS) EMG (r = 0.50-0.78). Univariate and multiple regression analyses showed ultrasound/SWE features of 'B-mode quality' (24.5%), '%Void pixels' (17.9%) and 'Connective tissue' (16.2%) explained most variation in the shear modulus/EMG relationship. Regression prediction scores generated using imaging features were correlated with r-coefficients of shear modulus/EMG relationship. When analysis was restricted to high quality data (i.e., regression prediction score above an a priori defined threshold), the shear modulus/EMG relationship increased to r = 0.70-0.96. Although a linear relationship between shear modulus/EMG was confirmed, supporting validity of SWE measures in anatomically distinct back muscles, this depends on image quality.